Skip to main content
Log in

Ik kies voor zelfcontrole: CGT op school bij gedragsproblemen

Een gerandomiseerd onderzoek naar de effectiviteit van een cognitief gedragstherapeutische interventie in het basisonderwijs voor kinderen met opstandig en antisociaal gedrag

  • Published:
Kind & Adolescent

Samenvatting

In dit onderzoek werd een cognitief-gedragstherapeutische interventie in het basisonderwijs vergeleken met een wachtlijstconditie. Ook werd onderzocht of actieve participatie van leerkrachten dan wel psycho-educatie aan de leerkracht tot gunstiger behandeleffecten leidden. Het onderzoek werd uitgevoerd bij 173 kinderen van 8 tot en met 12 jaar, grotendeels afkomstig uit gezinnen met een laag tot gemiddelde SES (79 %) en met diverse etnische achtergronden (63 % van niet-Westerse origine). Trainers (n = 13) en co-trainers (n = 22) verzorgden de interventie in duo’s. De gegevens werden met behulp van Multilevel Analyse geanalyseerd en Cohen’s d werd berekend. Ouders en leerkrachten rapporteerden een significante afname van opstandig en antisociaal gedrag (Cohen’s d = 0,31). De verbeteringen bleken stabiel of namen toe bij follow-up (Cohen’s d  =  0,39). Er werden geen effecten van de leerkrachtcondities gevonden direct na de behandeling, maar bij follow-up bleken leerkrachten uit de educatieve conditie minder probleemgedrag te rapporteren. Conclusie is dat behandeling van opstandig en antisociaal gedrag binnen de schoolcontext effectief kan zijn.

Abstract

The effectiveness of a school-based targeted intervention programme for disruptive behaviour was investigated by comparing the intervention condition to a waitlist control condition. Furthermore, the additional effects of active teacher training versus educational teacher training were compared. The children included (n = 173) were aged 8–12, from low or low-to-middle SES (79 %) and ethnically diverse (63 % of non-Western origin). Trainers (n = 13) offered the intervention together with co-trainers (n = 22). The data were analysed with multilevel analysis and Cohen’s d was calculated. Parents and teachers reported a significant decrease in oppositional and antisocial behavior (Cohen’s d = .31). The results remained stable or improved further at follow-up (Cohen’s d = .39). No post-treatment effects of the teacher condition were found, however at follow-up, the children from the educational condition fared significantly better. Children can benefit from school-based CBT for oppositional and antisocial behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figuur 1

Literatuur

  • Arsenio, W. F. (2010). Social information processing, emotions, and aggression: Conceptual and methodological contributions of the special section articles. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 627–632.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • August, G. J., Egan, E. A., Realmuto, G. M., & Hektner, J. M. (2003). Parceling component effects of a multifaceted prevention program for disruptive elementary school children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 31, 515–527.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barmby, P. (2006). Improving teacher recruitment and retention: The importance of workload and pupil behaviour. Educational Research, 48, 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broidy, L. M., Tremblay, R. E., Brame, B., Fergusson, D., Horwood, J. L., Laird, R., … Vitaro, F. (2003). Developmental trajectories of childhood disruptive behaviors and adolescent delinquencies: A six-site, cross-national study. Developmental Psychology, 39, 222–245.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Centraal Bureau voor Statistiek Nederland. (2001). Standaard beroepenclassificatie 1999. Voorburg: Statistics Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costin, J., & Chambers, S. M. (2007). Parent management training as a treatment for children with oppositional defiant disorder referred to a mental health clinic. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 12, 511–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 74–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Boo, G.M., & Liber, J.M. (2014a). Ik kies voor zelfcontrole; Actieboek voor kinderen. SWP Uitgeverij, Amsterdam

  • De Boo, G.M., & Liber, J.M. (2014b). Ik kies voor zelfcontrole; Trainershandleiding. SWP Uitgeverij, Amsterdam

  • De Los Reyes, A. (2011). More than measurement error: Discovering meaning behind informant discrepancies in clinical assessments of children and adolescents. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 40, 1–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Los Reyes, A., Henry, D. B., Tolan, P. H., & Wakschlag, L. S. (2009). Linking informant discrepancies to observed variations in young children's disruptive behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 37, 637–652.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Deković, M., Slagt, M. I., Asscher, J. J., Boendermaker, L., Eichelsheim, V. I., & Prinzie, P. (2011). Effects of early prevention programs on adult criminal offending: A meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 31, 532–544.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dymnicki, A. B., Weissberg, R. P., & Henry, D. B. (2011). Understanding how programs work to prevent overt aggressive behaviors: A meta-analysis of mediators of elementary school-based programs. Journal of School Violence, 10, 315–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gansle, K. A. (2005). The effectiveness of school-based anger interventions and programs: A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 43, 321–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamins, M. L., & Dweck, C. S. (1999). Person versus process praise and criticism: Implications for contingent self-worth and coping. Developmental Psychology, 35, 835–847.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E., & Wassell, G. (2000). Therapeutic changes in children, parents, and families resulting from treatment of children with conduct problems. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 39, 414–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazdin, A. E., Holland, L., & Crowley, M. (1997). Family experience of barriers to treatment and premature termination from child therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 65, 453–463.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liber, J.M, Boo, G.M. de, Huizenga, H. M., & Prins, P.J.M. (2013) School-based intervention for childhood disruptive behavior in disadvantaged settings: A randomized controlled trial with and without active teacher support. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(6), 975–987.

  • Mikami, A. Y., Boucher, M. A., & Humphreys, K. (2005). Prevention of peer rejection through a classroom-level intervention in middle school. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 5–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mytton, J., DiGuiseppi, C., Gough, D., Taylor, R., & Logan, S. (2006). School-based secondary prevention programmes for preventing violence. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, CD004606.

  • Oosterlaan, J., Baeyens, D., Scheres, A., Antrop, I., Roeyers, H., & Sergeant, J. A. (2008). VvGK 6–16 vragenlijst voor gedragsproblemen bij kinderen 6–16 jaar. handleiding. Amsterdam: Pearson Assessment and Information B.V.

  • Orobio de Castro, B. (2014). Agressieve en Regelovertredende Gedragsproblemen. In P. J. M. Prins & C. Braet (Eds.), Handboek Klinische Ontwikkelingspsychologie (pp. 297–324). Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyno, S. M., & McGrath, P.J. (2006). Predictors of parent training efficacy for child externalizing behavior problem – a meta-analytic review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 47, 99–111.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sukhodolsky, D. G., Kassinove, H., & Gorman, B. S. (2004). Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anger in children and adolescents: A meta-analysis. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 9, 247–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Leeuwen, E., & Bijl, B. (2003). The validity of the SPRINT instruments. Duivendrecht: PI Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, T. G. (2001). Zelfcontrole. Houten: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Manen, T. G., Prins, P. J. M., & Emmelkamp, P. M. (2004). Reducing aggressive behavior in boys with a social cognitive group treatment: Results of a randomized, controlled trial. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 1478–1487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Widenfelt, B. M., Goedhart, A. W., Treffers, P. D., & Goodman, R. (2003). Dutch version of the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ). European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 12, 281–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vansteenkiste, M., Verstuyf, J., Soenens, B., & Neyrinck, B. De complexiteit van beloningen verder belicht vanuit de Zelf-Determinatietheorie: Worden ze als controlerend of informerend ervaren? Psychopraktijk, 2, 22–26.

  • Verhulst, F. C. (2002). Gedragsvragenlijst voor kinderen van 6–18 jaar. Rotterdam: Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam/Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waschbusch, D. A., Pelham, W. E., & Massetti, G. (2005). The Behavior Education Support and Treatment (BEST) school intervention program: Pilot project data examining schoolwide, targeted-school, and targeted-home approaches. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 313–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • WebsterStratton, C., & Reid, M. J. (2003). Treating conduct problems and strengthening social and emotional competence in young children: The dina dinosaur treatment program. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 11, 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WebsterStratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Hammond, M. (2004). Treating children with early-onset conduct problems: Intervention outcomes for parent, child, and teacher training. Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, 33, 105–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WebsterStratton, C., Reid, M. J., & Stoolmiller, M. (2008). Preventing conduct problems and improving school readiness: Evaluation of the Incredible Years teacher and child training programs in high-risk schools. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49, 471–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, B., Harris, V., & Catron, T. (2002). Development and initial validation of the peer-report measure of internalizing and externalizing behavior. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 30, 285–294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, S. J., & Lipsey, M. W. (2007). School-based interventions for aggressive and disruptive behavior: Update of a meta-analysis. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 33, S130–S143.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juliëtte M. Liber.

Additional information

Het huidige artikel is een vertaalde en bewerkte versie van Liber, J.M, Boo, G.M. de, Huizenga, H.M., & Prins, P.J.M. (2013) School-based intervention for childhood disruptive behavior in disadvantaged settings: A randomized controlled trial with and without active teacher support. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(6), 975–987.

Dit onderzoek werd mogelijk gemaakt dankzij financiering door ZonMW (157001016).

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liber, J., de Boo, G., Huizenga, H. et al. Ik kies voor zelfcontrole: CGT op school bij gedragsproblemen. Kind Adolesc 36, 146–161 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12453-015-0093-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12453-015-0093-0

Trefwoorden

Keywords

Navigation