Skip to main content
Log in

Promoting perspective coordination by dilemma discussion. The effectiveness of classroom group discussion on interpersonal negotiation strategies of 12-year-old students

  • Published:
Social Psychology of Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Promoting social competence and social cognition is an important aim of education and socialization. According to theories of social cognitive and moral development, social cognition may be promoted by adolescent peer interaction. In this study, social cognition is theoretically conceptualized by the interpersonal negotiation strategies model of Selman which distinguishes levels of perspective coordination and steps of information processing (identification of a problem, generating negotiation strategies, selection of a strategy, evaluation). In a pre-post control group design this study investigated whether dilemma discussions among peers lead to higher individual levels of perspective coordination compared to an individualistic condition. Members of the discussion-condition exhibited higher gain scores in perspective coordination compared to the control group regarding the information processing steps ‘‘generating strategies’’ and ‘‘strategy selection’’. In order to analyze verbal interaction in the discussion groups, an integrative coding schedule was developed. In addition, trait-like argumentative motives of the participants were assessed. The results of multilevel analyses suggest that progress in posttest-perspective coordination is mediated by the group’s consensual solution of the dilemma as well as by an explanation-oriented discussion style, but only if the latter is accompanied by a trait-like subject- and consensus-oriented argumentative motive. Theoretical and practical conclusions are drawn.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • S. Adalbjarnardottir (1993) ArticleTitlePromoting children’s social growth in the schools: an intervention study Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 14 461–484

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Barnes F. Todd (1977) Communication and learning in small groups Routledge and Kegan Paul London

    Google Scholar 

  • M.W. Berkowitz (1986) Die Rolle der Diskussion in der Moralerziehung. (The role of discussion in moral education) F. Oser R. Fatke O. Hoeffe (Eds) Transformation und Entwicklung (Transformation and development: Bases of the moral education) Suhrkamp Frankfurt 89–123

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Berkowitz F. Oser W. Althof (1987) The development of sociomoral discourse W.M. Kurtines J.L. Gewirtz (Eds) Moral development through social interaction John Wiley New York 323–352

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Blatt L. Kohlberg (1975) ArticleTitleThe effects of classroom moral discussion upon children’s level of moral judgment Journal of Moral Education 4 129–161

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Blickle (1996) ArticleTitleWen interessieren schon die besseren Argumente? Skalenentwicklung und -validierung zu Durchsetzungs- und Konsensmotiven in Argumentationen. (Who really cares for the better arguments? Construction and validation of scales assessing assertive and consensus motives in argumentation) Zeitschrift fuer Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 17 109–118

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Blickle (1997) ArticleTitleArgumentativeness and the facets of the Big Five Psychological Reports 81 1379–1385

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Blickle S. Hauck W. Senft (1997) ArticleTitleAssertion and consensus motives in argumentations International Journal of Value-Based Management 10 193–203

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Blickle S. Hauck W. Senft (2000) ArticleTitleMotive in argumentationen und ihre interaktionalen Korrelate (Motives in argumentation and their interactional correlates Zeitschrift fuer Differentielle und Diagnostische Psychologie 21 76–90

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Brion-Meisels R.L. Selman (1996) From fight or flight to collaboration: a framework for understanding individual and institutional development in the school A.M. Hoffman (Eds) Schools, violence, and society Praeger/Greenwood Westport, US 163–184

    Google Scholar 

  • C.A. Chinn A.M. O’Donnell T.S. Jinks (2000) ArticleTitleThe structure of discourse in collaborative learning Journal of Experimental Education 69 77–97

    Google Scholar 

  • U. Christmann C. Mischo N. Groeben (2000) ArticleTitleComponents of the evaluation of integrity violations in argumentative discussions: relevant factors and their relationships Journal of Language and Social Psychology 19 315–341

    Google Scholar 

  • E.G. Cohen (1994) ArticleTitleRestructuring the classroom: conditions for productive small groups Review of Educational Research 64 1–35

    Google Scholar 

  • N.R. Crick K.A. Dodge (1994) ArticleTitleA review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children’s social adjustment Psychological Bulletin 115 74–101 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0033-2909.115.1.74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W. Damon (1984) ArticleTitlePeer education: the untapped potential Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 5 331–343

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Damon M. Killen (1984) ArticleTitlePeer Interaction and the processes of change in children’s moral reasoning Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 28 347–367

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodge, K.A., Pettit, G.S., McClaskey, C.L., & Brown, M.M. (1986). Social competence in children. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 51(2), Ser. 213.

    Google Scholar 

  • K.A. Dodge R. Laird J.E. Lochman A. Zelli (2002) ArticleTitleMultidimensional latent-construct analysis of children’s social information processing patterns: correlations with aggressive behavior problems Psychological Assessment 14 60–73

    Google Scholar 

  • F.V. Eemeren R. Grootendorst (1991) ArticleTitleA pragma-dialectical perspective on norms Communication and Cognition 24 25–42

    Google Scholar 

  • J.H. Flavell P.T. Botkin C.L. Fry J.W. Wright P.E. Jarvis (1968) The development of role-taking and communication skills in children Wiley New York

    Google Scholar 

  • W. Horn (1982) Leistungspruefsystem L-P-S Hogrefe (Leistungspruefsystem L-P-S). Goettingen

    Google Scholar 

  • J.J. Hox (1995) Applied multilevel analysis TT-Publikaties. Available: http://multilevel.ioe.ac.uk/publref/papers/amaboek.pdf Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Infante A.S. Rancer (1982) ArticleTitleA conceptualization and measurement of argumentativeness Journal of Personality Assessment 46 72–80

    Google Scholar 

  • D.W. Johnson R.T. Johnson (1992) Positive interdependence: key to effective cooperation R. Hertz-Lazarowitz N. Miller (Eds) Interaction in cooperative groups: The theoretical anatomy of group learning Cambridge University Press New York 174–199

    Google Scholar 

  • U.P. Kanning (2002) ArticleTitleSoziale Kompetenz – Definition, Strukturen und Prozesse (Social competence – Definition structure, and processes.) Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie 210 154–163

    Google Scholar 

  • M.W. Keefer C.M. Zeitz L.B. Resnick (2000) ArticleTitleJudging the quality of peer-led student dialogues Cognition and Instruction 18 53–81

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Landis G. G. Koch (1977) ArticleTitleThe measurement of observer agreement for categorical data Biometrics 33 159–174 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:CSiC3srhvFI%3D Occurrence Handle843571

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lind, G. (in press). The meaning and measurement of moral judgment competence revisited – A dual-aspect model. In D. Fasko & W. Willis (Eds.), Contemporary philosophical and psychological perspectives on moral development and education. Cresskill: NJ: Hampton Press.

  • G. Lind (2003) Moral ist lehrbar (Morals are teachable) Oldenbourg Muenchen

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Mischo (2002) ArticleTitlePersonality and reaction to argumentative unfairness: effects of cognitive abilities and personality traits on reactions to unfair argumentative contributions Social Justice Research 15 1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Mischo (2003) ArticleTitleCognitive, emotional and verbal response in unfair everyday discourse Journal of Language and Social Psychology 22 119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • C. Mischo N. Groeben U. Christmann J. Flender (2002) ArticleTitleKonzeption und evaluation eines trainings zum umgang mit unfairem argumentieren in organisationen (Concept and evaluation of a training program dealing with unfair argumentations in organizations) Zeitschrift fuer Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie 46 150–158

    Google Scholar 

  • P.B. Paulus H.C. Yang (2000) ArticleTitleIdea generation in groups: a basis for creativity in organizations Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 82 76–87

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Rest D. Narvaez M. Bebeau S. Thoma (1999) ArticleTitleA neo-Kohlbergian approach: The DIT and schema theory Educational Psychology Review 11 291–324

    Google Scholar 

  • R.E. Riggio (1986) ArticleTitleAssessment of basis social skills Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 649–660

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlaefli, A. (1986). Foerderung der sozial-moralischen Kompetenz: Evaluation, Curriculum und Durchfuehrung von Interventionsstudien. (Promoting socio-moral competence: evaluation and implementation of intervention studies.) Frankfurt: Lang.

  • A. Schlaefli J.R. Rest S.J. Thoma (1985) ArticleTitleDoes moral education improve moral judgment A meta-analysis of intervention studies using the Defining Issues Test Review of Educational Research 55 319–352

    Google Scholar 

  • B.H. Schneider (1993) Children’s social competence in context Pergamon Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Schreier N. Groeben U. Christmann (1995) ArticleTitleThat’s not fair! Argumentational integrity as an ethics of argumentative communication Argumentation 9 267–289

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Schreier N. Groeben G. Blickle (1995) ArticleTitleThe effects of (un)fairness and (im)politeness on the evaluation of argumentative communication Journal of Language and Social Psychology 14 260–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, L.H., Yeates, K.O., & Selman, R. (1989). The interpersonal negotiation strategies interview manual. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University.

  • R. Selman (1980) The growth of interpersonal understanding Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Selman L. Schultz (1988) Interpersonal thought and action in the case of a troubled early adolescent: toward a developmental model of the gap S. Shirk (Eds) Cognitive development and child psychotherapy Plenum Press New York 207–246

    Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Selman W. Beardslee L.H. Schultz M. Krupa D. Podorefsky (1986) ArticleTitleAssessing adolescent interpersonal negotiation strategies: towards the integration of structural and functional models Developmental Psychology 22 450–459

    Google Scholar 

  • J.D. Singer (1998) ArticleTitleUsing SAS proc mixed to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics 24 323–355

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Snijders R. Boskers (1999) Multilevel Analysis Sage London

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Terwel R.M. Gillies v.d.P. Eeden D Hoeck (2001) ArticleTitleCo-operative learning processes of students: a longitudinal multilevel perspective British Journal of Educational Psychology 71 619–645

    Google Scholar 

  • N. Webb (1991) ArticleTitleTask-related verbal interaction and achievement in mathematics learning in small groups Journal of Educational Psychology 76 33–44

    Google Scholar 

  • F.L. Wilczenski T. Bontrager P. Ventrone M. Correia (2001) ArticleTitleObserving collarobative problem-solving processes and outcomes Psychology in the Schools 38 269–279

    Google Scholar 

  • R.W. Williams D.W. Zimmerman (1996) ArticleTitleAre simple gain scores obsolete Applied Psychological Measurement 20 59–69

    Google Scholar 

  • K.O. Yeates L.H. Schultz R.L. Selman (1991) ArticleTitleThe development of interpersonal negotiation strategies in thought and action: a social-cognitive link to behavioral adjustment and social status Merill Palmer Quarterly 37 369–405

    Google Scholar 

  • K.O. Yeates R.L. Selman (1989) ArticleTitleSocial competence in schools: toward an integrative developmental model for intervention Developmental Review 9 64–100

    Google Scholar 

  • D.W. Zimmerman R.H. Williams (1998) ArticleTitleReliability of gain scores under realistic assumptions about properties of pre-test and post-test scores British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 51 343–351

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph Mischo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mischo, C. Promoting perspective coordination by dilemma discussion. The effectiveness of classroom group discussion on interpersonal negotiation strategies of 12-year-old students. Soc Psychol Educ 8, 41–63 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-004-1884-y

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-004-1884-y

Keywords

Navigation