Comparing hemodynamics, blood gas analyses and proinflammatory cytokines in endotoxemic and severely septic rats☆
Introduction
Despite significant progress in understanding the pathophysiology of sepsis, severe sepsis is still a major cause of death [1]. According to international consensus conferences, severe sepsis is characterized by arterial hypotension and organ dysfunction due to an infectious origin [2]. The complex situation in severe sepsis cannot be sufficiently investigated in cell culture approaches. Therefore, different animal models are essential to mirror the clinical situation [3]. For practical and ethical reasons, rodent models are widely used for immunopharmacological studies. In the past, induction of endotoxemia by intraperitoneal (i.p.) or intravenous (i.v.) injection of bacterial components (lipopolysaccharide, LPS) has been shown to be a convenient and reliable way to induce a state of (hyper-)inflammation within a very short observation time [4], [5]. However, endotoxemia and polymicrobial sepsis differ in their respective immunological alterations. Thus, results from endotoxemia trials must be interpreted with caution and are to be transferred with considerable limitations onto the complex situation during sepsis [6]. More specifically, LPS injection rapidly induces the expression of proinflammatory cytokines, which can effectively be treated with antiinflammatory drugs [7]. In contrast, clinically relevant sepsis models (i.e. cecal ligation and puncture, CLP [8]) induce systemic inflammation over a longer period of time. In addition, large trials involving antiinflammatory agents in sepsis have featured disappointing results [9], which owes tribute to the growing body of evidence that overcoming immunosuppression during sepsis is, in fact, crucial for survival [10].
Nevertheless, LPS administration remains frequently used in short-term inflammatory models for lack of short-term sepsis models. In order to fill this gap, we have recently published an acute sepsis model induced by cecal ligation and incision (CLI) [11], which has been used successfully for immunopharmacological studies [12], [13], [14]. CLI induces arterial hypotension and a state of (hyper-)inflammation within a very short observation time. In contrast to endotoxemia, CLI is induced by live bacteria and, therefore, fulfils international sepsis criteria [15].
We aimed to analyse own – to date unpublished – data from endotoxemic (LPS injection) and septic (CLI procedure) rats with respect to mortality, hemodynamics, blood gas analyses and proinflammatory cytokines in the plasma in order to identify additional differences or possible similarities between both experimental short-term approaches.
Section snippets
Animals and anesthesia
All animal experiments in this retrospective study were approved by the governmental board for the care of animal subjects (Regierungspräsidium Darmstadt, Germany) and were in accordance with the National Institute of Health guidelines (National Academy of Sciences, Washington DC, 1996). 32 male Sprague–Dawley rats (Harlan-Winkelmann, Borchen, Germany) were kept on a 12 h light/dark cycle with free access to food and water. Rats were anesthetized by i.p. injection of pentobarbital (10 mg/kg body
Survival, hemodynamics and blood gas analyses
Mortality within the CLI-group was 38%. In the three other groups (CTRL-, LPS-, SHAM-group), no animal died within the observation time of 300 min. At baseline, there were no significant differences in regard to MAP, arterial pH or BE between the four groups. MAP remained stable in the CTRL- and SHAM-group throughout the observation time. Compared to the CTRL- and the SHAM-group, both LPS and CLI induced significant arterial hypotension within observation time (Table 1). Likewise, arterial pH
Discussion
This retrospective analysis has identified differences but also similarities between endotoxemia and our recently established CLI sepsis model in rats. Endotoxemia is often induced in animal models to mirror (hyper-)inflammatory processes, thus mimicking “sepsis”. Although differences between endotoxemia and sepsis have been clearly denoted [6], LPS is convenient to handle and induces dose-responding effects, which are highly reproducible. Among potential targets of interest, we have focused on
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests.
Acknowledgement
Parts of this study have been presented at the 8th World Congress on Trauma, Shock, Inflammation and Sepsis (TSIS) 2010 in Munich, Germany. This study was supported by departmental funds.
References (30)
- et al.
Sepsis and septic shock — a review of laboratory models and a proposal
J Surg Res
(1980) - et al.
Cecal ligation and incision: an acute onset model of severe sepsis in rats
J Surg Res
(2009) Nitric oxide and septic shock
Gen Pharmacol
(1997)- et al.
Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the intensive care unit
Br J Hosp Med (Lond).
(2008) - et al.
Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2008
Crit Care Med
(2008) - et al.
Experimental models of sepsis and their clinical relevance
Shock
(2008) - et al.
The beta-adrenoceptor antagonist propranolol counteracts anti-inflammatory effects of isoflurane in rat endotoxemia
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand
(2007) - et al.
Targeting caspase-1 by inhalation-therapy: effects of Ac-YVAD-CHO on IL-1 beta, IL-18 and downstream proinflammatory parameters as detected in rat endotoxaemia
Intensive Care Med
(2007) - et al.
The disconnect between animal models of sepsis and human sepsis
J Leukoc Biol
(2007) - et al.
Targeting the lipopolysaccharides: still a matter of debate?
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol
(2008)
Immunomodulatory therapies in sepsis
Intensive Care Med
Effects of intravenous and inhaled levosimendan in severe rodent sepsis
Intensive Care Med
Dexamethasone suppresses interleukin-22 associated with bacterial infection in vitro and in vivo
Clin Exp Immunol
Cited by (11)
Effects of LPS-induced immune activation prior to trauma exposure on PTSD-like symptoms in mice
2017, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :First, we studied the time course of inflammatory response after acute predator stress in mice. Second, by administering the Toll-like-receptor 4 (TLR4) agonist lipopolysaccharide (LPS), which induces inflammatory markers (e.g. pro-inflammatory cytokines and CRP) in blood and brain [17,18], we studied the effect of immune activation prior to acute trauma on predator stress-induced avoidance behaviors. 1.1.1 Adult male C57BL/6 mice (n = 108) were used at 8–10 weeks of age (The Jackson Laboratories, CA, USA) and housed with water and food ad libitum and in a 12 h/12 h reverse light/dark cycle (lights on at 7:00 P.M. and off at 7:00 A.M.) before being single housed one week before predator stress exposure.
Humanized mice as a tool to study sepsis—more than meets the eye
2021, International Journal of Molecular SciencesProtective effects of erythropoietin towards acute lung injuries in rats with sepsis and its related mechanisms
2019, Annals of Clinical and Laboratory Science
- ☆
The study was conducted at the Hospital of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt/Main, Germany.