Skip to main content

Qualitativ-naturalistische Forschung als Zugang zur Entwicklung, Analyse und Evaluation sprachtherapeutischer Interventionen

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Evidenzbasierte Praxis in den Gesundheitsberufen
  • 4487 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Im Mittelpunkt dieses Beitrags stehen die spezifischen Leistungen und Möglichkeiten qualitativ-naturalistischer Sozialforschung in der Erforschung von Kommunikation, ihren Störungen und deren Veränderung durch sprachtherapeutische Interventionen. Illustriert durch ausgewählte Beispielstudien werden vier Themenschwerpunkte qualitativer Sprachtherapieforschung – Leben mit kommunikativ-sprachlichen Beeinträchtigungen, ungestörte und beeinträchtigte Alltagskommunikation, Interaktion im Therapiealltag, Prozess- und Ergebnisevaluation – vorgestellt. Der Fokus der Diskussion liegt auf der Bedeutung und den Potenzialen des qualitativen Forschungsstils für die Entwicklung, Analyse und Evaluation sprachtherapeutischer Interventionen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Literatur

  • Auer P (2014) The Limits of Collaboration – Speakership in Conversation with Persons with Aphasia. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 187–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) (2014) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrow R (2008) Listening to the voice of living life with aphasia: Anne's story. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 43 Suppl 1: 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820701697947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow R (2011) Shaping practice: The benefits of really attending to the person's story. In: Fourie RJ (Hrsg) Therapeutic processes for communication disorders. A guide for clinicians and students. Psychology Press, Hove, S 21–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer A (2009) Miteinander im Gespräch bleiben; Partizipation in aphasischen Alltagsgesprächen. Verl. für Gesprächsforschung, Mannheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer A (2015) Das Miteinander im Gespräch bleiben – Partizipation in aphasischen Familiengesprächen. Sprache Stimme Gehör 39: 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1055/s–0035–1559596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer A, Auer P, Lucius-Hoene G (2009) Aphasie im Alltag. Thieme, Stuttgart

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baylor C, Burns M, Eadie T, Britton D, Yorkston K (2011) A Qualitative Study of Interference With Communicative Participation Across Communication Disorders in Adults. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 20: 269. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360(2011/10–0084)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Beckley F, Best W, Johnson F, Edwards S, Maxim J, Beeke S (2013) Conversation therapy for agrammatism: exploring the therapeutic process of engagement and learning by a person with aphasia. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 48: 220–239. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460–6984.2012.00204.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch S, Wilkinson R (2004) The Understandability of AAC; A Conversation Analysis Study of Acquired Dysarthria. Augmen Altern Comm 20: 272–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/07434610400005614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bloch S, Wilkinson R (2011) Acquired dysarthria in conversation: methods of resolving understandability problems. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 46: 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460–6984.2011.00076.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Booth S, Perkins L (2010) The use of conversation analysis to guide individualized advice to carers and evaluate change in aphasia; A case study. Aphasiology 13: 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399402109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapey R, Duchan JF, Elman RGarcia LJ, Kagan A, Lyon JG, Simmons-Mackie N (2000) Life Participation Approach to Aphasia: A Statement of Values for the Future. www.aphasia.ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/LPAA_AI.pdf. Zugegriffen: 22. September 2016

  • Corcoran JA, Stewart M (1998) Stories of stuttering, a qualitative analysis of interview narratives. J Fluency Disord 23: 247–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corsten S, Hardering F (2015) Biographisch-narrative Intervention bei Aphasie; Sprachtherapie aktuell: Schwerpunktthema: Aus der Praxis für die Praxis 2: 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell JW (2009) Qualitative inquiry and research design; Choosing among five approaches. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

  • Damico JS, Augustine LE (1995) Social considerations in the labeling of students as attention deficit hyperactivity disordered. Semin Speech Lang 16: 259–274

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Damico JS, Simmons-Mackie N, Oelschlaeger M, Elman R, Armstrong E (1999) Qualitative methods in aphasia research; Basic issues. Aphasiology 13: 651–665. https://doi.org/10.1080/026870399401768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damico JS, Simmons-Mackie NN (2003) Qualitative Research and Speech-Language Pathology: A Tutorial for the Clinical Realm. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 12: 131–143. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360(2003/060)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson BJ, McAllister L (2002) An introduction to qualitative research approaches. Acquiring Knowledge in Speech, Language and Hearing 4: 28–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Denzin NK, Lincoln YS (Hrsg) (2011) The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage, Los Angeles, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  • DIMDI (2005) ICF (Internationale Klassifikation der Funktionsfähigkeit, Behinderung und Gesundheit); Stand Oktober 2005. http://www.dimdi.de/dynamic/de/klassi/downloadcenter/icf/endfassung. Zugegriffen: 17. Januar 2017

  • Duchan JF (2001) Impairment and Social Views of Speech-Language Pathology; Clinical Practices Re-Examined. Adv Speech Lang Pathol 3: 37–45. https://doi.org/10.3109/14417040109003707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchan JF (2014) Case Studies and Their Frameworks. Positivist, Interpretive, and Emancipatory. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 3–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewers M, Grewe T, Höppner H, Huber W, Sayn-Wittgenstein F, Stemmer R, Voigt-Radloff S, Walkenhorst U (2012) Forschung in den Gesundheitsfachberufen. Deutsche medizinische Wochenschrift (1946) 137 Suppl 2. https://doi.org/10.1055/s–0032–1305067

  • Ferguson A, Armstrong E (2004) Reflections on speech-language therapists' talk: implications for clinical practice and education. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 39: 469–77; discussion 477–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flick U (2002) Interviews in der Gesundheits- und Pflegeforschung: Wege zur Herstellung und Verwendung verbaler Daten. In: Schaeffer D, Müller-Mundt G (Hrsg) Qualitative Gesundheits- und Pflegeforschung. Huber, Bern, S 203–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Fourie R (2009) Qualitative study of the therapeutic relationship in speech and language therapy; Perspectives of adults with acquired communication and swallowing disorders. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 44: 979–999. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682820802535285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fourie R, Crowley N, Oliviera A (2011) A Qualitative Exploration of Therapeutic Relationships from the Perspective of Six Children Receiving Speech-Language Therapy. Top Lang Disord 31: 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1097/TLD.0b013e3182353f00

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraas MR, Calvert M (2009) The Use of Narratives to Identify Characteristics Leading to a Productive Life Following Acquired Brain Injury. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 18: 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360(2009/08–0008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Göldner J (im Druck) Die Beziehung zwischen erwachsenem Patient und Therapeutin in der Sprachtherapie – eine Auseinandersetzung mit Konzepten und Wirkfaktoren im Spiegel der psychotherapeutischen Diskussion. Schulz-Kirchner, Idstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H (2009) Therapiearbeit; Eine qualitative Untersuchung der Arbeitstypen und Arbeitsmuster ambulanter logopädischer Therapieprozesse. Schulz-Kirchner, Idstein

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H (2014a) Das Arbeitstypen-Modell in der Logopädieausbildung: Erste Erfahrungen und Ansätze. Therapie Lernen 3: 6–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H (2014b) Qualitative studies investigating the effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation – methodological approaches and perspectives / Qualitative Studien zur Wirkung therapeutischer Interventionen – methodische Zugänge und Perspektiven am Beispiel Schlaganfallrehabilitation. IJHP 1: 20–33. https://doi.org/10.2478/ijhp–2014–0005

