Comparing hemodynamics, blood gas analyses and proinflammatory cytokines in endotoxemic and severely septic rats

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2011.01.020Get rights and content

Abstract

Lipopolysaccharide (LPS) is often used in short-term models of inflammation. Since endotoxemia and sepsis are different entities we have recently established a short-term sepsis model in rats induced by cecal ligation and incision (CLI). This retrospective study was conducted in order to identify similarities and differences between both experimental approaches. 32 anesthetized/ventilated male rats from the following four groups were analysed (each n = 8): CTRL-group (0.9% NaCl i.v.); LPS-group (5 mg/kg i.v.); SHAM-group (laparotomy); CLI-group (1.5 cm blade incision). Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and blood gas parameters (arterial base excess (BE) and pH) were continuously recorded. Total observation time was 300 min. Plasma samples were obtained afterwards. LPS and CLI induced significant arterial hypotension and metabolic acidosis compared to CTRL- or SHAM-group, respectively. Yet, between the LPS- and CLI-groups, there were no differences in MAP, BE and pH. LPS significantly induced IL-1β, IL-6 and TNF-α in the plasma. In contrast, CLI showed a clear tendency towards increased IL-1β and IL-6 plasma levels and did not affect TNF-α. Our results indicate that the CLI sepsis model is suitable for short-term investigations on hemodynamic alterations and blood gas analyses during sepsis. 300 min after the proinflammatory insult, plasma concentrations of IL-1β and IL-6 in the plasma remain considerably lower after CLI compared to endotoxemia. Low TNF-α concentrations 300 min after sepsis induction could be interpreted as considerable immunosuppression during CLI sepsis.

Introduction

Despite significant progress in understanding the pathophysiology of sepsis, severe sepsis is still a major cause of death [1]. According to international consensus conferences, severe sepsis is characterized by arterial hypotension and organ dysfunction due to an infectious origin [2]. The complex situation in severe sepsis cannot be sufficiently investigated in cell culture approaches. Therefore, different animal models are essential to mirror the clinical situation [3]. For practical and ethical reasons, rodent models are widely used for immunopharmacological studies. In the past, induction of endotoxemia by intraperitoneal (i.p.) or intravenous (i.v.) injection of bacterial components (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) has been shown to be a convenient and reliable way to induce a state of (hyper-)inflammation within a very short observation time [4], [5]. However, endotoxemia and polymicrobial sepsis differ in their respective immunological alterations. Thus, results from endotoxemia trials must be interpreted with caution and are to be transferred with considerable limitations onto the complex situation during sepsis [6]. More specifically, LPS injection rapidly induces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, which can effectively be treated with antiinflammatory drugs [7]. In contrast, clinically relevant sepsis models (i.e. cecal ligation and puncture, CLP [8]) induce systemic inflammation over a longer period of time. In addition, large trials involving antiinflammatory agents in sepsis have featured disappointing results [9], which owes tribute to the growing body of evidence that overcoming immunosuppression during sepsis is, in fact, crucial for survival [10].

Nevertheless, LPS administration remains frequently used in short-term inflammatory models for lack of short-term sepsis models. In order to fill this gap, we have recently published an acute sepsis model induced by cecal ligation and incision (CLI) [11], which has been used successfully for immunopharmacological studies [12], [13], [14]. CLI induces arterial hypotension and a state of (hyper-)inflammation within a very short observation time. In contrast to endotoxemia, CLI is induced by live bacteria and, therefore, fulfils international sepsis criteria [15].

We aimed to analyse own – to date unpublished – data from endotoxemic (LPS injection) and septic (CLI procedure) rats with respect to mortality, hemodynamics, blood gas analyses and proinflammatory cytokines in the plasma in order to identify additional differences or possible similarities between both experimental short-term approaches.

Section snippets

Animals and anesthesia

All animal experiments in this retrospective study were approved by the governmental board for the care of animal subjects (Regierungspräsidium Darmstadt, Germany) and were in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines (National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, 1996). 32 male Sprague–Dawley rats (Harlan-Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany) were kept on a 12 h light/dark cycle with free access to food and water. Rats were anesthetized by i.p. injection of pentobarbital (10 mg/kg body

Survival, hemodynamics and blood gas analyses

Mortality within the CLI-group was 38%. In the three other groups (CTRL-, LPS-, SHAM-group), no animal died within the observation time of 300 min. At baseline, there were no significant differences in regard to MAP, arterial pH or BE between the four groups. MAP remained stable in the CTRL- and SHAM-group throughout the observation time. Compared to the CTRL- and the SHAM-group, both LPS and CLI induced significant arterial hypotension within observation time (Table 1). Likewise, arterial pH

Discussion

This retrospective analysis has identified differences but also similarities between endotoxemia and our recently established CLI sepsis model in rats. Endotoxemia is often induced in animal models to mirror (hyper-)inflammatory processes, thus mimicking “sepsis”. Although differences between endotoxemia and sepsis have been clearly denoted [6], LPS is convenient to handle and induces dose-responding effects, which are highly reproducible. Among potential targets of interest, we have focused on

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.

Acknowledgement

Parts of this study have been presented at the 8th World Congress on Trauma, Shock, Inflammation and Sepsis (TSIS) 2010 in Munich, Germany. This study was supported by departmental funds.

References (30)

  • K.A. Wichterman et al.

    Sepsis and septic shock — a review of laboratory models and a proposal

    J Surg Res

    (1980)
  • P. Scheiermann et al.

    Cecal ligation and incision: an acute onset model of severe sepsis in rats

    J Surg Res

    (2009)
  • C. Thiemermann

    Nitric oxide and septic shock

    Gen Pharmacol

    (1997)
  • J.L. Vincent et al.

    Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the intensive care unit

    Br J Hosp Med (Lond).

    (2008)
  • R.P. Dellinger et al.

    Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008

    Crit Care Med

    (2008)
  • L.F. Poli-de-Figueiredo et al.

    Experimental models of sepsis and their clinical relevance

    Shock

    (2008)
  • K.A. Boost et al.

    The beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol counteracts anti-inflammatory effects of isoflurane in rat endotoxemia

    Acta Anaesthesiol Scand

    (2007)
  • K.A. Boost et al.

    Targeting caspase-1 by inhalation-therapy: effects of Ac-YVAD-CHO on IL-1 beta, IL-18 and downstream proinflammatory parameters as detected in rat endotoxaemia

    Intensive Care Med

    (2007)
  • D. Rittirsch et al.

    The disconnect between animal models of sepsis and human sepsis

    J Leukoc Biol

    (2007)
  • R. Nahra et al.

    Targeting the lipopolysaccharides: still a matter of debate?

    Curr Opin Anaesthesiol

    (2008)
  • W.J. Kox et al.

    Immunomodulatory therapies in sepsis

    Intensive Care Med

    (2000)
  • Hotchkiss RS, Opal S. Immunotherapy for sepsis — a new approach against an ancient foe. N Engl J Med...
  • P. Scheiermann et al.

    Effects of intravenous and inhaled levosimendan in severe rodent sepsis

    Intensive Care Med

    (2009)
  • E. Ziesche et al.

    Dexamethasone suppresses interleukin-22 associated with bacterial infection in vitro and in vivo

    Clin Exp Immunol

    (2009)
  • Scheiermann P, Ott J, Hoegl S, Hecker M, Hofstetter C, Seeger W, Zwissler B, et al. Effects of short-term infusion of...
  • Cited by (11)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    The study was conducted at the Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

    View full text