Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Kindness as an Intervention for Student Social Interaction Anxiety, Resilience, Affect, and Mood: The KISS of Kindness Study II

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Happiness Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of deliberate acts of kindness (DAKs) plus access to a stress management booklet (intervention), compared to the booklet alone (control) on the stress-related outcomes of resilience, social interaction anxiety, affect, and mood of undergraduate and graduate students. Participants’ study-related experiences were also explored, as were the types of DAKs. This repeated-measures, randomized controlled trial included 112 students (80 undergraduate and 32 graduate) with 56 in each condition. Four previously validated scales were implemented at baseline, immediate post-intervention, and 3-months post-intervention. A linear mixed effects model was utilized with group and time entered as fixed effects. Content analysis of open-ended question responses and DAKs logs was conducted. The KISS of Kindness II had a statistically significant interaction effect on the intervention group participants’ resilience (p = 0.0099), social anxiety (p = 0.0016), and negative affect (p = 0.0033), but had no significant impact on their positive affect or mood. Intervention participants described improvements in mental wellbeing. DAKs were plentiful (1,542 DAKs, 26 types), and show promise for university-based mental health interventions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Note ‘Post’ refers to immediate post-intervention and ‘followup’ refers to 3-months post-intervention. Error bars represent ± 1 standard error

Fig. 3

Note ‘Post’ refers to immediate post-intervention and ‘followup’ refers to 3-months post-intervention. Error bars represent ± 1 standard error

Fig. 4

Note ‘Post’ refers to immediate post-intervention and ‘followup’ refers to 3-months post-intervention. Error bars represent ± 1 standard error

Fig. 5

Note Higher scores indicate greater positive affect. ‘Post’ refers to immediate post-intervention and ‘followup’ refers to 3-months post-intervention. Error bars represent ± 1 standard error

Fig. 6

Note Higher scores indicate greater negative affect. ‘Post’ refers to immediate post-intervention and ‘followup’ refers to 3-months post-intervention. Error bars represent ± 1 standard error

Fig. 7

Note This feedback loop hypothesizes the possible relationship between performing a deliberate act of kindness (DAK) and improved wellbeing via positive empathy. When an individual performs a DAK and observes the receiver’s reaction to be positive, the two individuals share positive affect – this is termed positive empathy. Positive empathy can increase feelings of social connection between the individuals, as well as increase the resilience of the DAK giver, ultimately buffering against stress and improving their overall wellbeing. The DAK giver’s feeling of improved wellbeing might prompt them to continue engaging in DAKs

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

We, the authors, are willing and able to share the data and materials upon request and in accordance with ethics protocol (HSREB #114,103).

Code Availability

All core statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS version 25 and R version 3.6.1. Script files are available on request.

Notes

  1. DAKs instructions for participants and the Relaxation and Stress Management Booklet can be found in the supplementary material.

  2. Mood was selected as an exploratory outcome given that we were primarily interested in measuring participants’ short-term emotional state (affect) as acts of kindness tend to have more of an immediate impact (Kaufmann et al., 2020). Further, mood has been criticized for reporting bias by the participant (Kaufmann et al., 2020).

  3. The authors of the original validated scale (Mayer & Gaschke, 1988) did not present individual Cronbach’s s for the sub-scales (with the exception of Arousal-Calm). Rather, a range of Cronbach’s s was provided, as presented above.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Taylor Labadie, Jillian Takacs, and Varsha Vasudevan for their support in helping with the project.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by Katie Shillington, Andrew Johnson, Tara Mantler, Shauna Burke, and Jennifer Irwin. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Katie Shillington and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jennifer D. Irwin.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee (HSREB #114103) and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent to Participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

We, the authors, consent to our manuscript being published and agree to transfer copyright over to the journal upon the article’s acceptance.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 2336 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shillington, K.J., Johnson, A.M., Mantler, T. et al. Kindness as an Intervention for Student Social Interaction Anxiety, Resilience, Affect, and Mood: The KISS of Kindness Study II. J Happiness Stud 22, 3631–3661 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00379-0

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10902-021-00379-0

Keywords

Navigation