Abstract
The development of ecologically sound water allocation strategies that account for the needs of riverine ecosystems is a pressing issue, especially in semiarid river basins. In the Aral Sea Basin, a search for strategies to mitigate ecological and socioeconomic deterioration has been in process since the early 1990s. The Geographic Information System–based simulation tool TUGAI has been developed to support the policy determination process by providing a simple, problem-oriented method to assess ecological effects of alternative water management strategies for the Amudarya River. It combines a multiobjective water allocation model with simple, spatially explicit statistical and rule-based models of landscape dynamics. Changes in environmental conditions are evaluated by a fuzzy habitat suitability index for Populus euphratica, which is the dominant species of the characteristic riverine Tugai forests. Water management scenarios can be developed by altering spatiotemporal water distribution in the delta area or the amount of water inflow into the delta. Outcomes of scenario analysis are qualitative comparisons of the ecological effects of different options for a time period of up to 28 years. The given approach utilizes different types of knowledge, from quantitative hydrological data to qualitative local expert knowledge. The main purpose of the tool is to integrate the knowledge in a comprehensive way to make it available for discussions on alternative policies in moderated workshops with stakeholders. In this article, the modules of the tool, their integration, and three hypothetical scenarios are presented. Based on the experience gained when developing the TUGAI tool, we propose that the general framework can be transferred to other areas where tradeoffs in water allocation between the environment and other water users are of major concern. The potential for a simulation tool to structure and inform a complex resource management situation by involving local experts and stakeholders in the development of possible future scenarios will become increasingly valuable for transparent and participatory resource management.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Angel D. L., P. Krost, W. L. Silvert. 1998. Describing benthic impacts of fish farming with fuzzy sets: theoretical background and analytical methods. Journal of Applied Ichthyology 14:1–8
Arnold J. G., R. S. Srinivasin, R. S. Muttiah, J. R. Williams. 1998. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 34:73–89
Baker J. P., D. W. Hulse, S. V. Gregory, D. White, J. Van Sickle, P. A. Berger, D. Dole, N. H. Schumaker. 2004. Alternative futures for the Willamette River Basin, Oregon. Ecological Applications 14:313–324
Bakhiev A. B., S. E. Treshkin, J. V. Kuzmina. 1994. The modern conditions of the Tugai Forests of Karakalpakstan and their protection. Karakalpakstan, Nukus, 72 pp [in Russian]
Brooke A., D. Kendrick, A. Meeraus, R. Raman. 1998. GAMS—A user’s guide. GAMS Development Cooperation, Washington, 276 pp
Gentile J. H., M. A. Harwell, W. Cropper, C. C. Harwell, D. DeAngelis, S. Davis, J. C. Ogden, D. Lirman. 2001. Ecological conceptual models: a framework and case study on ecosystem management for South Florida sustainability. Science of the Total Environment 274:231–253
Giese E., J. T. A. Sehring. 2004. Zwischenstaatliche Wassernutzungskonflikte in Zentralasien. Center for International Development and Environmental Research, Giessen, 57 pp
Han Y., H. Weisgerber. 1997. Genressourcen von Pappeln in China. Pages 220–229 in: H. Zhou, H. Weisgerber (eds.), Beiträge zur Wiederbewaldung der Lößhochebene in Nordchina. Datong/Hann, Münden.
Harbough A. W., E. R. Banta, M. C. Hill, M. G. McDonald. 2000. MODFLOW-2000, the U.S. Geological Survey modular ground-water model-user guide to modularization concepts and the ground-water flow process. Open-file report 00-92. U.S. Geological Survey, 121 pp
Interstate Coordination Water Commission (ICWC). 1998. Bulletin no 16. Scientific-Information Centre of the Interstate Coordination Water Commission, Tashkent, 53 pp
King J., C. Brown, H. Sabet. 2003. A scenario-based holistic approach to environmental flow assessments for rivers. River Research and Applications 19:619–639
Kouzmina J. V. 1997. Ecotones of Tugai-desert ecosystems. Pages 131–137 in V. S. Zaletaev (ed.), Ecotones in the biosphere. Russian Academy of Sciences, Institute of Water Problems, Moscow.
