Skip to main content
Log in

Effects of Preferred Orientation on the Tribological Behavior of the TiN and CrN Films by the CAIP

  • Published:
MRS Online Proceedings Library Aims and scope

Abstract

For the better understanding of anti-wear properties of hard coating films, the effects of preferred orientation, surface roughness, and surface hardness on the tribological property of TiN and CrN films have been studied. TiN and CrN films were deposited by cathodic AIP (CAIP) with working temperatures of 350∼450°C, working pressures of 1∼5Pa, arc currents of 50∼90 A, and bias voltages of 30∼150V. The characteristics of microstructure and its effect on the friction coefficient were investigated with working conditions. The preferred orientation of the film was examined by XRD. The friction coefficient was determined using ball on disk tribometer. The preferred orientation of films was changed from (200) to (111) with decreasing working pressure and increasing bias voltage. It is reported that TiN coating with strong (111) orientation have better tribological property, but, in this study, although similar tendency was also found in TiN, the tribological property was increased with diminishing (111) orientation in CrN films. It is concluded in this study that the tribological property is not affected only by the orientation of the film, but it depends on the combined properties of surface roughness, surface hardness, and orientation of the film. The friction coefficients of TiN and CrN were 0.48∼0.52 and 0.49∼0.53, respectively.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. P. Terrat, A. Gaucher, and L. Hadj-Rabah, Surf. Coat. Technol. 45, 59 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. L. Cunha, M. Andritschky, L. Rebouta, and K. Pischow, Surf. Coat. Technol. 116–119, 1152 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. L. Cunha, M. Andritschky, L. Rebouta, and Z. Wang, Thin solid films 355–356, 465 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. O. Knotek, F. Löffler and H. J. Scholl, Surf. Coat. Technol. 45, 53 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. B. Navinsek and P. Panjan, Surf. Coat. Technol. 74/75, 919 (1995).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. H. A. Jehn, F. Thiergarten, E. Ebersbach, and D. Fabian, Surf. Coat. Technol. 50, 45 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. S. B. Sant and K. S. Gill, Surf. Coat. Technol. 68/69, 152 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. J. E. Sundgren, Thin solid films, 128, 21 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Kobayashi and Y. Doi, Thin solid film, 111, 259 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. J. I. Jeong, J. H. Hong, J. S. Kang, H.J. Shin, and Y. P. Lee, J. Vac. Sci. Technol, A 9, 2618 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. D. S. Rickerby, A. M. Tones and B. A. Bellamy, Surf. Coat. Technol. 37, 4375 (1989).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Veprek, Thin solid films, 130, 135 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geun Bae, S., Ki Cho, Y., Il Moon, K. et al. Effects of Preferred Orientation on the Tribological Behavior of the TiN and CrN Films by the CAIP. MRS Online Proceedings Library 890, 817 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0890-Y08-17

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1557/PROC-0890-Y08-17

Navigation