Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Magnetic susceptibility and VLF-R investigations for determining geothermal blowout contaminated area: a case study from Alaşehir (Manisa/Turkey)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Environmental Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Western Turkey is one of the most spectacular regions of widespread, active continental extension in the world. The most prominent structures of this region are E–W trending Gediz and Büyük Menderes Grabens. Geothermal activity around city of Manisa in Gediz Graben has been investigated by many researchers and many geothermal boreholes were drilled in order to produce electricity. In the middle of May 2012, a geothermal blowout occurred 150 m away from the deep drilling (depth 1,100 m), in Alkan village of Alaşehir resort in city of Manisa. After that, four big blowouts took place at the same area and thermal water had been diverted to Alkan stream for almost 4 months. The boron (B) and Fe levels of thermal water are 87 and 11.2 ppm where the background B and Fe values of topsoil vary between 0.2–1.5 ppm and 3.08–5.63 ppm, respectively. The objective of this study was to utilize joint magnetic susceptibility and VLF-R investigations to determine possibly contaminated area with B, related to high Fe level on the topsoil and thermal water in the subterranean layers. It is observed that magnetic susceptibility values vary between 500 and 790 cgs (×10−6) in the vicinity of blowouts and 150–340 cgs (×10−6) at a distance of 50 m around, where the background average value is 20 cgs (×10−6), by using the data collected at 346 stations. Besides, the VLF-R studies were carried out along 18 profiles at three different frequencies. Laterally constrained two-layer inversion was applied to each station; in addition to the inversion of all profiles for each frequency, all lines were stacked, 2-D resistivity maps were obtained, and the contaminated area was determined approximately as 35,000 m2. The results show not only satisfactory agreement between magnetic susceptibility and VLF-R data, but also provide fast and valued interpretation of geochemical and geophysical properties of the geothermal contaminated area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alloway BJ (1990) Heavy metals in soils. Blackie and Son Ltd., Glassgow, p 339

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin A, Ferre EC, Aslan Z (2007) The magnetic susceptibility of granitic rocks as a proxy for geochemical composition: Example from the Saruhan granitoids, NE Turkey. Tectonophysics 441:85–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Başokur AT, İlkışık OM, Tokgöz T, Kaya C, Ulugergerli EU, Gürer A, Duvarcı E, Çınar A, Konak N, Bayrak M, Pekşen E, Karlık G (1996) The investigation of the crustal structure of Aegean region by the magnetotelluric method. In: National Marine Geology and Geophysics Program, pp 820–825

  • Bayrak M, İlkışık OM, Kaya C, Başokur AT (2000) Magnetotelluric data in western Turkey dimensionality analysis using Mohr circles. J Geophys Res 105(B10):23391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamish D (1994) Two dimensional, regularized inversion of VLF data. J Appl Geophys 32:357–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamish D (1998) Three-dimensional modelling of VLF data. J Appl Geophys 39:63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beamish D (2000) Quantitative 2D VLF data interpretation. J Appl Geophys 45:33–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bella F, Biagi PF, Caputo M, Cozzi E, Della ME, Ermini A, Plastino W, Sgrigna V (1998) Field strength variations of LF radio waves prior to earthquakes in central Italy. Phys Earth Planet Inter 105:279–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson AK, Payne KL, Stubben MA (1997) Mapping groundwater contamination using the resistivity and VLF geophysical methods-A case study. Geophysics 62:80–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bijaksana S, Huliselan EK (2010) Magnetic properties of heavy metal content of sanitary leachate sludge in two landfill sites near Bandung, Indonesia. Environm Earth Sci 60(2):409–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bityukova L, Scholger R, Birke M (1999) Magnetic susceptibility as indicator of environmental pollution of soils in Tallinn. Phys Chem Earth 24(9):829–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bosch FP, Müller I (2005) Improved karst exploration by VLF-EM-gradient survey: comparison with other geophysical methods. Near Surf Geophys 5:299–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruschlinsky NN, Danilov AV, Muminov KM, Israilov D, Stetsuk V, Usmanov MK (1997) Magnetometric method of investigating fire sites. Fire Technol 33(3):195–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cagniard L (1953) Basic theory of the magnetotelluric method of geophysical prospecting. Geophysics 18:605–635

