Elsevier

Biological Conservation

Volume 164, August 2013, Pages 62-72
Biological Conservation

Deforestation in an African biodiversity hotspot: Extent, variation and the effectiveness of protected areas

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2013.04.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Generalised additive models built to describe forest and woodland loss in the Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania.

  • Rates of evergreen forest loss, at −0.2% per year, are lower than rates of miombo woodland loss, at −2.3% per year.

  • Protected areas are partially effective at reducing forest (40% decrease) and woodland (16% decrease) loss.

  • The majority of remaining forest lies within protected areas, while most remaining woodland lies outside protected areas.

  • More resources are needed to reduce the loss of forest and, in particular, woodland, both valuable for ecosystem services.

Abstract

The Eastern Arc Mountains of Tanzania show exceptional endemism that is threatened by high anthropogenic pressure leading to the loss of natural habitat. Using a novel habitat conversion model, we present a spatially explicit analysis of the predictors of forest and woodland conversion in the Eastern Arc over 25 years. Our results show that 5% (210 km2) of evergreen forest and 43% (2060 km2) of miombo woodland was lost in the Eastern Arc Mountains between 1975 and 2000. Important predictors of habitat conversion included distance to natural habitat edge, topography and measures of remoteness. The main conservation strategy in these mountains for the past 100 years has been to develop a network of protected areas. These appear to have reduced rates of habitat loss and most remaining evergreen forest is now within protected areas. However, the majority of miombo woodland, an important source of ecosystem services, lies outside formal protected areas, where additional conservation strategies may be needed.

Introduction

Forest area in Africa decreased by an estimated 34–41 thousand km2 per year during the 1990s and 2000s (FAO, 2010). Tropical moist forests are amongst the most species-rich terrestrial habitats on Earth, making deforestation a crucial issue for biodiversity conservation (Joppa and Pfaff, 2011, Pimm et al., 2001). Furthermore, they sequester and store large amounts of carbon; tropical deforestation is estimated to contribute 7–14% of global carbon dioxide emissions, resulting in accelerated climate change (Harris et al., 2012, IPCC, 2007). Given forests’ crucial role in conserving biodiversity and mitigating climate change, as well as in sustaining local livelihoods, understanding the drivers and threat mechanisms of forest conversion and finding ways to reduce rates of loss is high on the conservation agenda (Balmford et al., 2009).

An increasing research focus on the rates and predictors of habitat conversion has been aided by the advent of satellite remote sensing technologies (DeFries and Townshend, 1999). Regression models have been widely used to identify predictors of habitat conversion and previous studies have investigated the impact of market access (e.g. distance to roads and population centres) and topography (e.g. slope and elevation) at study scales ranging from sub-national (Patarasuk and Fik, 2013, Serneels and Lambin, 2001, Vuohelainen et al., 2012) to regional (Pfeifer et al., 2012, Portillo-Quintero et al., 2012) and global (Scrieciu, 2007). These models have been used to elucidate threat mechanisms of habitat conversion and to investigate the effectiveness of conservation efforts to prevent it. Predictive models have more recently been proposed as a tool for protected area planning: by assessing threats spatially and designating protected areas accordingly the potential impact of reserves can be maximised (Joppa and Pfaff, 2009). Predictive models can also help in conservation resource allocation by suggesting different levels of investment required in different parts of a protected area network (Andam et al., 2008). Lastly, an international scheme to decrease the amount of carbon released into the atmosphere (Reduced Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation; REDD) requires an assessment of baseline (current) levels of habitat conversion and the future trajectories of loss to be estimated (Brown et al., 2007).

Much of our current knowledge of the causes and mechanisms of habitat loss is based upon research undertaken in Latin America and Asia, where deforestation is driven by agricultural exports and urban population growth, largely mediated through agricultural expansion, infrastructure development and resource extraction (DeFries et al., 2010, Geist and Lambin, 2002). However, the drivers and extent of deforestation have been found to vary between continents and Africa, in particular, has had few studies devoted to spatial modelling of habitat loss (Achard et al., 2002, DeFries et al., 2010, Fisher, 2010, Geist and Lambin, 2002, Pfeifer et al., 2012). We focus on the Eastern Arc Mountains in Tanzania where, although anthropogenic pressures are high, they vary across the landscape (Brooks et al., 2002, Burgess et al., 2006). Our objectives are to develop the first spatially explicit, high-resolution model of past evergreen forest and miombo woodland change in the Eastern Arc Mountains, based upon potential predictors of habitat loss and retention. We then use this model to predict likely future changes and to consider how habitat loss varies between protected and non-protected areas.

Section snippets

Study area

The Eastern Arc Mountains are a chain of ancient crystalline mountain blocs in East Africa under the climatic influence of the Indian Ocean (Lovett, 1985, Platts et al., 2011). In Tanzania, the range consists of 12 blocs running from the southern highlands to the northeast border with Kenya and covering over 50,000 km2. The forests of the Eastern Arc are important centres of biodiversity and the mountains host 400–500 strictly-endemic vascular plant species, around 20% of which are trees (Platts

Quantifying habitat loss

Woody vegetation in the Eastern Arc falls into two very distinct habitats. The first is closed canopy evergreen and semi-evergreen vegetation growing up to 40 m tall and with exceptional biodiversity value. The other is closed to nearly-closed canopy deciduous vegetation, known as miombo woodland, growing up to about 30 m tall and with lower biodiversity values (Burgess et al., 2004). Throughout this paper, we refer to these two habitat types as “forest” and “woodland”, respectively. The

How much habitat conversion has occurred in the EAM in the last 25 years?

We estimate that 26% (2274 km2) of forest and woodland was lost between 1975 and 2000 in the Eastern Arc, with the rate of habitat conversion lower in forest (5%/25 y) than in woodland (43%/25 y; Fig. 1a and b; Table 2). There was marked contrast between rates of loss in protected and unprotected areas: forest in protected areas was lost at approximately one third of the rate found outside protected areas (4% and 11% respectively), while woodland in protected areas was lost at approximately two

Discussion

Conservationists are justifiably concerned about forest loss in the Eastern Arc Mountains due to their exceptionally high levels of biodiversity (Burgess et al., 2007a, Hall et al., 2009). However, our results point to another important habitat within the Eastern Arc Mountains. Although less biodiverse (Burgess et al., 2004), woodlands are undergoing far greater rates of conversion than forests, both inside and outside of protected areas (see also Mbilinyi et al., 2006). This should be of

Acknowledgements

Funding from the John Fell Oxford University Press (OUP) Research Fund generously supported this work. In addition, JG received funding from the Arcadia Foundation, LC from the Oxford Martin School and the University of Queensland; NB from WWF-USA and the University of Copenhagen (Denmark); and PP from The Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Finland. UNDP-GEF ‘Conservation and Management of the Eastern Arc Mountain Forests’ funded the forest change analysis used here. Other datasets were compiled by

References (79)

  • M. Schaafsma et al.

    Towards transferable functions for extraction of non-timber forest products: a case study on charcoal production in Tanzania

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2012)
  • S.S. Scrieciu

    Can economic causes of tropical deforestation be identified at a global level?

    Ecol. Econ.

    (2007)
  • S. Serneels et al.

    Proximate causes of land-use change in Narok district, Kenya: a spatial statistical model

    Agric. Ecosyst. Environ.

    (2001)
  • S. Sloan et al.

    How accurately may we project tropical forest-cover change? A validation of a forward-looking baseline for REDD

    Global Environ. Change

    (2012)
  • R.D. Swetnam et al.

    Mapping socio-economic scenarios of land cover change: a GIS method to enable ecosystem service modelling

    J. Environ. Manage.

    (2011)
  • P.K. Thornton et al.

    Spatial variation of crop yield response to climate change in East Africa

    Global Environ. Change

    (2009)
  • S.N. Wood et al.

    GAMs with integrated model selection using penalized regression splines and applications to environmental modelling

    Ecol. Model.

    (2002)
  • F. Achard et al.

    Determination of deforestation rates of the world’s humid tropical forests

    Science

    (2002)
  • A. Ahrends et al.

    Predictable waves of sequential forest degradation and biodiversity loss spreading from an African city

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2010)
  • K.S. Andam et al.

    Measuring the effectiveness of protected area networks in reducing deforestation

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.

    (2008)
  • A. Balmford et al.

    Capturing the many dimensions of threat: comment on Salafsky et al.

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2009)
  • E.A. Bright et al.

    LandScan 2008

    (2009)
  • T. Brooks et al.

    Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity

    Conserv. Biol.

    (2002)
  • D.G. Brown et al.

    Stochastic simulation of land-cover change using geostatistics and generalized additive models

    Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens.

    (2002)
  • S. Brown et al.

    Baselines for land-use change in the tropics: Application to avoided deforestation projects

    Mitig. Adapt. Strat. Glob. Change

    (2007)
  • N.D. Burgess et al.

    Terrestrial Ecoregions of Africa and Madagascar: A Conservation Assessment

    (2004)
  • N.D. Burgess et al.

    The potential of forest reserves for augmenting the protected area network in Africa

    Oryx

    (2007)
  • N.D. Burgess et al.

    Valuing the Arc: a programme to map and value ecosystem services in Tanzania

    Mountain Res. Initiative Newslett.

    (2009)
  • N.D. Burgess et al.

    Getting ready for REDD+ in Tanzania: a case study of progress and challenges

    Oryx

    (2010)
  • Carranza, T., Balmford, A., Kapos, V., Manica, A., submitted for publication. Protected area effectiveness in reducing...
  • K. Chomitz et al.

    Roads, land use, and deforestation: a spatial model applied to Belize

    World Bank Econ. Rev.

    (1996)
  • Alejandro de las Heras et al.

    Future deforestation drivers in an Amazonian ranching frontier

    J. Land Use Sci.

    (2012)
  • R.S. DeFries et al.

    Global land cover characterization from satellite data: From research to operational implementation?

    Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr.

    (1999)
  • R.S. DeFries et al.

    Deforestation driven by urban population growth and agricultural trade in the twenty-first century

    Nat. Geosci.

    (2010)
  • ERDAS. 1999. ERDAS IMAGINE Tour Guides: ERDAS IMAGINE V8.4. ERDAS Worldwide Headquarters, Atlanta, GA,...
  • ESRI. 2010. ArcGIS 10.0, Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, CA,...
  • FAO

    Global Forest Resources Assessment 2010: Main Report

    (2010)
  • B. Fisher

    African exception to drivers of deforestation

    Nat. Geosci.

    (2010)
  • H.J. Geist et al.

    Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation

    Bioscience

    (2002)
  • Cited by (79)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text