Elsevier

Tourism Management

Volume 73, August 2019, Pages 134-142
Tourism Management

Progress in tourism public sector policy: Toward an ethic for non-human animals

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.11.017Get rights and content

Highlights

  • In the 1990s tourism policy was focused mostly on increasing economic returns for destinations.

  • After the millennium, tourism policies began considering a broader and deeper range of social and environmental impacts.

  • More recent destination policies provide evidence of a growing debate within tourism-focused communities between consumptive activities (i.e. hunting) and less consumptive activities (i.e. photography).

  • Many destinations are demonstrating growing concern for the impacts of tourism development and activities on animal welfare.

  • Tourism policies are likely to continue evolving along an ethics-focused continuum, which has important implications for tourism planning and management practitioners, government officials, policy makers, as well as academics.

Abstract:

This paper presents the content analysis of 123 tourism policies, from 73 countries, at the national and sub-national level. Specifically, we examined the policies for evidence of growing awareness of and concern for the impacts of tourism development and activities on non-human animals. The analysis reveals that tourism policy has been evolving over time, particularly as it relates to the depth and breadth of issues addressed. Policies that were mostly focused on economics in the 1990s have evolved to now include a broader range of topics related to the welfare of social and natural environments, including concern for the welfare of animals. However, we temper this positive finding by suggesting that until animals are considered a stakeholder in the tourism industry, their rights to exist and thrive will be considered only as it relates to their ability to enhance the attractiveness of and economic potential of a destination.

Introduction

This paper continues the trend in the tourism studies literature in the last few years of expanding the circle of morality by focusing on the interests of non-human animals (herein referred to as animals) used in the practice of tourism. These practices range from competitions (greyhound racing) and fighting (bullfights) to being hunted and fished, used for their senses (guide dogs), used for their strength (ridden or harnessed), kept in captive environments (zoos and aquaria), or simply viewed as ecotourism or wildlife tourism attractions (Fennell, 2012a). In all of these cases, animals are used for purposes of entertainment and commerce (see Wearing & Jobberns, 2011 in reference to the commoditization of animals), which often compromise their health and wellbeing and diminish their inherent value.

Past studies have touched on a range of ethical issues tied to the use of animals in tourism from several moral perspectives (see for example Fennell, 2012a, 2012b, 2013; Fennell & Sheppard, 2011; Shani & Pizam, 2008). Indeed, the moral theory perspective appears to be the most logical manner by which to understand these ethical dilemmas. What is missing in the extant literature, however, is a firmer understanding of how the interests of animals factor into the policy-making discourse of governments at various levels. Tourism policies and strategies are often viewed as the most important benchmarks for the planning, development, and management of tourism within jurisdictions. Assessing these documents over an extended period would provide an historical snapshot of the types of priorities around the use of animals in these regional contexts and would thus provide a needed standard from which to assess future strategies in this area.

As such, it is the purpose of this study to document concern for animal welfare and or rights within the tourism policies of as many national and state jurisdictions as possible. This will be accomplished using two methods. The first is to implement a key word search looking for evidence of a concern for animal welfare and or rights, and, second, to search for progress toward or away from greater concern for the welfare and rights of animals over time.

Section snippets

Literature review

In the following paragraphs we define the key concepts that form the foundation of this research. In doing so, we provide an overview of some of the more salient tourism focused-research related to the following key concepts: policy; strategy; animal rights and welfare. It is not our intention to provide more than a brief overview, as entire texts have been devoted to these concepts. Rather, we focus on laying a relevant foundation for the methods, findings, and discussion section of the paper,

Methods

Utilizing a naturalistic inquiry approach, the researchers undertook a summative content analysis of national and sub-national tourism policies from around the world. Researchers utilize a naturalistic approach to understand the social world through observation, description, and interpretation of the experiences and actions of specific people or groups of people (Salk, 2010). Rather than beginning with a hypothesis, researchers develop a general research question that serves as the foundation

Key word search results

In the following sections we provide the results of the various key word searches with the aim of providing evidence of concern for animal welfare and or rights within the various tourism policies. For these purposes and because of space constraints, we focus the results of our analysis on the following key words: animals, wildlife, species, protect, exploit, respect, welfare, and rights. We select and provide key examples from the various policies to demonstrate concern or lack of concern for

Discussion

There are some noteworthy findings emanating from our analysis, particularly as it relates to what is, undeniably, a deepening and broadening range of issues discussed within the tourism policies, over time. This is particularly the case in terms of greater recognition of the negative impacts of tourism development as it relates to the welfare of social and natural environments, including animals. In the following sections we discuss some of the more salient findings and the implications of

Conclusion

Overall, we found evidence to suggest there is increasing concern for a broader and deeper set of tourism developmental impacts, including concern for the welfare of animals. On the other hand, the cynic might rightly point out that such a finding is moderated by the fact that humans are increasingly aware of the connection between the health of the natural environment and their own health, as opposed to concern, per se, for the welfare or rights of individual animals. In other words, the

Declarations of interest

None for both authors.

Valerie Sheppard, PhD, School of Tourism & Hospitality, Universidade Europeia, Portugal, [email protected] researches in the areas of tourism ethics and destination sustainability and resilience. She is a field notes editor for the Journal of Ecotourism and a reviewer for a number of academic journals.

References (50)

  • B. Bramwell

    Governance, the state and sustainable tourism: A political economy approach

    Journal of Sustainable Tourism

    (2011)
  • G.L. Burns et al.

    Should dingoes die? Principles for engaging ecocentric ethics in wildlife tourism management

    Journal of Ecotourism

    (2011)
  • C. Catibog-Sinha

    Zoo tourism: Biodiversity conservation through tourism

    Journal of Ecotourism

    (2008)
  • E. Cohen

    Explorations in Thai Tourism

    (2008)
  • Cambridge Dictionary

    Marginalize

    (2018)
  • R. Duffy et al.

    Neoliberalising nature? Elephant-back tourism in Thailand and -Botswana

    Antipode

    (2010)
  • R. Duffy et al.

    Global regulations and local practices: The politics and governance of animal welfare in elephant tourism

    Journal of Sustainable Tourism

    (2011)
  • Marginalized groups

    (2018)
  • D.A. Fennell

    Tourism and animal ethics

    (2012)
  • D.A. Fennell

    Tourism and animal rights

    Tourism Recreation Research

    (2012)
  • D.A. Fennell

    Tourism and animal welfare

    Tourism Recreation Research

    (2013)
  • D.A. Fennell et al.

    Canada's 2010 Olympic & Paralympic Winter Games' legacy: Applying an ethical lens to the post-games’ sled dog cull

    Journal of Ecotourism

    (2011)
  • F.A. Garcia

    A comparative study of the evolution of tourism policy in Spain and Portugal

    Tourism Management Perspectives

    (2014)
  • D. Getz

    Event management and event tourism

    (1997)
  • C.M. Hall

    Tourism and politics: Policy, power and place

    (1994)
  • Cited by (58)

    • Animal-informed consent: sled dog tours as asymmetric agential events

      2022, Tourism Management
      Citation Excerpt :

      While stakeholders in the organisational context are usually thought of as customers, suppliers, financiers, employees, and local people, it is not a stretch to view animals used in research and experimentation in the same capacity as they are essential in bringing products to market (Kenehan, 2019). Fennell (2014) and Sheppard and Fennell (2019) argue that animals should be considered stakeholders in tourism to ensure their interests are being recognised and protected from abuse, a perspective adopted by García-Rosell and Tallberg (2021). Using the perspective outlined by Kenehan (2019), there is reason to consider sled dogs as vital or definitional to the survival of the dogsledding firm.

    • How tourism research integrates environmental issues? A keyword network analysis

      2022, Journal of Outdoor Recreation and Tourism
      Citation Excerpt :

      At the same time papers assigned to the tourism category (Hospitality Leisure Sport and Tourism (HLST) category of WOS) seem to be very multidisciplinary and it is hard to allocate them to one homogeneous thematic area. Topics cover a wide spectrum of research problems and vary from evaluating the impact of tourism on nature (Junaid & d’Hauteserre, 2017; Mohammed, 2018) and necessary improvements in visitor management (Nepal et al., 2019) to such themes as problems of ethics for animals (Sheppard & Fennell, 2019). Therefore, many of the research papers on tourism-nature interaction could be (and have been) easily published in journals classified under several other categories as they are of a multidisciplinary character.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Valerie Sheppard, PhD, School of Tourism & Hospitality, Universidade Europeia, Portugal, [email protected] researches in the areas of tourism ethics and destination sustainability and resilience. She is a field notes editor for the Journal of Ecotourism and a reviewer for a number of academic journals.

    David Fennell, PhD, Department of Geography and Tourism Studies, Brock University, Canada,[email protected] researches mainly in the areas of ecotourism, tourism ethics, and moral issues tied to the use of animals in the tourism industry. A major thrust of his research involves the use of theory from other disciplines (e.g., biology, philosophy) to gain traction on many of tourism's most persistent issues and problems. Fennell is the founding Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of Ecotourism and is an active member on editorial boards of many academic journals.

    View full text