Skip to main content

Abstract

Failure at multiple levels of governance rather than the resource base itself is at the origin of the water crisis. Despite increasing scholarly research on water governance and efforts towards policy reform the overall situation has not substantially improved and major transformations in water governance are yet to be implemented. The chapter summarises and addresses multi-level and multi-sectoral challenges for water governance by reviewing and discussing several key concepts in science and policy. An analysis of basin scale approaches and their effectiveness and a discussion of the importance of scale and of multi-level governance approaches shows that crossing boundaries is essential to tackle complexities of sustainable water governance and management. The concept of the WEF nexus is introduced and critically analysed concerning its potential to overcome sectoral fragmentation and sectoral power imbalances. Crossing boundaries also implies governance across national borders. The sub-chapters on transboundary water management and on global water governance address these international and global dimensions. Overall, the chapter highlights from different perspectives the importance of linking and of governing across scales from the local to the international and global.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

EU:

European Union

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations

GWP:

Global Water Partnership

INBO:

International Network of Basin Organisations

IWRM:

Integrated Water Resources Management

MDGs:

Millennium Development Goals

MRC:

Mekong River Commission

OECD:

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development

OMVS:

Organisation for the Development of the Senegal River

RBOs:

River Basin Organisations

RBM:

River Basin Management

SDGs:

Sustainable Development Goals

TVA:

Tennessee Valley Authority

UNFCCC:

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change

UNSGAB:

United Nations Secretary-General’s Advisory Board on Water and Sanitation

UN-WATER:

United Nations Water

WEF:

Water-Energy-Food

WFD:

Water Framework Directive

WTO:

World Trade Organisation

WWDR:

World Water Development Report

References

  • Allan JA (2003) IWRM/IWRAM: a new sanctioned discourse?. University of London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Allouche J, Middleton C, Gyawali D (2015) Technical veil, hidden politics: interrogating the power linkages behind the nexus. Water Altern 8(1):610–626

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D, Berkes F, Dale A, Kocho-Schellenberg E, Patton E (2011) Co-management and the co-production of knowledge: learning to adapt in Canada’s Arctic. In: Symposium on social theory and the environment in the new world (dis)order, vol 21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.006

  • Armitage D, de Loë RC, Morris M, Edwards TWD, Gerlak AK, Hall RI, Huitema D, Ison R, Livingstone D, MacDonald G, Mirumachi N, Plummer R, Wolfe BB (2015) Science–policy processes for transboundary water governance. Ambio 44(5):353–366. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-015-0644-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barrow CJ (1998) River basin development planning and management: a critical review. World Dev 26(1):171–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner T, Pahl-Wostl C (2013) UN-water and its role in global water governance. Ecol Soc 18(3). https://doi.org/10.5751/es-05564-180303

  • Benson D, Gain AK, Rouillard JJ (2015) Water governance in a comparative perspective: from IWRM to a ‘nexus’ approach? Water Altern 8(1):756–773

    Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge R, Monsees J (2012) Bridging parallel discourses of Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM): institutional and political challenges in developing and developed countries. Water Int 37(7):727–743. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2012.742713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhaduri A, Bogardi J, Siddiqi A, Voigt H, Vörösmarty C, Pahl-Wostl C, Bunn SE, Shrivastava P, Lawford R, Foster S, Kremer H, Renaud FG, Bruns A, Osuna VR (2016) Achieving sustainable development goals from a water perspective. Front Environ Sci 4(64). https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00064

  • Bina O (2008) Strategic environmental assessment. In: Jordan AJ, Lenschow A (eds) Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 134–156

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Biswas AK (2004) Integrated water resources management: a reassessment. Water Int 29(2):248–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060408691775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blomquist W, Dinar A, Kemper KE (2010) River basin management: conclusions and implications. In: Kemper K, Blomquist W, Dinar A (eds) Integrated river basin management through decentralization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 229–238

