Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Agile manufacturing: framework and its empirical validation

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The agile manufacturing is one of the operational strategies which organizations have adopted to beat environmental uncertainties resulting from worldwide economic recession, shortening of product life cycle, supplier constraints and obsolete technologies. In our study, we have adopted literature review to develop agile manufacturing (AM) framework. Our framework has six constructs that includes technologies, empowerment of workforce, customer focus, supplier relationship management, flexible manufacturing systems and organizational culture. To test our framework, we developed our instrument scientifically and collected data using Dillman’s (2007) total design test methods. We further performed a nonresponse bias test and then we checked the assumptions of constant variance, outliers and normality. Once we found that our dataset skewness and kurtosis values are within the defined range, we further performed a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) test to check the validity of our constructs. Our multivariate statistical analyses suggest that our proposed framework constructs are valid. The goodness-of-fit indices suggest that our framework is a good fit. Once the model was tested, conclusion, limitations and further directions of our study were outlined.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agarwal A, Shankar R, Tiwari MK (2006) Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: an ANP-based approach. Eur J Oper Res 173(1):211–225

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson JC, Gerbing DW (1988) Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychol Bull 103(3):411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Anoop Kumar G, Devadasan SR, Shalij PR, Vinodh S, Rajanayagam D, Edinbarough I (2010) Implementation of agile supply chain model in an electronic switches manufacturing company. Int J Serv Oper Manag 6(4):452–469

    Google Scholar 

  4. Aravind Raj S, Sudheer A, Vinodh S, Anand G (2013) A mathematical model to evaluate the role of agility enablers and criteria in a manufacturing environment. Int J Prod Res 51(19):5971–5984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Armstrong JS, Overton TS (1977) Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. J Mark Res (JMR) 14(3):396–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bagozzi RP, Yi Y, Phillips LW (1991) Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm Sci Q 36(3):421–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bernardes ES, Hanna MD (2009) A theoretical review of flexibility, agility and responsiveness in the operations management literature: toward a conceptual definition of customer responsiveness. Int J Oper Prod Manag 29(1):30–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Blome C, Schoenherr T, Rexhausen D (2013) Antecedents and enablers of supply chain agility and its effect on performance: a dynamic capabilities perspective. Int J Prod Res 51(4):1295–1318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bottani E (2010) Profile and enablers of agile companies: an empirical investigation. Int J Prod Econ 125(2):251–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brown S, Bessant J (2003) The manufacturing strategy-capabilities links in mass customisation and agile manufacturing—an exploratory study. Int J Oper Prod Manag 23(7):707–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bruce M, Daly L, Towers N (2004) Lean or agile: a solution for supply chain management in the textiles and clothing industry? Int J Oper Prod Manag 24(2):151–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cagliano R, Caniato F, Spina G (2004) Lean, agile and traditional supply: how do they impact manufacturing performance? J Purch Supply Manag 10(4):151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cao Q, Dowlatshahi S (2005) The impact of alignment between virtual enterprise and information technology on business performance in an agile manufacturing environment. J Oper Manag 23(5):531–550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charles A, Lauras M, Van Wassenhove L (2010) A model to define and assess the agility of supply chains: building on humanitarian experience. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 40(8/9):722–741

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chopra S, Meindl P, Kalra DV (2013) Supply chain management: strategy, planning, and operations, 5th edn. Pearson, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  16. Christopher M, Towill D (2001) An integrated model for the design of agile supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 31(4):235–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Churchill GA Jr (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Mark Res 16(1):64–73

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Coronado AE, Sarhadi M, Millar C (2002) Defining a framework for information systems requirements for agile manufacturing. Int J Prod Econ 75(1):57–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF (1996) The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1(1):16–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Denning S (2012) How Agile can transform manufacturing: the case of Wikispeed. Strateg Leadersh 40(6):22–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Denning S (2013) Why Agile can be a game changer for managing continuous innovation in many industries. Strateg Leadersh 41(2):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Devadasan SR, Goshteeswaran S, Gokulachandran J (2005) Design for quality in agile manufacturing environment through modified orthogonal array-based experimentation. J Manuf Technol Manag 16(6):576–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Devor R, Graves R, Mills JJ (1997) Agile manufacturing research: accomplishments and opportunities. IIE transactions 29(10):813–823

  24. Dillman D (2007) Mail and internet surveys: the tailored design method. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Disney SM, Towill DR (2003) The effect of vendor managed inventory (VMI) dynamics on the Bullwhip Effect in supply chains. Int J Prod Econ 85(2):199–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dowlatshahi S, Cao Q (2006) The relationships among virtual enterprise, information technology, and business performance in agile manufacturing: an industry perspective. Eur J Oper Res 174(2):835–860

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Duguay CR, Landry S, Pasin F (1997) From mass production to flexible/agile production. Int J Oper Prod Manag 17(12):1183–1195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Elkins DA, Huang N, Alden JM (2004) Agile manufacturing systems in the automotive industry. Int J Prod Econ 91(3):201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res (JMR) 18(1):39–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goldman SL, Nagel RN (1993) Management, technology and agility: the emergence of a new era in manufacturing. Int J Technol Manag 8:18–38

    Google Scholar 

  31. Goldman SL, Nagel RN, Preiss K (1995) Agile competitors and virtual organizations: strategies for enriching the customer (Vol. 8). Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gould P (1997) What is agility? Manuf Eng 76(1):28–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gunasekaran A (1998) Agile manufacturing: enablers and an implementation framework. Int J Prod Res 36(5):1223–1247

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Gunasekaran A (1999) Agile manufacturing: a framework for research and development. Int J Prod Econ 62(1):87–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Gunasekaran A, Yusuf YY (2002) Agile manufacturing: a taxonomy of strategic and technological imperatives. Int J Prod Res 40(6):1357–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hallgren M, Olhager J (2009) Lean and agile manufacturing: external and internal drivers and performance outcomes. Int J Oper Prod Manag 29(10):976–999

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Hasan MA, Shankar R, Sarkis J, Suhail A (2009) A study of enablers of agile manufacturing. Int J Ind Syst Eng 4(4):407–430

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  38. Helo P (2004) Managing agility and productivity in the electronics industry. Ind Manag Data Syst 104(7):567–577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hu LT, Bentler PM (1998) Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 3(4):424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Huang YY, Li SJ (2010) How to achieve leagility: a case study of a personal computer original equipment manufacturer in Taiwan. J Manuf Syst 29(2):63–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Inman RA, Sale RS, Green KW Jr, Whitten D (2011) Agile manufacturing: relation to JIT, operational performance and firm performance. J Oper Manag 29(4):343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ismail HS, Sharifi H (2006) A balanced approach to building agile supply chains. Int J Phys Distrib & Logist Manag 36(6):431–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Ismail HS, Snowden SP, Poolton J, Reid R (2006) Agile manufacturing framework and practice. Int J Agil Syst Manag 1(1):11–28

    Google Scholar 

  44. Jin-Hai L, Anderson AR, Harrison RT (2003) The evolution of agile manufacturing. Bus Process Manag J 9(2):170–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Kettunen P (2009) Adopting key lessons from agile manufacturing to agile software product development—a comparative study. Technovation 29(6):408–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kumar A, Motwani J (1995) A methodology for assessing time-based competitive advantage of manufacturing firms. Int J Oper Prod Manag 15(2):36–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Lambert DM, Harrington TC (1990) Measuring nonresponse bias in customer service mail surveys. J Bus Logist 11(2):5–25

    Google Scholar 

  48. Leitão P (2009) Agent-based distributed manufacturing control: a state-of-the-art survey. Eng Appl Artif Intell 22(7):979–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Leitão P, Restivo F (2006) ADACOR: a holonic architecture for agile and adaptive manufacturing control. Comput Ind 57(2):121–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Luo X, Wu C, Rosenberg D, Barnes D (2009) Supplier selection in agile supply chains: an information-processing model and an illustration. J Purch Supply Manag 15(4):249–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Maskell B (2001) The age of agile manufacturing. Supply Chain Manag Int J 6(1):5–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. McCullen P, Towill D (2001) Achieving lean supply through agile manufacturing. Integr Manuf Syst 12(7):524–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Meade LM, Sarkis J (1999) Analyzing organizational project alternatives for agile manufacturing processes: an analytical network approach. Int J Prod Res 37(2):241–261

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  54. Narasimhan R, Swink M, Kim SW (2006) Disentangling leanness and agility: an empirical investigation. J Oper Manag 24(5):440–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Pal R, Torstensson H, Mattila H (2014) Antecedents of organizational resilience in economic crises—an empirical study of Swedish textile and clothing SMEs. Int J Prod Econ 147:410–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Pan F, Nagi R (2010) Robust supply chain design under uncertain demand in agile manufacturing. Comput Oper Res 37(4):668–683

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  57. Pandey VC, Garg S (2009) Analysis of interaction among the enablers of agility in supply chain. J Adv Manag Res 6(1):99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Pereira CE, Carro L (2007) Distributed real-time embedded systems: recent advances, future trends and their impact on manufacturing plant control. Annu Rev Control 31(1):81–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Potter A, Breite R, Naim M, Vanharanta H (2004) The potential for achieving mass customization in primary production supply chains via a unified taxonomy. Prod Plan Control 15(4):472–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Power DJ, Sohal AS, Rahman SU (2001) Critical success factors in agile supply chain management—an empirical study. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 31(4):247–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Purvis L, Gosling J, Naim MM (2014) The development of a lean, agile and leagile supply network taxonomy based on differing types of flexibility. Int J Prod Econ 151:100–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Sharp JM, Irani Z, Desai S (1999) Working towards agile manufacturing in the UK industry. Int J Prod Econ 62(1):155–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. T Shu, C Shou, KK Lai, C Xie, S Wang (2006) A study of collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment mechanism of agile virtual enterprises. In Management of Innovation and Technology, 2006 I.E. International Conference on (Vol. 2, pp. 896-900). IEEE

  64. Stevenson WJ, Hojati M (2007) Operations management (Vol. 8). McGraw-Hill/Irwin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  65. Stough S, Eom S, Buckenmyer J (2000) Virtual teaming: a strategy for moving your organization into the new millennium. Ind Manag Data Syst 100(8):370–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Strode DE, Huff SL, Tretiakov A (2009) The impact of organizational culture on agile method use. In System Sciences, 2009. HICSS‘09. 42nd Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 1-9). IEEE

  67. Vázquez-Bustelo D, Avella L (2006) Agile manufacturing: industrial case studies in Spain. Technovation 26(10):1147–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Vázquez-Bustelo D, Avella L, Fernández E (2007) Agility drivers, enablers and outcomes: empirical test of an integrated agile manufacturing model. Int J Oper Prod Manag 27(12):1303–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Vinodh S, Aravindraj S, Pushkar B, Kishore S (2012) Estimation of reliability and validity of agility constructs using structural equation modelling. Int J Prod Res 50(23):6737–6745

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Vinodh S, Devadasan SR (2011) Twenty criteria based agility assessment using fuzzy logic approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 54(9–12):1219–1231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Vinodh S, Sundararaj G, Devadasan SR, Kuttalingam D, Rajanayagam D (2009) Computer-aided design of experiments: an enabler of agile manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44(9–10):940–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Vinodh S, Sundararaj G, Devadasan SR (2009) Total agile design system model via literature exploration. Ind Manag Data Syst 109(4):570–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Vokurka RJ, Fliedner G (1998) The journey toward agility. Ind Manag Data Syst 98(4):165–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Weng FT, Jenq SM (2012) Application integrating axiomatic design and agile manufacturing unit in product evaluation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 63(1–4):181–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Yang J (2014) Supply chain agility: securing performance for Chinese manufacturers. Int J Prod Econ 150:104–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Yang H, Baradat C, Krut S, Pierrot F (2013) An agile manufacturing system for large workspace applications. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-014-6023-0

    Google Scholar 

  77. Yao AC, Carlson JG (2003) Agility and mixed-model furniture production. Int J Prod Econ 81(1):95–102

  78. Yauch CA (2007) Team-based work and work system balance in the context of agile manufacturing. Appl Ergon 38(1):19–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Yusuf YY, Adeleye EO, Sivayoganathan K (2003) Volume flexibility: the agile manufacturing conundrum. Manag Decis 41(7):613–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Yusuf YY, Gunasekaran A, Adeleye EO, Sivayoganathan K (2004) Agile supply chain capabilities: determinants of competitive objectives. Eur J Oper Res 159(2):379–392

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  81. Yusuf YY, Sarhadi M, Gunasekaran A (1999) Agile manufacturing: the drivers, concepts and attributes. Int J Prod Econ 62(1):33–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Zhang DZ (2011) Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategies—case studies of an agility taxonomy. Int J Prod Econ 131(1):303–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Zhang L, Luo Y, Tao F, Li BH, Ren L, Zhang X, Liu Y (2014) Cloud manufacturing: a new manufacturing paradigm. Enterp Inf Syst 8(2):167–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. Zhang Z, Sharifi H (2007) Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategy—a taxonomical approach. Eng Manag IEEE Trans 54(2):351–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Symbiosis Institute of Operations Management, Symbiosis International University, Plot No. A-23, Shravan Sector, CIDCO, New Nashik, 422008, India

    Rameshwar Dubey

  2. Charlton College of Business, University of Massachusetts Dartmouth, North Dartmouth, MA, 02747-2300, USA

    Angappa Gunasekaran

Authors
  1. Rameshwar Dubey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Angappa Gunasekaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angappa Gunasekaran.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A. Agile manufacturing: framework and its empirical validation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 76, 2147–2157 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6455-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6455-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation