Skip to main content
Log in

The role of task dependence in supervisor’s gratitude when empowering: A quantitative diary study

  • Published:
Current Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Scholars have shown growing interest in leader-member exchange (LMX). Primary studies have considerably focused on the subordinate-related antecedents of LMX. However, the studies have an evident gap in the examination of when and how supervisors’ behavior and emotion affect themselves and their LMX relationships with subordinates. Given the potent role of a supervisors’ affective characteristics, we explored how empowering behavior may influence supervisors though a quantitative diary study. Results indicated that only when a supervisor has high task dependence on the subordinate can empowering behavior increase the supervisor’s gratitude, thus leading to higher LMX-affect. By shifting the primary focus from subordinates’ perceptions to supervisors’ psychological activities, we provided a supervisor perspective that enhances our understanding of both empowering behavior and the development of LMX.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Upon reasonable request, the relevant author will provide the datasets created and used in the current investigation.

References

  • Algoe, S. B. (2012). Find, remind, and bind: The functions of gratitude in everyday relationships. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 6(6), 455–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Algoe, S. B., & Zhaoyang, R. (2016). Positive psychology in context: Effects of expressing gratitude in ongoing relationships depend on perceptions of enactor responsiveness. Journal of Positive Psychology, 11(4), 399–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Alo, O., & Arslan, A. (2022). The antecedents of leader-member-exchange (LMX) relationships in African context: The influence of the supervisor’s feedback delivery-tactic. International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 30(7), 67–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amundsen, S., & Martinsen, L. (2014). Empowering leadership: Construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 487–511.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arif, L. N., Chaudhury, S. R., & LaCross, L. (2023). Understanding leader integrity on employees’ perceived inclusion through mediating role of leader-member exchange. International Journal of Organizational Leadership, 12(2), 216–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, C. M., Lucianetti, L., Bhave, D. P., & Christian, M. S. (2015). You wouldn’t like me when I’m sleepy: Leader sleep, daily abusive supervision, and work unit engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1419–1437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrick, M. R., Bradley, B. H., Kristof-Brown, A. L., & Colbert, A. E. (2007). The moderating role of top management team interdependence: Implications for real teams and working groups. Academy of Management Journal, 50, 544–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beal, D. J., & Gabriel, A. S. (2019). Looking within: An examination, combination, and extension of within-person methods across multiple levels of analysis. In S. E. Humphrey & J. M. LeBreton (Eds.), The handbook of multilevel theory, measurement, and analysis (pp. 305–327). American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, D. (1971). The attraction paradigm. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. C., Zhang, A. Y., & Wang, H. (2015). Enhancing the effects of power sharing on psychological empowerment: The roles of management control and power distance orientation. Management and Organization Review, 10(1), 135–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheong, M., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Spain, S. M., & Tsai, C.-Y. (2019). A review of the effectiveness of empowering leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 34–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colella, A., & Varma, A. (2001). The impact of subordinate disability on leader-member exchange relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 44, 304–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman, R. A., & Donoher, W. J. (2022). Looking beyond the dyad: How transformational leadership affects leader-member exchange quality and outcomes. Journal of Leadership Studies, 15(4), 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conger, J. A. (1989). Leadership: The art of empowering others. Academy of Management Perspectives, 3(1), 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, S. B., Van, d. V., Gerben S., & Molleman, E. (2007). The relationships among asymmetry in task dependence, perceived helping behavior, and trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(6), 1625-1637.

  • Dienesch, R. M., & Liden, R. C. (1986). Leader-member exchange model of leadership: A critique and further development. Academy of Management Review, 11, 618–634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012). A meta-analysis of antecedents and consequences of leader-member exchange integrating the past with an eye toward the future. Journal of Management, 38(6), 1715–1759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirza, S., & Katrinli, A. (2019). The relationship between leader construal level and leader-member exchange relationship : The role of relational demography. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 40(8), 845–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., & McCullough, M. E. (2003). Counting blessings versus burdens: An experimental investigation of gratitude and subjective well-being in daily life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(2), 377–389.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan, B., & Liden, R. C. (2002). Social exchanges in the workplace: A review of recent developments and future research directions in leader-member exchange theory. In L. L. Neider & C. A. Schriesheim (Eds.), Leadership, 65–114. Information Age.

  • Fairhurst, G. T. (2001). Dualisms in leadership research. In L. L. Putnam & F. M. Jablin (Eds.), The new handbook of organizational communication: 379–439. Sage: Newbury Park, CA. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

  • Fehr, R., Fulmer, A., Awtrey, E., & Miller, J. A. (2017). The grateful workplace: A multilevel model of gratitude in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 42(2), 361–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fenwick, K. M., Brimhall, K. C., Hurlburt, M., & Aarons, G. (2019). Who wants feedback? Effects of transformational leadership and leader-member exchange on mental health practitioners’ attitudes toward feedback. Psychiatric Services, 70(1), 11–18.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, K. A., & Brannick, M. T. (2022). Conflict behaviors mediate effects of manipulated leader-member exchange on team-oriented outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(5), 977–997.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Positive emotions broaden and build. In J. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graen, G. B., & Scandura, T. A. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. Research in Organizational Behavior, 9, 175–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guzzo, R. A., & Shea, G. P. (1992). Group performance and intergroup relations in organizations. Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 3, 269–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haggard, D. L., & Park, H. M. (2018). Perceived supervisor remorse, abusive supervision, and LMX. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(10), 1252–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han, C.-C., Chen, H., Yang, N., Wang, X.-H.F., & Wang, B.-L. (2023). Empowering leadership and leader’s psychological well-being: A moderated mediation model. Social Behavior and Personality, 51(5), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, S., Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. E. (2013). Ethical and empowering leadership and leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 28(2), 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayden, C., & Miura, Y. (2022). What about leader engagement? A preliminary analysis of this forgotten variable. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(6), 999–1010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. (1987). Principles of group solidarity. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmvall, C. M., Stevens, S., & Chestnut, N. (2019). The impact of subordinate disrespect on leader justice. Personnel Review, 48(1), 2–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G. L. (1961). Social behavior: Its elementary forms. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, X., Iun, J., Liu, A., & Gong, Y. (2010). Does participative leadership enhance work performance by inducing empowerment or trust? The differential effects on managerial and non-managerial subordinates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(1), 122–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inam, A., Ho, J. A., Ng, S. I., & Mohamed, R. (2021). Inhibiting unethical pro-organizational behavior: Harnessing the effects of responsible leadership and leader-member exchange. International Journal of Manpower, 42(7), 1183–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskes, I., Sallan, J., Simo, P., & Fernandez, V. (2018). Transformational leadership and organizational commitment: Mediating role of leader-member exchange. Journal of Management Development, 37(3), 271–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinicki, A. J., & Vecchio, R. P. (1994). Influences on the quality of supervisor-subordinate relations: The role of time-pressure, organizational commitment, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasikova, D. V., & LeBreton, J. M. (2012). Just the two of us: Misalignment of theory and methods in examining dyadic phenomena. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(4), 739–757.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, H. K., Chen, H., & Chiu, R. K. (2022). Effects of empowering leadership on followers’ work-family interface. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(7), 1403–1436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lanaj, K., & Jennings, R. E. (2020). Putting leaders in a bad mood: The affective costs of helping followers with personal problems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 105(4), 355–371.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J. (2001). An affect theory of social exchange. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lawler, E. J., & Yoon, J. (1996). Commitment in exchange relations: Test of a theory of relational cohesion. American Sociological Review, 61(1), 89–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, A., Willis, S., & Tian, A. W. (2018). Empowering leadership: A meta-analytic examination of incremental contribution, mediation, and moderation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 39(3), 306–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, T. S., Lee, D. W., Lee, H., & Park, H. S. (2005). Superior-subordinate relationships in Korean civil engineering companies. Journal of Management in Engineering, 21(6), 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LePine, J. A., & Dyne, L. V. (2001). Voice and cooperative behavior as contrasting forms of contextual performance: Evidence of differential relationships with Big Five personality characteristics and cognitive ability. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 326–336.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, E. Y., & Hui, C. (2021). A resource-based perspective on leader-member exchange: An updated meta-analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 38(1), 317–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Z., Liu, W., Li, X., & Song, Z. (2019). Give and take: An episodic perspective on leader-member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 104(1), 34–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Z., Song, Z., Li, X., Wu, L., & Liu, Y. (2015). Leader-member exchange process: The mediating roles of state gratitude and momentary trust in leader. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2015, 13871.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao, Z., Yam, K. C., Johnson, R. E., Liu, W., & Song, Z. (2018). Cleansing my abuse: A reparative response model of perpetrating abusive supervisor behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(9), 1039–1056.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., & Maslyn, J. M. (1998). Multidimensionality of leader-member exchange: An empirical assessment through scale development. Journal of Management, 24(1), 43–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership: Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mai, K. M., Welsh, D. T., Wang, F., Bush, J., & Jiang, K. (2022). Supporting creativity or creative unethicality? Empowering leadership and the role of performance pressure. Journal of Business Ethics, 179(1), 111–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R., Ono, M., Legood, A., Dello Russo, S., & Thomas, G. (2023). Leader-member exchange (LMX) quality and follower well-being: A daily diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 28(2), 103–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, S. L., Liao, H., & Campbell, E. M. (2013). Directive versus empowering leadership: A field experiment comparing impacts on task proficiency and proactivity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1372–1395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Masters, R. D. (1991). Individual and cultural differences in response to leaders’ nonverbal displays. Journal of Social Issues, 47(3), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCullough, M. E., Kilpatrick, S. D., Emmons, R. A., & Larson, D. B. (2001). Is gratitude a moral affect? Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 249–266.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miloslavic, S. A., Wildman, J. L., & Thayer, A. L. (2015). Structuring successful global virtual teams. In J. L. Wildman & R. L. Griffith (Eds.), Leading global teams (pp. 67–87). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Nahrgang, J. D., Morgeson, F. P., & Ilies, R. (2009). The development of leader-member exchanges: Exploring how personality and performance influence leader and member relationships over time. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108, 256–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9(2), 79–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otto, C. A. (1993). The relationship between transformational leadership and employee loyalty, employee commitment, and employee perceptions of organizational justice. Michigan State University.

  • Parsons, T. (1951). The social system. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, A. S., & Bedeian, A. G. (1994). Leader-follower exchange quality: The role of personal and interpersonal attributes. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 990–1001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Rucker, D. D., & Hayes, A. F. (2007). Addressing moderated mediation hypotheses: Theory, methods, and prescriptions. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(1), 185–227.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., Zyphur, M. J., & Zhang, Z. (2010). A general multilevel SEM framework for assessing multilevel mediation. Psychological Methods, 15(3), 209–233.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Qin, X., Huang, M., Johnson, R. E., Hu, Q., & Ju, D. (2018). The short-lived benefits of abusive supervisory behavior for actors: An investigation of recovery and work engagement. Academy of Management Journal, 61(5), 1951–1975.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riaz, A., Shahid, M., & Ali, Q. (2021). A moderated mediation model of empowering leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior. Journal of Management and Research, 8(2), 252–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, U., & Tscharaktschiew, N. (2014). An attributional analysis of moral emotions: Naïve scientists and everyday judges. Emotion Review, 6(4), 344–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherony, K. M. (2002). Leader emotional expression and leader-member exchange. Purdue University.

  • Spence, J. R., Brown, D. J., Keeping, L. M., & Lian, H. (2014). Helpful today, but not tomorrow? Feeling grateful as a predictor of daily organizational citizenship behaviors. Personnel Psychology, 67(3), 705–738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, F., Li, X., & Akhtar, M. N. (2022). Negative influences of differentiated empowering leadership on team members’ helping behaviors: The mediating effects of envy and contempt. Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 15, 9–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra-Tong, J., Ralston, D. A., Treviño, L. J., Naoumova, I., de la Garza Carranza, M. T., Furrer, O., Li, Y., & Darder, F. L. (2020). The quality of leader-member exchange (lmx): A multilevel analysis of individual-level, organizational-level and societal-level antecedents. Journal of International Management, 26(3), 100760.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibaut, J. W., & Kelley, H. H. (1959). The social psychology of groups. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsang, J. A. (2006). The effects of helper intention on gratitude and indebtedness. Motivation and Emotion, 30(3), 198–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange quality in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 487–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye, B. H., Tung, V. W. S., Li, J. J., & Zhu, H. (2020). Leader humility, team humility and employee creative performance: The moderating roles of task dependence and competitive climate. Tourism Management, 81, 104170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Z., Sun, U. Y., Effinger, A. L., & Zhang, J. (2023). Being on the same page matters: A meta-analytic investigation of leader-member exchange (LMX) agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108(9), 1540–1558.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zacher, H., Brailsford, H. A., & Parker, S. L. (2014). Micro-breaks matter: A diary study on the effects of energy management strategies on occupational well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 287–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruowen Shen.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, R., Wang, Y. & Gao, F. The role of task dependence in supervisor’s gratitude when empowering: A quantitative diary study. Curr Psychol 43, 11830–11840 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05302-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-05302-9

Keywords

Navigation