Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Nachhaltige Ernährung, Naturverbundenheit und Umweltbetroffenheit von angehenden Biologielehrkräften – Eine Anwendung der Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens

Sustainable Nutrition, Nature Relatedness and Environmental Concern of Pre-Service Biology Teachers – An Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Durch nicht-nachhaltige Verhaltensweisen, wie zum Beispiel durch die Wahl von Nahrungsmitteln, sind Menschen direkt und indirekt für eine Vielzahl globaler Umweltprobleme verantwortlich. Zur Reduktion negativer Auswirkungen des Nahrungskonsums auf die Umwelt, ist eine Umstellung auf nachhaltigere Ernährungsweisen inklusive einer Veränderung der individuellen Ernährungsgewohnheiten unabdingbar. Daher gilt das Thema „Nachhaltige Ernährung“ als Schlüsselkontext für eine Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung (BNE). In allgemeinbildenden Schulen nehmen gerade Biologie- und Sachunterrichtslehrkräfte eine Schlüsselrolle zur Förderung von BNE-relevanten Kompetenzen ein. Ziel des vorliegenden Beitrags ist es, sozial- und umweltpsychologische Einflussfaktoren auf das nachhaltige Ernährungsverhalten von angehenden Biologie- und Sachunterrichtslehrkräften (N = 155; MAlter = 21,2; SD = 1,95) zu untersuchen. Die Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens (TPB) wird als theoretisches Rahmenmodell um die umweltpsychologischen Konstrukte Naturverbundenheit und Umweltbetroffenheit erweitert. Diese stehen im Zusammenhang mit umweltfreundlichen Verhaltensweisen und können im Biologieunterricht, wie auch in der Biologie-Lehramtsausbildung gefördert werden. Um den Einfluss der Konstrukte auf die Intention, sich nachhaltig zu ernähren, zu zeigen, wird ein Pfadmodell präsentiert. Anhand der Ergebnisse der quantitativen Fragebogenstudie wird deutlich, dass sich das erweiterte TPB-Modell zur Vorhersage der Intention im Kontext einer nachhaltigen Ernährung eignet. Im Allgemeinen haben die Befragten eine relativ hohe Intention, sich nachhaltig zu ernähren (M = 3.49; 5-stufige Skala). Zudem wird gezeigt, dass Naturverbundenheit und Umweltbetroffenheit die Intention, sich nachhaltig zu ernähren, beeinflussen. Ansatzpunkte für die Gestaltung von Bildungsimplikationen werden diskutiert.

Abstract

Due to non-sustainable human behaviors, such as food choices, people are directly and indirectly responsible for a variety of global environmental problems. In order to reduce the negative impact of food consumption on the environment, a change towards a more sustainable nutrition, including changes in individual dietary habits, is necessary. Therefore, the topic of sustainable nutrition is considered to be a key context for Education for Sustainable Development (ESD). In schools, biology teachers play a key role in promoting ESD-relevant competences. The aim of the present study is to investigate social- and environmental-psychological factors that may influence the intention of pre-service biology teachers (N = 155; Mage = 21.2; SD = 1.95) to eat sustainably. The Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as the theoretical framework is extended to include the environmental psychological constructs of nature relatedness and environmental concern. Both constructs are closely related to environmentally friendly behaviors and might be promoted in biology lessons in school as well as in biology teacher training. To show the influence of the variables on the intention to eat sustainably, a path model is presented. Based on the key findings of this quantitative questionnaire study, it becomes clear that the extended TPB-model is suitable for predicting behavioral intention in the context of sustainable nutrition. In general, the respondents have a relatively high intention to eat sustainably (M = 3.49; 5-point Likert-scale). In addition, it is shown that nature relatedness and environmental concern have an impact on the intention to eat sustainably. Starting points for the design of educational implications are to be discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abb. 1
Abb. 2

Literatur

  • Abson, D. J., Fischer, J., Leventon, J., Newig, J., Schomerus, T., Vilsmaier, U., & Lang, D. J. (2017). Leverage points for sustainability transformation. Ambio, 46(1), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-016-0800-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aertsens, J., Verbeke, W., Mondelaers, K., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2009). Personal determinants of organic food consumption: a review. British Food Journal, 111(10), 1140–1167. https://doi.org/10.1108/00070700910992961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I. (2015). Consumer attitudes and behavior: the theory of planned behavior applied to food consumption decisions. Rivista di Economia Agraria, 2, 121–138. https://doi.org/10.13128/REA-18003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson & M. P. Zanna (Hrsg.), The handbook of attitudes (S. 173–221). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbuthnott, K. D. (2009). Education for sustainable development beyond attitude change. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370910945954.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Astleithner, F., & Brunner, K.-M. (2007). Chancen und Restriktionen für nachhaltige Ernährung in Österreich. Ein Resümee. In K.-M. Brunner, S. Geyer, M. Jelenko, W. Weiss & F. Astleithner (Hrsg.), Ernährungsalltag im Wandel (S. 209–215). Wien, New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Bamberg, S. (2003). How does environmental concern influence specific environmentally related behaviors? A new answer to an old question. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(1), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00078-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barth, M., Godemann, J., Rieckmann, M., & Stoltenberg, U. (2007). Developing key competencies for sustainable development in higher education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 8(4), 416–430. https://doi.org/10.1108/14676370710823582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, D., Arnold, J., & Kremer, K. (2018). Consumption-intention formation in education for sustainable development: an adapted model based on the theory of planned behavior. Sustainability, 10(10), 13–15. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumert, J., & Kunter, M. (2006). Stichwort: Professionelle Kompetenz von Lehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 9(4), 469–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-006-0165-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blazar, D., & Kraft, M. A. (2016). Teacher and teaching effects on students attitudes and behaviors. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(1) https://doi.org/10.3102/0162373716670260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braun, T., & Dierkes, P. (2017). Connecting students to nature - how intensity of nature experience and student age influence the success of outdoor education programs. Environmental Education Research, 23(7), 937–949. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1214866.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brieger, S. A. (2018). Social identity and environmental concern: the importance of contextual effects. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916518756988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büssing, A. G., Schleper, M., & Menzel, S. (2019). Do pre-service teachers dance with wolves? Subject-specific teacher professional development in a recent biodiversity conservation issue. Sustainability, 11(47), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11010047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çabuk, S., Tanrikulu, C., & Gelibolu, L. (2014). Understanding organic food consumption: attitude as a mediator. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 38(4), 337–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capaldi, A., Dopko, L., Zelenski, J. M., et al. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conner, M., Norman, P., & Bell, R. (2002). The theory of planned behavior and healthy eating. Health Psychology, 21(2), 194–201. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.21.2.194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corney, G. (2006). Education for sustainable development: an empirical study of the tensions and challenges faced by geography student teachers. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 15(3), 224–240. https://doi.org/10.2167/irgee194.0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission (DUK) (Hrsg.). (2012). Lehr- und Lernmaterialien zum Jahresthema Ernährung. UN-Dekade ‚Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung‘. Bonn: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsche UNESCO-Kommission [DUK] (Hrsg.). (2014). Roadmap zur Umsetzung des Weltkationsprogramms ‚Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung‘. Bonn: UNESCO. http://www.education21.ch/sites/default/files/uploads/pdf-d/bne/UNESCO_Roadmap_d.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, N., & Bortz, J. (2016). Forschungsmethoden und Evaluation in den Sozial- und Humanwissenschaften (5. Aufl.). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dornhoff, M., Hörnschemeyer, A., Fiebelkorn, F., & Menzel, S. (2018). Welche Vorstellungen haben Jugendliche von nachhaltiger Ernährung? In H. Korn, H. Dünnfelder & H. Schliep (Hrsg.), Treffpunkt Biologische Vielfalt XVI: Interdisziplinärer Forschungsaustausch im Rahmen des Übereinkommens über die biologische Vielfalt (S. 101–107). Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz [BfN].

