Skip to main content
Log in

Examining the effect of L2 motivational factors on the development of L2 achievement: using multilevel latent growth curve model

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Education Review Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using Gyeonggi Educational Panel Study data on 4051 Korean students (N = 4051; 1967 female, 2084 male) from 63 middle schools, this longitudinal study investigated the growth trajectory for second/foreign language (L2) achievement and associations with various L2 motivational factors by using a multilevel latent growth curve model in Mplus 8.4. Because of the hierarchal data structure, the predictive factors were sorted into three student-level subcategories: individual characteristics; L2 classroom engagement components; and family background. At the school level, school SES and teacher efficacy were specified. Results indicate that global and L2 self-efficacy affected the high initial scores; however, no effect was observed on the growth rate. Unexpectedly, L2 interest was found to have no effects, which suggested a possible engagement mediation effect. Finally, of the L2 classroom engagement factors, L2 class comprehension was found to have a strong explanatory power for the initial L2 achievement scores, but exhibited no impact on the growth rate. These findings have second language acquisition implications for practice and interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aikens, N., & Barbarin, O. (2008). Socioeconomic differences in reading trajectories: The contribution of family, neighborhood, and school contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, I., Janosz, M., Fallu, J.-S., & Pagani, L. S. (2009). Student engagement and its relationship with early high school dropout. Journal of Adolescence, 32(3), 651–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W. H. Freeman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boo, Z., Dörnyei, Z., & Ryan, S. (2015). L2 motivation research 2005–2014: Understanding a publication surge and a changing landscape. System, 55, 147–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S. D., Lent, R. W., & Larkin, K. C. (1989). Self-efficacy as a moderator of scholastic aptitude: Academic performance relationships. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 35(1), 64–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21(2), 230–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, Y. G. (2015). Parental factors in children’s motivation for learning English: A case in China. Research Papers in Education, 30(2), 164–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural equation modeling with AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative approaches to testing for the factorial validity of a measuring instrument. International Journal of Testing, 1(1), 55–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Routledge Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Steca, P., & Malone, P. S. (2006). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs as determinants of job satisfaction and students’ academic achievement: A study at the school level. Journal of School Psychology, 44(6), 473–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carhill, A., Suárez-Orozco, C., & Páez, M. (2008). Explaining English language proficiency among adolescent immigrant students. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1155–1179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, M., Expósito-Casas, E., López-Martín, E., Lizasoain, L., Navarro-Asencio, E., & Gaviria, J. L. (2015). Parental involvement on student academic achievement: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 14, 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex Differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 54–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chase, P. A., Hilliard, L. J., Geldhof, G. J., Warren, D. J., & Lerner, R. M. (2014). Academic achievement in the high school years: The changing role of school engagement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(6), 884–896.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, J. H. (2014). An analysis of the effects of teacher leadership on student achievement in the elementary school based on hierarchical linear model. The Journal of Elementary Education, 27(3), 163–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1994). Motivation, self-confidence, and group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language Learning, 44(3), 417–448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crumpton, H. E., & Gregory, A. (2011). “I’m not learning”: The role of academic relevancy for low achieving students. Journal of Educational Research, 104(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220670903567398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, R. (1994). From cross-sectional to longitudinal analysis. In R. B. Davies & A. Dale (Eds.), Analyzing social and political change: A casebook of methods (pp. 20–40). SAGE.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Demanet, J., & Van Houtte, M. (2014). Social-ethnic school composition and disengagement: An inquiry into the perceived control explanation. The Social Science Journal, 51(4), 659–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dörnyei, Z., & Skehan, P. (2003). 18 Individual Differences in Second Language Learning. In C. J. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 589–630). Blackwell.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Eccles, J., & Wang, M. T. (2012). Part I: Commentary: So what is student engagement anyway? In S. L. Christenson, A. L. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 133–145). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Erdoğdu, M. Y. (2019). The mediating role of school engagement in the relationship between attitude toward learning and academic achievement. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(2), 75–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, X., Thompson, B., & Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 56–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fancera, S. F., & Bliss, J. R. (2011). Instructional leadership influence on collective teacher efficacy to improve school achievement. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 349–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fry, R. (2008). The role of schools in the English language learner achievement gap. Pew Hispanic Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garcia-Reid, P., Reid, R., & Peterson, N. A. (2005). School engagement among Latino youth in an urban middle school context: Valuing the role of social support. Education and Urban Society, 37(3), 257–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goddard, R. D., & Goddard, Y. L. (2001). A multilevel analysis of the relationship between teacher and collective efficacy in urban schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 807–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. (2003). Looking in the classroom. Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, W. N. (2008). Multiple resources, multiple outcomes: Testing the “improved” school finance with NELS88. American Educational Research Journal, 45, 104–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakuta, K., Butler, Y., & Witt, D. (2000). How long does it take English learners to attain proficiency? (Policy Report 2000–1). University of California, Linguistic Minority Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, D. N., & Sass, T. R. (2011). Teacher training, teacher quality, and student achievement. Journal of Public Economics, 95(7), 798–812.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hattie, J. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence? Australian Council for Educational Research (pp. 1–16).

  • Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P. P. H., & Kang, H. S. (2010). Attribution and self-efficacy and their interrelationship in the Korean EFL context. Language Learning, 60(3), 606–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, P. H. P., & Schallert, D. L. (2008). Implications from self-efficacy and attribution theories for an understanding of undergraduates’ motivation in a foreign language course. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 33(4), 513–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6(1), 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, J. N., Luo, W., Kwok, O. M., & Loyd, L. K. (2008). Teacher-student support, effortful engagement, and achievement: A 3-year longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janosz, M., Archambault, I., Morizot, J., & Pagani, L. S. (2008). School engagement trajectories and their differential predictive relations to dropout. Journal of Social Issues, 64(1), 21–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao, G., & Thompson, J. S. (2003). Racial and ethnic stratification in education achievement and attainment. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 417–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karthigeyan, K., & Nirmala, K. (2012). Academic achievement in English: An analysis through gender lens. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends & Practices, 2(2), 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Socioeconomic status, English proficiency, and late-emerging reading difficulties. Educational Researcher, 39(6), 484–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K. H., Kim, W. S., Choi, I. B., Sang, K. A., Kim, H. K., Shin, J. A., Kim, J. Y., & Son, W. S. (2011). Characteristics of Educational Academic Improvement from NAEA (National Assessment of Educational Achievement). Korea Institute of Curriculum & Evaluation.

  • Kim, K.-K., & Jang, H. (2016). Longitudinal analysis on predictors of academic achievement among middle and high school students in Seoul. The Korea Educational Review, 21(3), 175–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, N. H., & Kim, J. B. (2011). The relationship between student-teacher attachment relationship and academic achievement mediated by basic psychological needs and academic engagement: Differences in the meaning and roles of teacher support and student-teacher attachment relationship. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 25(4), 763–789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. (2010). The effects of student’s and school’s characteristics on English achievement for the 6th grade students. The Journal of Yeolin Education, 18(2), 97–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S. I., Yoon, M. S., & So, Y. H. (2008). Academic interests of Korean students: Description, diagnosis, & prescription. The Korean Journal of Culture and Social Issues, 14(1), 187–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, T. (2012). The role of interest and self-efficacy in English achievement among Korean youth. Journal of Future Oriented Youth Society, 9(1), 47–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. J., Choi, I.-C., & Park, L. (2017). Longitudinal relations among English achievement, self-efficacy, and perceived teaching ability. Studies in English Education, 22(1), 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R. M., & Usher, E. L. (2010). Self-efficacy in educational settings: Recent research and emerging directions. In T. C. Urdan & S. A. Karabenick (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: The decade ahead: Theoretical perspectives on motivation and achievement (pp. 1–33). Emerald.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guildford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kpolovie, P. J. (2010). Effects of information processing styles and types of learning on students’ learning. Nigerian Journal of Empirical Studies in Psychology and Education., 1(11), 6–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhlemeier, H., Van Den Bergh, H., & Melse, L. (1996). Attitudes and achievements in the first year of German language instruction in Dutch secondary education. Modern Language Journal, 80, 494–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. S., Kim, S. S., Song, M. Y., Kim, J. Y., & Yang, S. K. (2011). Structural equation models of student achievement: School contextual and instructional differences in the development of reading, math, and English construct. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(2), 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. S., Shin, J. A., & Kim, K. H. (2013). Relationships between educational context variables and academic achievement based on multi-level SEM analyses. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 26(2), 477–506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J. (2010). The path analysis of teacher-student relationships, class climate, and learning flow on academic achievement in elementary students. The Journal of Elementary Education, 23(4), 207–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. J. (2012). The relationship of academic self-efficacy, task value, achievement goal, academic efforts and cognitive strategies to English academic achievement between middle and high school students in Korea. The Journal of Educational Research, 10(4), 103–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lent, R. W., Brown, S. D., & Gore, P. A., Jr. (1997). Discriminant and predictive validity of academic self-concept, academic self-efficacy, and mathematics-specific self-efficacy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 44(3), 307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2011). Trajectories of school engagement during adolescence: Implications for grades, depression, delinquency, and substance use. Developmental Psychology, 47(1), 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., & Lerner, R. M. (2013). Interrelations of behavioral, emotional, and cognitive school engagement in high students. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42(1), 20–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, D., & Kwon, G. H. (2012). Determinants of academic achievement of high school students in Seoul: Application of tobit model for censored data. Korean Journal of Policy Analysis and Evaluation, 22(2), 43–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, H. J., & Lee, J.-E. (2016). The longitudinal changes of students’ perception on teachers’ teaching ability, self-efficacy, and academic achievement. Korean Journal of Youth Studies, 23(6), 71–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills, N., Pajares, F., & Herron, C. (2007). Self-efficacy of college intermediate French students: Relation to achievement and motivation. Language Learning, 57(3), 417–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2003). Mplus short courses: Growth modeling with latent variables using Mplus. Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2018). Mplus user’s guide (8th ed.). Muthén & Muthén.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nariman-Jahan, R., & Rahimpour, M. (2010). The influence of self-efficacy and proficiency on EFL learners’ writing. Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 7(11), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh, Y. K. (2021). The growth trajectories of L2 self-efficacy and its effects on L2 learning: Using a curve-of-factors model. Applied Linguistics. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amab005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oh, Y. K., & Cha, S. H. (2017). Exploring structural relationships among student and school variables affecting English academic achievement in elementary schools. The Journal of Korean Teacher Education, 34(2), 251–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, L., & Iberri-Shea, G. (2005). Longitudinal research in second language acquisition: Recent trends and future directions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 26–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pae, T.-I. (2012). A comparative study of the factors affecting English achievement for Korean middle and high school students. English Language Teaching, 24(1), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996a). Assessing self-efficacy beliefs and academic outcomes: The case for specificity and correspondence. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pajares, F. (1996b). Self-efficacy beliefs in academic settings. Review of Educational Research, 66, 543–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, D. Y. (2011). A tendency analysis on school effectiveness using multilevel structural equation modeling. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 24(2), 345–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H., & Jun, M. N. (2007). The effect of student, teacher, and school characteristics on middle school students’ Korean, English, and Mathematics achievement outcomes. Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 21(1), 145–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Park, H. J., & Kim, Y. H. (2010). The effect of family’s cultural capital and social capital on the improvement of students’ English academic achievement: A latent growth model analysis. Korean Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(4), 55–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J. (2007). The trend in Korean middle school students’ affective variables toward mathematics and its effect on their mathematics achievements. The Mathematical Education, 46(1), 19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phan, H. P., & Ngu, B. H. (2014). Interrelations between self-esteem and personal self-efficacy in educational contexts: An empirical study. International Journal of Applied Psychology, 4(3), 108–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T., & McKeachie, W. (1991). A manual for the use of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). University of Michigan, National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raoofi, S., Tan, B. H., & Chan, S. H. (2012). Self-efficacy in second/foreign language learning contexts. English Language Teaching, 5(11), 60–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeve, J., & Tseng, C. M. (2011). Agency as a fourth aspect of students’ engagement during learning activities. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(4), 257–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes, M. R., Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., White, M., & Salovey, P. (2012). Classroom emotional climate, student engagement, and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothstein, J. (2010). Teacher quality in educational production: Tracking, decay, and student achievement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(1), 175–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, R., & Dembo, M. H. (1995). Motivational processes in learning: A comparative analysis of cognitive and sociocultural frameworks. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 9, 255–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 207–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, H. S. (2008). How junior high school students’ engagement in school relates to academic motivation, academic performance, and classroom conduct. Educational Research, 31, 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer, J. D., & Willett, J. B. (2003). Applied longitudinal data analysis: Modeling change and event occurrence. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sitzmann, T., & Yeo, G. (2013). A meta-analytic investigation of the within-person self-efficacy domain: Is self-efficacy a product of past performance or a driver of future performance? Personnel Psychology, 66(3), 531–568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song, J. Y., Kang, I., & Kim, S. I. (2013). Comparison of the predictive power of interest and utility value in predicting students’ classroom engagement and achievement in English across grade levels: The moderating role of perceived competence. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 27(4), 911–933.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh, S., Kim, S. W., & Kim, N. J. (2010). Effectiveness of MMORPG-based Instruction in Elementary English Education in Korea. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(5), 370–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ushioda, E. (2006). Language motivation in a reconfigured Europe: Access, identity, autonomy. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 27, 148–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ushioda, E. (2020). Language learning motivation. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, J. C., DuBois, D. L., & Cooper, H. (2004). The relation between self-beliefs and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 39(2), 111–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van de Gaer, E., Pustjens, H., Van Damme, J., & De Munter, A. (2009). School engagement and language achievement: A longitudinal study of gender differences across secondary school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 55(4), 373–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633–662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentzel, K. R. (1988). Gender differences in math and English achievement: A longitudinal study. Sex Roles, 18(11), 691–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilder, S. (2014). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: A meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, J. H. (2015). The relationships among parents-, teacher-, and student-related variables and student engagement in middle and high school. Korean Journal of Educational Research, 53(3), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, M. S., & Hong, C. Y. (2006). Relationships among parental involvement in education, subject-specific interests, and academic achievement. The Korea Journal of Education Methodology Studies, 18(2), 139–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, M. S., & Kim, S. I. (2003). A study on constructs of subject-specific interests and their relationship with academic achievement. The Korean Journal of Educational Psychology, 17(3), 271–290.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zee, M., & Koomen, H. M. Y. (2016). Teacher self-efficacy and its effects on classroom processes, student academic adjustment, and teacher well-being: A synthesis of 40 years of research. Review of Educational Research., 86(4), 981–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (1996). Measuring and mismeasuring academic self-efficacy: Dimensions, problems, and misconceptions. Symposium presented at the meeting of the American Educational Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 82–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Bandura, A. (1994). Impact of self-regulatory influences on writing course attainment. American Educational Research Journal, 31(4), 845–862.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2008). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and application (pp. 1–30). Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Young Kyo Oh.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This paper received the 2019 Gallup Korea Research Award and widely revised for peer review.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Oh, Y.K. Examining the effect of L2 motivational factors on the development of L2 achievement: using multilevel latent growth curve model. Asia Pacific Educ. Rev. 24, 113–127 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09737-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-021-09737-2

Keywords

Navigation