Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Property comparison of flexible Cu(InGa)Se2 thin film solar cells on Ti and Ni foils without diffusion barrier

  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Electronics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Flexible Cu(InGa)Se2 (CIGS) solar cells on metallic substrates are highly desirable for versatile energy applications. However, related researches reported on CIGS devices usually used a diffusion barrier, which involves an issue of thermal expansion coefficient matching and complicates the fabrication process. In this study, CIGS solar cells were fabricated on Ni and Ti foils through selenization of metal stacks deposited by e-beam evaporation, without the use of diffusion barrier. The films on Ti foils showed (112) preferred orientation while those on Ni foils exhibited (220) preferred orientation, due to the different crystal orientation of substrates. In–Ni and Ga–Ni phase were observed in films prepared on Ni foils, which led to the existence of Cu2–xSe. As a result, the CIGS solar cells fabricated on Ni foils showed inferior photoelectric properties, whereas those on 50 and 100 μm Ti foils presented conversion efficiency of 4.9% and 6.6%. The discrepancy on efficiency between two cells on Ti foils was ascribed to the different structural properties induced by the thermal stress. After 100 bending cycles, efficiency of cells on 50 and 100 μm thick Ti foils decreased by 1.0% and 2.6% respectively, indicating that CIGS solar cell on 50 μm Ti foil is more promising as flexible device applied on harsh circumstance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Z. Wei, P.R. Bobbili, S. Senthilarasu, T. Shimell, H.M. Upadhyaya, Surf. Coat. Technol. 241, 159–167 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. Yuan, D.B. Mitzi, W. Liu, A.J. Kellock, S.J. Chey, V.R. Deline, Chem. Mater. 22, 285–287 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. S. Teraji, J. Chantana, T. Watanabe, T. Minemoto, J. Alloys Compd. 756, 111–116 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. W.S. Liu, H.C. Hu, N.W. Pu, S.C. Liang, J. Alloys Compd. 631, 146–152 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. L. Zortea, S. Nishiwaki, T.P. Weiss, S. Haass, J. Perrenoud, L. Greuter, T. Feurer, G. Palaniswamy, S. Buecheler, A.N. Tiwari, Sol. Energy 175, 25–30 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Stanley, M. Jubault, F. Donsanti, N. Naghavi, Phys. Status Solidi C 14, 1700174 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. J. Chantana, T. Watanabe, S. Teraji, T. Minemoto, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 157, 750–756 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Roger, S. Noël, O. Sicardy, P. Faucherand, L. Grenet, N. Karst, H. Fournier, F. Roux, F. Ducroquet, A. Brioude, S. Perraud, Thin Solid Films 548, 608–616 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. S.Y. Kim, H. Yoo, T.R. Rana, T. Enkhbat, G. Han, J.H. Kim, S. Song, K. Kim, J. Gwak, Y.J. Eo, J.H. Yun, Adv. Energy Mater. 8, 1801501 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Chirilă, P. Reinhard, F. Pianezzi, P. Bloesch, A.R. Uhl, C. Fella, L. Kranz, D. Keller, C. Gretener, H. Hagendorfer, D. Jaeger, R. Erni, S. Nishiwaki, S. Buecheler, A.N. Tiwari, Nat. Mater. 12, 1107–1111 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Gerthoffer, C. Poulain, F. Roux, F. Emieux, L. Grenet, S. Perraud, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 166, 254–261 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Gerthoffer, F. Roux, F. Emieux, P. Faucherand, H. Fournier, L. Grenet, S. Perraud, Thin Solid Films 592, 99–104 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. X. Song, R. Caballero, R. Félix, D. Gerlach, C.A. Kaufmann, H.W. Schock, R.G. Wilks, M. Bär, J. Appl. Phys. 111, 034903 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. P. Blösch, F. Pianezzi, A. Chirilă, P. Rossbach, S. Nishiwaki, S. Buecheler, A.N. Tiwari, J. Appl. Phys. 113, 054506 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. B. Li, J. Li, L. Wu, W. Liu, Y. Sun, Y. Zhang, J. Alloys Compd. 627, 1–6 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. F. Pianezzi, A. Chirilă, P. Blösch, S. Seyrling, S. Buecheler, L. Kranz, C. Fella, A.N. Tiwari, Prog. Photovolt. Res. Appl. 20, 253–259 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. W.C. Tsai, S.R. Thomas, C.H. Hsu, Y.C. Huang, J.Y. Tseng, T.T. Wu, C.H. Chang, Z.M. Wang, J.M. Shieh, C.H. Shen, Y.L. Chueh, J. Mater. Chem. A 4, 6980–6988 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Y. Oh, K. Woo, D. Lee, H. Lee, K. Kim, I. Kim, Z. Zhong, S. Jeong, J. Moon, A.C.S. Appl, Mater. Interfaces 6, 17740–17747 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. L. Li, X. Zhang, Y. Huang, W. Yuan, Y. Tang, J. Alloys Compd. 698, 194–199 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. K.H.J. Buschow, R.W. Cahn, M.C. Flemings, B. Ilschner, E.J. Kramer, S. Mahajan, Encyclopedia of materials. Sci. Technol. 1, 11 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. R. Caballero, C.A. Kaufmann, T. Eisenbarth, A. Eicke, T. Unold, R. Klenk, H.W. Schock, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 1165, 53 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. S. Roy, P. Guha, S.N. Kundu, H. Hanzawa, S. Chaudhuri, A.K. Pal, Mater. Chem. Phys. 73, 24–30 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. V. Izquierdo-Roca, E. Saucedo, C.M. Ruiz, X. Fontané, L. Calvo-Barrio, J. Álvarez-Garcia, P.P. Grand, J.S. Jaime-Ferrer, A. Pérez-Rodríguez, J.R. Morante, V. Bermudez, Phys. Status Solid A 206, 1001–1004 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. W. Witte, R. Kniese, M. Powalla, Thin Solid Films 517, 867–869 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. H. Tanino, H. Deai, H. Nakanishi, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 32, 436 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been financially supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 61774084), the Fundamental Research Fund for the Central Universities (Grant No. 3082017NP2017106), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, by the research fund of Jiangsu Province Cultivation base for State Key Laboratory of Photovoltaic Science and Technology (Grant No. SKLPSTKF201506), and by Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (Grant No. KYCX17_0258).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Honglie Shen or Yufang Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, J., Shen, H., Zhai, Z. et al. Property comparison of flexible Cu(InGa)Se2 thin film solar cells on Ti and Ni foils without diffusion barrier. J Mater Sci: Mater Electron 30, 11754–11763 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01539-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-019-01539-y

Navigation