Skip to main content
Log in

Colposcopic analysis of cervical lesions using popular scoring systems: Reid versus Swede

  • General Gynecology
  • Published:
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To assess the effectiveness of colposcopy in detecting cervical lesions and to grade them according to Reid score and Swede score, and compare it with histopathology results.

Methods

This study was conducted on 130 patients in a tertiary care centre, who were subjected to pap smear and colposcopy. The cervical lesions were graded according to Reid score and Swede score, and a biopsy was obtained from the lesion. Histopathology results were correlated with colposcopy findings, and the scores were compared.

Results

The colposcopic findings using Reid score and Swede score correlated with histopathology results in the study population. The association between colposcopic impression and histopathology result was highly significant (p < 0.001), using both Reid score and Swede score. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of Reid score (overall) was 86.2%, 80.20%, 55.56% and 95.3%, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy was 81.54%. At score > 5, specificity increased to 99% and diagnostic accuracy was 92.31%. The overall sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy of Swede score was 89.7%, 49.5%, 33.8%, 94.3% and 48.46%, respectively. As the cut off value increased, the sensitivity decreased. But the specificity, PPV, NPV and diagnostic accuracy increased and was statistically significant. The specificity and PPV was 100% at score > 8.

Conclusion

As the cut off value increased, the diagnostic accuracy of both the Scores increased, and was more accurate in detecting high-grade lesions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organisation (2018) Cervical Cancer estimated incidence, Mortality and Prevalence Worldwide in 2018: Globocan 2018 (IARC)

  2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL et al (2015) Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 65:87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jacqueline MM, Elizabeth AVD, Mona S et al (2021) Assessing Impact of HPV vaccination on Cervical Cancer Incidence among women Aged 15–29 years in the United States, 1999–2017: an Etiologic Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 30:30–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Reid R, Scalzi P (1985) Genital warts and cervical cancer VII. An improved colposcopic index for differentiating benign papilloma viral infections from high grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Am J Obstet Gynecol 153(6):611–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Strander B, Ellstrom-Anderson A, Franzen S, Milson I, Radberg T (2005) The performance of a new scoring system for Colposcopy in detecting high grade dysplasia in the uterine cervix .(abstract). Acta Obstetric Gynaecol Scand 84:1013–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kamberg C, Ryed W, Strander B, Branstrom M, Radberg T (2010) Application of Colposcopic system (Swede score) in pregnant women diagnosed with atypical cytology (abstract). In: Abstract book of the 5th European congress of the European Federation for Colcoscopy and cervical pathology; May 27–29, 2010, Berlin, p 22

  7. Shojaei H, Yarandi F, Ghizati L, Yarandi N, Mood NI, Eftetkhar Z (2013) Acceptable predictive accuracy of histopathology result by Colposcopy done by gynaecology Residents using Reid index. Arch gynaecol Obstet 287:345–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Quaas J, Reich O, Frey Tirri B et al (2013) Explanation and Use of the Colposcopy Terminology of the IFCPC (International Federation for Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy) Rio 2011. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 73:904–907

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Durdi GS, Sherigar BY, Dalal AM, Desai BR, Malur PR (2009) correlation of colposcopy using Reid colposcopic index with histopathology—a prospective study. J Turk Gynecol Assoc 10(4):205–207

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ranga R, Rai S, Kumari A, Mathur S, Kriplani A (2017) A comparison of the strength of Association of Reid Colposcopic Index and Swede score with Cervical Histology. J Low Genit Tract Dis 21(1):55–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bowring J, Strander B, Young M, Evans H, Walker PG (2010) The Swede score: a scoring system designed to improve predictive value of colposcopy. J Low Genit Tract Dis 14(4):301–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nessa A, Wistrand C, Begum SA, Thuresson M, Shemer I, Thorell M (2014) Evaluation of stationary colposcope and the Gynocular, by the Swede score systematic colposcopic system in VIA positive women:a crossover randomized trial. Int J Gynecol Cancer 24(2):339–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Warner KH, Numnum TM (2005) A Prospective Blinded Evaluation of the Reid Colposcopic Index for Grading the Severity of Cervical Dysplasia. University of Alabama at Birminham, UAB Medicine School, Ob/Gyn Department

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sankarnarayan R, Rajkumar R, Frappert L, Thara S, Cherian J, Shanthakumary S (2007) Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of ‘see and treat’ with cryotherapy by nurses in a cervical screening study in India. Br J Cancer 96:738–743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li ZG, de Quian Y, Cen JM, Chan GD, Shu YH (2009) Three step versus ‘see and treat’ approach in women with high grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in a low resource country. Int J Gynecol Obstet 106:202–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was funded by Father Mullers Research Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS: protocol development, data collection, data analysis, manuscript writing, Manuscript editing. DK V:protocol development, data analysis, manuscript editing. PD: manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ayshath Safoorah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

Approval was obtained from the ethics committee of Father Muller Research Centre. The procedures used in this study adhere to the tenets of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Consent to participate

Written informed consent was taken from all the individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safoorah, A., Kanagal, D. & D’Cunha, P. Colposcopic analysis of cervical lesions using popular scoring systems: Reid versus Swede. Arch Gynecol Obstet 304, 1253–1258 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06184-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-021-06184-7

Keywords

Navigation