Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Fontan Pathway: Change in Dimension and Catheter-Based Intervention over Time

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Cardiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An unobstructed Fontan pathway is essential for optimal hemodynamics. We hypothesize that more extracardiac conduit (ECC) Fontan pathways develop obstruction compared to lateral tunnel (LT) Fontans and that the dilation typically observed in LTs results in similar mid-term clinical outcomes. A single-center, retrospective study was done including all Fontan cardiac catheterizations from 2006 to 2019. Angiography and medical records were reviewed to define Fontan pathway dimensions, interventions, and clinical outcomes. 232 patients underwent cardiac catheterization, where 60% were ECCs and 30% LTs. The minimum cross-sectional area (CSA) of ECCs was significantly smaller than LTs and LTs dilated over time. 13% of patients had Fontan pathway stenting at a median age of 16.2 years. The minimum CSA for patients who underwent intervention was significantly smaller than patients who did not. Lower weight at Fontan surgery was associated with intervention on the Fontan pathway, with a threshold weight of 15 kg for patients with an ECC. The median follow-up was 3.3 years. Patients who had Fontan pathway intervention were not more likely to experience the composite adverse clinical outcome. LTs were more likely than ECCs to have worse clinical outcome, when liver fibrosis was included. This is the first study to describe angiographic dimensions of the Fontan pathway in a large number of patients over time. ECCs tend to become stenotic. Lower weight at Fontan surgery is a potential risk for Fontan pathway intervention. LTs may experience worse clinical outcomes in follow-up. This information can help inform the optimal timing and method of post-Fontan surveillance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data are held in a secure, password protected format at the medical center.

References

  1. Schilling C, Dalziel K, Nunn R, Du Plessis K, Shi WY, Celermajer D et al (2016) The Fontan epidemic: population projections from the Australia and New Zealand Fontan registry. Int J Cardiol 219:14–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.05.035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Rychik J, Atz AM, Celermajer DS, Deal BJ, Gatzoulis MA, Gewillig MH et al (2019) Evaluation and management of the child and adult with Fontan circulation: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 140:E234-84. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000696 (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins [Internet])

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dasi LP, KrishnankuttyRema R, Kitajima HD, Pekkan K, Sundareswaran KS, Fogel M et al (2009) Fontan hemodynamics: importance of pulmonary artery diameter. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 137(3):560–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.04.036

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Tang E, Restrepo M, Haggerty CM, Mirabella L, Bethel J, Whitehead KK et al (2014) Geometric characterization of patient-specific total cavopulmonary connections and its relationship to hemodynamics. JACC Cardiovascular Imaging 7:215–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2013.12.010 (Elsevier Inc.)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hagler DJ, Miranda WR, Haggerty BJ, Anderson JH, Johnson JN, Cetta F et al (2019) Fate of the Fontan connection: mechanisms of stenosis and management. Congenit Heart Dis 14(4):571–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12757

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Mets JM, Bergersen L, Mayer JE, Marshall AC, McElhinney DB (2013) Outcomes of stent implantation for obstruction of intracardiac lateral tunnel Fontan pathways. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 6(1):92–100. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.112.000099

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Brakel TJ, Schoof PH, De Roo F, Nikkels PGJ, Evens FCM, Haas F (2014) High incidence of Dacron conduit stenosis for extracardiac Fontan procedure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 147(5):1568–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.07.013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ten Cate FEAU, Trieschmann U, Germund I, Hannes T, Emmel M, Bennink G et al (2017) Stenting the Fontan pathway in paediatric patients with obstructed extracardiac conduits. Heart 103(14):1111–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2016-310511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alexi-Meskishvili V, Ovroutski S, Ewert P, Dähnert I, Berger F, Lange PE et al (2000) Optimal conduit size for extracardiac Fontan operation. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 18(6):690–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1010-7940(00)00593-5

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoodeshenas S, Yin M, Venkatesh SK (2018) Magnetic resonance elastography of liver current update. Top Magn Reson Imaging 27:319–33. https://doi.org/10.1097/RMR.0000000000000177 (Lippincott Williams and Wilkins [Internet])

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Karlas T, Pfrepper C, Wiegand J, Wittekind C, Neuschulz M, Mössner J et al (2011) Acoustic radiation force impulse imaging (ARFI) for non-invasive detection of liver fibrosis: examination standards and evaluation of interlobe differences in healthy subjects and chronic liver disease. Scand J Gastroenterol 46(12):1458–67. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365521.2011.610004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ben Ali W, Bouhout I, Khairy P, Bouchard D, Poirier N (2019) Extracardiac versus lateral tunnel fontan: a meta-analysis of long-term results. Ann Thorac Surg 107(3):837–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.08.041

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Li D, Fan Q, Hirata Y, Ono M, An Q (2017) Arrhythmias after fontan operation with intra-atrial lateral tunnel versus extra-cardiac conduit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Cardiol 38(4):873–880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-017-1595-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Katogi T (2012) Extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure versus intra-atrial lateral tunnel Fontan procedure. Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 60:792–5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-012-0161-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Azakie A, McCrindle BW, Van Arsdell G, Benson LN, Coles J, Hamilton R et al (2001) Extracardiac conduit versus lateral tunnel cavopulmonary connections at a single institution: impact on outcomes. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 122(6):1219–28. https://doi.org/10.1067/mtc.2001.116947

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hsia TY, Migliavacca F, Pittaccio S, Radaelli A, Dubini G, Pennati G et al (2004) Computational fluid dynamic study of flow optimization in realistic models of the total cavopulmonary connections. J Surg Res 116(2):305–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2003.08.004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Backer CL, Deal BJ, Kaushal S, Russell HM, Tsao S, Mavroudis C (2011) Extracardiac versus intra-atrial lateral tunnel fontan: extracardiac is better. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Pediatr Card Surg Annu 14(1):4–10. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.pcsu.2011.01.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lin Z, Ge H, Xue J, Wu G, Du J, Hu X et al (2017) Comparison of extracardiac conduit and lateral tunnel for functional single-ventricle patients: a meta-analysis. Congenit Heart Dis 12(6):711–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/chd.12503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nürnberg JH, Ovroutski S, Alexi-Meskishvili V, Ewert P, Hetzer R, Lange PE (2004) New onset arrhythmias after the extracardiac conduit fontan operation compared with the intraatrial lateral tunnel procedure: early and midterm results. Ann Thorac Surg 78(6):1979–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.02.107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Robbers-Visser D, Miedema M, Nijveld A, Boersma E, Bogers AJJC, Haas F et al (2010) Results of staged total cavopulmonary connection for functionally univentricular hearts; comparison of intra-atrial lateral tunnel and extracardiac conduit. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 37(4):934–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.10.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Weixler VHM, Zurakowski D, Kheir J, Guariento A, Kaza AK, Baird CW et al (2020) Fontan with lateral tunnel is associated with improved survival compared with extracardiac conduit. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 159:1480-1491.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2019.11.048 (Mosby Inc.)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Itatani K, Miyaji K, Tomoyasu T, Nakahata Y, Ohara K, Takamoto S et al (2009) Optimal conduit size of the extracardiac fontan operation based on energy loss and flow stagnation. Ann Thorac Surg 88(2):565–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.109

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee C, Lee CH, Hwang SW, Lim HG, Kim SJ, Lee JY et al (2007) Midterm follow-up of the status of Gore-Tex graft after extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 31(6):1008–1012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2007.03.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ochiai Y, Imoto Y, Sakamoto M, Kajiwara T, Sese A, Watanabe M et al (2009) Mid-term follow-up of the status of Gore-Tex graft after extracardiac conduit Fontan procedure. Eur J Cardio-thoracic Surg 36(1):63–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejcts.2009.02.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received to assist with the preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Pediatric Cardiology, Department of Pediatrics, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    E McGovern

  2. The Heart Institute, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA

    T Alsaied, N Szugye, S Pradhan, S. P. Batlivala, A Lubert & R Hirsch

Authors
  1. E McGovern
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T Alsaied
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. N Szugye
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. S Pradhan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. S. P. Batlivala
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A Lubert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. R Hirsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All named authors have been active participants in this research and have approved the manuscript for submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E McGovern.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Consent to Participate

Consent from patients was not deemed necessary.

Ethical Approval

This retrospective study was approved by the local institutional Ethics Review Board and conducted with strict maintenance of patient anonymity.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

McGovern, E., Alsaied, T., Szugye, N. et al. The Fontan Pathway: Change in Dimension and Catheter-Based Intervention over Time. Pediatr Cardiol 42, 1740–1748 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02658-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00246-021-02658-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation