Abstract
The study aims to evaluate the microbial contamination in dental unit water system (DUWS) in Chandigarh, India, including knowledge, attitude, and practices of general dental practitioners (GDPs) to reduce the microbiological risks of DUWS. Microbiological risks were assessed by collecting water samples from 18 dental chair units including three main water supply units. Total of 44 water samples were examined for bacteriological contamination and the highest microbial contamination was observed in the ultrasound scalers having a range of 100 to 12,000 CFU/ml, with a median count of 950 CFU/ml. Only 2.3% of the water samples met the European Union recommendation of less than 100 CFU/ml, whereas 97.7% of the water samples have the total bacterial count exceeding 100 CFU/ml. In comparison to Center for Disease Control (CDC) guidelines, only 20.5% water samples fall within the recommended quality of drinking water (less than 500 CFU/ml), and the rest of the samples (79.5%) exceed the total bacteria count with a median count of 1100 CFU/ml. Acinetobacter species, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Sphingomonas paucimobilis were found in most of the water samples from DUWS. Dental chair units show higher microbial load and hence failed to meet any international guidelines, e.g., CDC. The highest microbial contamination was observed in ultrasound scaler and air/water syringe outlets. Hence, the study demand for Indian guidelines for the type of water used in DUWS water and urges for the proper training of GDPs to avoid further risks to the dental patients.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ajami B, Ghazvini K, Movahhed T, Ariaee N, Shakeri MT, Makarem S (2012) Contamination of a dental unit water line system by Legionella pneumophila in the Mashhad School of Dentistry in 2009. Iran Red Crescent Med J 14:376–378
Barben J, Kuehni CE, Schmid J (2009) Water quality in dental chair units. Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 119:976–980
Bârlean L, Iancu LS, Dănilă I, Navrotescu T, Cotea I, Minea L (2006) Waterline contamination in the dental practices in Iasi. J Prev Med 14:3–4
Burke FM, O’Mullane D, O’Sullivan M (2005) Attitudes of Irish and European dentists to water quality of dental unit water systems. J Ir Dent Assoc 51:119–125
Chandler J (2002). Special report on dental waterlines. Vista Research Group, LLC 2002. https://www.hu-friedy.com/sites/default/files/SpecialReport_DentalWaterlines_FINAL.pdf, last accessed 12 September 2018
Chua CS, Fathilah AR, Himratul-Aznita WH (2013) Health risk of dental unit waterline system to dental patients–an issue of concern. Ann Dent 20(1):20–26
Coleman DC, O’Donnell MJ, Miller AS, Boyle MA (2014). Minimising microbial contamination in dental unit water systems and microbial control in dental hospitals. In Decontamination in hospitals and healthcare (pp. 166–207)
El-sallamy RM, Atlam SA, Kabbash I, El-fatah SA, & El-flaky A. (2017). Knowledge, attitude, and practice towards ergonomics among undergraduates of Faculty of Dentistry, Tanta University, Egypt. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–9
Ibrahim C, Hassen A, Pothier P, Mejri S, Hammami S (2018). Molecular detection and genotypic characterization of enteric adenoviruses in a hospital wastewater. Environ Sci Pollut Res, 1–11
Ibrahim O, Al-Bouny T (2009). Microbial contamination of dental unit-and ultrasonic. Scaler Waterlines 243–260. http://new.damasuniv.edu.sy/mag/health/images/stories/243-260.pdf
Kohn WG, Harte JA, Malvitz DM, Collins AS, Cleveland JL, Eklund KJ (2004) Guidelines for infection control in dental health care settings—2003. J Am Dent Assoc 135(1):33–47
Kumar S, Choudhary AS, Gupta D, Goutham B, Duraiswamy P, Kulkarni S (2009) Microbial contamination in dental unit water lines (DUWL) in private dental clinics of Udaipur City, India. Int J Infect Control 5:1
Padma RM (2011) Control and prevention of biofilm in dental office. Indian J Dent Adv 3:512–521
Monarca S, Grottolo M, Renzi D, Paganelli C, Sapelli P, Zerbini I, Nardi G (2000) Evaluation of environmental bacterial contamination and procedures to control cross infection in a sample of Italian dental surgeries. Occup Environ Med 57(11):721–726
Mor S, Singh S, Yadav P, Rani V, Rani P, Sheoran M, Singh G, Ravindra K (2009) Appraisal of salinity and fluoride in a semi-arid region of India using statistical and multivariate techniques. Environ Geochem Health 31(6):643–655
Pankhurst CL, Coulter WA (2007) Do contaminated dental unit waterlines pose a risk of infection? J Dent 35(9):712–720
Pankhurst CL, Scully C, Samaranayake L (2017) Dental unit water lines and their disinfection and management: a review. Dental Update 44(4):284–292
Plaka K, Ravindra K, Mor S, Gauba K (2017) Risk factors and prevalence of dental fluorosis and dental caries in school children of North India. Environ Monit Assess 189(1):40
Ravindra K, Garg VK (2006) Distribution of fluoride in groundwater and its suitability assessment for drinking purpose. Int J Environ Health Res 16(2):163–166
Ravindra K, Garg VK (2007) Hydro-chemical survey of groundwater of Hisar city and assessment of defluoridation methods used in India. Environ Monit Assess 132(1-3):33–43
Romero I, Carnero MC (2017). Environmental assessment in health care organizations. Environ Sci Pollut Res 1–12
Rowland BM (2003) Bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines: what is your dentist spraying into your mouth? Clin Microbiol Newsl 25(10):73–77
Souza-Gugelmin MCM, Lima CDT, Lima SNM, Mian H, Ito IY (2003) Microbial contamination in dental unit waterlines. Braz Dent J 14:55–57
Szymańska J, Sitkowska J (2013) Bacterial contamination of dental unit waterlines. Environ Monit Assess 185(5):3603–3611
Smith AJ, McHugh S, McCormick L, Stansfield R, McMillan A, Hood J (2002) A cross sectional study of water quality from dental unit water lines in dental practices in the West of Scotland. Br Dent J 193:645–648. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4801651
Szymańska J (2004) Risk of exposure to legionella in dental practice. Ann Agric Environ Med 11(1):9–12
Tyagi S, Kulkarni P, Prasad K (2010) Science regarding dental unit waterlines (DUWL): a review. Ann Essences of Dent 2(3):117–122
Türetgen I, Göksay D, Cotuk A (2009) Comparison of the microbial load of incoming and distal outlet waters from dental unit water systems in Istanbul. Environ Monit Assess 158:9–14
Walker JT, Bradshaw DJ, Bennett AM, Fulford MR, Martin MV, Marsh PD (2000). Microbial biofilm formation and contamination of dental-unit water systems in general dental practice. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1;66(8):3363–7
Walker J, Bradshaw DJ, Finney M, Fulford MR, Frandsen E, ØStergaard E, Kamma JJ (2004) Microbiological evaluation of dental unit water systems in general dental practice in Europe. Eur J Oral Sci 112(5):412–418
Williams JF, Molinari JA, Andrews N (1996) Microbial contamination of dental unit waterlines: origin and characteristics. Compend Contin Educ Dent 17(6):538–540
Acknowledgments
RK would like to thank the Department of Health Research (DHR), Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR), and Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, for providing the Fellowship Training Program in Environmental Health under Human Resource Development Health Research Scheme.
Contributorship statement
BL and RK designed, conceptualized the study and conducted the field work. MB helped to develop the intellectual content of the protocol and manuscript including review/editing.
Data sharing statement
A MPH thesis is available on the topic and can be provided by e-mail to Dr. Ravindra Khaiwal.
Funding statement
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that there are no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The protocol was approved by the Dissertation Approval Committee of the Institute and Departmental Peer Review committee. PGIMER Institute Ethics Committee approved the thesis protocol via letter number INT/IEC/2017/1425A dated 05/12/2017.
Additional information
Responsible editor: Philippe Garrigues
Highlights
• Contaminated DUWS increases public health risks.
• Microbial contamination in the ultrasound scalers ranges from 100 to 12,000 CFU/ml.
• Acinetobacter species, P. aeruginosa, and S. paucimobilis were most common in water samples.
• Dental practitioners lack knowledge related to the DUWS risk management.
• Study demand for universal guidelines for the type of water used in DUWS.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lal, B., Ravindra, K. & Biswal, M. Appraisal of microbial contamination of dental unit water systems and practices of general dental practitioners for risk reduction. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25, 33566–33572 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3298-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3298-y