Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Effect of Swallowing Cues in Healthy Individuals: An Exploratory Study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Dysphagia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The goal of this study was to determine whether providing verbal and visual cues about swallowing changes the timing of swallowing events, and whether this information interacts with bolus volume. 20 healthy adults swallowed 5 ml and 15 ml liquid barium mixed with orange juice under videofluoroscopy during 2 conditions: one condition absent swallowing-specific cues and one condition with verbal and visual input about the swallowing process. Outcome measures included the timing of 10 swallowing events and the number of swallows per bolus. As expected, volume had a significant effect on all outcome measures (p < 0.05). Three timing events differed by cueing condition: 1. swallowing reaction time was earlier for control (− 9.45 ms vs. − 2.01 ms, p = 0.033); 2. the time between initial hyoid movement and maximum hyoid elevation was longer for control (152.85 ms vs. 143.79 ms; p = 0.015); and 3. the onset of upper esophageal sphincter opening occurred later after bolus entry into the pharynx for the swallowing cues condition (111.9 ms vs. 103.31 ms; p = 0.017); however, effect sizes were small (< 0.2). There was a significant interaction between cue condition and bolus volume on swallowing frequency, such that the mean number of swallows of 15 ml boluses was slightly higher during the control condition than during the swallowing cues condition. There were no significant interactions on measures of timing, suggesting distinct mechanisms for the effect of bolus volume and cues on swallowing kinematics. Further research is needed to investigate the effects of different cue modalities and focus (internal vs. external) on swallowing physiology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cola PC, Gatto AR, da Silva RG, Spadotto AA, Ribeiro PW, Schelp AO, Carvalho LR, Henry MA. Taste and temperature in swallowing transit time after stroke. Cerebrovasc Diseases Extra. 2012;2:45–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gatto AR, Cola PC, Silva RG da, Spadotto AA, Ribeiro PW, Schelp AO, Carvalho LR de, Henry MAC de A (2013) Sour taste and cold temperature in the oral phase of swallowing in patients after stroke. In: CoDAS. SciELO Brasil, pp 163–167

  3. Humbert IA, Sunday KL, Karagiorgos E, Vose AK, Gould GL, Azola A, Tolar A, Rivet A. Swallowing kinematic differences across frozen, mixed, and ultrathin liquid boluses in healthy adults: age, sex, and normal variability. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2018;61:1544–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Leow LP, Huckabee ML, Sharma S, Tooley TP. The influence of taste on swallowing apnea, oral preparation time, and duration and amplitude of submental muscle contraction. Chem Senses. 2006;32:119–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Michou E, Mastan A, Ahmed S, Mistry S, Hamdy S. Examining the role of carbonation and temperature on water swallowing performance: a swallowing reaction-time study. Chem Senses. 2012;37:799–807.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mulheren RW, Kamarunas E, Ludlow CL. Sour taste increases swallowing and prolongs hemodynamic responses in the cortical swallowing network. J Neurophysiol. 2016;116:2033–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wahab NA, Jones RD, Huckabee M-L. Effects of olfactory and gustatory stimuli on the biomechanics of swallowing. Physiol Behav. 2011;102:485–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller AJ. Characteristics of the swallowing reflex induced by peripheral nerve and brain stem stimulation. Exp Neurol. 1972;34:210–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ertekin C, Kiylioglu N, Tarlaci S, Turman AB, Secil Y, Aydogdu I. Voluntary and reflex influences on the initiation of swallowing reflex in man. Dysphagia. 2001;16:40–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Humbert IA, Lokhande A, Christopherson H, German R, Stone A. Adaptation of swallowing hyo-laryngeal kinematics is distinct in oral vs. pharyngeal sensory processing. J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:1698–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Aoyagi Y, Taniguchi H, Imaeda S, Hirumuta M, Kagaya H, Saitoh E. Elicitation of swallowing reflex by esophageal stimulation in healthy subjects: evaluation using high resolution manometry. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2018;61: e420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Jean A. Brain stem control of swallowing: neuronal network and cellular mechanisms. Physiol Rev. 2001;81:929–69.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Pouderoux P, Logemann JA, Kahrilas PJ. Pharyngeal swallowing elicited by fluid infusion: role of volition and vallecular containment. Am J Physiol-Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 1996;270:G354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Leopold NA, Kagel MC. Dysphagia–ingestion or deglutition?: a proposed paradigm. Dysphagia. 1997;12:202–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Azola AM, Sunday KL, Humbert IA. Kinematic visual biofeedback improves accuracy of learning a swallowing maneuver and accuracy of clinician cues during training. Dysphagia. 2017;32:115–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hind JA, Nicosia MA, Roecker EB, Carnes ML, Robbins J. Comparison of effortful and noneffortful swallows in healthy middle-aged and older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:1661–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Macrae P, Anderson C, Taylor-Kamara I, Humbert I. The effects of feedback on volitional manipulation of airway protection during swallowing. J Mot Behav. 2014;46:133–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Humbert IA, Joel S. Tactile, gustatory, and visual biofeedback stimuli modulate neural substrates of deglutition. Neuroimage. 2012;59:1485–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Humbert IA, McLaren DG. Differential psychophysiological interactions of insular subdivisions during varied oropharyngeal swallowing tasks. Physiol Rep. 2014;2: e00239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Deco G, Rolls ET. Attention, short-term memory, and action selection: a unifying theory. Prog Neurobiol. 2005;76:236–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Desimone R, Duncan J. Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annu Rev Neurosci. 1995;18:193–222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rosenkranz K, Rothwell JC. The effect of sensory input and attention on the sensorimotor organization of the hand area of the human motor cortex. J Physiol. 2004;561:307–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Marks LE, Wheeler ME. Attention and the detectability of weak taste stimuli. Chem Senses. 1998;23:19–29.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Grabenhorst F, Rolls ET. Selective attention to affective value alters how the brain processes taste stimuli. Eur J Neurosci. 2008;27:723–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rolls ET, Grabenhorst F, Margot C, da Silva MAAP, Velazco MI. Selective attention to affective value alters how the brain processes olfactory stimuli. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008;20:1815–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Baumeister RF. Choking under pressure: self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1984;46:610–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wulf G, Weigelt C (1997) Instructions about physical principles in learning a complex motor skill: to tell or not to tell…. null 68:362–367

  28. Daniels SK, Schroeder MF, DeGeorge PC, Corey DM, Rosenbek JC. Effects of verbal cue on bolus flow during swallowing. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007;16:140–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagy A, Leigh C, Hori SF, Molfenter SM, Shariff T, Steele CM. Timing differences between cued and noncued swallows in healthy young adults. Dysphagia. 2013;28:428–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kern MK, Jaradeh S, Arndorfer RC, Shaker R. Cerebral cortical representation of reflexive and volitional swallowing in humans. Am J Physiol-Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 2001;280:360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Martin RE, Goodyear BG, Gati JS, Menon RS. Cerebral cortical representation of automatic and volitional swallowing in humans. J Neurophysiol. 2001;85:938–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Steele CM, Peladeau-Pigeon M, Barbon CAE, et al. Reference values for healthy swallowing across the range from thin to extremely thick liquids. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2019;62:1338–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Bisch EM, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Kahrilas PJ, Lazarus CL. Pharyngeal effects of bolus volume, viscosity, and temperature in patients with dysphagia resulting from neurologic impairment and in normal subjects. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1994;37:1041–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Butler SG, Stuart A, Castell D, Russell GB, Koch K, Kemp S. Effects of age, gender, bolus condition, viscosity, and volume on pharyngeal and upper esophageal sphincter pressure and temporal measurements during swallowing. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2009;52:240–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dantas RO, Kern MK, Massey BT, Dodds WJ, Kahrilas PJ, Brasseur JG, Cook IJ, Lang IM. Effect of swallowed bolus variables on oral and pharyngeal phases of swallowing. Am J Physiol-Gastrointest Liver Physiol. 1990;258:675–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hoffman MR, Ciucci MR, Mielens JD, Jiang JJ, McCulloch TM. Pharyngeal swallow adaptations to bolus volume measured with high-resolution manometry. Laryngoscope. 2010;120:2367–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Variation in temporal measures of swallowing: sex and volume effects. Dysphagia. 2013;28:226–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Fink TA, Ross JB. Are We Testing a True Thin Liquid? Dysphagia. 2009;24:285–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Steele CM, Molfenter SM, Péladeau-Pigeon M, Stokely S. Challenges in preparing contrast media for videofluoroscopy. Dysphagia. 2013;28:464–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Molfenter SM, Steele CM. Temporal variability in the deglutition literature. Dysphagia. 2012;27:162–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Molfenter SM, Leigh C, Steele CM. Event sequence variability in healthy swallowing: building on previous findings. Dysphagia. 2014;29:234–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Lisman AL, Sadagopan N. Focus of attention and speech motor performance. J Commun Disord. 2013;46:281–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Freedman SE, Maas E, Caligiuri MP, Wulf G, Robin DA. Internal versus external: oral-motor performance as a function of attentional focus. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2007;50:131–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Wulf G, McNevin N, Shea CH. The automaticity of complex motor skill learning as a function of attentional focus. Q J Exp Psychol A. 2001;54:1143–54.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. McNevin NH, Shea CH, Wulf G. Increasing the distance of an external focus of attention enhances learning. Psychol Res. 2003;67:22–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Troche MS, Okun MS, Rosenbek JC, Altmann LJ, Sapienza CM. Attentional resource allocation and swallowing safety in Parkinson’s disease: A dual task study. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2014;20:439–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Jestrovic I, Coyle JL, Sejdic E. Decoding human swallowing via electroencephalography: a state-of-the-art review. J Neural Eng. 2015;12: 051001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received for conducting this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Case Western Reserve University, 11635 Euclid Ave., Cleveland, OH, 44106, USA

    Rachel W. Mulheren

  2. Swallowing Training and Education Portal, stepcommunity.com, Washington, D.C., USA

    Ianessa A. Humbert

Authors
  1. Rachel W. Mulheren
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ianessa A. Humbert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel W. Mulheren.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mulheren, R.W., Humbert, I.A. The Effect of Swallowing Cues in Healthy Individuals: An Exploratory Study. Dysphagia 38, 260–267 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10463-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00455-022-10463-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation