Abstract
Chronic Otitis Media (COM) of the squamosal type was primarily managed by performing a canal wall down mastoidectomy; however, the latter era otolaryngologist envisioned benefits in preserving the posterior canal wall. Our primary objective was to assess the disease specific quality of life following canal wall up (CWU) mastoidectomy and canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy surgery after a 6 month post-operative period. A prospective observational study was done from September 2017 to August 2018 where the charts of 380 patients from Christian Medical College, Vellore were reviewed. Details of patients above 18 years who had undergone the above surgeries for COM active squamosal disease from the period of January 2014 to December 2016; and had their post-operative follow up (average of 16 months) during the period of study were looked at. The CWU group had a significantly better disease-specific quality of life in the symptoms subscale than the CWD group (p value < 0.01). The CWU group showed a significant air-bone gap closure to 23.3 dB as compared to 27.7 dB in CWD (p value = 0.005). The recurrence rates were 4.5% (9 cases) in the CWU group and 3.9% (7 cases) in the CWD group, which was not statistically significant. Both CWU and CWD methods of mastoidectomy for COM squamosal type give comparable outcomes in terms of recurrence with the CWU group having a better disease-specific quality of life after surgery.
Level of Evidence
2a.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Yes.
References
World Health Organization (2004) Chronic suppurative otitis media: burden of illness and management options. World Health Organization, Geneva
World Health Organization (2020) Deafness and hearing loss [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss. Accessed 23 May 2020
Sharma Y, Mishra G, Patel JV (2017) Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media active mucosal disease (wet ear) versus chronic otitis media inactive mucosal disease (dry ear). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69:500–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1233-z
Sadé J (1987) Treatment of cholesteatoma. Am J Otol 8:524–533
Nadol JB, Staecker H, Gliklich RE (2000) Outcomes assessment for chronic otitis media: the chronic ear survey. Laryngoscope 110:32–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200003002-00009
Roden D, Honrubia VF, Wiet R (1996) Outcome of residual cholesteatoma and hearing in mastoid surgery. J Otolaryngol 25:178–181
Stankovic M (2007) Follow-up of cholesteatoma surgery: open versus closed tympanoplasty. ORL J OtorhinolaryngolRelat Spec 69:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1159/000105482
Nyrop M, Bonding P (1997) Extensive cholesteatoma: long-term results of three surgical techniques. J LaryngolOtol 111:521–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002221510013782x
Abramson M, Lachenbruch PA, Press BHJ, Mccabe BF (1977) Results of conservative surgery for middle ear cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 87:1281–1287. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197708000-00008
Palmgren O (1979) Long-term results of open cavity and tympanomastoid surgery of the chronic ear. ActaOtolaryngol 88:343–349. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016487909137178
Brown JS (1982) A ten year statistical follow-up of 1142 consecutive cases of cholesteatoma: the closed vs. the open technique. Laryngoscope 92:390–396. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198204000-00007
Charachon R, Roux O, Eyraud S (1980) Le cholestéatome de l’oreillemoyenne. Choix des techniques etrésultats chez l’adulte et chez l’enfant [Cholesteatoma of the middle ear. Choice of technique and results in the adult and child]. Ann OtolaryngolChirCervicofac 97:65–78
Tomlin J, Chang D, McCutcheon B, Harris J (2013) Surgical technique and recurrence in cholesteatoma: a meta-analysis. AudiolNeurootol 18:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346140
Tos M, Lau T (1989) Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 16:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0385-8146(89)80038-0
Cook JA, Krishnan S, Fagan PA (1996) Hearing results following modified radical versus canal-up mastoidectomy. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 105:379–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949610500510
Khan SU, Tewary RK, O’Sullivan TJ (2014) Modified radical mastoidectomy and its complications—12 years’ experience. Ear Nose Throat J 93:30–36
Kos MI, Castrillon R, Montandon P, Guyot JP (2004) Anatomic and functional long-term results of canal wall-down mastoidectomy. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 113:872–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940411301105
Jackson CG, Glasscock ME 3rd, Nissen AJ, Schwaber MK, Bojrab DI (1985) Open mastoid procedures: contemporary indications and surgical technique. Laryngoscope 95:1037–1043
Quaranta N, Iannuzzi L, Petrone P, D’Elia A, Quaranta A (2014) Quality of life after cholesteatoma surgery: intact-canal wall tympanoplasty versus canal wall-down tympanoplasty with mastoid obliteration. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 123:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489414523562
Funding
No external funding.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Approval
IRB No 10948.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abraham, L., Philip, A., Lepcha, A. et al. A Comparative Study of Outcomes and Quality of Life in Canal Wall up Mastoidectomies and Canal Wall down Mastoidectomies. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74 (Suppl 1), 600–607 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02424-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02424-z