    Google Scholar 

  • BMU (2011) Messages from the Bonn2011 conference: the water, energy and food security nexus—solutions for a green economy. German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMU) and the German Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development (BMZ), Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodin Ö, Crona BI (2009) The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Glob Environ Change 19(3):366–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bogardi J, Muller M, Biney C, Gupta J, Nachtnebel HP, Rossignol B, Stratenwerth T (2012) Dialogue between scientists and river basin managers: documentation of a panel discussion at the GWSP GCI conference in Bonn. In: Janos JB, Jan L, Hans-Peter N (eds) The global dimensions of change in river basins—threats, linkages and adaptation, organized within the global catchment initiative of the Global Water System Project (GWSP), Bonn, Germany, 2012. Global Water System Project, Bonn, Germany, pp 137–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogardi JJ, Dudgeon D, Lawford R, Flinkerbusch E, Meyn A, Pahl-Wostl C, Vielhauer K, Vörösmarty C (2012b) Water security for a planet under pressure: interconnected challenges of a changing world call for sustainable solutions. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 4(1):35–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonn conference messages from the Bonn2011 conference: the water, energy and food security nexus—solutions for a green economy. In: The water, energy and food security nexus—solutions for a green economy, Bonn, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Bréthaut C (2016) River management and stakeholders’ participation: the case of the Rhone river, a fragmented institutional setting. Environ Policy Gov 26(4):292–305. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1718

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brisbois MC, de Loë RC (2016) State roles and motivations in collaborative approaches to water governance: a power theory-based analysis, vol 74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.06.012

  • Burchi S (1985) Different types of river basin entities—a global outlook. In: Lundqvist J, Lohm U, Falkenmark M (eds) Strategies for river basin management. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht, pp 293–298

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Cascao A (2009) Changing power relations in the Nile river basin: unilateralism vs. cooperation? Water Altern 2(2):245–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Cascão AE, Nicol A (2017) Changing cooperation dynamics in the Nile basin and the role of the GERD. In: Yihdego Z, Rieu-Clarke A, Cascão AE (eds) The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and the Nile basin: implications for transboundary water cooperation. Routledge, Abington

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan DSW (2017) Asymmetric bargaining between Myanmar and China in the Myitsone Dam controversy: social opposition akin to David’s stone against Goliath. Pac Rev 30(5):674–691. https://doi.org/10.1080/09512748.2017.1293714

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen A, Bakker K (2014) The eco-scalar fix: rescaling environmental governance and the politics of ecological boundaries in Alberta, Canada. Environ Plan D: Soc Space 32(1):128–146. https://doi.org/10.1068/d0813

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conca K (2006) Governing water. Contentious transnational politics and global institution building. The MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Moral L, Do ÓA (2014) Water governance and scalar politics across multiple-boundary river basins: states, catchments and regional powers in the Iberian Peninsula. Water Int 39(3):333–347. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2013.878816

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinar A, Kemper KE, Blomquist W, Diez M, Sine G, Fru W (2005) Decentralization of river basin management: a global analysis. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper. World Bank

    Google Scholar 

  • Dinar A, Kemper KE, Blomquist W, Kurukulasuriya P (2007) Whitewater: decentralization of river basin water resource management. J Policy Model 29(6):851–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpolmod.2007.06.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowsky I (2007) Conflict, cooperation and institutions in international water management. An economic analysis. Advances in ecological economics. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK and Northampton, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowsky I (2008) Integration in the management of international waters: economic perspectives on a global policy discourse. Glob Gov 14(4):455–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowsky I, Houdret A, Horlemann L (2014) Evolving river basin management in Mongolia? In: Huitema D, Meijerink S (eds) The politics of river basin organizations. Institutional design choices, coalitions and consequences. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 267–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Dombrowsky I, Hagemann N, Houdret A (2014b) The river basin as a new scale for water governance in transition countries? A comparative study of Mongolia and Ukraine. Environ Earth Sci 72(12):4705–4726. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3308-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dore J, Lebel L (2010) Deliberation and scale in Mekong region water governance. Environ Manag 46(1):60–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-010-9527-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durner W, Ludwig R (2008) Paradigmenwechsel in der europäischen Umweltrechtsetzung? Natur und Recht 30(7):457–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EPA (1996) Watershed approach framework. US Environmental Protection Agency. http://www.epa.gov/owow/watershed/framework/. Accessed 7 May 2008

  • EU (2000) Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for Community action in the field of water policy. Off J Eur Communities L 327:1–72

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2014) The water-energy-food nexus: a new approach in support of food security and sustainable agriculture. Food Agric Organ, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Giordano M, Drieschova A, Duncan JA, Sayama Y, De Stefano L, Wolf AT (2014) A review of the evolution and state of transboundary freshwater treaties. Int Environ Agreem 14(3):245–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-013-9211-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleick HP, Lane J (2005) Large international water meetings: time for a reappraisal. Water Int 30(3):410–414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goria A, Sgobbi A, von Homeyer I (eds) (2010) Governance for the environment. A comparative analysis of environmental policy integration. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Grey D, Sadoff CW (2007) Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy 9:545–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J (2008) Global change: analysing scale and scaling in environmental governance. In: Young OR, King LA, Schroeder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change: principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. MIT Press, pp 225–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J (2014) Glocal politics of scale on environmental issues: climate, water and forests. In: Padt F, Opdam P, Polman N, Termeer C (eds) Scale-sensitive governance of the environment. Wiley, Oxford, pp 140–156

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Pahl-Wostl C (2013) Global water governance in the context of global and multi-level governance: its need, form, and challenges. Ecol Soc 18(4):53. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05952-180453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta J, Pahl-Wostl C, Zondervan R (2013) ‘Glocal’ water governance: a multi-level challenge in the anthropocene. Aquat Mar Syst 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.09.003

  • Gupta J, Pahl-Wostl C, Zondervan R (2013) Glocal water governance—a multi-level challenge in the anthropocene. Cur Opin Environ Sustain (This special Issue)

    Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2000) Integrated water resources management. Global Water Partnership, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • GWP (2004) Catalyzing change: a handbook for developing integrated water resources management (IWRM) and water efficiency strategies. Global Water Partnership (GWP) Technical Committee Stockholm, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  • GWP, INBO (2009) A handbook for integrated water resources management in basins. Global Water Partnership (GWP) and the International Network of Basin Organizations (INBO)

    Google Scholar 

  • GWSP (2005) The global water system project: science framework and implementation activities. ESSP Report No. 3. Earth System Science Partnership

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M, Nilsson M, Raworth K, Bakker P, Berkhout F, de Boer Y, Rockström J, Ludwig K, Kok M (2015) Beyond Cockpit-ism: four insights to enhance the transformative potential of the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci 7:1651–1660. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7021651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris LM, Alatout S (2010) Negotiating hydro-scales, forging states: comparison of the upper Tigris/Euphrates and Jordan river basins. Polit Geogr 29(3):148–156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2010.02.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartje V (2002) International dimensions of integrated water management. In: Al Baz I, Hartje V, Scheumann W (eds) Co-operation on transboundary rivers. Nomos, Baden-Baden, pp 7–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Heldt S, Rodríguez-de-Francisco JC, Dombrowsky I, Feld CK, Karthe D (2017) Is the EU WFD suitable to support IWRM planning in non-European countries? Lessons learnt from the introduction of IWRM and river basin management in Mongolia. Environ Sci Policy 75:28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hering JG, Sedlak DL, Tortajada C, Biswas AK, Niwagaba C, Breu T (2015) Local perspectives on water. Science 349(6247):479–480. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac5902

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Herrfahrdt-Pähle E (2010) South African water governance between administrative and hydrological boundaries. Clim Dev 2(2):111–127. https://doi.org/10.3763/cdev.2010.0038

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff H (2011) Understanding the nexus, background paper for the Bonn 2011 conference: the water, energy and food security nexus. Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzinger K, Knill C, Lenschow A (2009) Governance in EU environmental policy. In: Tömmel I, Verdun A (eds) Governance and policy-making in the EU. Lynne Rienner, Boulder, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe L, Marks G (2003) Unraveling the central state but how? Types of multi-level governance. Am Polit Sci Rev 97:233–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper BP (2006) Key performance indicators of river basin organizations. Visiting Scholar Program. Southern Illinois University

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooper BP, Lloyd GJ (2011) Report on IWRM in transboundary basins. UNEP-DHI Centre for Water and Environment, Hørsholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Horlemann L, Dombrowsky I (2012) Institutionalising IWRM in developing and transition countries—the case of Mongolia. Environ Earth Sci 65(5):1547–1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1213-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houdret A, Dombrowsky I, Horlemann L (2014) The institutionalization of river basin management as politics of scale—insights from Mongolia. J Hydrol 519(Part C):2392–2404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.11.037

  • Hüesker F, Moss T (2015) The politics of multi-scalar action in river basin management: implementing the EU Water Framework Directive (WFD). Land Use Policy 42:38–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitema D, Meijerink S (2014a) The politics of river basin organisations: institutional design choices, coalitions and consequences. In: Huitema D, Meijerink S (eds) The politics of river basin organisations—coalitions, institutional design choices and consequences. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 1–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema D, Meijerink S (eds) (2014b) The politics of river basin organisations—coalitions, institutional design choices and consequences. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Huitema D, Meijerink S (2017) The politics of river basin organizations: institutional design choices, coalitions, and consequences. Ecol Soc 22(2):42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICWE (1992) International conference on water and the environment: development issues for the 21st century, 26–31 Jan 1992, Dublin, Ireland. Report of the Conference. World Meteorological Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • INBO (1994) Constitutive meeting of an International Network of Basin Organisations

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingram H (2011) Beyond universal remedies for good water governance. In: Garrido A, Ingram H (eds) Water for food in a changing world. Contributions from the Rosenberg international forum on water policy. Routledge, Miltorn Park, pp 241–261

    Google Scholar 

  • IRENA (2014) Renewable energy in the water, energy & food nexus. International Renewable Energy Agency, Abu Dhabi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffrey P, Gearey M (2006) Integrated water resources management: lost on the road from ambition to realisation? Water Sci Technol 53(1):1–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A, Lenschow A (eds) (2008) Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A, Lenschow A (2010) Environmental policy integration: a state of the art review. Environ Policy Gov 20(3):147–158. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan A, Schout A (2006) The coordination of the European Union: exploring the capacities for networked governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kemper KE, Blomquist W, Dinar A (2010) Integrated river basin management through decentralization. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiik L (2016) Nationalism and anti-ethno-politics: why ‘Chinese Development’ failed at Myanmar’s Myitsone Dam. Eurasian Geogr Econ 57(3):374–402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15387216.2016.1198265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirchherr J, Matthews N, Charles KJ, Walton MJ (2017) “Learning it the hard way”: social safeguards norms in Chinese-led dam projects in Myanmar, Laos and Cambodia, vol 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.12.058

  • Kiser LL, Ostrom E (1982) The three world of action—a metatheoretical synthesis of institutional approaches. In: Ostrom E (ed) Strategies of political inquiry. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, pp 179–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Klijn E-H (2008) Governance and governance networks in Europe: an assessment of ten years of research on the theme. Public Manag Rev 10(4):505–525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kneese AV, Bower BT (1968) Managing water quality. Economics, technology, institutions. The Johns Hopkins University Press and Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lankford BA, Hepworth N (2010) The Cathedral and the Bazaar: monocentric and polycentric river basin management. Water Altern 3:82–101

    Google Scholar 

  • LAWA (2001) Handlungskonzept zur Umsetzung der Wasserrahmenrichtlinie. Länderarbeitsgemeinschaft Wasser. http://www.lawa.de/pub/thema/wrrl.html. Accessed 05 Oct 2006

  • Le Blanc D (2015) Towards integration at last? The sustainable development goals’ as a network of targets. DESA Working Paper, vol 141. United Nations, Department of Economic & Social Affairs, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebel L, Garden P, Imamura M (2005) The politics of scale, position, and place in the governance of water resources in the Mekong region. Ecol Soc 10(2):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenschow A, Zito AR (1998) Blurring or shifting of policy frames? Institutionalization of the economic-environmental policy linkage in the European community. Governance 4:415–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenschow A, Becker ST, Mehl C (2017) Scalar dynamics and legitimacy implications of ambient air quality management in the EU. J Environ Policy Plan 19(5):520–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medema W, McIntosh BS, Jeffrey PJ (2008) From premise to practice: a critical assessment of integrated water resources management and adaptive management approaches in the water sector. Ecol Soc 13(2):29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta L, Allouche J, Nicol A, Walnycki A (2014) Global environmental justice and the right to water: the case of peri-urban Cochabamba and Delhi, vol 54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.014

  • Meijerink S, Huitema D (2017) The institutional design, politics, and effects of a bioregional approach: observations and lessons from 11 case studies of river basin organizations. Ecol Soc 22(2):41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menga F, Mirumachi N (2016) Fostering Tajik hydraulic development: examining the role of soft power in the case of the Rogun Dam. Water Altern 9(2):373–388

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirumachi N (2013) Transboundary water security: reviewing the importance of national regulatory and accountability capacities. In: Lankford BA, Bakker K, Zeitoun M, Conway D (eds) Water security: principles, perspectives and practices. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirumachi N (2015) Transboundary water politics in the developing world. Earthscan studies in water resource management. Routledge, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell B (2005) Integrated water resource management, institutional arrangements, and land-use planning. Environ Plan 37:1335–1352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molle F (2008) Nirvana concepts, narratives and policy models: insights from the water sector. Water Altern 1(1):131–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Molle F (2009) River-basin planning and management: the social life of a concept. Geoforum 40:484–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss T (2003) Solving problems of ‘fit’ at the expense of problems of ‘interplay’? The spatial reorganisation of water management following the EU water framework directive. In: Breit H, Engels A, Moss T, Troja M (eds) How institutions change: perspectives on social learning in global and local environmental contexts. Leske + Budrich, Opladen, pp 85–121

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moss T (2004) The governance of land use in river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU water framework directive. Land Use Policy 21:85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss T (2012) Spatial fit, from panacea to practice: implementing the EU water framework directive. Ecol Soc 17(3):2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostert E (1998) River basin management in the European Union—how it is done and how it should be done. Eur Water Manag 1(3):26–35

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Motlagh M, Bhaduri A, Bogardi J, Ribbe L (2017) The role of trust-building in fostering cooperation in the Eastern Nile basin: a case of experimental game application. J Nat Resour Dev 7:73–83. https://doi.org/10.5027/jnrd.v7i0.09

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nasr H, Neef A (2016) Ethiopia’s challenge to Egyptian hegemony in the Nile river basin: the case of the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam. Geopolitics 21(4):969–989. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2016.1209740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Challies E (2014) Water, rivers and wetlands. In: Harris P (ed) Routledge handbook of global environmental politics. Routledge, London & New York, pp 439–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Fritsch O (2009) Environmental governance: participatory, multi-level—and effective? Environ Policy Gov 19(3):197–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Koontz TM (2014) Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: the EU’s mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. J Eur Public Policy 21(2):248–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Moss T (2017) Scale in environmental governance: moving from concepts and cases to consolidation. J Environ Policy Plan 19(5):473–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1390926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Günther D, Pahl-Wostl C (2010) Synapses in the network: learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecol Soc 15 (4)

    Google Scholar 

  • Newig J, Schulz D, Jager NW (2016) Disentangling puzzles of spatial scales and participation in environmental governance: the case of governance re-scaling through the European water framework directive. Environ Manag 58(6):998–1014. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-016-0753-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newson M (1992) Land, water and development: river basin systems and their sustainable management. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman ES (2015) Governing transboundary waters: Canada, the United States, and indigenous communities. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2011) Water governance in OECD countries: a multi-level approach. OECD studies on water. Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Lear S, Diehl PF (2007) Not drawn to scale: research on resource and environmental conflict. Geopolitics 12(1):166–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040601031263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19:354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2015) Water governance in the face of global change—from understanding to transformation. In: Water governance: concepts, methods and practice, vol 1. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21855-7

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2015) Water policy—from panaceas towards embracing complexity. In: Water governance in the face of global change—from understanding to transformation. Springer International Publishing, pp 11–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2017) An evolutionary perspective on water governance: from understanding to transformation. Water Resour Manag 31:2917–2932. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1727-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2019) Governance of the water-energy-food security nexus: a multi-level coordination challenge. Environ Sci Policy 92:356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Hoff H, Meybeck M, Sorooshian S (2002) The role of global change research for aquatic sciences. Aquat Sci 64:IV–VI. https://doi.org/10.1007/pl00012595

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Gupta J, Petry D (2008) Governance and the global water system: a theoretical exploration. Glob Gov 14:419–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Jeffrey P, Sendzimir J (2011) Adaptive and integrated management of water resources. In: Quentin RQ, Hussey K (eds) Water resources planning and management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 292–310

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Lebel L, Knieper C, Nikitina E (2012) From applying panaceas to mastering complexity: toward adaptive water governance in river basins. Environ Sci Policy 23:24–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Conca K, Kramer A, Maestu J, Schmidt F (2013a) Missing links in global water governance: a processes-oriented analysis. Ecol Soc 18(2):33. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05554-180233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Vörösmarty C, Bhaduri A, Bogardi J, Rockström J, Alcamo J (2013b) Towards a sustainable water future: shaping the next decade of global water research. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(6):708–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Palmer MA, Richards K (2013) Enhancing water security for the benefits of humans and nature—the role of governance. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.018

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Gupta J, Lebel L, Schulze R, Stuart-Hill S (2015) Institutional capacity and good governance for an effective implementation of the SDGs. GWSP Policy Brief. Global Water System Project, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Petry D, Dombrowsky I (2007) River basin management in Germany—past experiences and challenges ahead. In: Erickson JD, Messner F, Ring I (eds) Ecological economics of sustainable watershed management. Elsevier Publishers, Amsterdam, pp 11–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rahaman MM, Varis O, Kajander T (2004) EU water framework directive vs. international principles concerning IWRM: the seven mismatches. Int J Water Resour Dev 20(4):565–575

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman S, Mohr A (2014) Biofuels and the role of space in sustainable innovation journeys. J Clean Prod 65:224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rangeley R, Thiam BM, Andersen RA, Lyle CA (1994) International river basin organizations in Sub-Saharan Africa. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers P (1997) International river basins: pervasive unidirectional externalities. In: Dasgupta P, Mäler K-G, Vercelli A (eds) The economics of transnational commons. Carendon Press, Oxford, pp 35–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sadoff CW, Whittington D, Grey D (2002) Africa’s international rivers. An economic perspective. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlager E, Blomquist W (2008) Embracing watershed politics. University Press of Colorado, Boulder, Colorado, USA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schmeier S (2013) Governing international watercourses: river basin organizations and the sustainable governance of internationally shared rivers and lakes. Routledge, Abingdon, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmeier S (2015) The institutional design of river basin organizations—empirical findings from around the world. Int J River Basin Manag 13(1):51–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2014.963862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schreiner B (2013) Why has the South African national water act been so difficult to implement? Water Altern 6(2):239–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Serageldin I, Borlaug N, Kendall H, Carlsson I, Gorbatchev M (2000) A report of the World Commission on Water for the 21st century. Water Int 25(2):284–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sojamo S, Keulertz M, Warner J, Allan JA (2012) Virtual water hegemony: the role of agribusiness in global water governance. Water Int 37(2):169–182. https://doi.org/10.1080/02508060.2012.662734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steurer R (2008) Sustainable development strategies. In: Jordan AJ, Lenschow A (eds) Innovation in environmental policy? Integrating the environment for sustainability. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 93–113

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y (2012) China and the changing Myanmar. J Curr Southeast Asian Aff 31(4):51–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swyngedouw E (1997) Neither global nor local—”glocalization” and the politics of scale. In: Cox KR (ed) Spaces of globalization. The Guilford Press, New York/London, pp 137–166

    Google Scholar 

  • Tawfik R, Dombrowsky I (2018) GERD and hydro-politics in the Eastern Nile: from water to benefit-sharing? In: Yihdego Z, Rieu-Clarke A, Cascao A (eds) The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam and the Nile basin: implications for transboundary water cooperation. Routledge, London, pp 113–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Teclaff LA (1996) Evolution of the river basin concept in national and international water law. Nat Resour J 36:359–392

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (1958) Integrated river basin development. United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UN (2002) Report on the world summit on sustainable development, Johannesburg, South Africa, 26 Aug–4 Sept 2002, United Nations, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCED (1992) United Nations conference on environment and development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, Agenda 21, United Nations. http://www.sidsnet.org/docshare/other/Agenda21_UNCED.pdf. Accessed 23 Aug 2005

  • UNEP (2012) The UN-water status report on the application of integrated approaches to water resources management. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations (2006) Water: a shared responsibility. The United Nations World Water Development Report 2. UNESCO Publications, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • UNSGAB (2015) The UNSGAB journey. United Nations, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Brandeler F, Gupta J, Hordijk M (2018) Megacities and rivers: scalar mismatches between urban water management and river basin management. J Hydrol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.01.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varady RG, Iles-Shih M (2009) Global water initiatives: what do the experts think? Report on a survey of leading figures in the world of water. In: Biswas A, Tortajada C (eds) Impacts of megaconferences on the water sector. Springer, Berlin, pp 53–101

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Hoekstra AY, Bunn SE, Conway D, Gupta J (2015) Fresh water goes global. Science 349(6247):478–479. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac6009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner J, Wester P, Bolding A (2008) Going with the flow: river basins as the natural units for water management? Water Policy 10(Supplement 2):121–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WEFWI (2009) Managing our future water needs for agriculture, industry, human health and the environment (World economic forum water initiative)

    Google Scholar 

  • WEFWI (2011) Water security: the water-food-energy-climate nexus (World economic forum water initiative). Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitz N, Strambo C, Kemp-Benedict E, Nilsson M (2017) Closing the governance gaps in the water-energy-food nexus: insights from integrative governance. Glob Environ Change 45(Supplement C):165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.06.006

  • Wong S (2016) A post-critical perspective to community participation in trans-boundary water governance—a case study of the Volta river basin in West Africa, vol 77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.10.012

  • World Bank (1993) Water resources management. A World Bank policy paper. The World Bank, Washington, DC

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wurzel R, Zito A, Jordan A (2013) Environmental governance in Europe: a comparative analysis of new environmental policy instruments. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2002) The institutional dimensions of environmental change: fit, interplay, and scale. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2005) Science plan. Institutional dimensions of global environmental change. IHDP Report No. 16. International Human Dimensions Programme, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2013) Sugaring off: enduring insights from long-term research on environmental governance. Int Environ Agreem 13(1):87–105. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10784-012-9204-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarfl C, Lumsdon AE, Berlekamp J, Tydecks L, Tockner K (2015) A global boom in hydropower dam construction. Aquat Sci 77(1):161–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-014-0377-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeitoun M, Cascão AE, Warner J, Mirumachi N, Matthews N, Menga F, Farnum R (2016) Transboundary water interaction III: contest and compliance. Int Environ Agreem 17(2):271–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zwarteveen MZ, Liebrand J (2016) Performing modernity: the scalar politics of irrigation development in Nepal. In: Norman E, Cook C, Cohen A (eds) Negotiation water governance: why the politics of scale matter. Routledge, Abington, pp 263–280

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudia Pahl-Wostl .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pahl-Wostl, C., Dombrowsky, I., Mirumachi, N. (2021). Water Governance and Policies. In: Bogardi, J.J., et al. Handbook of Water Resources Management: Discourses, Concepts and Examples. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60147-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics