Abstract
Background, Goal and Scope, When contaminated soil and water are remediated by using plants, a multitude of pathways, partly not yet quantified, are activated. ‘Phytovolatilisation’ denotes the process in which usually organic compounds are emitted from the aboveground sections of the plant into the atmosphere. This includes all the compounds which are taken up by the roots, partly transformed within the roots, and transported into the shoot.
Even though the elimination of potential environmental pollutants by plant uptake was estimated to be much lower than microbial degradation in the soil back in the 1970s, in the 1990s the phytovolatilisation of volatile pollutants became a topic of economic interest since it held out the promise of accelerating the elimination of pollutants during the remediation of contaminated sites. In the past, investigating phytovolatilisation often failed because of the analytical methods’ high detection limits. More sensitive methods such as radioactive labelling usually only detected the cumulative elimination of pollutants by evaporation and provided little information on the mechanism of these emissions. Therefore, the experimental goal of this work was to determine the dynamics of specific emission rates.
Features
Independently of the volatilisation of the contaminants from the nutrient solution, the emission rates were determinated under defined, approximated natural conditions by using a dynamic gas exchange chamber. To detect traces of contaminants in air samples with high relative humidity, a purge & trap technology was used. An estimation of the specific emission rates of different materials was made with a transportation model. The model was used to ascertain what compounds are most likely to be emitted by plants due to their physical characteristics.
Results and Conclusions
In experiments with 2,6-Dimethylphenol and Trichloroethylene, a clear link was observed between contaminant emission and the lighting intensity likely to be due to the stomata aperture. The absolute values of the emission rates were very low and in the range of nmol/h m2 foliar surface. The calculation of the emission rates in different scenarios shows lowly higher emission rates for materials with lower n-octanol-water partition coefficients
Recommendations and Outlook
Phytovolatilisation is particularly suitable for eliminating volatile compounds in shallow groundwater contaminations, but the experimental proof of an increased net emission of planted areas with volatile soil contaminants near the surface compared with unplanted areas is still pending. On the basis of the model computations it is rather to be expected that the net emission of volatile lipophilic materials should be reduced into the atmosphere by using plants.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baeder-Bederski O (2001): Emission organischer Chemikalien durch Sumpfpflanzen auf kontaminierten Standorten. PhD Thesis, UFZ-Bericht 3/2001, ISSN 0948-9452
Banuelos GS, Ajwa HA, Terry N, Zayed A (1997): Phytoremediation of selenium laden soils: A new technology. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 52 (6) 426–430
Beath OA, Eppson HF, Gillbert CS (1935): Bulletin, University of Wyoming, Agricultural Experiment Station Laramie, Wyoming 206, 1–55
Chai M, Arthur CL, Pawliszyn J, Belardi RP, Pratt KF (1993): Determination of Volatile Chlorinated Hydrocarbons in Air and Water With Solid-Phase Microextraction. Analyst 118, 1501–1505
Feigner G, Meißner B, Seeboth H (1967): Untersuchungen zur Frage der Phenolaufnahme durch die Flechtbinse. Wasserwirtschaft-Wassertechnik 17 (8) 279–281
Gates DM (1980): Biophysical Ecology. Springer, New York
Hansen D, Duda PJ, Zayed A, Terry N (1998): Selenium Removal by Constructed Wetlands: Role of Biological Volatilization. Environ Sci Technol 32, 591–597
Hong H, Farmayan WD, Dortch DJ, Chiang CY, McMillan LK, Schnoor JL (2001): Phytoremediation of MTBE from a Groundwater Plume. Environ Sci Technol 35, 1231–1239
Jury WA, Russo D, Streik G, Hesham EA (1990): Evaluation of Volatilization by Organic Chemicals Residing Below The Soil Surface. Water Resources Research 26 (1) 13–20
Kreeb KH (1990): Methoden zur Pflanzenökologie und Bioindikation. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Stuttgart, 2. Aufl
Lewis BG, Johnson CM, Delwiche CC (1966): Release of Volatile Selenium Compounds by Plants: Collection Procedures and Preliminary Observations. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 14, 638–640
Meißner B, Friedmann E (1968): Abwasserreinigung mit Teichsimsen in Abwasserteichen. Wasserwirtschaft Wassertechnik 18 (11/12)420–425
Ophoff H (1998): Verflüchtigung und Mineralisierung von Fluoranthen, Parathionmethyl und Fenpropimorph unter simulierten Freilandbedingungen. PhD Thesis, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
Orchard BJ, Doucette WJ, Chard JK, Bugbee B (2000): Uptake of trichloroethylene by hybrid poplar trees grown hydroponically in flow-through plant growth chambers. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 19 (4I) 895–903
Rippen G (1999): Handbuch der Umwelt-Chemikalien. Band V: Datensammlung über Umweltchemikalien, ecomed verlagsgesellschaft AG & Co. KG, Landsberg, Germany
Schwarzenbach R, Westall J (1981): Transport of Nonpolar Organic Compounds From Surface Water to Groundwater: Laboratory Sorption Studies. Environ Sci Technol 15, 1360–1367
Terry N,Carlson C, Raab TK, Zayed AN (1992): Rates of Se Volatilization Among Crop Species. J Environ Quality 21, 341–344
Terry N, Zayed AM (1994): Selenium Volatilization by Plants. In: Frankenberger WT jr, Benson S (Eds): Selenium in the Environment. Marcel Dekker, 343–367
Trapp S, Matthies M (1995): Generic One-Compartment Model for Uptake of Organic Chemicals by Foliar Vegetation. Environ Sci Technol 29, 2333–2338
Trapp S, Mc Farlane C, Matthies M (1994): Model for Uptake of Xenobiotics into Plants: Validation With Bromacil Experiments. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 13 (3) 413–422
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baeder-Bederski-Anteda, O. Phytovolatilisation of organic chemicals. J Soils & Sediments 3, 65–71 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02991068
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02991068
Keywords
- Emission of VOCs
- gas-exchange experiments
- organic compounds
- phytoremediation
- phytovolatilisation
- volatile organic
- compounds (VOC)
- Trichloroethylen, 2,6-Dimethylphenol