Abstract
The U.S. Census Bureau designed the American Community Survey (ACS) to provide annual estimates of social and economic characteristics for states, counties, municipalities, census tracts, and block groups. Because of its April 1 reference date, in northern nonmetropolitan counties with substantial seasonal population fluctuations the decennial census provides a statistical representation of the demographic and social characteristics of the population at a time when the population is close to its annual minimum. The year-round monthly ACS sample survey has the potential to provide local communities with an unprecedented understanding of the average population characteristics over the course of a year. In the future, the ACS even has the potential for providing social and economic characteristics of the population by season. This paper examines four ACS pilot data collection counties, Oneida and Vilas Counties in northern Wisconsin, and Lake and Flathead Counties in northwest Montana. We hypothesize that the ACS will reflect a resident population over the course of the year that is different from the traditional April 1 decennial census population. While the ACS holds much promise, our research uncovered some sampling problems that are not yet fully resolved. In addition, our analysis was not able to examine ACS estimates for minor civil divisions (MCDs), which are functioning governmental units in many states. The fact that these MCDs often have very small populations, together with the fact that estimated standard errors at the much larger census tract level in these counties are disconcertingly large, raises (currently unanswerable) questions concerning the eventual statistical quality of ACS estimates for small MCDs. Consequently, the adequacy of the ACS as a replacement for the census long form may depend on the ability of the Census Bureau to effectively address the concerns presented in this analysis.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alexander, C. (2002). Still rolling: Leslie Kish’s “rolling samples” and the American Community Survey. Survey Methodology, 28(1), 35–41.
Bench, K. (2003). Census 2000 sample data and ACS 3-year averages quality measures comparison documentation. Planning, research, and evaluation division document. Washington DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
Berry, B. J. L., & Gillard, Q. (1977). The changing shape of metropolitan America: Commuting patterns, urban fields, and decentralization processes, 1960–1970. Cambridge MA: Ballinger.
Dahms, F. A., & McComb, J. (1999). ‘Counterurbanization,’ interaction and functional change in a rural amenity—a Canadian sample. Journal of Rural Studies, 15, 129–146.
Flathead County Planning and Zoning Office. (2002). About the Flathead Valley; last revised August 28, 2002. Available at: http://www.co.flathead.mt.us/frdo/bckgrd.html.
Frankel, M., & King, B. (1996). A conversation with Leslie Kish. Statistical Science, 11(1), 65–87.
Gallup, G. (1951). The Gallup Poll and the 1950 election. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(1), 16–22.
Gordon, R. A., & Chase-Lansdale, P. L. (2001). Availability of child care in the United States: A description and analysis of data sources. Demography, 38(2), 299–316.
Great Lakes Intertribal Council. (2003). Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa. Available at: http://glitc.bfm.org/tribes/lac_du_flambeau/default.php (September 15, 2003).
Hammer, R., Radeloff, V. C., Stewart, S., Winkler, R., & Voss, P. (2004). Characterizing spatial and temporal residential density patterns across the Midwest, 1940–1990. Landscape and Urban Planning, 69(2–3), 183–199.
Hammer, R., & Winkler, R. (2006). Housing affordability and population change in the North Woods of Minnesota, Wisconsin, and Michigan. In W. A. Kandel, & D. L. Brown (Eds.), Population change and rural society (pp. 293–309). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
Happel, S. K., & Hogan, T. D. (2002). Counting snowbirds: The importance of and the problems with estimating seasonal populations. Population Research and Policy Review, 21, 227–240.
Hauser, P. M. (1942). Proposed annual census of the population. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 37, 81–88.
Hough, G., & Swanson, D. (1998). Toward an assessment of continuous measurement: Comparison of returns with 1990 census returns for the Portland test site. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 24, 295–308.
Hubble, D. (2003). U.S. Census Bureau. E-mail clarifying ACS sampling plan, December 22, 2003.
Janofsky, M. (1999). Housing for poorer neighbors offends Vail’s rich. The New York Times (Late Edition). New York: September 5, 1999.
