Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Global Mental Health: Five Areas for Value-Driven Training Innovation

  • Empirical Report
  • Published:
Academic Psychiatry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

In the field of global mental health, there is a need for identifying core values and competencies to guide training programs in professional practice as well as in academia. This paper presents the results of interdisciplinary discussions fostered during an annual meeting of the Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture to develop recommendations for value-driven innovation in global mental health training.

Methods

Participants (n = 48), who registered for a dedicated workshop on global mental health training advertised in conference proceedings, included both established faculty and current students engaged in learning, practice, and research. They proffered recommendations in five areas of training curriculum: values, competencies, training experiences, resources, and evaluation.

Results

Priority values included humility, ethical awareness of power differentials, collaborative action, and “deep accountability” when working in low-resource settings in low- and middle-income countries and high-income countries. Competencies included flexibility and tolerating ambiguity when working across diverse settings, the ability to systematically evaluate personal biases, historical and linguistic proficiency, and evaluation skills across a range of stakeholders. Training experiences included didactics, language training, self-awareness, and supervision in immersive activities related to professional or academic work. Resources included connections with diverse faculty such as social scientists and mentors in addition to medical practitioners, institutional commitment through protected time and funding, and sustainable collaborations with partners in low resource settings. Finally, evaluation skills built upon community-based participatory methods, 360-degree feedback from partners in low-resource settings, and observed structured clinical evaluations (OSCEs) with people of different cultural backgrounds.

Conclusions

Global mental health training, as envisioned in this workshop, exemplifies an ethos of working through power differentials across clinical, professional, and social contexts in order to form longstanding collaborations. If incorporated into the ACGME/ABPN Psychiatry Milestone Project, such recommendations will improve training gained through international experiences as well as the everyday training of mental health professionals, global health practitioners, and social scientists.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

References

  1. Koplan JP, Bond TC, Merson MH, et al. Towards a common definition of global health. Lancet. 2009;373:1993–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Patel V, Minas H, Cohen A, et al. Global mental health: principles and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsai AC, Fricchione GL, Walensky RP, et al. Global health training in US graduate psychiatric education. Acad Psychiatry. 2014;38:426–32.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Marienfeld C, Rohrbaugh R. Impact of a global mental health program on a residency training program. Acad Psychiatry. 2013;37:276–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Dyke C, Tong L, Mack K. Global mental health training for United States psychiatric residents. Acad Psychiatry. 2011;35:354–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sweetland AC, Oquendo MA, Sidat M, et al. Closing the mental health gap in low-income settings by building research capacity: perspectives from Mozambique. Ann Glob Health. 2014;80:126–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Collins PY, Musisi S, Frehywot S, et al. The core competencies for mental, neurological, and substance use disorder care in sub-Saharan Africa. Glob Health Action. 2015;8:26682.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abramowitz S, Marten M, Panter-Brick C. Medical humanitarianism: anthropologists speak out on policy and practice. Med Anthropol Q. 2015;29:1–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Panter-Brick C, Eggerman M, Tomlinson M. How might global health master deadly sins and strive for greater virtues? Glob Health Action. 2014;7:23411.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Raviola G, Becker AE, Farmer P. A global scope for global health—including mental health. Lancet. 2011;378:1613–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Dalkey N, Helmer O. An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag Sci. 1963;9:458–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bowling A. Research methods in health: investigating health and health services. Buckingham: McGraw-Hill Education/Open University Press; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Butt L. The suffering stranger: medical anthropology and international morality. Med Anthropol. 2002;21:1–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Israel BA, Schulz AJ, Parker EA, et al. Review of community-based research: assessing partnership approaches to improve public health. Annu Rev Public Health. 1998;19:173–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gunderson GR, Cochrane JR. Religion and the health of the public: shifting the paradigm. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  16. Metzl JM, Hansen H. Structural competency: theorizing a new medical engagement with stigma and inequality. Soc Sci Med. 2014;103:126–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Kohrt BA, Upadhaya N, Luitel NP, et al. Authorship in global mental health research: recommendations for collaborative approaches to writing and publishing. Ann Glob Health. 2014;80:134–42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Straus SE, Johnson MO, Marquez C, et al. Characteristics of successful and failed mentoring relationships: a qualitative study across two academic health centers. Acad Med. 2013;88:82–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsai AC, Ordóñez AE, Reus VI, et al. Eleven-year outcomes from an integrated residency program to train research psychiatrists. Acad Med. 2013;88:983–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Baer HA, Singer M, Susser I. Medical anthropology and the world system. Westport: Praeger; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Padilla A. Teaching cultural competence in psychiatry utilizing an observed structured clnical examination. Providence: Culture and Global Mental Health 36th Annual Meeting of the Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kohrt BA, Jordans MJD, Rai S, et al. Therapist competence in global mental health: development of the enhancing assessment of common therapeutic factors (ENACT) rating scale. Behav Res Ther. 2015;69:11–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lewis-Fernandez R, Aggarwal NK, Hinton L, et al. DSM5 handbook on the cultural formulation interview. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  24. ACGME/ABPN The psychiatry milestone project. The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education, and the American Board of Psychiatry and Neurology, 2013.

  25. Tomlinson M, Rudan I, Saxena S, et al. Setting priorities for global mental health research. Bull World Health Organ. 2009;87:438–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the participants of the 2015 Society for the Study of Psychiatry and Culture annual meeting workshop on training in global mental health (April 23–25, Providence, Rhode Island, USA). The authors thank Anvita Bhardwaj for her assistance with workshop transcription.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brandon A. Kohrt.

Ethics declarations

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The study met criteria for institutional review board exemption.

Funding

The authors acknowledge salary support for Dr. Kohrt through K01MH104310 and Dr. Tsai through K23M096620.

Disclosures

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(PDF 52 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kohrt, B.A., Marienfeld, C.B., Panter-Brick, C. et al. Global Mental Health: Five Areas for Value-Driven Training Innovation. Acad Psychiatry 40, 650–658 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0504-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40596-016-0504-4

Keywords

Navigation