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaparro MAE, Sinito AM, Ramasamy V, Marinelli C, Chaparro MAE, Mullainathan S, Murugesan S (2008) Magnetic measurements and pollutants of sediments from Cauvery and Palaru River, India. Environ Geol 56:425–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constable SC, Parker RL, Constable CG (1987) Occam’s inversion: a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 52:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossley DJ (1981) The theory of EM surface wave impedance measurements. Geol Surv Can 81(15):1–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Dearing J (1999) Environmental magnetic susceptibility using the Bartington MS2 system. Bartington Instruments Limited, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • deGroot-Hedlin C, Constable S (1990) Occam’s inversion to generate smooth, two dimensional models from magnetotelluric data. Geophysics 55:1613–1624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dill AC, Turberg P, Müller I, Parriaux A (2009) The combined use of radio-frequency electromagnetics and radiomagnetotellurics methods in non-ideal field conditions for delineating hydrogeological boundaries and for environmental problems. Environ Geol 56:1071–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahor MG (2006) Integrated geophysical studies in the upper part of Sardis archaeological site, Turkey. J Appl Geophys 59:205–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drahor MG, Kaya MA, Bayrak M, İlkışık OM, Öztan A (1999) Electromagnetic-VLF results from Acemhöyük. J Eng Sci 1(2):5–17

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Hasan T (2008) The detection of roadside pollution of rapidly growing city in arid region using the magnetic proxies. Environ Geol 54:23–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Hasan T, Lataifeh M (2013) Field and dual magnetic susceptibility proxies for heavy metal pollution assessment in the urban soil of Al-Karak city, South Jordan. Environ Earth Sci 69(7):2299–2310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elmacı OL, Delibacak S, Secer M, Bodur A (2002) Fertility status, trace elements and heavy metal pollution of agricultural land irrigated from the Gediz river. Int J Water 2(2/3):184–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam P, Blaha U, Appel E, Neupane G (2004) Environmental magnetic approach towards the quantification of pollution in Kathmandu urban area, Nepal. Phys Chem Earth 29:973–984

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gautam P, Blaha U, Appel E (2005) Magnetic susceptibility of dust-loaded leaves as a proxy of traffic-related heavy metal pollution in Kathmandu city, Nepal. Atmos Environ 39:2201–2211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldman M, Neubauer FM (1994) Groundwater exploration using integrated geophysical techniques. Surv Geophys 15:331–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin R, Benderitter Y (1995) Shallow karst exploration using MT-VLF and DC resistivity methods. Geophys Prospect 43:635–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerin R, Tabbagh A, Andrieux P (1994) Field and/or resistivity mapping in MT-VLF and implications for data processing. Geophysics 59:1695–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gürer A, Pinçe A, Gürer ÖF, İlkışık OM (2002) Resistivity distribution in the Gediz Graben and its implications for crustal structure. Turk J Earth Sci 11:15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanesch M, Scholger R (2002) Mapping of heavy metal loadings in soils by means of magnetic susceptibility measurements. Environ Geol 42:857–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayakawa M, Molchanov OA (2000) Effect of earthquakes on lower ionosphere as found by subionospheric VLF propagation. Adv Space Res 26:1273–1276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry B, Jordanova D, Jordanova N, Souque C, Robion P (2003) Anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility of heated rocks. Tectonophysics 366:241–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann V, Knab M, Appel E (1999) Magnetic susceptibility mapping of roadside pollution. J Geochem Explor 66:313–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hohmann GW, Raiche AP (1988) Inversion of controlled-source electromagnetic data. In: Nabighian MN (ed) Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, vol 1. SEG, pp 469–503

  • Jeng Y, Lin MJ, Chen CS (2004) A very low frequency-electromagnetic study of the geo-environmental hazardous areas in Taiwan. Environ Geol 46:784–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan EC, Balmain KG (2001) Electromagnetic waves and radiating systems. Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jupp DLB, Vozoff K (1975) Stable iterative methods fort he inversion of geophysical data. Geophys J R Astron Soc 42:957–976

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaikkonen P (1979) Numerical VLF modeling. Geophys Prospect 27:815–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaikkonen P (1980a) Interpretation nomograms for VLF measurements. Acta Univ Oul A 92. Phys 17:48

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaikkonen P (1980b) Numerical VLF, VLF-R and AMT profiles over some complicated models. Acta Univ Oul A 91 Phys 16:34

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaikkonen P, Sharma SP (1998) 2-D nonlinear joint inversion of VLF and VLF-R data using simulated annealing. J Appl Geophys 39:155–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karlık G, Kaya MA (2000) Investigation of groundwater contamination using electric and electromagnetic methods at a solid waste disposal site—a case study from Isparta, West-Turkey. Environ Geol 40:725–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Kluciarova D, Marton P, Pichler V, Marton E, Tunyi I (2008) Pollution detection by magnetic susceptibility measurements aided by the steamflow effect. Water Air Soil Pollut 189:213–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kosaka K (2000) Evaluating landslide deposits along the Tsurukawa fault zone, Japan, using magnetic susceptibility. Bull Eng Geol Environ 58:179–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunetz G (1972) Processing and interpretation of magnetotelluric soundings. Geophyscis 37:1005–1021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li XP, Ling FN (2012) Geostatistical analysis and fractionation of heavy metals in urban soil from industrial district in Weinan, NW China. Environ Earth Sci 67(7):2129–2140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher BA (1986) Characterisation of soils by mineral magnetic measurements. Phys Earth Planet Inter 42:76–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquardt DW (1963) An algorithm for least-squares estimation of non-linear parameters. J Soc Ind Appl Math 11:431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mcneill JD, Labson VF (1991) Geological mapping using VLF radio fields. In: Nabighian MN (ed) Electromagnetic methods in applied geophysics, vol 2. SEG, pp 521–640

  • Molchanov OA, Hayakawa M, Oudoh T, Kawai E (1998) Precursory effects in the subionospheric VLF signals for the Kobe earthquake. Phys Earth Planet Inter 105:239–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MTA (1964) Geological map of Turkey, Scale 1:500000. Izmir sheet. Institute of Mineral Research and Exploration Publications, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Mullins CE (1977) Magnetic susceptibility of the soil and its significance in soil science: a review. J Soil Sci 28:223–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagao T, Enomoto Y, Fujinawa Y, Hata M, Hayakawa M, Huang Q, Izutsu J, Kushida Y, Maeda K, Oike K, Uycda S, Yoshino T (2002) Electromagnetic anomalies associated with 1995 Kobe earthquake. J Geodyn 33:401–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani T (2000) Investigation of underground resistivity structures using the VLF-MT method. Archaeol Prospect 7:231–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson O (1978) Scattering of electromagnetic waves by a perfectly conducting half-plane below a stratified overburden. Radio Sci 13:391–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson O (1983) Computation of VLF response over half-plane and wedge models. Geophys Prospect 31:171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orellana E (1974) Prospeccion geoelectrica: por campos variables. Paraninfo, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Palacky GJ, Ritsema IL, De Jong SJ (1981) Electromagnetic prospecting for groundwater in Precambrian terrains in the Republic of Upper Volta. Geophys Prospect 29:932–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirttijarvi M (2003) Numerical modelling and inversion of geophysical electromagnetic measurements using a thin plate model. PhD Thesis, University of Oulu Department of Geosciences Division of Geophysics

  • Pirttijarvi M (2006) 2Layinv-Laterally constrained two-layer inversion of VLF-R measurements. User’s guide University of Oulu, Division of Geophysics

  • Pirttijarvi M, Verma SK, Hjelt SE (1998) Inversion of transient electromagnetic profile data using conductive finite plate model. J Appl Geophys 38:181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JM (2011) An introduction to applied and environmental geophysics. Wiley and Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodger CJ, Wait RW, Dowden RL, Thomson NR (1998) Radiating conducting columns inside the earth-ionosphere waveguide: application to red sprites. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 60:1193–1204

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki Y (1989) Two dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and dipole–dipole resistivity data. Geophysics 54:254–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saydam AS (1981) Very low-frequency electromagnetic interpretation using tilt angle and ellipticity measurements. Geophysics 46:1594–1605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha AK (1990) Interpretation of ground VLF-EM data in terms of inclined sheet-like conductor models. Pure Appl Geophys 132:733–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith DS, Ward SH (1974) On the computation of polarization ellipse parameters. Geophysics 39:867–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanikawa W, Mishima T, Hirono T, Soh W, Song SR (2008) High magnetic susceptibility produced by thermal decomposition of core samples from the Chelungpu fault in Taiwan. Earth Planeta Sci Lett 272:372–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarcan G, Gemici Ü, Aksoy N (2005) Hydrogeological and geochemical assessments of the Gediz Graben geothermal areas, western Anatolia, Turkey. Environ Geol 47:523–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tezkan B (1999) A review of environmental applications of quasi-stationary electromagnetic techniques. Surv Geophys 20:279–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomson R, Bloemendal J, Dearing J, Oldfield F, Rummery J, Stober J, Turner G (1980) Environmental applications of magnetic measurements. Science 4430(207):481–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timur E (2003) Application of VLF method at archaeological sites. MSc Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, İzmir

  • Timur E (2009) Joint inversion of magnetic and electromagnetic data. PhD Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, The Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, İzmir

  • Timur E (2012) VLF-R studies in the Agora of Magnesia archaeological site, Aydin, Turkey. J Geophys Eng 9:697–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tite M, Linington R (1975) Effect on climate on the magnetic susceptibility of soils. Nature 256:565–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uchida T (1993) Smooth 2-D inversion for magnetotelluric data based on statistical criterion ABIC. J Geomagn Geoelectr 45:841–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vozoff K (1971) The effect of overburden on vertical component anomalies in AFMAG and VLF exploration. Geophysics 36:53–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wait JR (1962) Theory of magnetotelluric fields. J Res Natl Bur Stand Sect D Radio Sci 66:509–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright JL (1988) VLF ınterpretation manual. Geonics Ltd, Ontario, Canada

  • Wu TN, Lu GY (2012) Climatic sub-cycles recorded by the fourth paleosol layer at Luochuan on the Loess Plateau. Environ Earth Sci 66(5):1329–1335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Y, Yue LP, Li JX, Sun L, Sun B, Zhang JY, Ma J, Wang JQ (2012) Red clay deposits on the Chinese Plateau during 11.0–2.6 Ma and its implications for long-term evolution of East Asian monsoon. Environ Earth Sci 66(7):2021–2030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yağmur B, Aydın S, Çoban H (2013) The physical and chemical characteristics of vineyard soils and its heavy metal content in semi-arid environments. Afr J Agric Res 8(38):4819–4826

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Liu QS, Zeng QL, Chan LS (2012) Relationship between magnetic properties and heavy metals of urban soils with different soil types and environment settings: implications for magnetic mapping. Environ Earth Sci 66(2):409–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yazman KM (2013) Personal communication. Türkerler Geothermal Energy Company, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Yılmazer S, Pasvanoğlu S, Vural S (2010) The relation of geothermal resources with young tectonics in the Gediz Graben (West Anatolia, Turkey) and their hydrochemical analyses. Proc World Geotherm Congr, Bali

    Google Scholar 

  • Zawadzki J, Fabijanczyk P, Magiera T, Strzyszcz Z (2010) Study of litter influence on magnetic susceptibility measurements of urban forest topsoils using the MS2D sensor. Environ Earth Sci 61(2):223–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhdanov MS, Fang S (1996) 3-D quasi linear electromagnetic inversion. Radio Sci 31:741–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Prof. Dr. Coşkun Sarı, Prof. Dr. Gregory N. Tsokas and the anonymous reviewers for their ideas and support. Many thanks to our departments’ hardworking students for their enormous effort during the VLF-R survey at Alaşehir. Also I would like to thank Scientific Research Foundation of Dokuz Eylül University, Turkey (DEUBAP-2009.KB.FEN.030) for supporting the magnetic susceptibility equipment.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geophysics, Engineering Faculty, Dokuz Eylul University, Buca, 35160, Izmir, Turkey

    Emre Timur

Authors
  1. Emre Timur
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emre Timur.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Timur, E. Magnetic susceptibility and VLF-R investigations for determining geothermal blowout contaminated area: a case study from Alaşehir (Manisa/Turkey). Environ Earth Sci 72, 2497–2510 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3158-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3158-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation