Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effects of Escalating Commitment on Ethical Decision-Making

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although scholars have invoked the escalation framework as a means of explaining the occurrence of numerous organizationally undesirable behaviors on the part of decision makers, to date no empirical research on the potential influences of escalating commitment on the likelihood of unethical behavior at the individual level of analysis has been reported in either the escalation or the ethical decision-making literatures. Thus, the main purpose of this project is to provide a theoretical foundation and empirical support for the contention that escalating commitment situations can induce unethical behavior in decision makers. An experimental research design utilizing a computerized investment task was administered to 155 undergraduate business majors as a means of assessing the hypotheses presented here. Results from a hierarchical logistic regression analysis found strong support for the contention that exposure to an escalation situation increases the likelihood of unethical behavior on the part of decision makers. Further, results also supported previous ethical decision-making findings by confirming the effects of locus of control (LOC) on ethical behavior. Specifically, the data indicated that individuals with an external LOC orientation were significantly more likely to select the unethical option than were individuals with an internal LOC orientation. Interestingly, support was not found for the effects of Machiavellianism or gender on ethical decision-making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • J.H. Aldrich F.D. Nelson (1984) Linear Probability, Logit, and Probit Models Sage Publications Newbury Park, A.A.

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Arkes C. Blumer (1985) ArticleTitle‘The Psychology of Sunk Cost’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 35 125–140 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0749-5978(85)90049-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. W. Armstrong R. J. Williams J. D. Barrett (2004) ArticleTitle‘The Impact of Banality, Risky Shift, and Escalating Commitment on Ethical Decision-Making’ Journal of Business Ethics 53 365–370 Occurrence Handle10.1023/B:BUSI.0000043491.10007.9a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton, V.: 2004, ‘Affective Morality: The Role of Emotions in the Ethical Decision-making Process’, Dissertation at Florida State University.

  • R. Christie F. Geis (Eds) (1970) Studies in Machiavellianism Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Collins (2000) ArticleTitle‘The Quest to Improve the Human Condition: The First 1,500 Articles Published in the Journal of Business Ethics’ Journal of Business Ethics 26 1–73

    Google Scholar 

  • J. B. Dozier M. P. Miceli (1985) ArticleTitle‘Potential Predictors of Whistle-Blowing: A Prosocial Behavior Perspective’ Academy of Management Review 10 823–836

    Google Scholar 

  • H. J. Eysenck S. B. G. Eysenck (1964) Manual of the Eysenck Personality Inventory Educational Testing Service San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • S. Flynn M. Reichard S. Slane (1987) ArticleTitle‘Cheating as a Function of Task Outcome and Machiviallianism’ The Journal of Psychology 121 423–427

    Google Scholar 

  • D. J. Fritzsche H. Becker (1984) ArticleTitle‘Linking Management Behavior to Ethical Philosophy – An Empirical Investigation’ Academy of Management Journal 27 164–175

    Google Scholar 

  • W. H. Hegarty H. P. Sims (1979) ArticleTitle‘Organizational Philosophy, Policies, and Objectives Related to Unethical Decision Behavior: A Laboratory Experiment’ Journal of Applied Psychology 64 331–338

    Google Scholar 

  • T. M. Jones (1991) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model’ Academy of Management Review 16 366–395

    Google Scholar 

  • G. E. Jones M. J. Kavanagh (1996) ArticleTitle‘An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Intentions in the Workplace’ Journal of Business Ethics 15 511–523 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF00381927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • K. Kamdea S. Sugimori (1993) ArticleTitle‘Psychological Entrapment in Group Decision Making: An Assigned Decision Rule and a Groupthink Phenomenon’ Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 65 282–292

    Google Scholar 

  • H. M. Lefcourt (1982) Locus of Control: Current Trends in Theory and Research EditionNumber2 Erlbaum Hillsdale, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • T. W. Loe L. Ferrell P. Mansfield (2000) ArticleTitle‘A Review of Empirical Studies Assessing Ethical Decision-Making in Business’ Journal of Business Ethics 25 185–204 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1006083612239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Montealegre M. Keil (2000) ArticleTitle‘De-escalating Information Technology Projects: Lessons from the Denver International Airport’ MIS Quarterly 24 IssueID3 417–448

    Google Scholar 

  • M. J. Norusis (1994) SPSS Advanced Statistics SPSS Inc Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Platt (1973) ArticleTitle‘Social Traps’ American Psychologist 28 641–651

    Google Scholar 

  • J. D. Robinson P. R. Shaver L. S. Wright (Eds) (1991) Measures in Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes Academic Press San Diego

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Ross B. M. Staw (1993) ArticleTitle‘Organizational Escalation and Exit: Lessons from the Shoreham Nuclear Power Plant’ Academy of Management Journal 36 701–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotter, J. B.: 1966, ‘Generalized Expectancies for Internal Versus External Control of Reinforcement’, Psychological Monographs: General and Applied 80, 1–28. Scale from Robinson, J. D., Shaver, P. R. and Wright, L. S. (Eds.): 1991, Measures in Personality and Social Psychological Attitudes (San Diego: Academic Press), pp. 420–425.

  • I. Simonson B. M. Staw (1992) ArticleTitle‘Deescalation Strategies: A Comparison of Techniques for Reducing Commitment to Losing Courses of Action’ Journal of Applied Psychology 77 419–426 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0021-9010.77.4.419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A. and S. J. Vitelli: 1990, ‘Marketing Ethics: Factors Influencing Perceptions of Ethical Problems and Alternatives’, Journal of Macromarketing Spring, 4–18.

  • P. E. Spector (1982) ArticleTitle‘Behavior in Organizations as Function of Employees’ Locus of Control’ Psychological Bulletin 91 482–497

    Google Scholar 

  • B. M. Staw (1976) ArticleTitle‘Knee-deep in the Big Muddy: A Study of Escalating Commitment to a Chosen Course of Action’ Organizational Behavior and Human Performance 16 27–44 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0030-5073(76)90005-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B. M. Staw (1981) ArticleTitle‘The Escalation of Commitment to a Course of Action’ Academy of Management Review 6 577–587

    Google Scholar 

  • B. M. Staw J. Ross (1987) ‘Behavior in Escalation Situations: Antecedents, Prototypes, and Solutions’ L. L. Cummings B. Staw (Eds) Research in Organizational Behavior JAI Press Greenwich, CT 39–78

    Google Scholar 

  • M. D. Street S. C. Douglas S. W. Geiger M. J. Martinko (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Impact of Cognitive Expenditure on the Ethical Decision Making Process: The Cognitive Elaboration Model’ Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 256–277 Occurrence Handle10.1006/obhd.2001.2957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. D. Street W. P. Anthony (1997) ArticleTitle‘A Conceptual Framework Establishing the Relationship between Groupthink and Escalating Commitment Behavior’ Small Group Research 28 267–293

    Google Scholar 

  • M. D. Street C. Robertson S. Geiger (1997) ArticleTitle‘Ethical Decision Making: The Effects of Escalating Commitment’ Journal of Business Ethics 16 1153–1161 Occurrence Handle10.1023/A:1005701823810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • A. Teger (1980) Too Much Invested to Quit Pergamon Press New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management, University of South Florida, 140 7th Ave South, St. Petersburg, FL, 33701, U.S.A.

    Marc Street & Vera L. Street

Authors
  1. Marc Street
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vera L. Street
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Street.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Street, M., Street, V.L. The Effects of Escalating Commitment on Ethical Decision-Making. J Bus Ethics 64, 343–356 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5836-z

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-005-5836-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation