Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A fuzzy AHP approach based on the concept of possibility extent

  • Published:
Quality & Quantity Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of this paper is to develop a fuzzy AHP method for tackling the uncertainty and imprecision existing in multi-criteria decision process. The proposed method uses fuzzy pair-wise comparison judgments in place of exact numerical values of the comparison ratios. The geometric mean technique is used to integrate all decision-makers’ opinions and construct the fuzzy positive reciprocal matrices. The algebraic operations of triangular fuzzy numbers are utilized to calculate the fuzzy suitability indices of all alternatives. The extent analysis method is used to compute the degree of possibility of priority among fuzzy suitability indices. Besides, two principles are presented to solve the multi-criteria decision problem in a fuzzy decision environment. Principle I provides a partial preorder, and Principle II gives a total preorder on the set of the possible alternatives. Finally, a numerical example of selecting the company with optimal performance in performing customer relationship management is used to demonstrate the decision process of proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aczel J., Saaty T.L.: Procedures for synthesizing ratio judgments. J. Math. Psychol. 27(1), 93–102 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arslan A.: A hybrid model of fuzzy and AHP for handling public assessments on transportation projects. Transportation 36(1), 97–112 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayağ Z.: A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment. IIE Trans. 37(9), 827–842 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayağ Z., Özdemir R.G.: A fuzzy AHP approach to evaluating machine tool alternatives. J. Intell. Manuf. 17(2), 179–190 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin O., Arslan G.: Optimal hospital location with fuzzy AHP. Bus. Rev. Cambr. 15(1), 262–268 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges P.C., Villavicencio A.: Avoiding academic and decorative planning in GHG emissions abatement studies with MCDA: the Peruvian case. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 152(3), 641–654 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bozdağ C.E., Kahraman C., Ruan D.: Fuzzy group decision making for selection among computer integrated manufacturing systems. Comput. Ind. 51, 13–29 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brans J.P., Vincke P.H.: A preference ranking organization method: (The PROMETHEE method for multiple criteria decision-making). Manag. Sci. 31(6), 647–656 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckinx W., Poel D.V.: Customer base analysis: partial defection of behaviourally loyal clients in a non-contractual FMCG retail setting. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 164(1), 252–268 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley J.J.: Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 17(3), 233–247 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan F.T.S., Kumar N.: Global supplier development considering risk factors using fuzzy extended AHP-based approach. Omega. Oxf. 35(4), 417–431 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang D.Y.: Application of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 95(3), 649–655 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen J.K., Chen I.S.: Improving the advantages of traditional manufacturing organizations in Taiwan based on vision using fuzzy AHP. Bus. Rev. Cambr. 10(1), 82–88 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubois D., Prade H.: Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic Press, New York (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ensslin L., Dutra A., Ensslin S.R.: MCDA: a constructivist approach to the management of human resources at a governmental agency. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 7(1), 79–100 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenton N., Neil M.: Making decisions: using Bayesian nets and MCDA. Knowl. Base. Syst. 14(7), 307–325 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guitouni A., Martel J.M.: Tentative guidelines to help choosing an appropriate MCDA method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 109(2), 501–521 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodgkin J., Belton V., Koulouri A.: Supporting the intelligent MCDA user: A case study in multi-person multi-criteria decision support. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 160(1), 172–189 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C., Kaya I.: A fuzzy multicriteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst. Appl. 37(9), 6270–6281 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C., Cebeci U., Ruan D.: Multi-attribute comparison of catering service companies using fuzzy AHP: The case of Turkey. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 87(2), 171–184 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C., Ertay T., Büyüközkan G.: A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171(2), 390–411 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannan G.: Fuzzy approach for the selection of third party reverse logistics provider. Asia Pac. J. Mark. Logist. 21(3), 397–416 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körner V., Zimmermann H.D.: Management of customer relationship in business media (MCR-BM). Electron. Mark. 10(3), 162–168 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo R.J., Chi S.C., Kao S.S.: A decision support system for selecting convenience store location through integration of fuzzy AHP and artificial neural network. Comput. Ind. 47(2), 199–214 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwong C.K., Bai H.: Determining the importance weights for the customer requirements in QFD using a fuzzy AHP with an extent analysis approach. IIE Trans. 35(7), 619–626 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee K.L., Huang W.C., Teng J.Y.: Locating the competitive relation of global logistics hub using quantitative SWOT analytical method. Qual Quant. 43, 87–107 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J., Chen S.: Evaluating the architectural design services by using Fuzzy AHP. Bus. Rev. Cambr. 13(2), 129–137 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Murtaza M.B.: Fuzzy-AHP application to country risk assessment. Am. Bus. Rev. 21(2), 109–116 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves L.P., Dias L.C., Antunes C.H., Martins A.G.: Structuring an MCDA model using SSM: A case study in energy efficiency. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 199(3), 834–845 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perçin S.: Use of fuzzy AHP for evaluating the benefits of information-sharing decisions in a supply chain. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 21(3), 263–284 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T.L.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill Companies Inc., New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sohn K.Y., Yang J.W., Kang C.S.: Assimilation of public opinions in nuclear decision-making using risk perception. Ann. Nucl. Energ. 28(6), 553–563 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srdjevic B., Medeiros Y.D.P.: Fuzzy AHP assessment of water management plans. Water Resour. Manag. 22(7), 877–894 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai H.Y., Chang C.W., Lin H.L.: Fuzzy hierarchy sensitive with Delphi method to evaluate hospital organization performance. Exp. Syst. Appl. 37(8), 5533–5541 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uppuluri V.R.R.: Logarithmic least-squares approach to Saaty’s decision problems. In: Lever, W.E., Shepherd, D.E., Ward, R.C., Wilson, D.G. (eds) Mathematics and Statistics Research Department Progress Report, pp. 19–21. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Uppuluri V.R.R.: Expert Opinion and Ranking Methods. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, NRC FIN No. B044, Oak Ridge (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • Weck M., Klocke F., Schell H., Rüenauver E.: Evaluating alternative production cycles using the extended fuzzy AHP method. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 100(2), 351–366 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control. 8(3), 338–353 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Part I, II and III. Inf. Sci. 8, 199–249, 301–357; 9, 43–80 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Shipping and Transportation Management, National Taiwan Ocean University, Keelung, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Chen-Hui Chou, Gin-Shuh Liang & Hung-Chung Chang

  2. Department of Shipping Business Management, Taipei College of Maritime Technology, Taipei, Taiwan, R.O.C.

    Chen-Hui Chou & Hung-Chung Chang

Authors
  1. Chen-Hui Chou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gin-Shuh Liang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hung-Chung Chang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gin-Shuh Liang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chou, CH., Liang, GS. & Chang, HC. A fuzzy AHP approach based on the concept of possibility extent. Qual Quant 47, 1–14 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9473-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9473-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation