Abstract
The paper explores the role of values in design decision-making through the eyes of key authors and a pilot study. ‘Knowing that’ and ‘knowing how’ in designing are reviewed and the problematic distinctions between ‘know how’; and skill noted. The effect of values on design decision-making is discussed and examples from the pilot study are presented together with a new categorisation strategy for values in design decision-making.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashby, M. & Johnson, K.: 2003, Materials and Design: The Art and Science of Material Selection in Product Design, Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford.
Author unknown: 2003, ‘Revealed: the hidden benefits of plastic bottle recyling’, in Recycling Plastics News, Spring 2003, Recoup, pp. 1-2.
J. Cagan C. M. Vogel (2002) Creating Breakthrough Products: Innovation from Product Planning to Program Approval Prentice Hall PTR Upper Saddle River, NJ
Centre for Alternative Technology, http://www.cat.org.ukaccessed 30/6/2003.
Cooper, T.: 2003,‘Durable consumption: reflections on product life cycles and the throwaway society’, in T. Cooper (ed.), Product Life and the Throwaway Society, Centre for Sustainable Consumption, Sheffield Hallam University.
Cross, N.: 1982, ‘Designerly ways of knowing’ in Design Studies, Vol. 3 No. 4 October, Butterworth and Co Ltd, pp. 221-227.
J. Daley (1982) Design creativity and the understanding of objects N. Cross (Eds) (1984) Developments in Design Methodology John Wiley and Sons Chichester 291–302
Dasgupta, S.: 1996, Technology and Creatavity, Oxford University Press, NewYork.
De Vries. M. J.: 2003, ‘The nature of technological knowledge: philosophical reflections and educational consequences’ in Patt-13: International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research, University of Glasgow, pp. 83-86.
Dorst, K.: 2003, ‘Exploring the structure of design problems’, in Research for practice: Innovation in Products Processes and Organisations, Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Engineering Design ICED, Stockhholm, August 19th-21st, 2003.
S. Goonatilake (1984) Aborted Discovery: Science and Creativity in the Third World Zed Books London
Heath, D.: 1995, ‘Recycling plastic and rubber’, in New Designer Vol. 1 Issue 1, pp. 28-30.
Hicks, G. et al.: 1982, Understanding Design and Technology, Assessment of Performance Unit.
ITDG, http://www.itdg.org/html/education/sda.htm, accessed 30/06/2003.
Keirl, S. and Mclaren, S.: 2003, ‘Values in Design and Technology curriculum – a comparative analysis of two curricula, in J. Dakers and M. J. de Vries (eds), Patt-13: International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research 2003, University of Glasgow, pp. 165–169.
Layton, D.: 1992, Values and Design and Technology – Design Curriculum Matters: 2, Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University of Technology.
Layton, D.: 1993, ‘Science education and praxis: the relationship of school science to practical action’ in R. McKormick, C. Newey & J. Sparkes (eds), Technology for Technology Education, The Open University, Milton Keynes, pp. 11–23.
Loughborough University, http://www.lboro.ac.uk, accessed 30/6/2003.
Martin, M.: 2003 ‘Significance of sustainability issues for design and technology education: rhetoric, reality and resources’, in J. Dakers & M. J. de Vries (eds), Patt-13: International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research 2003, University of Glasgow, pp. 165–169
Middleton, H.: 2003, ‘Some new ideas on new ideas: Creative, inventive thinking, values and Design and Technology Education’, in J. Dakers & M. J. de Vries (eds), Patt-13: International Conference on Design and Technology Education Research 2003, University of Glasgow, pp. 165–169.
J. Naughton D. Walker (1982) Design method and scientific method R. Jaques J. Powell (Eds) Design: Science: Method Westbury House Gilford.
Norman, E.: 1998, ‘The nature of technology for design’, International Journal of Technology and Design Education 8, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands, pp. 67–87.
Oxberry E (1995) ‘Problems with waste’, in New Designer Vol. 1 Issue 1, pp. 28–30.
Pedgley, O. F.: 1999, PhD thesis, Industrial Designers Attention to Materials and Manufacturing Processes: Analyses at Macroscopic and Microscopic Level, Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
Polanyi, M.: 1962, ‘Tacit knowing: Its bearing on some problems of philosophy’ in Reviews of modern Physics, Vol. 34 No. 4, pp. 601–616.
Recoup, http://www.recoup.org.uk, accessed 30/06/2003.
P. Roberts (1993) The Royal College of Art Schools Technology Project, Project Paper – The Purposes of Design and Technology in Education Royal College of Art London
Roberts, P., Archer, B. & Baynes, K.: 1992, Modelling: The Language of Designing – Design: Occasional Paper No. 1, Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University of Technology.
Rodgers, P. A. & Clarkson, P. J.: 1998, ‘Knowledge usage in new product development (NPD)’ in IDATER98, Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University, pp. 252–259.
Ryle, G.: 1948, The Concept of Mind, Hutchinson, London.
Shrum, L.J. & McCarty, J.A.: 1997, ‘Issues involving the relationship between personal values and consumer behaviour: theory, methedology, and application,’ in L. Kahle & L. Chiagouris (eds.), Values Lifestyles and Psychrographics, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, New Jersey.
Smile Plastics, http://www.smile-plastics.co.uk, accessed 30/06/2003.
W. G. Vincenti (1990) What Engineers Know and How they Know it John Hopkins University Press Baltimore and London
Yemhart Plastics, http://www.yemhart.com, accessed 30/06/2003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coles, R., Norman, E. An Exploration of the Role Values Plays in Design Decision-Making. Int J Technol Des Educ 15, 155–171 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-8274-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-005-8274-4