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlap, R. E., & Jones, R. E. (2002). Environmental concern: conceptual and measurement issues. In R. E. Dunlap & W. Michelson (Hrsg.), Handbook of Environmental Sociology (S. 482–524). Westport: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberle, U., Fritsche, U. R., Hayn, D., Rehaag, R., Simshäuser, U., Stieß, I., & Waskow, F. (2005). Nachhaltige Ernährung. Ziele, Problemlagen und Handlungsbedarf im gesellschaftlichen Handlungsfeld Umwelt-Ernährung-Gesundheit (Nr. 4). Darmstadt, Hamburg: Forschungsverbund Ökoforum, Öko-Institut.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. J., & Thompson, F. (1997). Culture and the environment in the Pacific Northwest. The American Political Science Review, 91(4), 885–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Empen, L., & Schulze-Ehlers, B. (2015). Analyse des Einstellungs-Verhaltens-Zusammenhangs bei fair gehandelter Schokolade. In Neuere Theorien und Methoden in den Wirtschafts- und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus. (S. 365–376). Göttingen: Landwirtschaftsverlag Münster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebelkorn, F., & Kuckuck, M. (2019a). Immer mehr Menschen mit Hunger auf Fleisch. Geographische Rundschau, 6, 48–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebelkorn, F., & Kuckuck, M. (2019b). Insekten oder In-vitro-Fleisch - Was ist nachhaltiger? Eine Beurteilung mithilfe der Methode des „Expliziten Bewertens“. Praxis Geographie, 6, 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiebelkorn, F., & Menzel, S. (2013). Student teachers’ understanding of the terminology, distribution and loss of biodiversity: perspectives from a biodiversity hotspot and an industrialized country. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1593–1615. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9323-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiebelkorn, F., & Puchert, N. (2018). Aufgetischt: Mehlwurm statt Rindfleisch. Unterricht Biologie, 42(439), 12–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behavior: the reasoned action approach. New York: Psychology Press (Taylor & Francis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Flade, A. (2018). Zurück zur Natur? Erkennntnisse und Konzepte der Naturpsychologie. Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01859574.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Franzen, A., & Meyer, R. (2010). Environmental attitudes in cross-national perspective: a multilevel analysis of the ISSP 1993 and 2000. European Sociological Review, 26(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcp018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: a review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijop.12034.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R., Steg, L., & Reser, J. P. (2011). Environmental psychology. In P. R. Martin, F. M. Cheung, M. C. Knowles, M. Kyrios, L. Littlefield, J. B. Overmier & J. M. Prieto (Hrsg.), Handbook of applied psychology (S. 440–470). Chichester: Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.29.020178.001345.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Godfray, H. C. J., Beddington, J. R., Crute, I. R., Haddad, L., Lawrence, D., Muir, J. F., Toulmin, C., et al. (2010). Food security: the challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science, 327, 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graf, D. (2007). Die Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens. In D. Krüger & H. Vogt (Hrsg.), Theorien in der biologiedidaktischen Forschung: Ein Handbuch für Lehramtsstudierende und Doktoranden (S. 33–43). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gralher, M. (2015). Nachhaltige Ernährung verstehen. Ein Beitrag zur didaktischen Rekonstruktion der Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamann, K., Baumann, A., & Löschinger, D. (2016). Psychologie im Umweltschutz: Handbuch zur Förderung nachhaltigen Handelns. München: Oekom.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasbullah, N., Mahajar, A. J., & Salleh, M. I. (2014). Extending the theory of planned behavior: evidence of the arguments of its sufficiency. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(14), 101–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hascher, T. (2006). Die Lehrerin/der Lehrer als Modell. Salzburger Beiträge zur Erziehungswissenschaft, 10(2), 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible Learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. A. C., Beywl, W., & Zierer, K. (2013). Lernen sichtbar machen. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heuckmann, B., Hammann, M., & Asshoff, R. (2018). Using the theory of planned behaviour to develop a questionnaire on teachers’ beliefs about teaching cancer education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 75, 128–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.06.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachers’ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Education Research Journal, 42(2), 371–406. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312042002371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honkanen, P., Verplanken, B., & Ottar Olsen, S. (2006). Ethical values and motives driving organic food choice. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 5, 420–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, A. J., Dopko, R. L., Passmore, H. A., & Buro, K. (2011). Nature connectedness: associations with well-being and mindfulness. Personality and Individual Differences, 51(2), 166–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.03.037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jüttner, M., Boone, W., Park, S., & Neuhaus, B. J. (2013). Development and use of a test instrument to measure biology teachers’ content knowledge (CK) and pedagogical content knowledge (PCK). Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(1), 45–67. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-013-9157-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller, M. M., Neumann, K., & Fischer, H. E. (2017). The impact of physics teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge and motivation on students’ achievement and interest. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 54(5), 586–614. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching? Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945–980. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654315626800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachers’ content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: the role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487112460398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Koerber, K. (2014). Fünf Dimensionen der Nachhaltigen Ernährung und weiterentwickelte Grundsätze – Ein Update. Ernährung im Fokus, 14, 260–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korthagen, F. (2017). Inconvenient truths about teacher learning: Towards professional development 3.0. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 23(4), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2016.1211523.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, K., Durchgraf, L., & Schwanewedel, J. (2018). Ernährt die Erde uns alle? Unterricht Biologie, 42(439), 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Morin, A. J., & Schmidt, P. (2014). Gender differences in psychosocial determinants of university students’ intentions to buy fair trade products. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37, 485–505. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-014-9262-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewalter, D., & Geyer, C. (2009). Motivationale Aspekte von schulischen Besuchen in naturwissenschaftlich-technischen Museen. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 12(1), 28–44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-009-0060-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liefländer, A. K., & Bogner, F. X. (2018). Educational impact on the relationship of environmental knowledge and attitudes. Environmental Education Research, 24(4), 611–624. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2016.1188265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Roehrig, G. H., Bhattacharya, D., & Varma, K. (2015). In-service teachers’ attitudes, knowledge and classroom teaching of global climate change. Science Educator, 24(1), 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magnusson, M. K., Arvola, A., Hursti, U. K. K., Åberg, L., & Sjödén, P.-O. (2003). Choice of organic foods is related to perceived consequences for human health and to environmentally friendly behaviour. Appetite, 40(2), 109–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0195-6663(03)00002-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahler, D., Großschedl, J., & Harms, U. (2017). Opportunities to learn for teachers’ self-efficacy and enthusiasm. Education Research International. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4698371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martens, A., Remmele, M., & Yli-Panula, E. (2013). Erwerb formenkundlicher Kenntnisse durch Lehramtsstudierende. In J. Mayer, M. Hammann, N. Wellnitz, J. Arnold & M. Werner (Hrsg.), Internationale Tagung der Fachsektion Didaktik der Biologie (FDdB) im VBIO (S. 268–269). Kassel: Universität Kassel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. P. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: a measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, M. S., Oliver, M., Svenson, A., Simnadis, T., Beck, E. J., Coltman, T., Sharma, R., et al. (2015). The theory of planned behaviour and discrete food choices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12966-015-0324-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menon, D., & Sadler, T. D. (2018). Sources of science teaching self-efficacy for preservice elementary teachers in science content courses. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(5), 835–855. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-017-9813-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menozzi, D., Sogari, G., & Veneziani, M. (2017). Eating novel foods: an application of the theory of planned behaviour to predict the consumption of an insect-based product. Food Quality and Preference, 59, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2017.02.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2009). The nature relatedness scale. Linking individual’s connection with nature to environmental concern and behavior. Environment and Behavior, 27(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916508318748.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nisbet, E. K., Zelenski, J. M., & Murphy, S. A. (2011). Happiness is in our nature: exploring nature relatedness as a contributor to subjective well-being. Journal of Happiness Studies, 12(2), 303–322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-010-9197-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obery, A., & Bangert, A. (2017). Exploring the influence of nature relatedness and perceived science knowledge on proenvironmental behavior. Education Sciences, 7(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci7010017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based environmental education of children: Environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behaviour. Global Environmental Change, 47, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, J., Modi, A., & Patel, J. (2016). Predicting green product consumption using theory of planned behavior and reasoned action. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 29, 123–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2015.11.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rieckmann, M. (2018a). Key themes in education for sustainable development. In A. Leicht, J. Heiss & J. Byun (Hrsg.), Issues and trends in education for sustainable development (S. 61–84). Paris: UNESCO.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieckmann, M. (2018b). Learning to transform the world: Key competencies in education for sustainable development. In A. Leicht, J. Heiss & W. J. Byun (Hrsg.), Issues and trends in education for sustainable development (S. 39–59). Paris: UNESCO. https://en.unesco.org/themes/119915/publications/all?page=2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieckmann, M., & Holz, V. (2017). Verankerung von Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung in der Lehrerbildung. Zeitschrift für internationale Bildungsforschung und Entwicklungspädagogik, 3, 4–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieckmann, M., Fischer, D., & Richter, S. (2014). Nachhaltige Ernährung im Wertediskurs – Beiträge einer Hochschulbildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. In C. Schank, K. Vorbohle & J. H. Quandt (Hrsg.), Perspektive Nahrungsmittelethik (S. 29–58). München, Mering: Rainer Hampp Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riese, J., & Reinhold, P. (2010). Empirische Erkenntnisse zur Struktur professioneller Handlungskompetenz von angehenden Physiklehrkräften. Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 16, 167–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruzek, E. A., Domina, T., Conley, A. M. M., Duncan, G. J., & Karabenick, S. A. (2015). Using value-added models to measure teacher effects on students’ motivation and achievement. Journal of Early Adolescence, 35(5-6), 852–882. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272431614525260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scalco, A., Noventa, S., Sartori, R., & Ceschi, A. (2017). Predicting organic food consumption: a meta-analytic structural equation model based on the theory of planned behavior. Appetite, 112, 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2017.02.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz, G. L., & Rocha, J. B. T. (2018). Environmental education program as a tool to improve children’s environmental attitudes and knowledge. Education, 8(2), 15–20. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.edu.20180802.01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W. (2000). New environmental theories: empathizing with nature: the effects of perspective taking on concern for environmental issues. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 391–406. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, P. W. (2002). Inclusion with nature: the psychology of human-nature relations. In P. Schmuck & W. P. Schultz (Hrsg.), Psychology of sustainable development (S. 62–78). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer-Brodowski, M., Brock, A., Etzkorn, N., & Otte, I. (2018). Monitoring of education for sustainable development in Germany – insights from early childhood education, school and higher education. Environmental Education Research, 4622, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1440380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sparks, P., Hinds, J., Curnock, S., & Pavey, L. (2014). Connectedness and its consequences: a study of relationships with the natural environment. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44(3), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staats, H. (2003). Understanding proenvironmental attitudes and behavior. An analysis and review of research based on the theory of planned behavior. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee & M. Bonaiuto (Hrsg.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (S. 171–201). Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statistisches Bundesamt (2017). Bildung und Kultur. Studierende an Hochschulen. Wintersemester 2016/2017. Wiesbaden: Destatis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, P. C. (2000). New environmental theories: Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-4537.00175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoll-Kleemann, S., & Schmidt, U. J. (2017). Reducing meat consumption in developed and transition countries to counter climate change and biodiversity loss: a review of influence factors. Regional Environmental Change, 17(5), 1261–1277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-016-1057-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stranieri, S., Ricci, E., & Banterle, A. (2016). The theory of planned behaviour and food choices: the case of sustainable pre-packed salad. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 209–212. https://doi.org/10.18461/pfsd.2016.1623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauß, S., König, J., & Nold, G. (2019). Fachdidaktisches Wissen, Überzeugungen, Enthusiasmus und Selbstwirksamkeit: Prüfung der Struktur von Merkmalen professioneller Kompetenz von angehenden Englischlehrkräften. Unterrichtswissenschaft, 47, 243–266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42010-019-00039-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tam, K. P. (2013). Concepts and measures related to connection to nature: similarities and differences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2013.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tomas, L., Girgenti, S., & Jackson, C. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ attitudes toward education for sustainability and its relevance to their learning: Implications for pedagogical practice. Environmental Education Research, 23(3), 324–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1109065.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2017). Education for sustainable development goals. Learning objectives. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0024/002474/247444e.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., & Vackier, I. (2005). Individual determinants of fish consumption: application of the theory of planned behavior. Appetite, 44(1), 67–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2004.08.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walshe, N. (2008). Understanding students’ conceptions of sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 14(5), 537–558. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802345958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, A., & Fiebelkorn, F. (2018). Sozialpsychologische Einflussfaktoren auf eine nachhaltige Ernährung von angehenden Biologielehrkräften - Eine Anwendung der Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). In B. Laux & S. Stomporowski (Hrsg.), Nachhaltigkeit in den Bereichen Tourismus, Hotelgewerbe und Ernährung (S. 215–226). Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Hohengehren.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfrum, A., & Remmele, M. (2018). „Food Chair“ - globale Verteilung endlich verständlich! Unterricht Biologie, 42(439), 34–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yavetz, B., Goldman, D., & Pe’er, S. (2009). Environmental literacy of pre-service teachers in Israel: a comparison between students at the onset and end of their studies. Environmental Education Research, 15(4), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620902928422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zint, M. (2002). Comparing three attitude-behavior theories for predicting science teachers’ intentions. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(9), 819–844. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10047.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Fachbereich 05 Biologie/Chemie, Abteilung Biologiedidaktik, Universität Osnabrück, Barbarastraße 11, 49076, Osnabrück, Deutschland

    Alina Weber & Florian Fiebelkorn

Authors
  1. Alina Weber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Florian Fiebelkorn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alina Weber.

Caption Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Weber, A., Fiebelkorn, F. Nachhaltige Ernährung, Naturverbundenheit und Umweltbetroffenheit von angehenden Biologielehrkräften – Eine Anwendung der Theorie des geplanten Verhaltens. ZfDN 25, 181–195 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-019-00098-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40573-019-00098-3

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation