Skip to main content
Log in

On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Comparative Physiology A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To understand complex sensory–motor behavior related to object perception by echolocating bats, precise measurements are needed for echoes that bats actually listen to during flight. Recordings of echolocation broadcasts were made from flying bats with a miniature light-weight microphone and radio transmitter (Telemike) set at the position of the bat’s ears and carried during flights to a landing point on a wall. Telemike recordings confirm that flying horseshoe bats (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon) adjust the frequency of their sonar broadcasts to compensate for echo Doppler shifts. Returning constant frequency echoes were maintained at the bat’s reference frequency ±83 Hz during flight, indicating that the bats compensated for frequency changes with an accuracy equivalent to that at rest. The flying bats simultaneously compensate for increases in echo amplitude as target range becomes shorter. Flying bats thus receive echoes with both stabilized frequencies and stabilized amplitudes. Although it is widely understood that Doppler-shift frequency compensation facilitates detection of fluttering insects, approaches to a landing do not involve fluttering objects. Combined frequency and amplitude compensation may instead be for optimization of successive frequency modulated echoes for target range estimation to control approach and landing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

BF:

Best frequency

CF:

Constant frequency

CM:

Cochlear microphonic

DSC:

Doppler-shift compensation

FM:

Frequency modulated

IPI:

Interpulse interval

RF:

Resting frequency

References

  • Au WWL, Benoit-Bird KJ (2003) Automatic gain control in the echolocation system of dolphins. Nature 423:861–863

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Boonman A, Jones G (2002) Intensity control during target approach in echolocating bats; stereotypical sensory–motor behaviour in Daubenton’s bats, Myotis daubentonii. J Exp Biol 205:2865–2874

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edamatsu H, Suga N (1993) Differences in response properties of neurons between two delay-tuned areas in the auditory cortex of the mustached bat. J Neurophysiol 69:1700–1712

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaioni SJ, Riquimaroux H, Suga N (1990) Biosonar behavior of mustached bats swung on a pendulum prior to cortical ablation. J Neurophysiol 64:1801–1817

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin DR (1958) Listening in the dark. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson Y, Schnitzler HU (1979) Echolocation and obstacle avoidance in the hipposiderid bat Assellia tridens. J Comp Physiol A 131:161–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartley DJ, Campbell KA, Suthers RA (1989) The acoustic behavior of the fish-catching bat, Noctilio leporinus, during pre-capture. J Acoust Soc Am 86:8–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henson OW Jr, Pollak GD, Kobler JB, Henson MM, Goldman LJ (1982) Cochlear microphonic potentials elicited by biosonar signals in flying bats, Pteronotus p. parnellii. Hear Res 7:127–147

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Henson OW Jr, Bishop AL, Keating AW, Kobler JB, Henson MM, Wilson BS, Hansen R (1987) Bisonar imaging of insects by Pteronotus p. parnellii, the mustached bat. Nat Geor Res 3:82–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Henson OW, Koplas PA, Keating AW, Huffman RF, Henson MM (1990) Cochlear resonance in the mustached bat: behavioral adaptations. Hear Res 50:259–273

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hiryu S, Katsura K, Lin LK, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2005) Doppler-shift compensation in the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat (Hipposideros terasensis) recorded with a telemetry microphone system during flight. J Acoust Soc Am 118:3927–3933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hiryu S, Katsura K, Nagato T, Yamazaki H, Lin LK, Watanabe Y, Riquimaroux H (2006) Intra-individual variation in the vocalized frequency of the Taiwanese leaf-nosed bat, Hipposideros terasensis, influenced by conspecific colony members. J Comp Physiol A 192:807–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiryu S, Hagino T, Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2007) Echo-intensity compensation in echolocating bats (Pipistrellus abramus) during flight measured by a telemetry microphone. J Acoust Soc Am 121:1749–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman RF, Henson OW Jr (1993a) Labile cochlear tuning in the mustached bat. I. Concomitant shifts in biosonar emission frequency. J Comp Physiol A 171:725–734

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman RF, Henson OW Jr (1993b) Labile cochlear tuning in the mustached bat. II. Concomitant shifts in neural tuning. J Comp Physiol A 171:735–748

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jen PH, Kamada T (1982) Analysis of orientation signals emitted by the CF–FM bat, Pteronotus p. parnellii and the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus during avoidance of moving and stationary obstacles. J Comp Physiol A 148:389–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kick SA, Simmons JA (1984) Automatic gain control in the bat’s sonar receiver and the neuroethology of echolocation. J Neurosci 4:2725–2737

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kobler JB, Wilson BS, Henson OW Jr, Bishop AL (1985) Echo intensity compensation by echolocating bats. Hear Res 20:99–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster WC, Keating AW, Henson OW Jr (1992) Ultrasonic vocalizations of flying bats monitored by radiotelemetry. J Exp Biol 173:43–58