Krapilskaya, N. M. 1987. Assessment and prediction of the changes in hydrogeological conditions under the influence of water management activities based on air and satellite images (on the lower reaches of the Amudarya river). Moscow, 22 pp [in Russian]
Kuzmina Z. V., S. E. Treshkin. 1997. Soil salinization and dynamics of Tugai vegetation in the Southeastern Caspian Sea Region and in the Aral Sea Coastal Region. Eurasian Soil Science 30:642–649
Letolle R., Mainguet M. 1996. Der Aralsee—Eine ökologische Katastrophe. Springer, Berlin, 517 pp
Liphschitz N., Y. Waisel. 1970. The effect of water stresses on radial growth of Populus euphratica Oliv. La-Yaaran 20:80–84
Ma H.-C., L. Fung, S.-S. Wang, A. Altman, A. Hüttermann. 1997. Photosynthetic response of Populus euphratica to salt stress. Forest Ecology Management 93:55–61
Mackinson S. 2000. An adaptive fuzzy expert system for predicting structure, dynamics and distribution of herring shoals. Ecological Modelling 126:155–178
Matson, K. C., and Fels, J. E. 2001. Approaches to automated water table mapping. http://www.sbg.ac.at/geo/idrisi/gis_env ...g/sf_papers/matson_kris/santa-fe.2.htm
McKinney D. C., A. G. Savitsky. 2001. EPIC modeling system guide—Water, salt & energy management problems. Austin, Texas, 60 pp
Micklin P., P. Reimov, A. Ptichnikov, N. Novikova, G. Kapustin, R. Ressl. 1998. Aral Sea GIS. Nukus University, Nukus
Novikova N. M., G. S. Kust, J. V. Koumina, G. U. Trofimova, T. V. Dikariova, S. A. Avetian, S. U. Rozov, V. D. Deruzhinskaya, L. F. Safonicheva, U. E. Lubeznov. 1998. Contemporary plant and soil cover changes in the Amudarya and Syrdarya river deltas. Pages 55–80 in UNESCO (ed.), Ecological research and monitoring of the Aral Sea Deltas. UNESCO, Paris.
Novikova N. M. 2001. Ecological basis for botanical diversity conservation within the Amudarya and Syrdarya river deltas. Pages 86–94 in: S.-W. Breckle, M. Veste, W. Wucherer (eds.), Sustainable land use in deserts. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York.
Novikova N. M., J. V. Kuzmina, T. V. Dikareva, G. U. Trofimova. 2001. Preservation of the Tugai bio-complex diversity within the Amu-Dar’ya and Syr-Dar’ya river deltas in aridization conditions. Pages 10–17 in Ecological research and monitoring of the Aral Sea Deltas—A basis for restoration, volume 2. UNESCO Aral Sea Project
O’Rourke J. 1993. Computational geometry in C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. 346 pp
Ortigosa G. R., G. A. De Leo, M. Gatto. 2000. VVF: integrating modelling and GIS in a software tool for habitat suitability assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software 15:1–12
Pereira A. G., J.-D. Rinaudo, P. Jeffrey, S. C. Quintana, N. Courtois, S. Funtowicz, V. Petit. 2003. ICT tools to support public participation in water resources governance & planning: Experiences from the design and testing of a multi-media platform. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 5:395–420
Peterson G. D., G. S. Cumming, S. R. Carpenter. 2003. Scenario planning: a tool for conservation in an uncertain world. Conservation Biology 17:358–366
Richter B. D., R. Mathews, D. L. Harrison, R. Wigington. 2003. Ecologically sustainable water management: managing river flows for ecological integrity. Ecological Applications 13:206–224
Rüger, N. 2002. Habitat suitability for Populus euphratica in the Northern Amudarya delta—a fuzzy approach. Diploma thesis. University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück
Rüger N., M. Schlüter, M. Matthies. 2005. A fuzzy habitat suitability index for Populus euphratica in the Northern Amudarya delta. Ecological Modelling 184:313–328
Salski A. 1992. Fuzzy knowledge-based models in ecological research. Ecological Modelling 63:103–112
Schlüter M., A. G. Savitsky, D. C. McKinney, H. Lieth. 2005. Optimizing long-term water allocation in the Amudarya river delta—A water management model for ecological impact assessment. Environmental Modelling & Software 20:529–545
Silvert W. L. 1997. Ecological impact classification with fuzzy sets. Ecological Modelling 96:1–10
Silvert W. 2000. Fuzzy indices of environmental conditions. Ecological Modelling 130:111–119
Stave K. 2003. A system dynamics model to facilitate public understanding of water management options in Las Vegas, Nevada. Journal of Environmental Management 67:303–313
Thomas F. M., S. K. Arndt, H. Bruelheide, A. Foetzki, D. Gries, J. Huang, M. Popp, G. Wang, X. Zhang, M. Runge. 2000. Ecological basis for a sustainable management of the indigenous vegetation in a Central-Asian desert: Presentation and first results. Journal of Applied Botany 74:212–219
Treshkin S. Y., S. K. Kamalov, A. Bachiev, N. Mamutov, A. I. Gladishev, I. Aimbetov. 1998. Present status of the Tugai forests in the lower Amudarya basin and problems of their protection and restoration. Pages 43–54 in UNESCO (ed.), Ecological research and monitoring of the Aral Sea deltas. UNESCO, Paris
Treshkin, S. Y. 2001. Transformation of Tugai ecosystems in the floodplains of the lower reaches and the delta of the Amu-Dar’ya and their protection. Ecological research and monitoring of the Aral Sea deltas—A basis for restoration. UNESCO, Paris
UNESCO. 2000. Water related vision for the Aral Sea basin. UNESCO, Paris
WARMAP Project. 1997. Formulation and analysis of regional strategies on land & water management. EU/TACIS, Tashkent
Weisgerber, H. 1994. Populus euphratica. Pages 39–41 in P. Schütt, H. Schuck, G. Aas, U. Lang (eds), Enzyklopädie der Holzgewächse: Handbuch und Atlas der Dendrologie. Ecomed, Landsberg am Lech, 22. Erg. Lfg. 12/00
Weisgerber H., Y. Han. 2001. Diversity and breeding potential of poplar species in China. Forest Chronicle 77:227–237
Wilkinson, R. 2003. Integrated water resources management: Landscape planning in a watershed context. CALFED Urban Water Use Efficiency Pilot Project, Inland Empire Utilities Agency. Rocky Mountain Institute
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the Tugai experts, S. Kouzmina, S. Treshkin, N. Mamutov, and H. Weisgerber for providing valuable insight into ecology and distribution of Tugai vegetation in the Amudarya delta and other areas. J. Berlekamp and S. Lautenbach assisted in all GIS-related aspects of tool development. Thanks to D.C. McKinney for support in the development of the AmuEPIC module and critical comments at all stages of the work. The first author is very grateful to M. Mesarovic for advice and support in conducting the research and to D. DeAngelis for sharing experiences of the ATLSS project in the Florida Everglades and critical comments on the manuscript. Comments of C. Pahl-Wostl and three anonymous reviewers significantly improved the manuscript. The work was funded by the INTAS project 00-1039 “Restoration and Management Options for Aquatic and Tugai Ecosystems in the Northern Amudarya delta,” a fellowship of the German Exchange Service (DAAD) to the first author and a grant of the Universitätsgesellschaft Osnabrück to M. Schlüter and N. Rüger for travel to Uzbekistan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Schlüter, M., Rüger, N., Savitsky, A.G. et al. TUGAI: An Integrated Simulation Tool for Ecological Assessment of Alternative Water Management Strategies in a Degraded River Delta. Environmental Management 38, 638–653 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0108-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-005-0108-3