Abstract
As part of NOAA’s “Warn-On-Forecast” initiative, a convective-scale data assimilation and prediction system was developed using the WRF-ARW model and ARPS 3DVAR data assimilation technique. The system was then evaluated using retrospective short-range ensemble analyses and probabilistic forecasts of the tornadic supercell outbreak event that occurred on 24 May 2011 in Oklahoma, USA. A 36-member multi-physics ensemble system provided the initial and boundary conditions for a 3-km convective-scale ensemble system. Radial velocity and reflectivity observations from four WSR-88Ds were assimilated into the ensemble using the ARPS 3DVAR technique. Five data assimilation and forecast experiments were conducted to evaluate the sensitivity of the system to data assimilation frequencies, in-cloud temperature adjustment schemes, and fixed- and mixed-microphysics ensembles. The results indicated that the experiment with 5-min assimilation frequency quickly built up the storm and produced a more accurate analysis compared with the 10-min assimilation frequency experiment. The predicted vertical vorticity from the moist-adiabatic in-cloud temperature adjustment scheme was larger in magnitude than that from the latent heat scheme. Cycled data assimilation yielded good forecasts, where the ensemble probability of high vertical vorticity matched reasonably well with the observed tornado damage path. Overall, the results of the study suggest that the 3DVAR analysis and forecast system can provide reasonable forecasts of tornadic supercell storms.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aksoy, A., D. C. Dowell, and C. Snyder, 2009: A multicase comparative assessment of the ensemble kalman filter for assimilation of radar observations. Part I: Storm-scale analyses. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 1805–1824.
Albers, S. C., J. A. McGinley, D. L. Birkenheuer, and J. R. Smart, 1996: The local analysis and prediction system (LAPS): Analyses of clouds, precipitation, and temperature. Wea. Forecasting, 11, 273–287.
Anderson, J. L., 2001: An ensemble adjustment Kalman filter for data assimilation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 129, 2884–2903.
Anderson, J. L., and N. Collins, 2007: Scalable implementations of ensemble filter algorithms for data assimilation. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 24, 1452–1463.
Anderson, J. L., T. Hoar, K. Raeder, H. Liu, N. Collins, R. Torn, and A. Avellano, 2009: The data assimilation research testbed: A community facility. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 1283–1296.
Brewster, K. A., 2002: Recent advances in diabatic initialization of a non-hydrostatic numerical model. Preprints, 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction/21st Conf. on Severe Local Storms, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., CD-ROM, J6.3. [Available online at http://arps.ou.edu/ARPS/ARPS5DOC/BrewsterNWP2002.pdf.]
Brewster, K., M. Hu, M. Xue, and J. D. Gao, 2005: Efficient assimilation of radar data at high resolution for short-range numerical weather prediction. World Weather Research Program Symp. on Nowcasting and Very Short-Range Forecasting, WSN05, Toulouse, France, WMO World Weather Research Programme, Symp. CD, Paper 3.06.
Calhoun, K. M., T. M. Smith, D. M. Kingfield, J. D. Gao, and D. J. Stensrud, 2014: Forecaster use and evaluation of realtime 3DVAR analyses during severe thunderstorm and tornado warning operations in the hazardous weather testbed. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 601–613.
Clark, A. J., J. S. Kain, P. T. Marsh, J. Correia, M. Xue, and F. Y. Kong, 2012a: Forecasting tornado path lengths using a three-dimensional object identification algorithm applied to convection-allowing forecasts. Wea. Forecasting, 27, 1090–1113.
Clark, A. J., and Coauthors, 2012b: An overview of the 2010 hazardous weather testbed experimental forecast program spring experiment. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 93, 55–74.
Dawson, D. T., L. J. Wicker, E. R. Mansell, and R. L. Tanamachi, 2012: Impact of the environmental low-level wind profile on ensemble forecasts of the 4 May 2007 Greensburg, Kansas, tornadic storm and associated mesocyclones. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 696–716.
Dawson, D. T., M. Xue, J. A. Milbrandt, and A. Shapiro, 2015: Sensitivity of real-data simulations of the 3 May 1999 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell and associated tornadoes to multimoment microphysics. Part I: Storm-and tornado-scale numerical forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 2241–2265.
Doswell, C. A., III, H. E. Brooks, and N. Dotzek, 2009: On the implementation of the enhanced Fujita scale in the USA. Atmos. Res., 93, 554–563.
Dowell, D. C., F. Q. Zhang, L. J. Wicker, C. Snyder, and N. A. Crook, 2004: Wind and temperature retrievals in the 17 May 1981 Arcadia, Oklahoma, supercell: Ensemble kalman filter experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 1982–2005.
Elmore, K. L., D. J. Stensrud, and K. C. Crawford, 2002: Explicit cloud-scale models for operational forecasts: A note of caution. Wea. Forecasting, 17, 873–884.
Fierro, A. O., E. R. Mansell, C. L. Ziegler, and D. R. MacGorman, 2012: Application of a lightning data assimilation technique in the WRF-ARW model at cloud-resolving scales for the tornado outbreak of 24 May 2011. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2609–2627.
Fujita, T., D. J. Stensrud, and D. C. Dowell, 2007: Surface data assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter approach with initial condition and model physics uncertainties. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 1846–1868.
Gao, J. D., M. Xue, A. Shapiro, and K. K. Droegemeier, 1999: A variational method for the analysis of three-dimensional wind fields from two Doppler radars. Mon. Wea. Rev., 127, 2128–2142.
Gao, J. D., M. Xue, K. Brewster, F. H. Carr, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2002: New development of a 3DVAR system for a non-hydrostatic NWP model. Preprints, 15th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction/19th Conf. on Weather Analysis and Forecasting, San Antonio, TX, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 12.4.
Gao, J. D., M. Xue, K. Brewster, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2004: A three-dimensional variational data analysis method with recursive filter for Doppler radars. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 21, 457–469.
Gao, J. D., and Coauthors, 2013: A real-time weather-adaptive 3DVAR analysis system for severe weather detections and warnings with automatic storm positioning capability. Wea. Forecasting, 28, 727–745.
Ge, G. Q., J. D. Gao, and M. Xue, 2013a: Impacts of assimilating measurements of different state variables with a simulated supercell storm and three-dimensional variational method. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 2759–2777.
Ge, G. Q., J. D. Gao, and M. Xue, 2013b: Impact of a diagnostic pressure equation constraint on tornadic supercell thunderstorm forecasts initialized using 3DVAR radar data assimilation. Advances in Meteorology, 2013, 947874.
Gilmore, M. S., J. M. Straka, and E. N. Rasmussen, 2004: Precipitation uncertainty due to variations in precipitation particle parameters within a simple microphysics scheme. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 2610–2627.
Hong, S. Y., and J. O. J. Lim, 2006: The WRF single moment 6 class microphysics scheme (WSM6). J. Korean Meteor. Soc., 42, 129–151.
Hong, S. Y., J. Dudhia, and S. H. Chen, 2004: A revised approach to ice microphysical processes for the bulk parameterization of clouds and precipitation. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 103–120.
Hu, M., and M. Xue, 2007: Impact of configurations of rapid intermittent assimilation of WSR-88D radar data for the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City tornadic thunderstorm case. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 507–525.
Hu, M., M. Xue, and K. Brewster, 2006a: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D level-II Data for the prediction of the fort worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part I: Cloud analysis and its impact. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 675–698.
Hu, M., M. Xue, J. D. Gao, and K. Brewster, 2006b: 3DVAR and cloud analysis with WSR-88D Level-II Data for the prediction of the fort worth, Texas, Tornadic Thunderstorms. Part II: Impact of radial Velocity analysis via 3DVAR. Mon. Wea. Rev., 134, 699–721.
Jones, T. A., D. Stensrud, L. Wicker, P. Minnis, and R. Palikonda, 2015: Simultaneous radar and satellite data storm-scale assimilation using an ensemble Kalman filter approach for 24 May 2011. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 165–194.
Kain, J. S., and Coauthors, 2010: Assessing advances in the assimilation of radar data and other mesoscale observations within a collaborative forecasting–research environment. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1510–1521.
Lange, H., and G. C. Craig, 2014: The impact of data assimilation length scales on analysis and prediction of convective storms. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 3781–3808.
Morrison, H., J. A. Curry, and V. I. Khvorostyanov, 2005: A new double-moment microphysics parameterization for application in cloud and climate models. Part I: Description. J. Atmos. Sci., 62, 1665–1677.
Purser, R. J., W. S. Wu, D. F. Parrish, and N. M. Roberts, 2003a: Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part I: Spatially homogeneous and isotropic Gaussian covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1524–1535.
Purser, R. J., W. S. Wu, D. F. Parrish, and N. M. Roberts, 2003b: Numerical aspects of the application of recursive filters to variational statistical analysis. Part II: Spatially inhomogeneous and anisotropic general covariances. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1536–1548.
Schwartz, C. S., and Coauthors, 2010: Toward improved convection-allowing ensembles: Model physics sensitivities and optimizing probabilistic guidance with small ensemble membership. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 263–280.
Skamarock, W. C., J. B. Klemp, J. Dudhia, D. O. Gill, D. Barker, M. G. Duda, X. Y. Huang, and W. Wang, 2008: A description of the advanced research WRF Version 3. NCAR Tech. Note TN-475+STR, 113 pp.
Smith T. M., and Coauthors, 2014: Examination of a real-time 3DVAR analysis system in the hazardous weather testbed. Wea. Forecasting, 29, 63–77.
Snook, N., and M. Xue, 2008: Effects of microphysical drop size distribution on tornadogenesis in supercell thunderstorms. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L24803, doi: 10.1029/2008GL035866.
Snook, N., M. Xue, and Y. Jung, 2012: Ensemble probabilistic forecasts of a tornadic mesoscale convective system from ensemble kalman filter analyses using WSR-88D and CASA Radar Data. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 2126–2146.
Snyder, C., and F. Q. Zhang, 2003: Assimilation of simulated Doppler radar observations with an ensemble kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1663–1677.
Stensrud, D. J., and J. D. Gao, 2010: Importance of horizontally inhomogeneous environmental initial conditions to ensemble storm-scale radar data assimilation and very short-range forecasts. Mon. Wea. Rev., 138, 1250–1272.
Stensrud, D. J., J. W. Bao, and T. T. Warner, 2000: Using initial condition and model physics perturbations in short-range ensemble simulations of mesoscale convective systems. Mon. Wea. Rev., 128, 2077–2107.
Stensrud, D. J., and Coauthors, 2009: Convective-scale warn-onforecast system a vision for 2020. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 90, 1487–1499.
Stensrud, D. J., and Coauthors, 2013: Progress and challenges with warn-on-forecast. Atmos. Res., 123, 2–16.
Sun, J. Z., and N. A. Crook, 1998: Dynamical and microphysical retrieval from Doppler radar observations using a cloud model and its adjoint. Part II: Retrieval experiments of an observed Florida convective storm. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 835–852.
Thompson, G., R. M. Rasmussen, and K. Manning, 2004: Explicit forecasts of winter precipitation using an improved bulk microphysics scheme. Part I: Description and sensitivity analysis. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 519–542.
Thompson, T. E., L. J. Wicker, X. G. Wang, and C. Potvin, 2015: A comparison between the local ensemble transform Kalman filter and the ensemble square root filter for the assimilation of radar data in convective-scale models. Quart. J. Roy. Meteor. Soc., 141, 1163–1176.
Tong, M. J., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman filter assimilation of Doppler radar data with a compressible nonhydrostatic model: OSS experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 1789–1807.
Toth, Z., O. Talagrand, G. Candille, and Y. J. Zhu, 2003: Probability and ensemble forecasts. Forecast Verification: A Practitioner’s Guide in Atmospheric Science, I. T. Jolliffe and D. B. Stephenson, Eds., John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England, 137–163.
van den Heever, S. C., and W. R. Cotton, 2004: The impact of hail size on simulated supercell storms. J. Atmos. Sci., 61, 1596–1609.
Wei, M. Z., Z. Toth, R. Wobus, and Y. J. Zhu, 2008: Initial perturbations based on the ensemble transform (ET) technique in the NCEP global operational forecast system. Tellus A, 60, 62–79.
Wheatley, D. M., D. J. Stensrud, D. C. Dowell, and N. Yussouf, 2012: Application of a WRF mesoscale data assimilation system to springtime severe weather events 2007–09. Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 1539–1557.
Wheatley, D. M., N. Yussouf, and D. J. Stensrud, 2014: Ensemble kalman filter analyses and forecasts of a severe mesoscale convective system using different choices of microphysics schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 142, 3243–3263.
Xue, M., and Coauthors, 2011: Realtime convection-permitting ensemble and convection-resolving deterministic forecasts of CAPS for the hazardous weather testbed 2010 spring experiment. Proc. 25th Conference on Wea. Forecasting, 20th Conference on Numerical Weather Prediction, Amer. Meteor. Soc., Seattle, WA.
Yussouf, N., E. R. Mansell, L. J. Wicker, D. M. Wheatley, and D. J. Stensrud, 2013a: The ensemble kalman filter analyses and forecasts of the 8 May 2003 Oklahoma City tornadic supercell storm using single-and double-moment microphysics schemes. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 3388–3412.
Yussouf, N., J. D. Gao, D. J. Stensrud, and G. Q. Ge, 2013b: The impact of mesoscale environmental uncertainty on the prediction of a tornadic supercell storm using ensemble data assimilation approach. Advances in Meteorology, 2013, 731647.
Yussouf, N., D. C. Dowell, L. J. Wicker, K. H. Knopfmeier, and D. M. Wheatley, 2015: Storm-scale data assimilation and ensemble forecasts for the 27 April 2011 severe weather outbreak in Alabama. Mon. Wea. Rev., 143, 3044–3066.
Zhang, J., F. Carr, and K. Brewster, 1998: ADAS cloud analysis. Preprints, 12th Conf. on Numerical Weather Prediction, Phoenix, AZ, Amer. Meteor. Soc., 185–188.
Zhang, F., C. Snyder, and J. Z. Sun, 2004: Impacts of initial estimate and observation availability on convective-scale data assimilation with an ensemble kalman filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 132, 1238–1253.
Zhang, J., and Coauthors, 2011: National mosaic and multi-sensor QPE (NMQ) system: Description, results, and future plans. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 1321–1338.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhuang, Z., Yussouf, N. & Gao, J. Analyses and forecasts of a tornadic supercell outbreak using a 3DVAR system ensemble. Adv. Atmos. Sci. 33, 544–558 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-015-5072-0
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00376-015-5072-0