Abstract
This study aimed to investigate how the community-based socioscientific issues program (SSI-COMM) affected middle school students’ sense of place (SOP) and character development as citizens. We designed and implemented SSI-COMM on fine dust, abandoned pets, and recycling issues that were closely related to the students’ local communities. SSI-COMM consisted of four phases, and in each phase, students engaged in various activities both within and outside of school. A total of 441 seventh graders participated in SSI-COMM over 8 weeks. Two questionnaires were used to measure the changes in students’ SOP and character development (CVGCA) through SSI-COMM. Paired t test was used to compare the effects of SSI-COMM on SOP and CVGCA. In addition, hierarchical cluster analysis was conducted to identify and describe the students who showed similar patterns based on score changes in SOP and CVGCA and to create student profiles to investigate how to appropriately target those students to develop their SOP and CVGCA. The results indicated that students’ SOP and CVGCA scores improved after the students participated in SSI-COMM. In detail, a 6-cluster option was determined to provide the best representation of the data measured before and after intervention (groups A to F). Although there were some differences in the pattern of score change among groups, four groups out of six groups (groups A, B, C, and D; about 69%) showed a positive change after implementing SSI-COMM. SOP scores were found to be statistically significant in all groups except group E, and CVGCA scores were statistically significant only in groups A, B, and C.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Altman, I., & Low, S. (1992). Place attachment. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
Ardoin, N. M. (2006). Toward an interdisciplinary understanding of place: Lessons for environmental education. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 11(1), 112–126.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (Vol. 17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Bencze, L. (2017). Science and technology education promoting wellbeing for individuals, societies and environments: STEPWISE. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Billig, S. (2000). Research on K-12 school-based service-learning: The evidence builds. Phi Delta Kappan, 81, 658–664.
Birmingham, D., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2014). Putting on a green carnival: Youth taking educated action on socioscientific issues. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 51(3), 286–314.
Bouillion, L. M., & Gomez, L. M. (2001). Connecting school and community with science learning: Real world problems and school-community partnerships as contextual scaffolds. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(8), 878–898.
Bowen, G. M., & Roth, W. M. (2007). The practice of field ecology: Insights for science education. Science Education, 37(2), 171–187.
Calabrese Barton, A. C., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.
Catalano, R. F., Oesterle, S., Fleming, C. B., & Hawkins, D. (2004). The importance of bonding to school for healthy development: Findings from the social development research group. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 252–261.
Chang, H., & Lee, H. (2010). College students’ decision-making tendencies in the context of socioscientific issues (SSI). Journal of Korean Association in Science Education, 30(7), 887–900.
Cheng, J. C. H., & Monroe, M. C. (2010). Examining teachers’ attitudes toward a required environmental education program. Applied Environmental Education and Communication, 9(1), 28–37.
Choi, K., Lee, H., Shin, N., Kim, S., & Krajcik, J. (2011). Re-conceptualization of scientific literacy in South Korea for the 21st century. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(6), 670–697.
Cobb, P., & Bowers, J. (1999). Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, 28(2), 4–15.
Connell, S., Fien, J., Lee, J., Sykes, H., & Yencken, D. (1999). If it doesn’t directly affect you, you don’t think about it’: A qualitative study of young people’s environmental attitudes in two Australian cities. Environmental Education Research, 5(1), 96–113.
DeBoer, G. E. (2000). Scientific literacy: Another look at its historical and contemporary meanings and its relationship to science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(6), 582–601.
Elmose, S., & Roth, W. M. (2005). Allgemeinbildung: Readiness for living in risk society. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(1), 11–34.
Fensham, P. J. (2002). Time to change drivers for scientific literacy. Canadian Journal of Math, Science & Technology Education, 2(1), 9–24.
Herman, B. C., Olson, J. K., Holtz, J. D., & Colbert, J. T. (2013). The relationship between environmental free-choice learning and students’ learning, attitudes, and policy views about waterways. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(6), 1327–1350.
Hodson, D. (2003). Time for action: Science education for an alternative future. International Journal of Science Education, 25(6), 645–670.
Hulleman, C. S., Godes, O., Hendricks, B. L., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). Enhancing interest and performance with a utility value intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 880–895.
Hurd, P. D. (1998). Scientific literacy: New minds for a changing world. Science Education, 82(3), 407–416.
Jorgensen, B. S., & Stedman, R. C. (2001). Sense of place as an attitude: Lakeshore owners attitudes toward their properties. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, 233–248.
Kim, M., & Yoon, O. (2013). Development and application of a sense of place test instrument: A case study of gender differences of elementary students. Journal of Geographic and Environmental Education, 21(2), 17–28.
Knapp, C. E. (2008). Place-based curricular and pedagogical models: My adventures in teaching through community contexts. In D. Gruenewald & G. Smith (Eds.), Place-based education in the global age: Local diversity (pp. 5–28). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Laugksch, R. C. (2000). Scientific literacy: A conceptual overview. Science Education, 84(1), 71–94.
Lee, S., & Roth, M. W. (2003). Science and the “good citizen”: Community-based scientific literacy. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 28(3), 403–424.
Lee, H., Yoo, J., Choi, S., Kim, S., Krajcik, S., Herman, B., & Zeidler, D. (2013). Socioscientific issues as a vehicle for promoting character and values for global citizens. International Journal of Science Education, 35(12), 2079–2113.
Lim, M., & Calabrese Barton, A. (2010). Exploring insideness in urban children’s sense of place. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(3), 328–337.
Lubke, G. H., & Muthén, B. O. (2004). Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Structural Equation Modeling, 11(4), 514–534.
Morgan, A. (2011). Place-based education versus geography education? In G. Butt (Ed.), Geography, education and the future (pp. 84–108). New York, NY: Continuum International Publishing Group.
Powers, A. L. (2004). An evaluation of four place-based education programs. Reports & Research, 35(4), 17–32.
Proshansky, H. M. (1978). The city and self-identity. Environment & Behavior, 10, 147–169.
Roth, W. M. (2003). Scientific literacy as an emergent feature of collective human praxis. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 35(1), 9–23.
Roth, W. M., & Lee, S. (2004). Science education as/for participation in the community. Science Education, 88(2), 263–294.
Semken, S., & Freeman, B. C. (2008). Sense of place in the practice and assessment of place-based science teaching. Science Education, 92, 1042–1057.
Semken, S., Freeman, B. C., & Watts, N. B. (2009). Factors that influence sense of place as a learning outcome and assessment measure of place-based geoscience teaching. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 13(2), 136–158.
Shamai, S. (1991). Sense of place: An empirical measurement. Geoforum, 22(3), 347–358.
Smith, G. A. (2002). Place-based education. Phi Delta Kappan, 83(8), 584–594.
Sperling, E., & Bencze, J. L. (2010). ‘More than particle theory’: Citizenship through school science. Canadian Journal of Science, Mathematics and Technology Education, 10(3), 255–266.
Stevenson, K. T., Peterson, M. N., Carrier, S. J., Strnad, R. L., Bondell, H. D., Kirby-Hathaway, T., & Moore, S. E. (2014). Role of significant life experiences in building environmental knowledge and behavior among middle school students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 45(3), 163–177.
Tal, T., & Abramovitch, A. (2013). Activity and action: Bridging environmental sciences and environmental education. Research in Science Education, 43(4), 1665–1687.
Theobald, P., & Curtiss, J. (2000). Communities as curricula. Forum for Applied Research and Public Policy, 15(1), 106–111.
Tytler, R., Symington, D., & Clark, J. C. (2017). Community-school collaborations in science: Towards improved outcomes through better understanding of boundary issues. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 15(4), 643–661.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Williams, D. R., & Patterson, M. E. (1999). Environmental psychology: Mapping landscape meanings for ecosystem management. In H. K. Cordell & J. C. Bergstrom (Eds.), Integrating social sciences and ecosystem management: Human dimensions in assessment, policy and management (pp. 141–160). Champaign, IL: Sagamore Press.
Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: Validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science, 49, 830–840.
Williams, D. R., Patterson, M. E., Roggenbuck, J. W., & Watson, A. E. (1992). Beyond the commodity metaphor: Examining emotional and symbolic attachment to place. Leisure Sciences, 14, 29–46.
Zeidler, D. L., Sadler, T. D., Simmons, M. L., & Howes, E. V. (2005). Beyond STS: A research-based framework for socioscientific issues education. Science Education, 89(3), 357–377.
Zeidler, D. L., Berkowitz, M., & Bennett, K. (2014). Thinking (scientifically) responsibly: The cultivation of character in a global science education community. In M. P. Mueller, D. J. Tippins, & A. J. Steward (Eds.), Assessing schools for generation R (responsibility): A guide to legislation and school policy in science education (pp. 83–99). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic Supplementary Material
ESM 1
(DOCX 17 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, G., Ko, Y. & Lee, H. The Effects of Community-Based Socioscientific Issues Program (SSI-COMM) on Promoting Students’ Sense of Place and Character as Citizens. Int J of Sci and Math Educ 18, 399–418 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09976-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-019-09976-1