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Wang D, Wang K, Akamatsu T (2006) Sonar gain control in echolocating finless porpoises (Neophocaena phocaenoides) in an open water. J Acoust Soc Am 120(4):1803–1806

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Metzner W (1993) An audio-vocal interface in echolocating horseshoe bats. J Neurosci 13:1899–1915

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Metzner W, Zhang S, Smotherman M (2002) Doppler-shift compensation behavior in horseshoe bats revisited: auditory feedback controls both a decrease and an increase in call frequency. J Exp Biol 205:1607–1616

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moss CF, Surlykke A (2001) Auditory scene analysis by echolocation in bats. J Acoust Soc Am 110:2207–2226

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neumann I, Schuller G (1991) Spectral and temporal gating mechanisms enhance the clutter rejection in the echolocating bat, Rhinolophus rouxi. J Comp Physiol A 169:109–116

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G (1970) Neurophysilogische Untersuchungen zum Echoortungssystem der groben Hufeisennase Rhinolophus ferrum equinum Schreber, 1774. Z Vergl Physiol 67:273–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuweiler G (2000) The biology of bats. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostwald J (1984) Tonotopical organization and pure tone response characteristics of single units in the auditory cortex of the greater horseshoe bat. J Comp Physiol A 155:821–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riquimaroux H, Watanabe Y (2000) Characteristics of bat sonar sounds recorded by a telemetry system and a fixed ground microphone. Seventh Western Pacific Regional Acoustics Conference (WESTPRACVII):233–238

  • Riquimaroux H, Gaioni SJ, Suga N (1991) Cortical computational maps control auditory perception. Science 251:565–568

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU (1968) Die Ultraschallortungslaute der Hufeisen-Fledermäuse (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in verschiedenen Orientierungssituationen [The ultrasonic sounds of horseshoe bats (Chiroptera-Rhinolophidae) in different orientation situations]. Z Vergl Physiol 57:376–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnitzler HU, Henson OW Jr (1980) Performance of airborne animal sonar system, I. Microchiroptera. In: Busnel R-G, James FF (eds) Animal sonar systems. Plenum Press, New York, pp 109–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuller G, Beuter K, Schnitzler HU (1974) Response to frequency shifted artificial echoes in the bat Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Comp Physiol A 89:275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simmons JA (1974) Response of the Doppler echolocation system in the bat, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum. J Acoust Soc Am 56:672–682

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Smotherman M, Metzner W (2003) Fine control of call frequency by horseshoe bats. J Comp Physiol A 189:435–446

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suga N (1984) The extent to which biosonar information is represented in the bat auditory cortex. In: Edelman GM, Gall WE, Cowan WM (eds) Dynamic aspects of neocortical function. Wiley, New York, pp 315–373

    Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Jen PH (1976) Disproportionate tonotopic representation for processing CF–FM sonar signals in the mustache bat auditory cortex. Science 194:542–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Suga N, Niwa H, Taniguchi I, Margoliash D (1987) The personalized auditory cortex of the mustached bat: adaptation for echolocation. J Neurophysiol 58:643–654

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Taniguchi I (1985) Echolocation sounds and hearing of the greater Japanese horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum nippon). J Comp Physiol A 156:185–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Moss CF, Vater M (2003) Echolocation in bats and dolphins. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian B, Schnitzler HU (1997) Echolocation signals of the greater horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum) in transfer flight and during landing. J Acoust Soc Am 101:2347–2364

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vogler B, Neuweiler G (1983) Echolocation in the noctule (Nyctalus noctula) and horseshoe bat (Rhinolophus ferrumequinum). J Comp Physiol A 152:421–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Prof. James A. Simmons for careful reading of the manuscript and valuable comments. We also thank T. Hagino, M. Fukuda, E. Fujioka, M. Omura and Y. Osawa for analysis and technical support during this experiment; N. Urano for assistance in capturing bats in the field. The experiments complied with the Principles of Animal Care, publication no. 86–23, revised in 1985, of the National Institutes of Health, and the procedures were approved by the animal care committee of Doshisha University. This work was partly supported by a grant to the Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology (RCAST) at Doshisha University from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MEXT) of Japan: Special Research Grants for the Development of Characteristic Education from the Promotion and Mutual Aid Corporation for Private Schools of Japan and the Innovative Cluster Creation Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shizuko Hiryu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hiryu, S., Shiori, Y., Hosokawa, T. et al. On-board telemetry of emitted sounds from free-flying bats: compensation for velocity and distance stabilizes echo frequency and amplitude. J Comp Physiol A 194, 841–851 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-008-0355-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00359-008-0355-x

Keywords

Navigation