Johnson, K. (2003). Unpredictable directions of rural population growth and migration. In D. L. Brown, & L. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the 21st century. (pp. 19–31). University Park PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
Kish, L. (1990). Rolling samples and censuses. Survey Methodology, 16, 63–93.
Marx, L. (1964). The machine in the garden: Technology and the pastoral ideal in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
Salvo, J. J., & Lobo, A. P. (2002). The American Community Sfsurvey: Quality response by mode of data collection in the Bronx test site. Paper presented at the 2002 Joint Statistical Meetings of the American Statistical Association, New York NY.
Shields, M., Deller, S. C., & Stallman, J. I. (1998). The impact of retirees and working-age families on a small rural region: An application of the Wisconsin Economic Impact Modeling System, Faculty Paper Series, Faculty Paper 99-1. Prepared for presentation at the 45th North American Meetings of the Regional Science Association International, Santa Fe, NM, November 11–14.
Spar, E. The American Community Survey: Where it currently stands. Available at: http://members.aol.com/copafs/acs.htm (December 12, 2003).
State of Wisconsin Department of Workforce Development. (2003). Vilas County workforce profile; published October 2002 (revised 3/2003). Available at: http://www.dwd.state.wi.us/lmi/cp_pdf/v125cpw.pdf.
Swanson, D. (2004). Advancing methodological knowledge within state and local demography: A case study. Population Research and Policy Review, 23(4), 379–398.
U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2005). Summary File 3 Technical Documentation. Available at: http://www.census.gov/prod/cen2000/doc/sf3.pdf.
U.S. Census Bureau. (1996). CPS overview. Last revised May 9, 1996. Available at: http://www.bls.census.gov/cps/overmain.htm.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003a). 2000 U.S. Census of Population and Housing Summary File 1.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003b). Survey basics: What is the American Community Survey? Available at: http://www.census.gov/acs/www/SBasics/What/goals.htm (September 15, 2003).
U.S. Census Bureau. (2003c). 1990 Census Summary Tape File 3.
U.S. Congress. (2000). The American Community Survey—a replacement for the census long form? Hearing before the subcommittee on the census of the committee on government reform, house of representatives, 106th Congress, second session, July 20, 2000. Serial No. 106–246. Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Services [ERS]. (2004a). County typology codes. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/TypologyCodes/ (November 15, 2004).
U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Services [ERS]. (2004b). Measuring rurality: 2004 county typology codes. Page updated August 26, 2004. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/rurality/Typology/.
U.S. Department of Agriculture Economic Research Services [ERS]. (2004c). Measuring rurality: 1989 county typology codes. Page updated April 29, 2004. Available at: http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Rurality/Typology/Typology1989/.
U.S. General Accounting Office [GAO]. (2002). 2000 Census: Lessons learned for planning a more cost-effective 2010 census. Report to Congressional requesters, GAO-03-40, October 2002. Washington DC: General Accounting Office.
Williams, D., & Kaltenborn, B. (1998). Leisure places and modernity: The use and meaning of recreational cottages in Norway and the USA. In D. Crouch (Ed.), Leisure practices and geographic knowledge (pp. 214–230). London, England: Routledge.
Wirtz, R. A. (2002). More than just a pretty place? fedgazette. Minneapolis: Federal Reserve Bank of America. Available at: http://minneapolisfed.org/pubs/edgaz/02-11/rural.cfm.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the U.S. Census Bureau (Order YA1323-03-SE-0316) and by the U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service North Central Research Station (Research Joint Venture Agreement) Requisition/Reference No. 03-32136-0-0. An earlier version of the paper was presented at the 2004 annual meeting of the Population Association of America, Boston, MA; at the April 19, 2004 meeting of the National Research Council Panel on the Functionality and Usability of Data from the American Community Survey, and at the 2004 Annual Joint Statistical Meetings. This paper expresses the views of the authors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Van Auken, P.M., Hammer, R.B., Voss, P.R. et al. The American Community Survey in counties with “seasonal” populations. Popul Res Policy Rev 25, 275–292 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-0010-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-006-0010-6