Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Performance evaluation of deep eutectic solvent as a draw solute and vertical up-flow forward osmosis module for desalination of seawater

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Forward osmosis (FO) has gained prominence in recent years particularly in desalination due to its ability to operate at low or no hydraulic pressure, with relatively limited membrane fouling and high-water recovery. However, pre-treatment of seawater is required to reduce membrane fouling caused by the presence of suspended solid particles. Also, a significant area of research in forward osmosis is still finding a suitable draw solute (DS) with the ideal characteristics. In this study, a novel deep eutectic solvent (DES) draw solute was used and able to extract water after the 500% dilution of DS. This signifies it as the potential candidate for the ideal DS. A comparative study of plate and frame and vertical up-flow forward osmosis (VUF) FO modules has been evaluated to eliminate the drawbacks associated with FO in terms of membrane fouling and draw solute. In addition, the performance of a novel DES as reline (choline chloride-urea) has been tested in both the modules. In VUF module, significantly less fouling was observed than in the plate and frame module. The initial water flux in plate and frame module was 2.30 LMH with seawater (without pre-treatment) as feed. However, it dropped to 1 LMH after 26 h of run. However, initial water flux in VUF was 1.90 LMH, and it was maintained to 1.50 LMH after 89 h of run. Regeneration of draw solute was carried out using a phase separation method and it was observed that phase separation was only observed for 10% dilution of DES.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are provided in the manuscript.

References

  • Achilli A, Cath TY, Childress AEJJoms (2010) Selection of inorganic-based draw solutions for forward osmosis applications. 364(1–2):233–241

  • Aende A, Gardy J, Hassanpour A (2020) Seawater desalination: a review of forward osmosis technique, its challenges, and future prospects. 8(8):901

  • Azadi F, Karimi-Jashni A, Zerafat MMJEt (2021) Desalination of brackish water by gelatin-coated magnetite nanoparticles as a novel draw solute in forward osmosis process. 42(18):2885–2895

  • Cao TN-D, Chen S-S, Chang H-M, Ray SS, Le HQ, Duong CC, Bui TXJET Innovation (2020) Evaluating the performance of polystyrene sulfonate coupling with non ionic Triton-X114 surfactant as draw solution in forward osmosis and membrane distillation systems. 19:100993

  • Cath TY, Childress AE, Elimelech M.J.J.o.m.s. (2006) Forward osmosis: principles, applications, and recent developments. 281(1–2):70–87

  • Chekli L, Kim Y, Phuntsho S, Li S, Ghaffour N, Leiknes T, Shon HKJJoEM (2017) Evaluation of fertilizer-drawn forward osmosis for sustainable agriculture and water reuse in arid regions. 187:137–145

  • Dutta S, Nath KJJoWPE (2018) Prospect of ionic liquids and deep eutectic solvents as new generation draw solution in forward osmosis process. 21:163–176

  • Ellis SN, Cunningham MF, Jessop PGJD (2021) A forward osmosis hydrogel draw agent that responds to both heat and CO2. 510:115074

  • Ge Q, Ling M, Chung T-SJJoms (2013) Draw solutions for forward osmosis processes: developments, challenges, and prospects for the future. 442:225–237

  • Ibrar I, Yadav S, Altaee A, Samal AK, Zhou JL, Nguyen TV, Ganbat NJSoTTE (2020) Treatment of biologically treated landfill leachate with forward osmosis: investigating membrane performance and cleaning protocols. 744:140901

  • Joafshan M, Shakeri A, Razavi SR, Salehi HJS, Technology P (2021) Gas responsive magnetic nanoparticle as novel draw agent for removal of rhodamine B via forward osmosis: high water flux and easy regeneration. 119998

  • Li M, Wang X, Porter CJ, Cheng W, Zhang X, Wang L, Elimelech MJEs technology (2019) Concentration and recovery of dyes from textile wastewater using a self-standing, support-free forward osmosis membrane. 53(6):3078–3086

  • Mahto A, Mondal D, Polisetti V, Bhatt J, MRN, Prasad K, Nataraj SJI Research EC (2017) Sustainable water reclamation from different feed streams by forward osmosis process using deep eutectic solvents as reusable draw solution. 56(49):14623–14632

  • Matsuyama K, Makabe R, Ueyama T, Sakai H, Saito K, Okumura T, Hayashi H, Tanioka AJD (2021) Power generation system based on pressure retarded osmosis with a commercially-available hollow fiber PRO membrane module using seawater and freshwater. 499:114805

  • Mondal D, Mahto A, Veerababu P, Bhatt J, Prasad K, Nataraj SKJRa (2015) Deep eutectic solvents as a new class of draw agent to enrich low abundance DNA and proteins using forward osmosis. 5(109):89539–89544

  • Patel A, Mungray AK, Mungray AJC (2021) A novel concept of vertical up-flow forward osmosis reactor: design, performance and evaluation. 281:130741

  • Phuntsho S, Shon HK, Hong S, Lee S, Vigneswaran SJJoms (2011) A novel low energy fertilizer driven forward osmosis desalination for direct fertigation: evaluating the performance of fertilizer draw solutions. 375(1–2):172–181

  • Rabiee H, Jin B, Yun S, Dai SJJoMS (2020) O2/N2-responsive microgels as functional draw agents for gas-triggering forward osmosis desalination. 595:117584

  • Shaffer DL, Werber JR, Jaramillo H, Lin S, Elimelech MJD (2015) Forward osmosis: where are we now? , 356:271–284

  • Shokrollahzadeh S, Bide Y, Gholami SJD (2020) Enhancing forward osmosis performance via an oligomeric deep eutectic solvent as a draw solute. 491:114473

  • Singh SK, Sharma C, Maiti AJJoece (2021) A comprehensive review of standalone and hybrid forward osmosis for water treatment: membranes and recovery strategies of draw solutions. 9:105473

  • Su J, Chung T-S, Helmer BJ, de Wit JSJJoMS (2012) Enhanced double-skinned FO membranes with inner dense layer for wastewater treatment and macromolecule recycle using sucrose as draw solute. 396:92–100

  • Vu MT, Ansari AJ, Hai FI, Nghiem LDJESWR Technology (2018) Performance of a seawater-driven forward osmosis process for pre-concentrating digested sludge centrate: organic enrichment and membrane fouling. 4(7):1047–1056

  • Wu W, Shi Y, Liu G, Fan X, Yu YJD (2020) Recent development of graphene oxide based forward osmosis membrane for water treatment: a critical review. 491:114452

  • Yang S, Lee S, Hong SJJoMS (2021) Enhancing the applicability of forward osmosis membrane process utilizing food additives as draw solutes. 638:119705

  • Yu M, Zhang H, Wang Y, Zhao R, Xu X, Ge C, Zhang X, Yang FJASS (2020) Hyaluronic acid-graphene oxide/PVA hybrid monolith: a hydrophilic and compressible solid draw agent in forward osmosis. 531:147235

  • Zhekenov T, Toksanbayev N, Kazakbayeva Z, Shah D, Mjalli FSJFPE (2017) Formation of type III deep eutectic solvents and effect of water on their intermolecular interactions. 441:43–48

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Sardar Vallabhbhai National Institute of Technology, Surat, Gujarat, 395007, India

    Sristina Baruah, Asfak Patel, Arvind Kumar Mungray & Alka A. Mungray

Authors
  1. Sristina Baruah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asfak Patel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Arvind Kumar Mungray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Alka A. Mungray
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Sristina and Asfak has contributed to the study conceptualization, design, material preparation, experiment performed, data analysis, and writing the original draft of the manuscript. Dr. Alka A. Mungray and Dr. Arvind Kumar Mungray have access conceptualization, suggested design, interpretation of data, and draft checking of manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alka A. Mungray.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

All authors have approved the version to be published.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Angeles Blanco.

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baruah, S., Patel, A., Mungray, A.K. et al. Performance evaluation of deep eutectic solvent as a draw solute and vertical up-flow forward osmosis module for desalination of seawater. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 32108–32116 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24192-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-24192-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation