Abstract
Diacritics in Arabic are optional orthographic symbols used to alter the pronunciation of a letter or distinguish between words of similar spellings, which may add or subtract complexity by imposing additional loads on the individual’s information-processing system. In this study, we explored how reading Arabic text with and without diacritical signs (known as ḥarakāt) can influence readers’ brain activation. An electroencephalogram (EEG) recording of 18 subjects was used in this study to assess the differences in brain activation while reading in two reading conditions (with and without ḥarakāt). The results showed that ḥarakāt had a significant impact on the cognitive responses of subjects as exemplified by differences in cortical activity between the conditions. Our results imply promising results in the application of reading skills where diacritical marks may play a key role in increasing the level of attention an individual pays to text, thus improving information-processing accuracy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aabed, M. A., Awaideh, S. M., Elshafei, A.-R. M., & Gutub, A. A. (2007). Arabic diacritics based steganography. Paper presented at the Signal Processing and Communications, 2007. ICSPC 2007. IEEE International Conference on.
Abadzi, H. & Martelli, M. (2014). Efficient Reading for Arab Students: Implications from Neurocognitive Research [conference paper]. World Summit of Innovation in Education (WISE).
Abdelhadi, S., Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2011). Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic: Effects of orthographic visual complexity on detection. Writing Systems Research, 3(2), 117–127.
Abu-Rabia, S. (1997). Reading in Arabic orthography: The effect of vowels and context on reading accuracy of poor and skilled native Arabic readers. Reading and Writing, 9(1), 65–78.
Abu-Rabia, S. (2001). The role of vowels in reading Semitic scripts: Data from Arabic and Hebrew. Reading and Writing, 14(1–2), 39–59.
Abu-Rabia, S. (2007). The role of morphology and short vowelization in reading Arabic among normal and dyslexic readers in grades 3, 6, 9, and 12. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36(2), 89–106.
Alptekin, C., & Erçetin, G. (2010). The role of L1 and L2 working memory in literal and inferential comprehension in L2 reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(2), 206–219.
Al-Samarraie, H., Sarsam, S. M., & Umar, I. N. (2017). Visual perception of multi-column-layout text: Insight from repeated and non-repeated reading. Behaviour & Information Technology, 36(1), 75–84.
Al-Samarraie, H., Eldenfria, A., Price, M. L., Zaqout, F., & Fauzy, W. M. (2019a). Effects of map design characteristics on users’ search performance and cognitive load. The Electronic Library, 37(4), 593-606. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-01-2019-0006
Al-Samarraie, H., Eldenfria, A., Zaqout, F., & Price, M. L. (2019b). How reading in single-and multiple-column types influence our cognitive load: An EEG study. The Electronic Library, 37(4), 667–679. https://doi.org/10.1108/EL-10-2018-0202
Anderson, E. W., Potter, K. C., Matzen, L. E., Shepherd, J. F., Preston, G. A., & Silva, C. T. (2011). A user study of visualization effectiveness using EEG and cognitive load. In Computer graphics forum (Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 791–800). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Ashby, J., Treiman, R., Kessler, B., & Rayner, K. (2006). Vowel processing during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32(2), 416.
Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its control processes. Psychology of Learning and Motivation, 2, 89–195.
Azzam, R. (1989). Orthography and reading of the Arabic language. In Reading and writing disorders in different orthographic systems (pp. 203–218). Springer, Dordrecht.
Baddeley, A. (1992). Working memory and conscious awareness. In Theories of Memory (Collins, A.F. et al., eds), pp. 11–28, Lawrence Erlbaum
Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory: Looking back and looking forward. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 4(10), 829–839.
Bishara, S., & Weiss, I. (2017). Correlation between phonological and morphological awareness and the reading of punctuated and non-punctuated words in Arabic as first language and Hebrew as second language. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1322028.
Buckwalter, T. (2004). Issues in Arabic orthography and morphology analysis. Paper presented at the proceedings of the workshop on computational approaches to Arabic script-based languages.
Buzsáki, G., & Draguhn, A. (2004). Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science, 304(5679), 1926–1929.
Cavanagh, J. F., Zambrano-Vazquez, L., & Allen, J. J. (2012). Theta lingua franca: A common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. Psychophysiology, 49(2), 220–238.
Chi, Y. M., Jung, T.-P., & Cauwenberghs, G. (2010). Dry-contact and noncontact biopotential electrodes: Methodological review. IEEE Reviews in Biomedical Engineering, 3, 106–119.
Cosman, J. D., & Vecera, S. P. (2011). The contents of visual working memory reduce uncertainty during visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 73(4), 996–1002.
Crossley, S. A., Skalicky, S., Dascalu, M., McNamara, D. S., & Kyle, K. (2017). Predicting text comprehension, processing, and familiarity in adult readers: New approaches to readability formulas. Discourse Processes, 1–20.
Elsayyad, H., Everatt, J., Mortimore, T., & Haynes, C. (2017). The influence of working memory on reading comprehension in vowelized versus non-vowelized Arabic. Reading and Writing, 30(4), 871–886.
Gevins, A., Smith, M. E., Leong, H., McEvoy, L., Whitfield, S., Du, R., & Rush, G. (1998). Monitoring working memory load during computer-based tasks with EEG pattern recognition methods. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 40(1), 79–91.
Gough, P. B., Hoover, W. A., Peterson, C. L., Cornoldi, C., & Oakhill, J. (1996). Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. Some observations on a simple view of reading, 1–14.
Guermandi, M., Cardu, R., Scarselli, E. F., & Guerrieri, R. (2014). Active electrode ic for eeg and electrical impedance tomography with continuous monitoring of contact impedance. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 9(1), 21–33.
Hamed, O., & Zesch, T. (2017). The role of diacritics in designing lexical recognition tests for Arabic. Procedia Computer Science, 117, 119–128.
Henriques, J., Gabriel, D., Grigoryeva, L., Haffen, E., Moulin, T., Aubry, R., ... Ortega, J.-P. (2014). Protocol design challenges in the detection of awareness in aware subjects using EEG signals. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 1550059414560397.
Hermena, E. W., Drieghe, D., Hellmuth, S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2015). Processing of Arabic diacritical marks: Phonological–syntactic disambiguation of homographic verbs and visual crowding effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(2), 494.
Hyönä, J., & Vainio, S. (2001). Reading morphologically complex clause structures in Finnish. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 13(4), 451–474.
Ibrahim, R. (2013). Reading in Arabic: New evidence for the role of vowel signs. Creative Education, 4(04), 248.
Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of Arabic orthography slow its processing. Neuropsychology, 16(3), 322.
Jensen, E. D., & Vinther, T. (2003). Exact repetition as input enhancement in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 53(3), 373–428.
Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1992). A capacity theory of comprehension: Individual differences in working memory. Psychological Review, 99(1), 122.
Lage-Castellanos, A., Martínez-Montes, E., Hernández-Cabrera, J. A., & Galán, L. (2010). False discovery rate and permutation test: An evaluation in ERP data analysis. Statistics in Medicine, 29(1), 63–74.
Landi, N., & Ryherd, K. (2017). Understanding specific reading comprehension deficit: A review. Language and Linguistics Compass, 11(2).
Layes, S., Lalonde, R., & Rebaï, M. (2017). Study on morphological awareness and rapid automatized naming through word reading and comprehension in normal and disabled reading Arabic-speaking children. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 33(2), 123–140.
Leil, A. K. A., Share, D. L., & Ibrahim, R. (2014). How does speed and accuracy in reading relate to reading comprehension in Arabic? Psicológica, 35(2), 251–276.
Maroun, M., & Hanley, J. R. (2016). Diacritics improve comprehension of the Arabic script by providing access to the meanings of heterophonic homographs. Reading and Writing, 1–17.
McDuff, D., Gontarek, S., & Picard, R. (2014). Remote measurement of cognitive stress via heart rate variability. In 2014 36th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (pp. 2957–2960). IEEE.
Maroun, M., & Hanley, J. R. (2017). Diacritics improve comprehension of the Arabic script by providing access to the meanings of heterophonic homographs. Reading and Writing, 30(2), 319–335.
Metzner, P., Malsburg, T., Vasishth, S., & Rösler, F. (2017). The importance of reading naturally: Evidence from combined recordings of eye movements and electric brain potentials. Cognitive Science, 41(S6), 1232–1263.
Mickan, P. (2017). Text-based research and teaching from a social semiotic perspective: Transformative research and pedagogy. In Text-Based Research and Teaching (pp. 15–35). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
Miller, P. (2004). The importance of vowel diacritics for reading in Hebrew: What can be learned from readers with prelingual deafness? Reading and Writing, 17(6), 593–615.
Murata, A. (2016). An Attempt to Evaluate Mental Workload Using Wavelet Transform of EEG. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47(3):498–508.
Natour, Y. S., Darawsheh, W., Sartawi, A. M., Marie, B. A., & Efthymiou, E. (2016). Reading error patterns prevailing in Arab Emirati first graders. Cogent Education, 3(1), 1226459.
Primor, L., Pierce, M. E., & Katzir, T. (2011). Predicting reading comprehension of narrative and expository texts among Hebrew-speaking readers with and without a reading disability. Annals of Dyslexia, 61(2), 242–268.
Randall, M. (2009). Second language Reading proficiency and word recognition: The concept of saliency and its application across different scripts. Issues in second language proficiency, 116–131.
Rippon, G., & Brunswick, N. (1998). EEG correlates of phonological processing in dyslexic children. Journal of Psychophysiology, 12(3), 261–274.
Ryan, A., & Meara, P. (1992). The case of the invisible vowels: Arabic speakers reading English words. Reading in a foreign language, 7, 531–531.
Saigh, K., & Schmitt, N. (2012). Difficulties with vocabulary word form: The case of Arabic ESL learners. System, 40(1), 24–36.
Salehuddin, K., & Winskel, H. (2014). Reducing the cognitive complexity in reading the Arabic script of written Malay via diacritics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 114, 40–44.
Sarsam, S. M., & Al-Samarraie, H. (2018). Towards incorporating personality into the design of an interface: A method for facilitating users’ interaction with the display. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 28(1), 75–96.
Schimmel, N., & Ness, M. (2017). The effects of oral and silent reading on reading comprehension. Reading Psychology, 38(4), 390–416.
Sniezek, J. A., & Buckley, T. (1995). Cueing and cognitive conflict in judge-advisor decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 62(2), 159–174.
Snow, C. E. (2002). Reading for understanding: Towards a research and development program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand.
Taha, H. (2016). Deep and shallow in Arabic orthography: New evidence from reading performance of elementary school native Arab readers. Writing Systems Research, 8(2), 133–142.
Taouka, M., & Coltheart, M. (2004). The cognitive processes involved in learning to read in Arabic. Reading and Writing, 17(1–2), 27–57.
Tracey, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading. New York: Guilford.
Xu, J., Yazicioglu, R. F., Grundlehner, B., Harpe, P., Makinwa, K. A., & Van Hoof, C. (2011). A $160~\mu {\text w} $8-channel active electrode system for eeg monitoring. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Circuits and Systems, 5(6), 555–567.
Zarjam, P., Epps, J., & Chen, F. (2011). Characterizing working memory load using EEG delta activity. Paper presented at the Signal Processing Conference, 2011 19th European.
Acknowledgements
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group No (RG-1438-062).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This research complied with the American Psychological Association Code of Ethics where informed consent was obtained from each participant.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Al-Samarraie, H., Sarsam, S.M., Alzahrani, A.I. et al. Reading text with and without diacritics alters brain activation: The case of Arabic. Curr Psychol 39, 1189–1198 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00493-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00493-6