Skip to main content
Log in

Efficiency of intraoperative endoscopic inspection in reducing residuals in canal-wall-up surgery for pediatric cholesteatoma involving the mastoid

  • Otology
  • Published:
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the efficiency of additional intraoperative endoscopic inspection in reducing residual cholesteatoma in pediatric cholesteatoma involving the mastoid treated with classic canal-wall-up mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty.

Materials and methods

32 cases of pediatric cholesteatoma involving the mastoid were enrolled in this perspective study and treated with classic canal-wall-up mastoidectomy and tympanoplasty. Transmastoid posterior tympanotomy, atticotomy and transecting tendon of tympani tensor were conducted to achieve adequate visualization of hidden spaces in the middle ear. After complete removal of cholesteatoma, endoscopic inspection was additionally performed to check residual cholesteatoma. All cases had at least a 2-year follow-up by routine otoscopy examination, CT scan or MR imaging. Residual rates of both intraoperative and follow-up findings were used to evaluate the efficiency of the endoscopic inspection in reducing residual cholesteatoma and compared with published reports.

Results

The additional intraoperative endoscopic inspection did not find any residual in this case series. In the 2-year follow-up, 2 cases (2/32, 6.3%) with residual cholesteatoma and 3 cases with recurrence (3/32, 9.4%) were found. The mean duration of endoscopic inspection and microscopic procedure were 17.9 min and 93.6 min, respectively.

Conclusions

This study suggested that the additional intraoperative endoscopic inspection in microscopic CWU surgery for pediatric cholesteatoma involving the mastoid had no obvious value in reducing residual cholesteatoma but took extra time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data analysed during this study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Dodson EE, Hashisaki GT, Hobgood TC, Lambert PR (1998) Intact canal wall mastoidectomy with tympanoplasty for cholesteatoma in children. Laryngoscope 108(7):977–983. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-199807000-00005

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schraff SA, Strasnick B (2006) Pediatric cholesteatoma: a retrospective review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 70(3):385–393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shirazi MA, Muzaffar K, Leonetti JP, Marzo S (2006) Surgical treatment of pediatric cholesteatomas. Laryngoscope 116(9):1603–1607. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.mlg.0000233248.03276.9b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Tos M, Lau T (1989) Hearing after surgery for cholesteatoma using various techniques. Auris Nasus Larynx 16(2):61–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0385-8146(89)80038-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bennett ML, Zhang D, Labadie RF, Noble JH (2016) Comparison of middle ear visualization with endoscopy and microscopy. Otol Neurotol 37(4):362–366. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000000988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Basonbul RA, Ronner EA, Kozin ED (2021) Systematic review of endoscopic ear surgery outcomes for pediatric cholesteatoma. Otol Neurotol 42(1):108–115. https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.0000000000002876

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hunter JB, Zuniga MG, Sweeney AD et al (2016) Pediatric endoscopic cholesteatoma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154(6):1121–1127. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599816631941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Han SY, Lee DY, Chung J, Kim YH (2019) Comparison of endoscopic and microscopic ear surgery in pediatric patients: a meta-analysis. Laryngoscope 129(6):1444–1452. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.27556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Luu K, Chi D, Kiyosaki KK, Chang KW (2019) Updates in pediatric cholesteatoma: minimizing intervention while maximizing outcomes. Otolaryngol Clin N Am 52(5):813–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otc.2019.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sarcu D, Isaacson G (2016) Long-term results of endoscopically assisted pediatric cholesteatoma surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 154(3):535–539. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599815622441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cohen MS, Basonbul RA, Barber SR et al (2018) Development and validation of an endoscopic ear surgery classification system. Laryngoscope 128(4):967–970. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26802

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marchioni D, Soloperto D, Rubini A et al (2015) Endoscopic exclusive transcanal approach to the tympanic cavity cholesteatoma in pediatric patients: our experience. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79(3):316–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2014.12.008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Piras G, Sykopetrites V, Taibah A et al (2021) Long term outcomes of canal wall up and canal wall down tympanomastoidectomies in pediatric cholesteatoma. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 150:110887. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ghadersohi S, Carter JM, Hoff SR (2017) Endoscopic transcanal approach to the middle ear for management of pediatric cholesteatoma. Laryngoscope 127(11):2653–2658. https://doi.org/10.1002/lary.26654

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. James AL, Cushing S, Papsin BC (2016) Residual cholesteatoma after endoscope-guided surgery in children. Otol Neurotol 37(2):196–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Yaniv D, Tzelnick S, Ulanovski D et al (2019) Effect of endoscope assistance in tympanomastoidectomy for lowering the rate of residual cholesteatoma: results from 91 paediatric patients. Clin Otolaryngol 44(6):1105–1108. https://doi.org/10.1111/coa.13405

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen MS, Basonbul RA, Kozin ED, Lee DJ (2017) Residual cholesteatoma during second-look procedures following primary pediatric endoscopic ear surgery. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 157(6):1034–1040. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599817729136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Dixon PR, James AL (2020) Evaluation of residual disease following transcanal totally endoscopic vs postauricular surgery among children with middle ear and attic cholesteatoma. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 146(5):408–413. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Glikson E, Feinmesser G, Sagiv D et al (2019) Trans-canal endoscopic ear surgery and canal wall-up tympano-mastoidectomy for pediatric middle ear cholesteatoma. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(11):3021–3026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-019-05588-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shufeng Li.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, X., Chen, M., Dai, W. et al. Efficiency of intraoperative endoscopic inspection in reducing residuals in canal-wall-up surgery for pediatric cholesteatoma involving the mastoid. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 280, 3593–3600 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07857-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-023-07857-6

Keywords

Navigation