Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Current perioperative practice in rectal surgery in Austria and Germany

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Colorectal Disease Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

‘Fast-track’ rehabilitation is able to accelerate recovery, reduce general morbidity, and decrease hospital stay. This is widely accepted for colonic resections. Despite recent evidence that fast track concepts are safe and feasible in rectal resection, there is no information on the acceptance and utilization of these concepts among Austrian and German surgeons.

Method

A questionnaire concerning perioperative routines in elective, open rectal resection was sent to the chief surgeons of 1,270 German and 120 Austrian surgical centers.

Results

The response rate was 63% in Austria (76 centers) and 30% in Germany (385 centers). Mechanical bowel preparation is only abandoned by 2% of the Germany and 7% of the Austrian surgeons. Nasogastric decompression tubes are rarely used; four of five of the questioned surgeons in both countries use intra-abdominal drains. Half of the surgical centers allow the intake of clear fluids on the day of surgery. Mobilization starts in half of the centers on the day of surgery. Epidural analgesia is used in three-fourths of the institutions. Institutions which have implemented fast track rehabilitation for rectal resections discharge the patients earlier then hospitals that adhere to traditional care.

Conclusion

In many perioperative procedures, Austrian and German Surgeons rely on their traditional approaches. Recent evidence-based adaptations of perioperative routines in rectal resections are only slowly introduced into daily routine; therefore, further efforts have to be done to optimizing patients’ care.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson AD, Mcnaught CE, Macfie J et al (2003) Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. Br J Surg 90:1497–1504

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anthuber M, Fuerst A, Elser F et al (2003) Outcome of laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer in 101 patients. Dis Colon Rectum 46:1047–1053

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Kehlet H (2000) Rapid rehabilitation in elderly patients after laparoscopic colonic resection. Br J Surg 87:1540–1545

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Basse L, Hjort Jakobsen D, Billesbolle P et al (2000) A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Ann Surg 232:51–57

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Basse L, Jacobsen DH, Billesbolle P et al (2002) Colostomy closure after Hartmann’s procedure with fast track rehabilitation. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1661–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Brady M, Kinn S, Stuart P (2003) Preoperative fasting for adults to prevent perioperative complications. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online):CD004423

  7. Breuer JP, Bosse G, Seifert S et al (2009) Pre-operative fasting: a nationwide survey of German anaesthesia departments. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand (in press)

  8. Cheadle WG, Vitale GC, Mackie CR et al (1985) Prophylactic postoperative nasogastric decompression. A prospective study of its requirement and the influence of cimetidine in 200 patients. Ann Surg 202:361–366

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ et al (2001) 'Fast track' postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 88:1533–1538

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Dowdall JF, Maguire D, Mcanena OJ (2002) Experience of surgery for rectal cancer with total mesorectal excision in a general surgical practice. Br J Surg 89:1014–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M et al (2005) Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr 24:466–477

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Gendall KA, Kennedy RR, Watson AJ et al (2007) The effect of epidural analgesia on postoperative outcome after colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis 9:584–598, discussion 598-600

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A et al (2009) Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis 24:1119–1131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Guenaga KK, Matos D, Wille-Jorgensen P (2009) Mechanical bowel preparation for elective colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (Online):CD001544

  15. Hannemann P, Lassen K, Hausel J et al (2006) Patterns in current anaesthesiological peri-operative practice for colonic resections: a survey in five Northern European countries. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 50:1152–1160

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hasenberg T, Keese M, Langle F et al (2009) 'Fast-track' colonic surgery in Austria and Germany—results from the survey on patterns in current perioperative practice. Colorectal Dis 11:162–167

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Henriksen MG, Jensen MB, Hansen HV et al (2002) Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition 18:147–152

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Huser N, Michalski CW, Erkan M et al (2008) Systematic review and meta-analysis of the role of defunctioning stoma in low rectal cancer surgery. Ann Surg 248:52–60

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Jottard K, Hoff C, Maessen J et al (2009) Life and death of the nasogastric tube in elective colonic surgery in the Netherlands. Clin Nutr 28:26–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Karliczek A, Jesus EC, Matos D et al (2006) Drainage or nondrainage in elective colorectal anastomosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 8:259–265

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kehlet H, Buchler MW, Rw B, Beart RW Jr et al (2006) Care after colonic operation54is it evidence-based? Results from a multinational survey in Europe and the United States. J Am Coll Surg 202:45–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2008) Evidence-based surgical care and the evolution of fast-track surgery. Ann Surg 248:189–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kehlet H, Wilmore DW (2002) Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. Am J Surg 183:630–641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Khoo CK, Vickery CJ, Forsyth N et al (2007) A prospective randomized controlled trial of multimodal perioperative management protocol in patients undergoing elective colorectal resection for cancer. Ann Surg 245:867–872

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lassen K, Hannemann P, Ljungqvist O et al (2005) Patterns in current perioperative practice: survey of colorectal surgeons in five Northern European countries. Bmj 330:1420–1421

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lewis SJ, Andersen HK, Thomas S (2009) Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of intestinal surgery versus later commencement of feeding: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 13:569–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Lindsetmo RO, Champagne B, Delaney CP (2009) Laparoscopic rectal resections and fast-track surgery: what can be expected? Am J Surg 197:408–412

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Maessen J, Dejong CH, Hausel J et al (2007) A protocol is not enough to implement an enhanced recovery programme for colorectal resection. Br J Surg 94:224–231

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Marret E, Remy C, Bonnet F (2007) Meta-analysis of epidural analgesia versus parenteral opioid analgesia after colorectal surgery. Br J Surg 94:665–673

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Martling AL, Holm T, Rutqvist LE et al (2000) Effect of a surgical training programme on outcome of rectal cancer in the County of Stockholm. Stockholm Colorectal Cancer Study Group, Basingstoke Bowel Cancer Research Project. Lancet 356:93–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marusch F, Koch A, Schmidt U et al (2002) Early postoperative results of surgery for rectal carcinoma as a function of the distance of the tumor from the anal verge: results of a multicenter prospective evaluation. Langenbeck's archives of surgery/Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie 387:94–100

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Muller ML, Forschner A, Luger LA et al (2007) G-DRG version 2007: a short overview. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 5:778–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Muller S, Zalunardo MP, Hubner M et al (2009) A fast-track program reduces complications and length of hospital stay after open colonic surgery. Gastroenterology 136:842–847

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B (2007) Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. Cochrane database of systematic reviews (Online):CD004929

  35. Nygren J, Thorell A, Ljungqvist O (2007) Are there any benefits from minimizing fasting and optimization of nutrition and fluid management for patients undergoing day surgery? Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 20:540–544

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Peeters KC, Tollenaar RA, Marijnen CA et al (2005) Risk factors for anastomotic failure after total mesorectal excision of rectal cancer. Br J Surg 92:211–216

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Popping DM, Elia N, Marret E et al (2008) Protective effects of epidural analgesia on pulmonary complications after abdominal and thoracic surgery: a meta-analysis. Arch Surg 143:990–999, discussion 1000

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Roig JV, Garcia-Fadrique A, Redondo C et al (2009) Perioperative care in colorectal surgery: current practice patterns and opinions. Colorectal Dis 11:976–983

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sauer R, Becker H, Hohenberger W et al (2004) Preoperative versus postoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer. N Engl J Med 351:1731–1740

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Schwandner O, Schiedeck TH, Killaitis C et al (1999) A case-control-study comparing laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectosigmoidal and rectal cancer. Int J Colorectal Dis 14:158–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Raue W et al (2006) "Fast-track" rehabilitation after rectal cancer resection. Int J Colorectal Dis 21:547–553

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Schwenk W, Raue W, Haase O et al (2004) "Fast-track" colonic surgery-first experience with a clinical procedure for accelerating postoperative recovery. Chirurg 75:508–514

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Senagore AJ, Duepree HJ, Delaney CP et al (2003) Results of a standardized technique and postoperative care plan for laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: a 30-month experience. Dis Colon Rectum 46:503–509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Slim K, Vicaut E, Launay-Savary MV et al (2009) Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials on the role of mechanical bowel preparation before colorectal surgery. Ann Surg 249:203–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Soreide E, Ljungqvist O (2006) Modern preoperative fasting guidelines: a summary of the present recommendations and remaining questions. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol 20:483–491

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Spatz H, Zulke C, Beham A et al (2006) "Fast-Track" for laparoscopic-assisted rectum resection—what can be achieved? First results of a feasibility study. Zentralbl Chir 131:383–387

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Stephen AE, Berger DL (2003) Shortened length of stay and hospital cost reduction with implementation of an accelerated clinical care pathway after elective colon resection. Surgery 133:277–282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Tan WS, Tang CL, Shi L et al (2009) Meta-analysis of defunctioning stomas in low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Br J Surg 96:462–472

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Theurl E, Winner H (2007) The impact of hospital financing on the length of stay: evidence from Austria. Health Policy 82:375–389

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Walter CJ, Collin J, Dumville JC et al (2009) Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis 11:344–353

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Yeh CY, Changchien CR, Wang JY et al (2005) Pelvic drainage and other risk factors for leakage after elective anterior resection in rectal cancer patients: a prospective study of 978 patients. Ann Surg 241:9–13

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University Hospital Mannheim, Ruprecht Karls University Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany

    Till Hasenberg, Stefan Post & Edward Shang

  2. Department of General Surgery, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria

    Friedrich Längle

  3. The Austrian Society of Clinical Nutrition, Vienna, Austria

    Bianca Reibenwein & Karin Schindler

  4. Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Charité Campus Mitte and Charité Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitatsmedizin, Berlin, Germany

    Claudia Spies

  5. Department for General and Visceral Surgery, Asklepios Clinic Altona, Hamburg, Germany

    Wolfgang Schwenk

Authors
  1. Till Hasenberg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Friedrich Längle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Bianca Reibenwein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Karin Schindler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Stefan Post
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Claudia Spies
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Wolfgang Schwenk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Edward Shang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Till Hasenberg.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hasenberg, T., Längle, F., Reibenwein, B. et al. Current perioperative practice in rectal surgery in Austria and Germany. Int J Colorectal Dis 25, 855–863 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0900-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00384-010-0900-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation