Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

High c-Met expression is a negative prognostic marker for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis

  • Review
  • Published:
Tumor Biology

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that c-Met is an important signal in the development of colorectal cancer, but the prognostic value of c-Met remains unclear. We aimed to analyze the prognostic effect of c-Met in colorectal cancer through a systematic review and meta-analysis. Through database searches, we identified six articles describing how c-Met status affects colorectal cancer prognosis. A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the relationship between the hazard ratio and survival. The available outcome data from six articles were examined. A meta-analysis of the HR and the 95 % confidence interval (CI) indicated a significantly poor overall survival and disease-free survival in patients with high expression levels of c-Met. The subgroup analysis showed that the prognostic effect of the c-Met level was similar in different methods and was not associated with disease stages. High c-Met expression levels could predict a poor prognosis in colorectal cancer patients. The c-Met status could be used to evaluate the prognosis in clinical patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center M, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Jemal A, Siegel R, Xu J, Ward E. Cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2010;60:277–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sartore-Bianchi A, Di Nicolantonio F, Nichelatti M, Molinari F, De Dosso S, Saletti P, et al. Multi-determinants analysis of molecular alterations for predicting clinical benefit to EGFR-targeted monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer. PLoS One. 2009;4:e7287.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Garouniatis A, Zizi-Sermpetzoglou A, Rizos S, Kostakis A, Nikiteas N, Papavassiliou AG. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1,3 and caveolin-1 are implicated in colorectal cancer aggressiveness and prognosis—correlations with epidermal growth factor receptor, CD44v6, focal adhesion kinase, and c-Met. Tumour Biol. 2013;34(4):2109–17.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gherardi E, Birchmeier W, Birchmeier C, Vande WG. Targeting MET in cancer: rationale and progress. Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(2):89–103.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Garouniatis A, Zizi-Sermpetzoglou A, Rizos S, Kostakis A, Nikiteas N, Papavassiliou AG. FAK, CD44v6, c-Met and EGFR in colorectal cancer parameters: tumour progression, metastasis, patient survival and receptor crosstalk. Int J Color Dis. 2013;28(1):9–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Liu Y, Li Q, Zhu L. Expression of the hepatocyte growth factor and c-Met in colon cancer: correlation with clinicopathological features and overall survival. Tumori. 2012;98(1):105–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Qian LY, Li P, Li XR, Chen DJ, Zhu SH. Multivariate analysis of molecular indicators for postoperative liver metastasis in colorectal cancer cases. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(8):3967–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. GA Wells, B Shea and D O’Connell. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. Available: http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinicalepidemiology/oxford.asp.

  10. Tierney JF, Stewart LA, Ghersi D, Burdett S, Sydes MR. Practical methods for incorporating summary time-to-event data into meta-analysis. Trials. 2007;8:16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Umeki K, Shiota G, Kawasaki H. Clinical significance of c-met oncogene alterations in human colorectal cancer. Oncology. 1999;56(4):314–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. De Oliveira AT, Matos D, Logullo AF, DA Silva SR, Neto RA, Filho AL, et al. MET is highly expressed in advanced stages of colorectal cancer and indicates worse prognosis and mortality. Anticancer Res. 2009;29(11):4807–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lee CT, Chow NH, Su PF, Lin SC, Lin PC, Lee JC. The prognostic significance of RON and MET receptor co-expression in patients with colorectal cancer. Dis Colon Rectum. 2008;51(8):1268–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Uddin S, Hussain AR, Ahmed M, Al-Sanea N, Abduljabbar A, Ashari LH, et al. Coexpression of activated c-Met and death receptor 5 predicts better survival in colorectal carcinoma. Am J Pathol. 2011;179(6):3032–44.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Kammula US, Kuntz EJ, Francone TD, Zeng Z, Shia J, Landmann RG, et al. Molecular co-expression of the c-Met oncogene and hepatocyte growth factor in primary colon cancer predicts tumor stage and clinical outcome. Cancer Lett. 2007;248(2):219–28.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Osada S, Matsui S, Komori S, Yamada J, Sanada Y, Ihawa A, et al. Effect of hepatocyte growth factor on progression of liver metastasis in colorectal cancer. Hepatogastroenterology. 2010;57(97):76–80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Abou-Bakr AA, Elbasmi A. c-MET overexpression as a prognostic biomarker in colorectal adenocarcinoma. Gulf J Oncol. 2013;1(14):28–34.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Inno A, Di Salvatore M, Cenci T, Martini M, Orlandi A, Strippoli A, et al. Is there a role for IGF1R and c-MET pathways in resistance to cetuximab in metastatic colorectal cancer? Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2011;10(4):325–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ginty F, Adak S, Can A, Gerdes M, Larsen M, Cline H, et al. The relative distribution of membranous and cytoplasmic met is a prognostic indicator in stage I and II colon cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:3814–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Resnick MB, Routhier J, Konkin T, Sabo E, Pricolo VE. Epidermal growth factor receptor, c-MET, beta-catenin, and p53 expression as prognostic indicators in stage II colon cancer: a tissue microarray study. Clin Cancer Res. 2004;10:3069–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zeng ZS, Weiser MR, Kuntz E, Chen CT, Khan SA, Forslund A, et al. c-Met gene amplification is associated with advanced stage colorectal cancer and liver metastases. Cancer Lett. 2008;265:258–69.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Takeuchi H, Bilchik A, Saha S, Turner R, Wiese D, Tanaka M, et al. c-MET expression level in primary colon cancer: a predictor of tumor invasion and lymph node metastases. Clin Cancer Res. 2003;9:1480–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Otte JM, Schmitz F, Kiehne K, Stechele HU, Banasiewicz T, Krokowicz P, et al. Functional expression of HGF and its receptor in human colorectal cancer. Digestion. 2001;61:237–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Samadi AK, Cohen SM, Mukerji R, Chaguturu V, Zhang X, Timmermann BN, et al. Natural withanolide withaferin A induces apoptosis in uveal melanoma cells by suppression of Akt and c-MET activation. Tumour Biol. 2012;33(4):1179–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Yu S, Yu Y, Zhao N, Cui J, Li W, Liu T. c-Met as a prognostic marker in gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Plos One. 2013;8(11):e79137.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Trusolino L, Comoglio PM. Scatter-factor and semaphoring receptors: cell signaling for invasive growth. Nat Rev Cancer. 2002;2:289–300.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsui S, Osada S, Tomita H, Komori S, Mori R, Sanada Y, et al. Clinical significance of aggressive hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastasis, evaluated from the HGF/c-Met pathway. Int J Oncol. 2010;37:289–97.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Coskun U, Bukan N, Sancak B, Gunel N, Ozenirler S, Unal A, et al. Serum hepatocyte growth factor and interleukin-6 levels can distinguish patients with primary or metastatic liver tumors from those with benign liver lesions. Neoplasma. 2004;51:209–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Migliore C, Giordano S. Molecular cancer therapy: can our expectation be MET? Eur J Cancer. 2008;44:641–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Toschi L, Janne P. Single-agent and combination therapeutic strategies to inhibit hepatocyte growth factor/MET signaling in cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:5941–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. D’Arcangelo M, Cappuzzo F. Focus on the potential role of ficlatuzumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. Biogeosciences. 2013;7:61–8.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tan E, Park K, Lim WT, Ahn M, Ng QS, Ahn JS, et al. Phase Ib study of ficlatuzumab (formerly AV-299), an anti-hepatocyte growth factor monoclonal antibody in combination with gefitinib in Asian patients with NSCLC. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:7571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chen HJ, Mok TS, Chen ZH, Guo AL, Zhang XC, Su J, et al. Clinicopathologic and molecular features of epidermal growth factor receptor T790M mutation and c-MET amplification in tyrosine kinase inhibitor-resistant Chinese non-small cell lung cancer. Pathol Oncol Res. 2009;15:651–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Turke AB, Zejnullahu K, Wu YL, Song Y, Dias-Santagata D, Lifshits E, et al. Pre-existence and clonal selection of MET amplification in EGFR mutant NSCLC. Cancer Cell. 2010;17:77–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest

None

Author contributions

GHL and GM contributed to the literature searching and writing of the manuscript. SZ performed the statistical analysis. BCM participated in study design and coordination and helped to draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China

    HeLi Gao, Mei Guan, Zhao Sun & ChunMei Bai

Authors
  1. HeLi Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mei Guan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhao Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. ChunMei Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to ChunMei Bai.

Additional information

HeLi Gao and Mei Guan are equal contributors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Gao, H., Guan, M., Sun, Z. et al. High c-Met expression is a negative prognostic marker for colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumor Biol. 36, 515–520 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2659-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13277-014-2659-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation