¹ It was Litvinov, the Soviet Foreign Minister, who first publicly used the term “indivisibility of peace.” See League of Nations Official Journal, 1935, at 1142. Cited in Taracouzio, T. A., War and Peace in Soviet Diplomacy 195 (New York, 1940).Google Scholar

² Morgenthau, Hans, Politics Among Nations (3rd ed., New York, 1964)Google Scholar; Schwarzenberger, Georg, Power Politics (3rd ed., London, 1964).Google Scholar

³ Boutros-Ghali, Boutros, Contribution à l’Étude des Ententes Régionales (Paris, 1949)Google Scholar; Liska, George, International Equilibrium (Cambridge, Mass., 1957)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Yalem, Ronald, Regionalism and World Order (Washington, 1965)Google Scholar; Vellas, P., Le regionalisme international et l’Organisation des Nations Unies (Paris, 1948)Google Scholar; Yakemtchouk, R., L’O.N.U., la Sécurité regionale et le probleme du regionalisme (Paris, 1955)Google Scholar; Akindele, R. A., Regional Organizations and World Order (unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada, 1970).Google Scholar

⁴ Orue, y Arregui, , “Le Régionalisme dans L’Organisation Internationale,” 53 Recueil des Cours 7 (1935-III)Google Scholar; von Freytagh-Loringhoven, Axel, “Les Ententes Regionales,” 56 Recueil des Cours 589 (1936-II)Google Scholar. See also the works cited in supra note 3.

⁵ In addition to the works cited in supra note 3, see also Yepes, J. M., “Les accords régionaux et le droit internationale’, 71 Recueil des Cours 235 (1947-II)Google Scholar; Saba, H., “Les Accords Regionaux dans la Charte de L’O.N.U.,” 80 Recueil des Cours 639 (1953–1)Google Scholar; Liang, Y., “Regional Arrangements and International Security,” 31 Transactions of Grotius Society 216 (1946).Google Scholar

⁶ Vandenberg, Arthur Jr. (ed.), The Private Papers of Senator Vandenberg 191 (Boston, 1952)Google Scholar. See also Russell, Ruth, A History of the United Nations Charter 688 et. seq. (Washington, 1958)Google Scholar; Camargo, Alberto Lleras, “Regionalism and the International Community,” Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Perspectives on Peace, 1910–1960 , 107–19 (New York, 1960)Google Scholar; Saba, supra note 5, at 674.

⁷ Senator Vandenberg in Doc. 972, III/6, United Nations Conference on International Documents (U.N.C.I.O. Doc), Vol. 11, at 52. See also Vandenberg (ed.), op. cit. supra note 6, at 198; Department of State, Charter of the United Nations: Report to the President on the Results of the San Francisco Conference 108 (Washington, 1945).

⁸ R. A. Akindele, op. cit. supra note 3, ch. 4.

⁹ The Venezuelan Foreign Minister in Doc. 972, III/6, U.N.C.I.O. Doc, Vol. 11, at 56.

¹⁰ See Lawson, Ruth (ed.), International Regional Organizations: Constitutional Foundations (New York, 1965)Google Scholar; Nye, Joseph Jr., (ed.), International Regionalism: Readings (Boston, 1968)Google Scholar; Yalem, op. cit. supra note 3; Peaslee, A. J., International Governmental Organization, 2 vols, (revised ed., The Hague, 1961)Google Scholar; Robertson, A. H., European Institutions (2nd ed., New York, 1966).Google Scholar

¹¹ Furnis, Edgar S. Jr., “A Re-examination of Regional Arrangements,” 9 Col. J. Int’l Aff. 84 (1955).Google Scholar

¹² See Goodrich, L. M., “Regionalism and the United Nations,” 3 Col. J. Int’l Aff. 13–17 (1949)Google Scholar; Calvocoressi, Peter (ed.), Survey of International Affairs 1949–1950, 517 Google Scholar; Goodwin, G. L., Britain and the United Nations 93 (New York, 1957)Google Scholar; Liska, op. cit. supra note 3, at 137; Yalem, op. cit. supra note 3.

