Abstract
Objective
In the field of global mental health, there is a need for identifying core values and competencies to guide training programs in professional practice as well as in academia. This paper presents the results of interdisciplinary discussions fostered during an annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture to develop recommendations for value-driven innovation in global mental health training.
Methods
Participants (n = 48), who registered for a dedicated workshop on global mental health training advertised in conference proceedings, included both established faculty and current students engaged in learning, practice, and research. They proffered recommendations in five areas of training curriculum: values, competencies, training experiences, resources, and evaluation.
Results
Priority values included humility, ethical awareness of power differentials, collaborative action, and “deep accountability” when working in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. Competencies included flexibility and tolerating ambiguity when working across diverse settings, the ability to systematically evaluate personal biases, historical and linguistic proficiency, and evaluation skills across a range of stakeholders. Training experiences included didactics, language training, self-awareness, and supervision in immersive activities related to professional or academic work. Resources included connections with diverse faculty such as social scientists and mentors in addition to medical practitioners, institutional commitment through protected time and funding, and sustainable collaborations with partners in low resource settings. Finally, evaluation skills built upon community-based participatory methods, 360-degree feedback from partners in low-resource settings, and observed structured clinical evaluations (OSCEs) with people of different cultural backgrounds.
Conclusions
Global mental health training, as envisioned in this workshop, exemplifies an ethos of working through power differentials across clinical, professional, and social contexts in order to form longstanding collaborations. If incorporated into the ACGME/ABPN Psychiatry Milestone Project, such recommendations will improve training gained through international experiences as well as the everyday training of mental health professionals, global health practitioners, and social scientists.
References
Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet. 2009;373:1993–5.
Patel V, Minas H, Cohen A, et al. Global mental health: principles and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.
Tsai AC, Fricchione GL, Walensky RP, et al. Global health training in US graduate psychiatric education. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:426–32.
Marienfeld C, Rohrbaugh R. Impact of a global mental health program on a residency training program. Acad Psychiatry. 2013;37:276–80.
Van Dyke C, Tong L, Mack K. Global mental health training for United States psychiatric residents. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35:354–9.
Sweetland AC, Oquendo MA, Sidat M, et al. Closing the mental health gap in low-income settings by building research capacity: perspectives from Mozambique. Ann Glob Health. 2014;80:126–33.
Collins PY, Musisi S, Frehywot S, et al. The core competencies for mental, neurological, and substance use disorder care in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:26682.
Abramowitz S, Marten M, Panter-Brick C. Medical humanitarianism: anthropologists speak out on policy and practice. Med Anthropol Q. 2015;29:1–23.
Panter-Brick C, Eggerman M, Tomlinson M. How might global health master deadly sins and strive for greater virtues? Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23411.
Raviola G, Becker AE, Farmer P. A global scope for global health—including mental health. Lancet. 2011;378:1613–5.
Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci. 1963;9:458–67.
Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Buckingham: McGraw-Hill Education/Open University Press; 2014.
Butt L. The suffering stranger: medical anthropology and international morality. Med Anthropol. 2002;21:1–24.
Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, et al. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.
Gunderson GR, Cochrane JR. Religion and the health of the public: shifting the paradigm. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.
Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Soc Sci Med. 2014;103:126–33.
Kohrt BA, Upadhaya N, Luitel NP, et al. Authorship in global mental health research: recommendations for collaborative approaches to writing and publishing. Ann Glob Health. 2014;80:134–42.
Straus SE, Johnson MO, Marquez C, et al. Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: a qualitative study across two academic health centers. Acad Med. 2013;88:82–9.
Tsai AC, Ordóñez AE, Reus VI, et al. Eleven-year outcomes from an integrated residency program to train research psychiatrists. Acad Med. 2013;88:983–8.
Baer HA, Singer M, Susser I. Medical anthropology and the world system. Westport: Praeger; 2003.
Padilla A. Teaching cultural competence in psychiatry utilizing an observed structured clnical examination. Providence: Culture and Global Mental Health 36th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture; 2015.
Kohrt BA, Jordans MJD, Rai S, et al. Therapist competence in global mental health: development of the enhancing assessment of common therapeutic factors (ENACT) rating scale. Behav Res Ther. 2015;69:11–21.
Lewis-Fernandez R, Aggarwal NK, Hinton L, et al. DSM5 handbook on the cultural formulation interview. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2015.
ACGME/ABPN The psychiatry milestone project. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, 2013.
Tomlinson M, Rudan I, Saxena S, et al. Setting priorities for global mental health research. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:438–46.
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the participants of the 2015 Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture annual meeting workshop on training in global mental health (April 23–25, Providence, Rhode Island, USA). The authors thank Anvita Bhardwaj for her assistance with workshop transcription.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study met criteria for institutional review board exemption.
Funding
The authors acknowledge salary support for Dr. Kohrt through K01MH104310 and Dr. Tsai through K23M096620.
Disclosures
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Electronic Supplementary Material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
ESM 1
(PDF 52 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kohrt, B.A., Marienfeld, C.B., Panter-Brick, C. et al. Global Mental Health: Five Areas for Value-Driven Training Innovation. Acad Psychiatry 40, 650–658 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0504-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0504-4