Skip to main content
Log in

The development of efficient portfolios in Japan with particular emphasis on sales and earnings forecasting

  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, we show that earnings forecasting creates an index-tracking portfolio that dominates the historical model trade-off curve. We find that using Toyo Keizai earnings forecasts improves geometric means by over 300 basis points compared to the historical model. Weighted latent root regression is used in this study to create portfolios that have outperformed the Japanese market in backtest and in real-time performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. A.E. Beaton and J.W. Tukey, The fitting of power series, meaning polynomials, illustrated on bank-spectroscopic data, Technometrics 16 (1974) 147–185.

    Google Scholar 

  2. D. A. Belsley, Collinearity and Forecasting, J. Forecasting 3 (1984) 183–196.

    Google Scholar 

  3. D.A. Belsley, A.E. Kuh and R.E. Welsch,Regression Diagnostics — Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity (Wiley, 1980).

  4. M. Bloch, J.B. Guerard, H.M. Markowitz and P. Todd, A comparison of some aspects of US and Japanese equity markets,Cross-Border Investments and Valuation Conf., New York University (September 1991).

  5. L. Breiman, Optimal gambling system for favorable games,Proc. 4th Berkeley Symp. on Mathematical Statistics and Probability (1961), pp. 63–68.

  6. D. Bunn, Editorial: Forecasting with more than one model, J. Forecasting 8 (1989) 161–166.

    Google Scholar 

  7. L. Chan, Y. Hamao and J. Lakonishok, Fundamentals and stock returns in Japan, J. Fin. 46 (1991) 1739–1764.

    Google Scholar 

  8. V.K. Chopra and W.T. Ziemba, The effects of errors in means, variances, and covariances on optimal choice, J. Portfolio Manag. (1993) 6–11.

  9. R.T. Clemen, Combining forecasts: A review and annotated bibliography, Int. J. Forecasting 5 (1989) 559–584.

    Google Scholar 

  10. R. Conroy and R. Harris, Consensus forecasts of corporate earnings: Analysts' forecasts and time series methods, Manag. Sci. 33 (1987) 725–738.

    Google Scholar 

  11. S. Cottle, R.F. Murray and F.E. Block,Graham and Dodd's Security Analysis, 5th ed. (McGraw-Hill, 1988).

  12. M.D. Darrough and T.S. Harris, Do management forecasts of earnings affect stock prices in Japan?, in:Japanese Financial Market Research, eds. Ziemba, Bailey, and Hamao (North-Holland, 1991).

  13. E. Dimson (ed.),Stock Market Anomalies (Cambridge University Press, 1988).

  14. E.J. Elton and M.J. Gruber,Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis (Wiley, 1987).

  15. E.J. Elton and M.J. Gruber, Analysts' expectations and Japanese stock prices, Japan and the World Economy 2 (1989).

  16. E.F. Fama and K.R. French, Cross-sectional variation in expected stock returns, J. Fin. 30 (1992) 427–465.

    Google Scholar 

  17. J. Farrell,Guide to Portfolio Management (McGraw-Hill, 1983).

  18. J.B. Guerard, Jr., Linear constraints, robust-weighting, and efficient composite modeling, J. Forecasting 6 (1987) 193–199.

    Google Scholar 

  19. J.B. Guerard, Jr., Optimal portfolio analysis using composite model-tilting, Drexel Burnham Lambert (January 1990).

  20. J.B. Guerard, Jr. and M. Takano, The development of mean-variance efficient portfolios in Japan,IBES Quantitative Seminar, Tokyo (June 1992).

  21. J.B. Guerard, Jr. and M. Takano, Stock selection and composite modeling in Japan, Security Anal. J. 29 (1991) 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  22. J.B. Guerard, Jr. and B.K. Stone, Composite forecasting of annual corporate earnings, in:Research in Finance 10, ed. A. Chen (JAI Press, Greenwich, CT, 1992), pp. 205–230.

    Google Scholar 

  23. J.B. Guerard, Jr., M. Takano and G. Xu, Composite equity modeling: The problem of survivor-bias in the United States,CRSP Seminar (November 1991).

  24. R.F. Gunst, and R.L. Mason,Regression Analysis and its Application (Marcel Dekker, 1980).

  25. R.F. Gunst, J.T. Webster and R.L. Mason, A comparison of least squares and latent root regression estimators, Technometrics 18 (1976) 75–83.

    Google Scholar 

  26. B. Jacobs and K. Levy, Disentangling equity return regularities: New insights and investment opportunities, Fin. Anal. J. (1988) 18–43.

  27. J. Kelly, A new interpretation of information rate, Bell Syst. Tech. J. 35 (1956) 917–926.

    Google Scholar 

  28. H. Konno and H. Yamazaki, Mean-absolute deviation portfolio optimization model and its application to the Tokyo stock market, Manag. Sci. 37 (1991) 519–531.

    Google Scholar 

  29. H. Latane, Criteria for choice among risky ventures, J. Polit. Econ. (1959) 144–155.

  30. L.C. MacLean, W.T. Ziemba and G. Blazenko, Growth versus security in dynamic investment analysis, Manag. Sci. 38 (1992) 1562–1585.

    Google Scholar 

  31. H.M. Markowitz, The optimization of a quadratic function subject to linear constraints, Naval Res. Log. Quarterly 3 (1956) 111–133.

    Google Scholar 

  32. H.M. Markowitz,Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments (Wiley, New York, 1959).

    Google Scholar 

  33. H.M. Markowitz,Mean-Variance Analysis in Portfolio Choice and Capital Markets (Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1987).

    Google Scholar 

  34. H.M. Markowitz, Investment for the long run: New evidence for an old rule, J. Fin. 36 (1976) 1273–1285.

    Google Scholar 

  35. H.M. Markowitz, P. Todd, G. Xu and Y. Yamane, Fast computation of mean-variance efficient sets using historical covariance, Daiwa Securities Trust Company (1991).

  36. H.M. Markowitz and G. Xu, Data mining corrections, submitted.

  37. H.M. Markowitz, Trade-off curves using 250 vs 500 daily observations, Daiwa Securities Trust Company (1992).

  38. J.D. Miller, J.B. Guerard, Jr. and M. Takano, Bridging the gap between theory and practice in equity selection modeling: Case studies of US and Japanese models, submitted.

  39. A. Rudd and B. Rosenberg, Realistic portfolio optimization, in:Portfolio Theory: 25 Years Later, eds. Elton and Gruber (North-Holland, 1979).

  40. J.T. Webster, R.F. Gunst and R.L. Mason. Latent root regression analysis, Technometrics 16 (1974) 513–522.

    Google Scholar 

  41. W.T. Ziemba, Fundamental factors in US and Japanese stock returns,Berkeley Program in Finance, Santa Barbara, CA (September 1990).

  42. W.T. Ziemba,Invest Japan (Probus Publ. Co., Chicago, 1992).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guerard, J.B., Takano, M. & Yamane, Y. The development of efficient portfolios in Japan with particular emphasis on sales and earnings forecasting. Ann Oper Res 45, 91–108 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02282043

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02282043

Keywords

Navigation