Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Comparative Study of Outcomes and Quality of Life in Canal Wall up Mastoidectomies and Canal Wall down Mastoidectomies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chronic Otitis Media (COM) of the squamosal type was primarily managed by performing a canal wall down mastoidectomy; however, the latter era otolaryngologist envisioned benefits in preserving the posterior canal wall. Our primary objective was to assess the disease specific quality of life following canal wall up (CWU) mastoidectomy and canal wall down (CWD) mastoidectomy surgery after a 6 month post-operative period. A prospective observational study was done from September 2017 to August 2018 where the charts of 380 patients from Christian Medical College, Vellore were reviewed. Details of patients above 18 years who had undergone the above surgeries for COM active squamosal disease from the period of January 2014 to December 2016; and had their post-operative follow up (average of 16 months) during the period of study were looked at. The CWU group had a significantly better disease-specific quality of life in the symptoms subscale than the CWD group (p value < 0.01). The CWU group showed a significant air-bone gap closure to 23.3 dB as compared to 27.7 dB in CWD (p value = 0.005). The recurrence rates were 4.5% (9 cases) in the CWU group and 3.9% (7 cases) in the CWD group, which was not statistically significant. Both CWU and CWD methods of mastoidectomy for COM squamosal type give comparable outcomes in terms of recurrence with the CWU group having a better disease-specific quality of life after surgery.

Level of Evidence

2a.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

(Adopted from Nadol et al. 5)

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Yes.

References

  1. World Health Organization (2004) Chronic suppurative otitis media: burden of illness and management options. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization (2020) Deafness and hearing loss [Internet]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/deafness-and-hearing-loss. Accessed 23 May 2020

  3. Sharma Y, Mishra G, Patel JV (2017) Comparative study of outcome of type I tympanoplasty in chronic otitis media active mucosal disease (wet ear) versus chronic otitis media inactive mucosal disease (dry ear). Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69:500–503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-017-1233-z

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Sadé J (1987) Treatment of cholesteatoma. Am J Otol 8:524–533

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nadol JB, Staecker H, Gliklich RE (2000) Outcomes assessment for chronic otitis media: the chronic ear survey. Laryngoscope 110:32–35. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200003002-00009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Roden D, Honrubia VF, Wiet R (1996) Outcome of residual cholesteatoma and hearing in mastoid surgery. J Otolaryngol 25:178–181

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Stankovic M (2007) Follow-up of cholesteatoma surgery: open versus closed tympanoplasty. ORL J OtorhinolaryngolRelat Spec 69:299–305. https://doi.org/10.1159/000105482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nyrop M, Bonding P (1997) Extensive cholesteatoma: long-term results of three surgical techniques. J LaryngolOtol 111:521–526. https://doi.org/10.1017/s002221510013782x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Abramson M, Lachenbruch PA, Press BHJ, Mccabe BF (1977) Results of conservative surgery for middle ear cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 87:1281–1287. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-197708000-00008

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Palmgren O (1979) Long-term results of open cavity and tympanomastoid surgery of the chronic ear. ActaOtolaryngol 88:343–349. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016487909137178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown JS (1982) A ten year statistical follow-up of 1142 consecutive cases of cholesteatoma: the closed vs. the open technique. Laryngoscope 92:390–396. https://doi.org/10.1288/00005537-198204000-00007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Charachon R, Roux O, Eyraud S (1980) Le cholestéatome de l’oreillemoyenne. Choix des techniques etrésultats chez l’adulte et chez l’enfant [Cholesteatoma of the middle ear. Choice of technique and results in the adult and child]. Ann OtolaryngolChirCervicofac 97:65–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Tomlin J, Chang D, McCutcheon B, Harris J (2013) Surgical technique and recurrence in cholesteatoma: a meta-analysis. AudiolNeurootol 18:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1159/000346140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tos M, Lau T (1989) Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 16:61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0385-8146(89)80038-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cook JA, Krishnan S, Fagan PA (1996) Hearing results following modified radical versus canal-up mastoidectomy. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 105:379–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348949610500510

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Khan SU, Tewary RK, O’Sullivan TJ (2014) Modified radical mastoidectomy and its complications—12 years’ experience. Ear Nose Throat J 93:30–36

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kos MI, Castrillon R, Montandon P, Guyot JP (2004) Anatomic and functional long-term results of canal wall-down mastoidectomy. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 113:872–876. https://doi.org/10.1177/000348940411301105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jackson CG, Glasscock ME 3rd, Nissen AJ, Schwaber MK, Bojrab DI (1985) Open mastoid procedures: contemporary indications and surgical technique. Laryngoscope 95:1037–1043

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Quaranta N, Iannuzzi L, Petrone P, D’Elia A, Quaranta A (2014) Quality of life after cholesteatoma surgery: intact-canal wall tympanoplasty versus canal wall-down tympanoplasty with mastoid obliteration. Ann OtolRhinolLaryngol 123:89–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003489414523562

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No external funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ajay Philip.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

IRB No 10948.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abraham, L., Philip, A., Lepcha, A. et al. A Comparative Study of Outcomes and Quality of Life in Canal Wall up Mastoidectomies and Canal Wall down Mastoidectomies. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74 (Suppl 1), 600–607 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02424-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-021-02424-z

Keywords

Navigation