¹³ See, for instance, Claude, Inis L. Jr., “The OAS, the UN and the United States,” Int’l Concil., No. 547 (March 1964)Google Scholar; Macdonald, R. St. J., “The Developing Relationship between Superior and Subordinate Political Bodies at the International Level: A Note on the Experience of the United Nations and the Organization of American States,” 2 Canadian Yearbook of International Law 21–54 (1964)Google Scholar; Baron, Dona, “The Dominican Republic Crisis of 1965: A Case-Study of the Regional versus the Global Approach to International Peace and Security,” in Cordier, Andrew W. (ed.), Columbia Essays in International Affairs, Volume III: The Dean’s Papers, 1967, 1–37 (New York, 1968)Google Scholar; de Arechaga, M. E. J., “La Coordination des Systems de L’ONU et de L’Organization des Etats Americans Pour de Reglement Pacifique des Differends et la Securité,” 111 Recueil des Cours 423 (1964–1)Google Scholar; Akehurst, M., “Enforcement Action by Regional Agencies, With Special Reference to the Organization of American States,” 42 Brit. Yb. Int’l L. 175 (1967)Google Scholar; Halderman, J. W., “Regional Enforcement Measures and the United Nations,” 52 Geo. L. J. 89 (1963)Google Scholar; Duputy, R. J., “Les Etats-Unies, L’O.E.A. et L’O.N.U. à Saint-Dominique,” 71 Annuaire Francais de Droit International 71–100 (1965).Google Scholar

¹⁴ Amador, F. V. Garcia, Regional Action for Pacific Settlement Within the Framework of the Charter, (A/AC/18/SC.9/L.7) 1950 Google Scholar. Reproduced in General Assembly Official Record, 5th session, supplement no. 14 (A/1388), at 31–34; Kelsen, Hans, The Law of the United Nations 387 et. seq. (New York, 1964)Google Scholar; Eagleton, Clyde, “The Jurisdiction of the Security Council Over Disputes,” 40 Am. J. Int’l L. 513–33 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; de Arechaga, J., “Le traitement des différends internationaux par le Conseil de Sécurité,” 85 Recueil des Cours 5 (1954–1)Google Scholar; Akindele, op. cit. supra note 3 at 176–85.

¹⁵ Cmd. 6666: A Commentary on the Charter of the United Nations Signed at San Francisco on the 26th June, 1945, par. 86 (London, 1945).

¹⁶ Department of State, Charter of the United Nations: Report to the President on the Result of the San Francisco Conference 105 (Washington, 1945).

¹⁷ Bentwich, N. and Martin, A., A Commentary on the Charter of the United Nations 76 (London, 1968).Google Scholar

¹⁸ Kelsen, op. cit. supra note 14; Bowett, D. W., Self-Defence in International Law (Manchester, 1958)Google Scholar; Brownlie, I., International Law and the Use of Force (London, 1963)Google Scholar; McDougal, M. S. and Feliciano, F. P., Law and Minimum World Public Order: The Legal Regulation of International Coercion (New Haven, 1961)Google Scholar; Stone, Julius, Legal Controls of International Conflict (New York, 1959)Google Scholar; Schwarzenberger, Georg, International Law, Vol. 2 (London, 1968)Google Scholar; Green, L. C., “Armed Conflict, War and Self-Defence,” 6 Archiv des Volkerrechts 387–438 (1956–57).Google Scholar

¹⁹ It has been relatively easy for the US-led western camp to defeat Soviet proposals and resolutions not by a positive exercise of the veto (“open” veto) power, but by organizing sufficient abstentions and, thus, denying the Soviet camp the votes necessary to pass Soviet-sponsored resolutions. The latter is called the “hidden” veto. The term is used by Stoessinger, J. G., The United Nations and the Super-powers 3 (New York, 1965).Google Scholar

²⁰ See, for instance, Reservations to the Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, cited in Shotwell, J. T., War as an Instrument of National Policy (New York, 1929)Google Scholar; Bowett, op. cit. supra note 18; and Green, supra note 18, at 410; Borchard, Edwin, “The Multilateral Treaty for the Renunciation of War,” 23 Am. J. Int’l L. 116–20 (1929).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²¹ Then there were only three independent non-white African states, namely, Egypt, Ethiopia and Liberia.

²² As a result, the General Assembly of the United Nations is now numerically dominated by the Afro-Asian states.

²³ Cadoux, Charles, “La Supériorité du Droit des Nations Unies sur le droit des etats membres,” 63 Revue Generale de Droit International Public 649–80 (1959)Google Scholar; Akindele, op. cit. supra note 3, at 242–44.

²⁴ OAU Charter, Art. 2(i) (e).

²⁵ Organization of African Unity, Basic Documents of the Organization of African Unity (Addis Ababa, 1963); Cervenka, Zdenek, The Organization of African Unity and its Charter (New York, 1969)Google Scholar; Boutros-Ghali, , “The Addis Ababa Charter,” Int’l Concil., No. 546 (Jan. 1964)Google Scholar; Elias, T., “The Charter of the Organization of African Unity,” 59 Am. J. Int’l L. 243 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁶ Dugard, C. J. R., “The Organization of African Unity and Colonialism: An Inquiry into the Plea of Self-Defence as a Justification for the Use of Force in the Eradication of Colonialism,” 6 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 158 (1967).Google Scholar

²⁷ See works cited in supra note 25.

²⁸ Boutros-Ghali, , L’Organisation de L’Unity Africaine 98–101 (Paris, 1969)Google Scholar; Akindele, op. cit. supra note 3, at 254–55; Elias, supra note 25, at 251.

²⁹ Cited in Africa, South of the Sahara, A.F.P., No. 979, June 27, 1963, at 11.

³⁰ Ibid., No. 983, July 8, 1963, at 1 (emphasis added).

³¹ Kelsen, , “Collective Security and Collective Self-Defence under the Charter of the United Nations,” 42 Am. J. Int’l L. 783 (1948)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bowett, op. cit. supra note 18, ch. 10.

³² See, for instance, Nawaz, M. K., “The Meaning and Range of the Principle of Self-Determination,” Duke L. J., 1965, at 82–101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lachs, M., “The Law in and of the United Nations,” 1 Indian J. Int’l L. 429–42 (1961)Google Scholar; The Ambassador, “Future United Nations in the Maintenance of International Peace and Security,” in Swift, R. N. (ed.), Annual Review of United Nations Affairs, 1965-1566, 117–18 (New York, 1967)Google Scholar; Brownlie, , Principles of Public International Law 482–85 (Oxford, 1966)Google Scholar; Osnitskaya, G., “The Downfall of Colonialism and International Law,” International Affairs 39 (Moscow, Jan. 1961)Google Scholar; Higgins, Rosalyn, The Development of International Law Through the Political Organs of the United Nations 90–106 (London, 1963).Google Scholar

³³ 5 Whiteman, Digest of International Law 38–86.

³⁴ Kelsen, , “Legal Technique in International Law: A Textual Critique of the League Covenant,” 10 Geneva Studies 157 (1939)Google Scholar; Kelsen, op. cit. supra note 14.

³⁵ Kelsen, op. cit. supra note 14, at 50–53.

³⁶ Lauterpacht, H., International Law and Human Rights 149 (London, 1950).Google Scholar

³⁷ For a comprehensive account see 13 Whiteman, Digest of International Law 679 et. seq.; Johnson, H. S., Self-Determination Within the Community of Nations (Leyden, 1967)Google Scholar; Barros, R. J., African States and the United Nations versus Apartheid (New York, 1967).Google Scholar

³⁸ The Ambassador, supra note 32, at 117–18.

³⁹ Lauterpacht, Judge, [1955] I.C.J. Rep. 122 Google Scholar. See also Asamoah, Obed Y., The Legal Significance of the Declaration of the General Assembly of the United Nations 6 (The Hague, 1966).Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Namely, budgeting, appointment of the Secretary-General, admission, suspension and expulsion of members.

⁴¹ Higgins, op. cit. supra note 32, at 5; Tunkin, G.I., Droit International Public 101 et. seq. (Paris, 1961).Google Scholar

⁴² Text of the Declaration in Brownlie, (ed.), Basic Documents in International Law 176-77 (Oxford, 1967).Google Scholar

⁴³ Nogueira, Franco, The United Nations and Portugal (London, 1963).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ See the 1964 and 1966 Reports of the UN Special Committee on the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States, UN Doc. A/5746, Nov. 16, 1964; A/6230, June 27, 1966.

⁴⁵ See SirHertslet, E., Map of Africa by Treaty, 3 vols. (3rd ed., London, 1967)Google Scholar; Hailey, Lord, An African Survey (rev. ed., London, 1956).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Hill, S. McCalmont, “The Growth and Development of International Law in Africa,” 16 L.Q.R. 249–68 (1900)Google Scholar; Alexandrowicz, G. H., “The Afro-Asian World and the Law of Nations (Historical Aspects),” 123 Recueil des Cours 169 et. seq. (1968–1).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Osnitskaya, supra note 32; Ginsburgs, George, “Wars of National Liberation and the Modern Law of Nations — The Soviet Thesis,” in Baade, Hans W. (ed.), The Soviet Impact on International Law 66–98 (Dobbs Ferry, 1965)Google Scholar.

⁴⁸ See, for instance, the Joint proposal by Algeria, Burma, Cameroon, Dahomey, Ghana, India, Kenya, Lebanon, Madagascar, Nigeria, Syria, the UAR, and Yugoslavia presented to the UN Special Committee on the Principles of International Law concerning Friendly Relations and Cooperation among States (UN Doc. A/6230, June 27, 1966). It states in part: “Territories under colonial domination do not constitute parts of the territories of states exercising colonial rule” (p. 205); “The use of force by a colonial Power against such territories should be regarded as an international and not domestic matter” (p. 223). See generally, Dugard, supra note 26; Green, L. C., “The Impact of the New States on International Law,” 4 Israel L. Rev. 27–60 esp. pp. 48–53 (1969)Google Scholar; Krishnan, V. M., “African State Practice Relating to Certain Issues of International Law,” 14 Indian Yb. Int’l Aff. 196–241 (1965).Google Scholar

⁴⁹ See generally, Jansen, G. J., Afro-Asia and Non-Alignment (London, 1966).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Indian Society of International Law, Asian-African States: Texts of International Declarations 82 (New Delhi, 1965). Also cited in Green, L. C., “The Impact of the New States on International Law,” 4 Israel L. Rev. 47 (1969).Google Scholar

⁵¹ Wright, Quincy, “The Goa Incident,” 56 Am. J. Int’l L. 617–32 (1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Royal Institute of International Affairs, Documents on International Affairs 1961, 709 et. seq. (London, 1965) ; Reddy, T. R., India’s Policy in the United Nations 82 et. seq. (Rutherford, 1968).Google Scholar

⁵² UN Doc. S/PV. 987 (Dec. 18, 1961), par. 61. See also Flory, Maurice, “Les implications juridiques de l’affaire de Goa,” 8 Annuaire Francais de Droit International 476–91 (1962).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁵³ UN Doc. S/PV. 987 par. 95-99, 105. See also UN Doc. S/5032.

⁵⁴ The US Ambassador to the UN, Stevenson: UN Doc. S/PV. 988, par. 93.

⁵⁵ Dugard, supra note 26, at 157.

⁵⁶ Nogueira, op. cit. supra note 43, at 70–74.

⁵⁷ See Taubenfeld, R. F. and Taubenfeld, H. J., “Race, Peace Law and Southern Africa,” in Carey, John (ed.), Race, Peace and Law in Southern Africa (New York, 1968)Google Scholar; McDougal, and Reisman, , “Rhodesia and the United Nations: The Lawfulness of International Concern,” 62 Am. J. Int’l L. 1–19 (1968)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Green, L. C., “Rhodesian Oil: Bootleggers or Pirates,” 21 Int’l J. 350–58 (1965–1966)Google Scholar. For a strong dissent, see Fenwick, C. G., “Where is there a threat to the Peace? — Rhodesia,” 61 Am. J. Int’l L. 753–55 (1967)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁵⁸ For such view, see 5 Whiteman, , Digest of International Law 982 Google Scholar. Also Brierly, , The Law of Nations 315 (5th ed., 1955)Google Scholar; McDougal and Feliciano, op. cit. supra note 18, at 238–41; Waldock, , “The Regulation of the Use of Force by Individual States in International Law,” 81 Recueil des Cours 489 (1952–II)Google Scholar; L. C. Green, supra note 18. For an opposing view, see Brownlie, op. cit. supra note 18, at 275–80; Wright, Quincy, International Law and the United Nations 100 (1960)Google Scholar; Krylov, Judge in International Law Association, Report of the 48th Conference, New York, 1958, at 512 Google Scholar; Singh, Nagendra, Nuclear Weapons and International Law (New York, 1959)Google Scholar; Kelsen, op. cit. supra note 14, at 791 et seq.

⁵⁹ See supra note 20.

⁶⁰ The Security Council censured Portugal for these incidents. See UN Monthly Chronicle, vol. 5, no. 8, 1969, at 34, 56; The Times (London), Dec. 10, 1969, at 5. The Council also recently condemned Portugal for an illegal attack against Senegal: see Daily Times (Lagos), July 18, 1971.

⁶¹ Brownlie, , “International Law and the Activities of Armed Bands,” 7 Int’l & Comp. L. Q. 712–35 (1958)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. Contrast the view of Garcia-Mora, Manuel, International Responsibility For Hostile Acts of Private Persons against Foreign States 115–20 (The Hague, 1962)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. “There can of course be no doubt that allowing the formation of irregular bands would justify resort to the Security Council, though resort to self-defence would clearly be unlawful” (p. 120).

⁶² Draper, Theodore, Israel and World Politics 16, 32, 37 (New York, 1968)Google Scholar. On the activities of the Palestine Liberation Organization, see Hudson, Michael, “The Palestinian Arab Resistance Movement: Its Significance in the Middle East Crisis,” 23 The Middle East Journal 291–307 (1969)Google Scholar.

⁶³ Garcia-Mora, op. cit. supra note 61, at 113; Thomas, , Thomas, and Salas, , The International Law of Indirect Aggression and Subversion 313–31 (Dallas, 1966 Google Scholar); Fawcett, J. E., “Intervention in International Law: A Study of Some Recent Cases,” 103 Recueil des Cours 347 (1961–II).Google Scholar

⁶⁴ G. A. Res. 2131 (XX), Dec. 21, 1965. Text in 5 Int’l Leg. Mat. 374–76 (1966).

⁶⁵ Text of the Accra Declaration in 5 Int’l Leg. Mat. 138-–39 (1966).

⁶⁶ Yet, it is necessary for an interpreter to guard against what Kelsen identifies as “the fallacy of presenting a political convenience as a logical necessity": see The Law of the United Nations xvi (New York, 1964).

⁶⁷ Text in, R.I.I.Α., Documents on International Affairs, 1961, at 516 (London, (1965).

⁶⁸ Claude, Inis Jr., The Changing United Nations (New York, 1967)Google Scholar; Kay, David A., “The Impact of African States on the United Nations,” 23 Int’l Organ. 20–47 (1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁶⁹ [1962] I.C.J. Rep. 151, 168. For a criticism of this majority opinion, see the dissenting opinion of Judges Winiarski (pp. 227–34) and Koretsky (pp. 253–87).

⁷⁰ Lauterpacht, E., “The Legal Effects of Illegal Acts of International Organizations,” in Cambridge Essays in International Law: Essays in Honour of Lord McNair 117 (London, 1965)Google Scholar; Tunkin, G. I., “The Legal Nature of the United Nations,” 119 Recueil des Cours 20–25 (1966–III).Google Scholar

⁷¹ See Akindele, op. cit. supra note 3, at 400–04.

⁷² G. A. Ress, 377 (V), Nov. 1950. For text, see Kelsen, op. cit. supra note H, at 953 et. seq.

⁷³ UN Doc. S/PV. 675, (June 20, 1954), par. 1. Cited in Akindele, op. cit. supra note 3, at 353.

⁷⁴ Anabtawi, M. F., Arab Unity in Terms of Law 82 et. seq. (The Hague, 1963)Google Scholar; Foda, E., The Projected Arab Court of Justice, ch. 2 (The Hague, 1957).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁵ Boutros-Ghali, supra note 25, at 31 ; Cervenka, op. cit. supra note 25, at 90.

⁷⁶ Elias, T. O., “The Commission of Mediation, Conciliation and Arbitration of the Organization of African Unity,” 40 Brit. Yb. Int’l L. 336–54 (1964)Google Scholar; Degan, D. V., “Commission of Mediation, Conciliation and Arbitration of the OAU,” 20 Revue Egyptienne de Droit International 53–80 (1964)Google Scholar.

⁷⁷ Chime, Samuel, “The Organization of African Unity and African Boundaries,” in Widstrand, Carl Gosta (ed.), African Boundary Problems 65–78 (Uppsala, 1969)Google Scholar; Matthews, Robert, “Interstate Conflicts in Africa,” 24 Int’l Organ. 335–60 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Touval, Saadia, “The Organization of African Unity and African Borders,” 21 Int’l Organ. 102–27 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁷⁸ Wild, P. B., “The Organization of African Unity and the Algeria-Moroccan Border Conflict: A Case Study of New Machinery for Peaceful Settlement of Disputes,” 20 Int’l Organ. 18–36 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

⁷⁹ Fox, Hazel, “The Settlement of Disputes by Peaceful Means and the Observation of International Law — African Attitudes,” 3 Int’l Rel. 389–440, 443 (London, 1968).Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Akindele, op. cit. supra note 3, at 339–412.

⁸¹ See Hoskyns, Catherine (ed.), The Ethiopia-Somalia-Kenya Dispute, 1960–1967 (Dar-es Salaam and Nairobi, Case Studies in African Diplomacy, No. 2, 1969)Google Scholar; Mariam, M. M., “The Ethio-Somalian Boundary Dispute,” 2 J. Mod. African Studies 189–219 (1964)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Castagno, A., “The Somali-Kenya Controversy,” ibid., 165–68.Google Scholar

⁸² It should be noted that although the OAU Charter curiously refrains from making any explicit reference to the preservation of African boundaries beyond saying that “respect for the sovereignty and territorial integrity of each state and for its inalienable right to independent existence” is a purpose of the organization, a majority of African leaders at Addis Ababa in 1963 were in favour of status quo with respect to African boundaries unless, of course, states mutually consent to revise their frontiers. See Boutros-Ghali, supra note 25, at 29–30; Elias, supra note 25. It is also worth noting that a Resolution of the First Ordinary Session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government in Cairo in 1964 explicitly supported the maintenance of the present boundaries; it declared that “the borders of African States, on the day of their independence, constitute a tangible reality.” See Legum, , Pan-Africanism: A Short Political Guide 303 (1964)Google Scholar; Boutros-Ghali, op. cit. supra note 28, at 51–52.

⁸³ UN Doc. S/5538 (Feb. 10, 1964).

⁸⁴ UN Doc. S/5542.

⁸⁵ UN Doc. S/5557, S/5558.

⁸⁶ Cited in UN Doc. S/5558; Hoskyns (ed.), op. cit. supra note 81, at 60.

⁸⁷ Text of Resolution in NATO: Facts About the North Atlantic Treaty Organization 277–78 (Paris, 1962).

⁸⁸ Charter of Bogota, Art. 23; Pact of Bogota, Art. 50; Rio Treaty, Art. 2. See generally, Akindele, op. cit. supra note 3, at 293–94.

⁸⁹ Gordon, King, The United Nations in the Congo: A Quest for Peace (New York, 1962)Google Scholar; Lefever, Ernest, Crisis in the Congo: A United Nations Force in Action (Washington, 1965)Google Scholar.

⁹⁰ Miller, L. B., “Regional Organization and the Regulation of Internal Conflict,” 19 World Politics 582–600 (1967).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

⁹¹ For a comprehensive account see, Akindele, op. cit. supra note 3, ch. VII.

⁹² Kaplan, Morton, System and Process in International Politics 38 (New York, 1957).Google Scholar

⁹³ Cervenka, op. cit. supra note 25, ch. 9.

⁹⁴ UN Charter, Art. 39.

⁹⁵ Reparations for Injuries Case, [1948] I.C.J. Rep. 121, 179. See also, Robinson, J. R., “Metamorphosis of the United Nations,” 94 Recueil des Cours 560–81 (1958–II)Google Scholar; Eagleton, Clyde, “The United Nations: A Legal Order?” in Lipsky, (ed.), Law and Politics in the World Community 129 et. seq. (1953).Google Scholar

⁹⁶ See Rajan, , United Nations and Domestic Jurisdiction, ch. 4 (1961)Google Scholar; Higgins, op. cit. supra note 32, at 58–130; Miller, , World Order and Internai Disorder: The United Nations and Internal Conflicts (New Jersey, 1967).Google Scholar

⁹⁷ Nagel, R. and Rathbone, R., “The OAU at Kinshasa,” 23 World Today 473–83 (1967)Google Scholar; Report of the OAU Consultative Mission to Nigeria 1–2 (Lagos, 1967); Whiteman, K., “The OAU and the Nigerian Issue,” 449–53 World Today (Nov. 1968)Google Scholar.

⁹⁸ Text of the Kinshasa Resolution in 6 Int’l Leg. Mat. 56 (1969).

⁹⁹ See generally, Emerson, Rupert, Self-Determination Revisited in the Era of Decolonization 35–36 (Cambridge, Mass., 1964)Google Scholar; Johnson, H. S., Self-Determination Within The Community of Nations 53 (Leyden, 1967)Google Scholar; Mazrui, Ali A., Towards a Pax Africana 23 (London, 1967).Google Scholar

¹⁰⁰ The Eighth Ordinary Session of the Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the OAU firmly rejected the issue of dialogue particularly with the government of Republic of South Africa.

¹⁰¹ Boutros-Ghali, supra note 25, at 36–37.