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H, Schneider B (2015) Qualitative Ansätze in der teilhabeorientierten Aphasie-Diagnostik: Kennzeichen und Anwendungen. Aphasie und verwandte Gebiete 1: 3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Hersh D (2009) How do people with aphasia view their discharge from therapy? Aphasiology 23: 331–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701764220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh D, Armstrong E (2014) Grounded Theory ind Speech-Language Pathology. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 113–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Horton S (2007) Topic generation in aphasia language therapy sessions; Issues of identity. Aphasiology 21: 283–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600911377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kagan A, Simmons-Mackie N, Rowland A, Huijbregts M, Shumway E, McEwen S, Threats T, Sharp S (2008) Counting what counts; A framework for capturing real‐life outcomes of aphasia intervention. Aphasiology 22: 258–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030701282595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelle U (2006) Qualitative Evaluationsforschung und das Kausalitätsparadigma. In: Flick U (Hrsg) Qualitative Evaluationsforschung. Konzepte – Methoden – Umsetzung. Rowohlt-Taschenbuch, Reinbek bei Hamburg, S 117–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohler J (2016) Zur Bedeutung qualitativer Studien. In: Grohnfeldt M (Hrsg) Kompendium der akademischen Sprachtherapie und Logopädie, Bd 1. W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, S 77–95

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovarsky D (2008) Representing voices from the life-world in evidence-based practice. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 43 Suppl 1: 47–57. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820701698036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovarsky D (2014) The Ethnography of Communication Revisited. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 55–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Kovarsky D, Duchan JF (1997) The Interactional Dimensions of Language Therapy. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch 28: 297–307. https://doi.org/10.1044/0161–1461.2803.297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovarsky D, Shaw A, Adingono-Smith M (2007) The construction of identity during group therapy among adults with traumatic brain injury. Comm Med 4: 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/CAM.2007.029

    Google Scholar 

  • Kowarsky D, Maxwell MM (1992) Ethnography and the clinical setting: Communicative expectancies in clinical discourse. Top Lang Disord 12: 76–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy MM (2004) Therapy talk: analyzing therapeutic discourse. Language, speech, and hearing services in schools 35: 70–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leahy MM, Walsh IP (2008) Talk in Interaction in the Speech-Language Pathology Clinic. Topics in Language Disorders 28: 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.TLD.0000333598.53339.5a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markham C, van Laar D, Gibbard D, Dean T (2009) Children with speech, language and communication needs: their perceptions of their quality of life. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 44: 748–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820802359892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medical Research Council (2008) Developing and evaluating complex interventions: New guidance. https://www.mrc.ac.uk/documents/pdf/complex-interventions-guidance/. Zugegriffen: 12. Oktober 2014

  • Merrick R, Roulstone S (2011) Children's views of communication and speech-language pathology. International journal of speech-language pathology 13: 281–290. https://doi.org/10.3109/17549507.2011.577809

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Milroy L, Perkins L (1992) Repair strategies in aphasic discourse; towards a collaborative model. Clinical linguistics and Phonetics 6: 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3109/02699209208985517

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Morse JM (2012) Qualitative health research; Creating a new discipline. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek, Calif

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RL, Abendroth K, Lynch K (2014) Ethnography. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 39–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas DB, Zwaigenbaum L, Ing S, MacCulloch R, Roberts W, McKeever, P, McMorris (2016) „Live It to Unterstand It”: The Experiences of Mothers of Children With Autism Spectrum Disorder. Qual Health Res 26: 921–934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parr S (2007) Living with severe aphasia; Tracking social exclusion. Aphasiology 21: 98–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600798337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parr S, Byng S, Gilpin S, Ireland C (1998) Talking about aphasia; Living with loss of language after stroke. Open University Press, Buckingham, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfammatter M, Junghan UM, Tschacher W (2012) Allgemeine Wirkfaktoren der Psychotherapie: Konzepte, Widersprüche und eine Synthese. Psychotherapie in Psychiatrie, Psychotherapeutischer Medizin und Klinischer Psychologie 17: 17–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Pound C, Parr S, Duchan J (2001) Using partners' autobiographical reports to develop, deliver, and evaluate services in aphasia. Aphasiology 15: 477–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687040143000159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robillard AB (1999) Meaning of a disability; The lived experience of paralysis. Temple Univ. Press, Philadelphia, Pa

    Google Scholar 

  • Sackett DL, Wennberg JE (1997) Choosing the best research design for each question; It's time to stop squabbling over the „best” methods. BMJ 315: 1636

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffner Hammer C (2014) „Life Is Hard But I'm Trying“: Understanding the Lives of the Families Speech-Language Pathologists Serve. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 207–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Shadden BB, Hagstrom F, Koski PR (2008) Neurogenic Communication Disorders; Life Stories and the Narrative Self. Plural Publishing Inc, San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie N, Damico J (1996) Accounting for handicaps in aphasia: communicative assessment from an authentic social perspective. Disabil Rehabil 18: 540–549

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS (2001) Intervention Outcomes: A Clinical Application of Qualitative Methods. Top Lang Disord 21: 21–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS (2008) Exposed and embedded corrections in aphasia therapy: issues of voice and identity. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 43 Suppl 1: 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/13682820701697889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS (2009) Engagement in Group Therapy for Aphasia. Semin Speech Lang 30: 18–26

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS (2011) Exploring clinical interaction in speech-language therapy. In: Fourie RJ (Hrsg) Therapeutic processes for communication disorders. A guide for clinicians and students. Psychology Press, Hove, S 34–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie N, Damico JS, Damico HL (1999) A Qualitative Study of Feedback in Aphasia Treatment. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 8: 218–230. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360.0803.218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie N, Elman R, Holland AL, Damico JS (2007a) Management of Discourse in Group Therapy for Aphasia. Top Lang Disord 27: 5–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie N, Elman RJ (2011) Negotiation of identity in group therapy for aphasia: the Aphasia Cafe. Int J of Lang Comm Disord 46: 312–323. https://doi.org/10.3109/13682822.2010.507616

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons-Mackie NN, Damico JS (2003) Contributions of Qualitative Research to the Knowledge Base of Normal Communication. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 12: 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058–0360(2003/061)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons‐Mackie NN, Kagan A, O'Neill Christie C, Huijbregts M, McEwen S, Willems J (2007b) Communicative access and decision making for people with aphasia; Implementing sustainable healthcare systems change. Aphasiology 21: 39–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030600798287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starks H, Trinidad SB (2007) Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qual Health Res 17: 1372–1380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732307307031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss A, Fagerhaugh S, Suczek B, Wiener C (1985) Social organization of medical work. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss AL, Corbin J (1996) Grounded Theory: Grundlagen Qualitativer Sozialforschung. Psychologie Verlags Union, Weinheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Tetnowski JA, Damico JS (2001) A demonstration of the advantages of qualitative methodologies in stuttering research. Disorders. J Fluency Disord 26: 17–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh IP (2007) Small Talk Is „Big Talk” in Clinical Discourse. Top Lang Disord 27: 24–36. https://doi.org/10.1097/00011363–200701000–00004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wampold BE (2015) How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry 14: 270–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20238

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson R (2014) Conversation Analysis. In: Ball MJ, Müller N, Nelson RL (Hrsg) Handbook of Qualitative Research in Communication Disorders. Psychology Press, New York, S 79–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson R, Bryan K, Lock S, Sage K (2010) Implementing and evaluating aphasia therapy targeted at couples' conversations; A single case study. Aphasiology 24: 869–886. https://doi.org/10.1080/02687030903501958

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilke Hansen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer-Verlag GmbH Deutschland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hansen, H. (2018). Qualitativ-naturalistische Forschung als Zugang zur Entwicklung, Analyse und Evaluation sprachtherapeutischer Interventionen. In: Haring, R., Siegmüller, J. (eds) Evidenzbasierte Praxis in den Gesundheitsberufen. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55377-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-55377-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-662-55376-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-662-55377-0

  • eBook Packages: Medicine (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics