Abstract
Growing research interest in asexuality has led to several notable findings around the differences between asexual people and those with other sexual orientations. These findings have recently extended to personality, but questions remain around differences in personality between asexual people and others. Furthermore, qualitative and quantitative research disagrees about whether asexual people are less interested in close relationships than others. This paper used data from a nationally representative sample of self-identified asexual participants (Analysis 1: nwomen = 216, nmen = 54, ngender diverse = 13; Analysis 2: nwomen = 53, nmen = 19, ngender diverse = 3) and matched samples of heterosexual and lesbian, gay, and bisexual/plurisexual (LGB) participants (N’s = 75–283) drawn from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (Ns = 19,396–54,183) to explore personality (Analysis 1) and approach and avoidance social motivations (Analysis 2). Compared to heterosexuals, asexual participants reported significantly lower extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness, and higher emotionality, openness, and honesty-humility. Compared to those who identified as LGB, asexual participants reported significantly lower extraversion and agreeableness and higher honesty-humility. In addition, asexual participants scored significantly lower on approach (but not avoidance) social motivation than both heterosexual and LGB participants, indicating that they are less motivated to enhance positive experiences and behavior in their social relationships. These results help to clarify how personality and social motivations covary with sexual identity.
Similar content being viewed by others
Code Availability
Mplus syntax for the models reported here will be posted publicly on the NZAVS website upon acceptance of this article. Syntax is also available upon request for reviewing purposes. www.psych.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/NZAVS
Data Availability
As per the NZAVS data access statement, a copy of the anonymous data reported in each NZAVS publication is available CS upon request from appropriately qualified researchers. Such data will be provided with the explicit understanding that it is used solely for the purposes of replicating or otherwise checking the validity of analyses reported in scientific papers analyzing NZAVS data.
References
Aicken, C. R., Mercer, C. H., & Cassell, J. A. (2013). Who reports absence of sexual attraction in Britain? Evidence from national probability surveys. Psychology & Sexuality, 4(2), 121–135.
Allen, M. S., & Robson, D. A. (2020). Personality and sexual orientation: New data and meta-analysis. Journal of Sex Research, 57(8), 953–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2020.1768204
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2007). Empirical, theoretical, and practical advantages of the HEXACO model of personality structure. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 150–166. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868306294907
Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2009). The HEXACO–60: A short measure of the major dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 91(4), 340–345.
Atkinson, J., Salmond, C. E., & Crampton, P. (2014). NZDep2013 index of deprivation. Wellington, New Zealand: Department of Public Health, University of Otago. Retrieved from http://www.otago.ac.nz/wellington/otago069936.pdf
Bogaert, A. F. (2004). Asexuality: Prevalence and associated factors in a national probability sample. Journal of Sex Research, 41(3), 279–287.
Bogaert, A. F. (2006). Toward a conceptual understanding of asexuality. Review of General Psychology, 10(3), 241–250.
Bogaert, A. F. (2012). Understanding asexuality. Rowman & Littlefield.
Bogaert, A. F. (2013). The demography of asexuality. In A. K. Baumle (Ed.), International handbook on the demography of sexuality (pp. 275–288). Springer.
Bogaert, A. F. (2015). Asexuality: What it is and why it matters. Journal of Sex Research, 52(4), 362–379.
Bogaert, A. F., Ashton, M. C., & Lee, K. (2018). Personality and sexual orientation: Exstension to asexuality and the HEXACO model. Journal of Sex Research, 55(8), 951–961.
Brotto, L. A., Knudson, G., Inskip, J., Rhodes, K., & Erskine, Y. (2010). Asexuality: A mixed-methods approach. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(3), 599–618.
Brotto, L. A., & Yule, M. A. (2011). Physiological and subjective sexual arousal in self-identified asexual women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(4), 699–712.
Brotto, L. A., & Yule, M. (2016). Asexuality: Sexual orientation, paraphilia, sexual dysfunction, or none of the above? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(3), 619–627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0802-7
Campbell, W. K., Bonacci, A. M., Shelton, J., Exline, J. J., & Bushman, B. J. (2004). Psychological entitlement: Interpersonal consequences and validation of a self-report measure. Journal of Personality Assessment, 83(1), 29–45.
Carrigan, M. (2011). There’s more to life than sex? Difference and commonality within the asexual community. Sexualities, 14, 462–478.
Chou, K. L., Ng, I. S., & Yu, K. M. (2014). Lifetime abstention of sexual intercourse and health in middle-aged and older adults: Results from wave 2 of the National Epidemiologic survey on alcohol and related conditions. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43(5), 891–900.
Dawson, M., McDonnell, L., & Scott, S. (2016). Negotiating the boundaries of intimacy: The personal lives of asexual people. Sociological Review, 64(2), 349–365.
Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas, R. E. (2006). The mini-IPIP scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality. Psychological Assessment, 18(2), 192–203.
Eisinga, R., te Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58(4), 637–642.
Elliot, A. J., Gable, S. L., & Mapes, R. R. (2006). Approach and avoidance motivation in the social domain. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32(3), 378–391.
Fraser, G., Bulbulia, J., Greaves, L. M., Wilson, M. S., & Sibley, C. G. (2019). Coding responses to an open-ended gender measure in a New Zealand national sample. Journal of Sex Research, 57(8), 979–986.
Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.
Greaves, L. M., Barlow, F. K., Huang, Y., Stronge, S., Fraser, G., & Sibley, C. G. (2017a). Asexual identity in a New Zealand national sample: Demographics, well-being, and health. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(8), 2417–2427.
Greaves, L. M., Barlow, F. K., Huang, Y., Stronge, S., & Sibley, C. G. (2017b). Personality across sexual identity and gender in a national probability sample in New Zealand. Sex Roles, 77(9–10), 653–662.
Greaves, L. M., Barlow, F. K., Lee, C., Matika, C., Wang, W., Lindsay, C., Case, C. J. B., Sengupta, N. K., Huang, Y., Cowie, L. J., Stronge, S., Storey, M., De Souza, L., Manuela, S., Hammond, M. D., Milojev, P., Townrow, C. S., Muriwai, E., Satherley, N., … Sibley, C. G. (2017c). The diversity and prevalence of sexual orientation self-labels in a New Zealand national sample. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 46(5), 1325–1336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-016-0857-5
Ho, D. E., Imai, K., King, G., & Stuart, E. A. (2011). MatchIt: Nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. Journal of Statistical Software, 42(8), 6–14.
Lippa, R. A. (2005). Sexual orientation and personality. Annual Review of Sex Research, 16(1), 119–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/10532528.2005.10559831
Lippa, R. A. (2008). Sex differences and sexual orientation differences in personality: Findings from the BBC internet survey. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(1), 173–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9267-z
Lippa, R. A. (2020). Interest, personality, and sexual traits that distinguish heterosexual, bisexual, and homosexual individuals: Are there two dimensions that underlie variations in sexual orientation? Archives of Sexual Behavior, 49(2), 607–622.
MacInnis, C. C., & Hodson, G. (2012). Intergroup bias toward “Group X”: Evidence of prejudice, dehumanization, avoidance, and discrimination against asexuals. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(6), 725–743.
McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1997). Personality trait structure as a human universal. American Psychologist, 52(5), 509–516. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.52.5.509
Poston, D. L., & Baumle, A. K. (2010). Patterns of asexuality in the United States. Demographic Research, 23, 509–530.
Prause, N., & Graham, C. A. (2007). Asexuality: Classification and characterization. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36(3), 341–356.
Scott, S., & Dawson, M. (2015). Rethinking asexuality: A symbolic interactionist account. Sexualities, 18(1–2), 3–19.
Sibley, C. G., Luyten, N., Purnomo, M., Mobberley, A., Wootton, L. W., Hammond, M. D., Sengupta, N., Perry, R., West-Newman, T., Wilson, M. S., McLellan, L., Hoverd, W. J., & Robertson, A. (2011). The Mini-IPIP6: Validation and extension of a short measure of the Big-Six factors of personality in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Psychology, 40(3), 142–159.
Sibley, C. G. (2018). Sampling procedure and sample details for the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Study (NZAVS Technical Documents, e01). Retrieved from https://cdn.auckland.ac.nz/assets/psych/about/our-research/nzavs/NZAVSTechnicalDocuments/NZAVS-Technical-Documents-e01-Sampling-Procedure-and-Sample-Details.pdf
Smith, A., Rissel, C., Richters, J., Grulich, A., & de Visser, R. (2003). Sex in Australia: Sexual identity, sexual attraction and sexual experience among a representative sample of adults. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health, 27(2), 138–145.
Statistics New Zealand. (2016). Qualifications. Retrieved from http://www.stats.govt.nz/methods/classifications-and-standards/classification-related-stats-standards/qualifications/classification-and-coding-process.aspx
Statistics New Zealand. (2020). Ethnicity. Retrieved from https://www.stats.govt.nz/topics/ethnicity
Yule, M. A., Brotto, L. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2013). Mental health and interpersonal functioning in self-identified asexual men and women. Psychology & Sexuality, 4(2), 136–151.
Yule, M. A., Brotto, L. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2014). Biological markers of asexuality: Handedness, birth order, and finger length ratios in self-identified asexual men and women. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 43, 299–310.
Yule, M. A., Brotto, L. A., & Gorzalka, B. B. (2015). A validated measure of no sexual attraction: The Asexuality Identification Scale. Psychological Assessment, 27(1), 148–160.
Zheng, L., Lippa, R. A., & Zheng, Y. (2011). Sex and sexual orientation differences in personality in China. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 40(3), 533–541. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-010-9700-6
Acknowledgments
Samantha Stronge and Lara M. Greaves contributed equally to this manuscript.
Funding
Data collection for the NZAVS was supported by a grant from the Templeton Religion Trust (TRT096). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
Ethics approval for the NZAVS was attained from the University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee (014889), and all relevant ethical regulations were complied with.
Informed Consent
Informed consent was obtained from all participants for each wave of the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Greaves, L.M., Stronge, S., Sibley, C.G. et al. Asexual Identity, Personality, and Social Motivations in a New Zealand National Sample. Arch Sex Behav 50, 3843–3852 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02038-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-02038-0