Victoria Palacin
Matti Nelimarkka
Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar
Christoph Becker
ABSTRACT
Participation is key to building an equitable, realistic and democratic future. Yet a lack of agency in decision making and agenda-setting is a growing phenomenon in the design of digital public services. We call this pseudo-participation by and in design. The configuration of digital artifacts and/or processes can provide an illusion of participation but lack supportive processes and affordances to allow meaningful participation to happen. This exploratory paper examines the realm of pseudo-participation in the design of public digital services through two concepts: 1) pseudo-participation by design, digital interfaces, and tools that provide the illusion of participation to the people, 2) pseudo-participation in design, processes in which those affected by the design decisions are marginalized and not given any agency. We contribute to the re-imagination of participatory design in modern societies where the role of politics has become ubiquitous and is yet to be critically scrutinized by designers.
- Leo G Anthopoulos, Panagiotis Siozos, and Ioannis A Tsoukalas. 2007. Applying participatory design and collaboration in digital public services for discovering and re-designing e-Government services. Government Information Quarterly 24, 2 (2007), 353–376.Google Scholar
Cross Ref
- Sherry R Arnstein. 1969. A Ladder of Citizen Participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planner 35, 4 (1969), 216–224.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Eri Bertsou and Giulia Pastorella. 2017. Technocratic attitudes: a citizens’ perspective of expert decision-making. West European Politics 40, 2 (2017), 430–458.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Alan Borning, Batya Friedman, and P Kahn. 2004. Designing for human values in an urban simulation system: Value sensitive design and participatory design. In Proceedings From the Eighth Biennial Participatory Design Conference.Google Scholar
- Margot Brereton and Jacob Buur. 2008. New challenges for design participation in the era of ubiquitous computing. Co-Design 4, 2 (2008), 101–113.Google Scholar
- Meredith Broussard. 2018. Artificial unintelligence: how computers misunderstand the world. MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Joy Buolamwini and Timnit Gebru. 2018. Gender shades: Intersectional accuracy disparities in commercial gender classification. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. 77–91.Google Scholar
- Helen Carter. 2002. Minorities accuse TV and radio of tokenism | Media | The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/media/2002/nov/12/radio.raceintheuk. (Accessed on 03/15/2020).Google Scholar
- Andrew Chadwick and Christopher May. 2003. Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet: ”e-Government” in the United States, Britain, and the European Union. Governance 16, 2 (2003), 271–300.Google Scholar
- Manuela Ekowo. 2016. Why Numbers can be Neutral but Data Can’t. https://www.newamerica.org/education-policy/edcentral/numbers-can-neutral-data-cant/. (Accessed on 11/01/2019).Google Scholar
- Robert Faris, Hal Roberts, Bruce Etling, Nikki Bourassa, Ethan Zuckerman, and Yochai Benkler. 2017. Partisanship, propaganda, and disinformation: Online media and the 2016 US presidential election. Berkman Klein Center Research Publication 6 (2017).Google Scholar
- Gerhard Fischer. 2011. Understanding, Fostering, and Supporting Cultures of Participation. interactions 18, 3 (5 2011), 42. https://doi.org/10.1145/1962438.1962450Google Scholar
- Alexandre Apsan Frediani, MA Fench, and I Nunez Ferrera. 2011. Change by Design: Building Communities Through Participatory Design.Google Scholar
- Deen Freelon. 2018. Computational Research in the Post-API Age. Political Communication 35, 4 (2018), 665–668. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2018.1477506Google ScholarCross Ref
- Archon Fung. 2006. Varieties of Participation in Complex Governance. Public Administration Review 66, s1 (12 2006), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.xGoogle ScholarCross Ref
- Naska Goagoses, Asnath Paula Kambunga, and Heike Winschiers-Theophilus. 2018. Enhancing commitment to participatory design initiatives. In Proceedings of the 15th Participatory Design Conference: Short Papers, Situated Actions, Workshops and Tutorial-Volume 2. ACM, 14.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Todd Graham. 2012. Beyond ”Political” Communicative Spaces: Talking Politics on the Wife Swap Discussion Forum. Journal of Information Technology & Politics 9, 1 (2012), 31–45.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Seán Hanley. 2018. Legitimacy and the paradox of technocratic government in newer European democracies: the Fischer administration in the Czech Republic revisited. East European Politics and Societies 32, 1 (2018), 78–100.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gabriel Bodin Hetland. 2015. Making Democracy Real: Participatory Governance in Urban Latin America. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
- Henry Jenkins, Mizuko Ito, and danah boyd. 2015. Participatory culture in a networked era: A conversation on youth, learning, commerce, and politics. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
- Anne Marie Kanstrup and Ellen Christiansen. 2005. Model power: still an issue?. In Proceedings of the 4th decennial conference on Critical computing: between sense and sensibility. 165–168.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Christopher Kelty, Aaron Panofsky, Morgan Currie, Roderic Crooks, Seth Erickson, Patricia Garcia, Michael Wartenbe, and Stacy Wood. 2015. Seven Dimensions of Contemporary Participation Disentangled. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66, 3 (3 2015), 474–488. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23202Google ScholarDigital Library
- Sarah Knapton. 2016. ’BoatyMcBoatface’ to live on as yellow submarine, science minister Jo Johnson announces. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/05/06/boatymcboatface-to-live-on-as-yellow-submarine-science-minister/. (Accessed on 12/03/2019).Google Scholar
- Theresa Libby. 1999. The influence of voice and explanation on performance in a participative budgeting setting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 24, 2 (1999), 125–137.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Silvia Lindtner and Cindy Lin. 2017. Making and its promises. CoDesign 13, 2 (2017), 70–82.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Lucía Liste and Knut H Sørensen. 2015. Consumer, client or citizen? How Norwegian local governments domesticate website technology and configure their users. Information, Communication & Society 18, 7 (7 2015), 733–746. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.993678Google Scholar
- Christoph Lutz and Christian Pieter Hoffmann. 2017. The dark side of online participation: exploring non-, passive and negative participation. Information Communication and Society 20, 6 (2017), 876–897. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293129Google ScholarCross Ref
- Esa Mäkinen. 2019. HS muutti vaalikoneen suositustapaa: uusi algoritmi avattuna ja selitettynä - Politiikka | HS.fi. https://www.hs.fi/politiikka/art-2000006039563.html. (Accessed on 12/03/2019).Google Scholar
- Curtis William McCord. 2016. Making Digital Polity Spaces: Encoding Democracy into Information Systems. Master’s thesis. University of Toronto. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/75357Google Scholar
- Justin McGuirk. 2014. Radical cities: across Latin America in search of a new architecture. Verso Trade.Google Scholar
- James Midgley 1986. Community participation: history, concepts and controversies. Community participation, social development and the state (1986), 13–44.Google Scholar
- Michael J. Muller. 2007. Participatory Design. In Human-Computer Interaction, Andrew Sears and Julie A. Jacko (Eds.). CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781420088892Google Scholar
- Hailuoto Municipality. 2019. Kysely: Kysely Hailuodon kunnan vakituisille ja vapaa-ajan asukkaille - Otakantaa.fi. https://www.otakantaa.fi/fi/hankkeet/384/osallistuminen/717/kysely/. (Accessed on 12/02/2019).Google Scholar
- T. Nam. 2015. Challenges and Concerns of Open Government: A Case of Government 3.0 in Korea. Social Science Computer Review 33, 5 (2015), 556–570. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439314560848Google Scholar
- Taewoo Nam and Theresa A Pardo. 2011. Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. In Proceedings of the 5th international conference on theory and practice of electronic governance. ACM, 185–194.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matti Nelimarkka. 2019. A Review of Research on Participation in Democratic Decision-Making Presented at SIGCHI Conferences. Toward an Improved Trading Zone Between Political Science and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW (11 2019), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1145/3359241Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matti Nelimarkka. 2019. A Review of Research on Participation in Democratic Decision-Making Presented at SIGCHI Conferences. Toward an Improved Trading Zone Between Political Science and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW(2019), 139.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Matti Nelimarkka, Salla-Maaria Laaksonen, and Bryan Semaan. 2018. Social Media Is Polarized, Social Media Is Polarized: Towards a New Design Agenda for Mitigating Polarization. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference. ACM, 957–970.Google ScholarDigital Library
- Helen Nissenbaum. 2005. Values in Technical Design. In Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics, Carl Mitcham (Ed.). MacMillan, New York, lxvi–lxx.Google Scholar
- A Dictionary of Human Resource Management. 2020. Pseudo-participation - Oxford Reference. https://www.oxfordreference.com/view/10.1093/oi/authority.20110803100352217. (Accessed on 03/14/2020).Google Scholar
- Cathy O’Neill. 2016. Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. Nueva York, NY: Crown Publishing Group(2016).Google Scholar
- W Pasewark and R Welker. 1990. A Vroom-Yetton evaluation of subordinate participation in budgetary decision making. Journal of Management Accounting Research 2, 1 (1990), 13–126.Google Scholar
- Michael Petite. 2014. Participation and Praxis: A Study of How Participatory Budgeting Deepens Democracy by Institutionalizing Critical Consciousness. Ph.D. Dissertation. Carleton University.Google Scholar
- Markus Prior. 2013. Media and political polarization. Annual Review of Political Science 16 (2013), 101–127.Google ScholarCross Ref
- William H. Riker and Peter C. Ordeshook. 1968. A Theory of the Calculus of Voting. American Political Science Review 62, 1 (1968), 25–42. http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S0003055400000125Google ScholarCross Ref
- Gene Rowe and Lynn J Frever. 2005. A Typology of Public Engagement Mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values 30, 2 (2005), 251–290. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243904271724Google ScholarCross Ref
- Joanna Saad-Sulonen, Eva Eriksson, Kim Halskov, Helena Karasti, and John Vines. 2018. Unfolding participation over time: temporal lenses in participatory design. CoDesign 14, 1 (2018), 4–16.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Bryan C. Semaan, Scott P Robertson, Sara Douglas, and Misa Maruyama. 2014. Social media supporting political deliberation across multiple public spheres. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing - CSCW ’14. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 1409–1421. https://doi.org/10.1145/2531602.2531605Google ScholarDigital Library
- Taylor Shelton, Matthew Zook, and Alan Wiig. 2015. The ‘actually existing smart city’. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society 8, 1 (2015), 13–25.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Yves Sintomer, Carsten Herzberg, and Anja Röcke. 2008. Participatory budgeting in Europe: potentials and challenges. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32, 1 (2008), 164–178.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Graham Smith. 2009. Democratic innovations: Designing institutions for citizen participation. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Elli Sormunen. 2019. Lappeenrantalaiset haluavat pinkit bussit katukuvaan - pinkki keräsi lähes puolet yleisöäänestyksen äänistä | Yle Uutiset | yle.fi. https://yle.fi/uutiset/3-11031996. (Accessed on 03/13/2020).Google Scholar
- Fiona Ssozi-Mugarura, Edwin Blake, and Ulrike Rivett. 2017. Codesigning with communities to support rural water management in Uganda. CoDesign 13, 2 (2017), 110–126.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Nathalie Stembert and Ingrid J Mulder. 2013. Love your city! An interactive platform empowering citizens to turn the public domain into a participatory domain. In International Conference Using ICT, Social Media and Mobile Technologies to Foster Self-Organisation in Urban and Neighbourhood Governance, Delft, The Netherlands, 16-17 May 2013.Google Scholar
- Jennifer Stromer-Galley. 2004. Interactivity-as-Product and Interactivity-as-Process. The Information Society 20, 5 (11 2004), 391–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240490508081Google Scholar
- Lucy Suchman. 2002. Located accountabilities in technology production. Scandinavian journal of information systems 14, 2 (2002), 7.Google Scholar
- Rutiana Dwi Wahyunengseh. 2016. Inclusion-Elitist Paradox in Participatory Public Budgeting A Case Study on Surakarta City, Central Java, Indonesia. In 2016 International Conference on Public Management. Atlantis Press.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Langdon Winner. 1985. Do artifacts have politics?In The social shaping of technology, Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman (Eds.). Open University Press, Buckingham, 26–38.Google Scholar
- Steve Woolgar. 1990. Configuring the user: the case of usability trials. The Sociological Review 38, 1_suppl (1990), 58–99.Google ScholarCross Ref
- Scott Wright. 2015. ‘Success’ and online political participation: The case of Downing Street E-petitions. Information, Communication & Society 4462, October (9 2015), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1080285Google Scholar
- Scott Wright and John Street. 2007. Democracy, Deliberation and Design: the Case of Online Discussion Fsorums. New Media & Society 9, 5 (10 2007), 849–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444807081230Google Scholar
Recommendations
Empowered Participation: How Citizens Use Technology in Local Governance
CHI '17: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing SystemsThe partnership between local residents and city officials to inform policy and decision-making about government resources, or participatory governance, has been extensively studied. In addition to numerous ethnographic studies about how citizens engage ...
From participation to e-participation: the German case
ICEGOV '08: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governanceThis paper informs about the public policies on e-Participation in Germany. At the moment e-Participation happens in political niche arenas and does not have real impact or importance on political decision-making. Activists and researchers promote the ...
Coordination of the Digital Transformation of Governments in Federalist Context: Hierarchy, Markets and Network-Based Instruments’ Effects on Subnational Governments’ digital service delivery
ICEGOV '22: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic GovernanceDigital transformation in governments is hard to implement. As a cross-cutting change process that affects public management, public policies and services across all government levels, all policy domains and State branches, it changes processes, ...
Comments