Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Governance in a River Restoration Project in South Korea: The Case of Incheon

  • Published:
Water Resources Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research aims to explore an emergence of river governance in Incheon, South Korea, in relation to the Incheon Stream Restoration Project from 2003 to 2010. The purpose of the project is to restore local streams in Incheon for improvement of ecological restoration, water quality, flood prevention, and waterfront amenities for local residents. The project epitomizes the ethos of river governance through accommodation of views from various stakeholders, such as the government, nongovernmental organizations, local residents, and experts through establishment of the Stream Restoration Propulsion Group (SRPG). The enactment of the Special Ordinance for the SRPG has served to help the governance system work in the project. The interim assessment of the project in terms of river governance and ecological restoration indicates that the project has achieved a good degree of river governance coupled with a limited range of ecological restoration. The key to the success of the project hinges upon a continuous collaboration between the stakeholders to achieve river restoration, particularly political bargaining between the government and the other stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beierle C (1999) Using social goals to evaluate public participation in environmental decisions. Pol Stud Rev 16(3/4):l75–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt E, Palmer M, Allan J, Alexander G, Barnars K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf G, Lake P, Lave R, Meyer J, O’Donnell T, Pagano L, Powell B, Sudduth E (2005) Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho M (2005) Achievement & limit of Cheong Gye Cheon restoration. J Korea Assoc Civ Eng 53(11):140–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho S, Kang Y, Kim K (2007) The study of the formation factors of the cooperative local governance – centering on the case of the creation of the natural type of the Jeonju River. Poli Info Res 10(1):257–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimadama Z, Zikos P (2010) Social networks as Trojan horses to challenge the dominance of existing hierarchies: knowledge and learning in the water governance of Volos, Greece. Water Resour Manag 24(14):3853–3870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foerstar A (2011) Developing purposeful and adaptive institutions for effective environmental water governance. Water Resour Manag Online first. doi:10.1007/s11269-011-9879-x

  • Franks T (2006) Water governance: a solution to all problems. University of Bradford Water Seminar Series

  • Garis Y, Lutt N, Tagg A (2003) Stakeholder involvement in water resources planning. Water Environ J 17(1):54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen HJ, Refsgaard JC, Hojberg AL, Ferrand N, Gijsbers P (2009) Harmonized principles for public participation in quality assurance of integrated water resources modelling. Water Resour Manag 23(12):2539–2544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hommes S, Kruijf JV, Otter HS, Bouma G (2009) Knowledge and perceptions in participatory policy process: lessons from the delta-region in the Netherlands. Water Resour Manag 23(18):1641–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper B (2003) Integrated Water Resources Management and River Basin Governance. Water Resources Update 126, Universities Council on Water Resources, 12–20

  • Government I (2008a) Incheon Environmental White Paper 2008. Incheon Government, Incheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Government I (2008b) Incheon Statistical Yearbook 2008. Incheon Government, Incheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Incheon Stream Restoration Propulsion Group (2004) Mid-Term Report of the Incheon River Restoration Movement (October 1997–May 2004). Incheon SRPG and Incheon Regional Environment & Technology Development Center, Incheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Incheon Stream Restoration Propulsion Group (2005) Mid-Term Report of the Incheon River Restoration Movement (June 2004–May 2005). Incheon SRPG and Incheon Regional Environment & Technology Development Center, Incheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Incheon Stream Restoration Propulsion Group (2006) Mid-Term Report of the Incheon River Restoration Movement (June 2005–May 2006). Incheon SRPG and Incheon Regional Environment & Technology Development Center, Incheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Incheon Stream Restoration Propulsion Group (2007) Mid-Term Report of the Incheon River Restoration Movement (June 2006–May 2007). Incheon SRPG and Incheon Regional Environment & Technology Development Center, Incheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Incheon Stream Restoration Propulsion Group (2009) Monitoring results on the river restoration projects in Incheon. Incheon Government and Incheon SRPG, Incheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Incheon Water Management Division (2006) Major Work Plan in 2006. Annual Report

  • Kim S (2008) Past and Present of the Anyang Stream, South Korea – Success Factors. Presented at the Incheon River Governance Forum, 1 October, Songdo, Incheon, South Korea

  • Knuppe K, Pahl-Wostl C (2011) A framework for the analysis of governance structures applying to groundwater resources and the requirements for the sustainable management of associated ecosystem services. Water Resour Manag 25(13):3387–3411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korea Network for River and Watershed (2010) Manual for river restoration movement in small-sized watersheds. Korea Network for River and Watershed, Busan

    Google Scholar 

  • K-Water (2008) Water and Future. K-Water, Daejeon. Lee S, Kim S (2009) A new mode of river basin management in South Korea. Water Environ J 23(2):91–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald A, Lane N, Haycock E, Chalk A (2004) Rivers of dreams: on the gulf between theoretical and practical aspects of an upland river restoration. Trans Inst Br Geogr 29(3):257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Construction and Transportation (2007a) National policy guidelines on river restoration in Korea. MOCT, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Construction and Transportation (2007b) Water resources in Korea 2007. MOCT, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsmaker (2008) Local Governments Carbon-copying the Chyunggye Stream Project without Critical Assessment. 22 January, No.759. Newsmaker

  • Palmer M, Bernhardt E, Allan J, Lake P, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Shah J, Galat D, Loss G, Goodwin P, Hart D, Bassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf G, Lave R, Meyer J, O’Donnell T, Pagano L, Sudduth E (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J Appl Ecol 42:208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre J (2000) Introduction: understanding governance. In: Pierre J (ed) Debating governance: authority, steering, and democracy. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes R (1997) Understanding governance. Open University Press, Berkshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes R (2000) Governance and public administration. In: Pierre J (ed) Debating governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • River Restoration Research Group (2006) River restoration case study collection. Chungmomgak, Seoul

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P, Hall A (2003) Effective Water Governance. GWP Technical Committee (TEC) Background Paper No.7

  • Shin J, Lee I (2006) Chong Gye Cheon restoration in Seoul, Korea. Civil Eng 159:162–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Special Ordinance for the Stream Restoration Propulsion Group. 12 January 2004

  • Tunstall M, Penning-Rowsell C, Tapsell M, Eden E (2000) River restoration: public attitudes and expectations. Water Environ J 14(5):363–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turton R, Hattingh J, Claasen M, Roux J, Ashton J (2007) Governance as a trialogue: government-society-science in transition. In: Turton R, Hattingh J, Claasen M, Roux J, Ashton J (eds) Governance as a trialogue: government-society-science in transition. Springer, Berlin and Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Van Diggelen R, Grootjans A, Harris J (2001) Ecological restoration: state of the art or state of the science? Restor Ecol 9(2):115–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Angermeier P, Bledsoe B, Kondolf M, MacDonnell L, Merritt D, Palmer M, Poff N, Tarboton D (2005) River restoration. Water Resour Res 41:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolsey S, Capelli F, Gonser T, Hoehn E, Hostmann M, Junker B, Paetzold A, Roulier C, Schweizer S, Tiegs D, Tockner K, Weber C, Peter A (2007) A strategy to assess river restoration success. Freshwat Biol 52:752–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo J, Park J, Choi G (2006) Stories of rivers in Incheon. Dain Art, Incheon

    Google Scholar 

  • Zikos D, Bithas K (2006) The Case of a “Weak Water” Governance Model: Athens-Greece. Proceedings of the 2006 IASME/WSEAS International Conference on Water Resources, Hydraulics & Hydrology. Chalkida, Greece, 11–13 May, 161–166

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to express our gratitude towards the Stream Restoration Propulsion Group in Incheon for its kindness in making this research possible. This research has been funded by the Incheon Regional Environment and Technical Development Center and the Sustainable Water Resources Research Center of the Korean Twenty-First Century Frontier Research Program (Grant Code:1-0-3).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seungho Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, S., Choi, GW. Governance in a River Restoration Project in South Korea: The Case of Incheon. Water Resour Manage 26, 1165–1182 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9952-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-011-9952-5

Keywords

Navigation