Abstract
Many animals communicate using multiple sensory channels simultaneously and this ability enables them to overcome the challenges of living in variable environments. Studies of wolf spiders have been important in understanding complex communication with a primary focus on the roles of visual and vibratory signals during mating. However, it is well documented that wolf spiders leave silk draglines behind that are often associated with additional chemical residues such as pheromones. We verified that females detect the silk and secretions left on a substrate by male wolf spiders in the species, Tigrosa helluo. We hypothesized that male chemotactile cues play different roles when vision is limited and so we explored the effects of adding male cues prior to courtship in light vs dark situations. Aggression was lower when male chemotactile cues were augmented and when vision was reduced. Males and females came together more quickly and had higher mating success when male cues were augmented under red light, which simulated darkness for these spiders, whereas contact was delayed and mating success was lower in the treatment with added male cues in white light. Thus, the availability of visual signals adjusted the importance of male chemotactile cues either through a shift in sensory priorities of the female or in the evaluative criteria used to make decisions. Chemotactile cues potentially allow for sophisticated information to be conveyed about the male, as such, may be an important communication modality on their own as well as in concert with other signaling channels.
Significance statement
Selecting the right mate depends on effective communication so that the prospective partner can detect and accurately evaluate key traits. Animals living in variable habitats must overcome the communication challenges by presenting information through multiple sensory channels. The understanding of multimodal communication has been advanced by studies of visual and vibratory signaling in wolf spiders. We found that females detect male silk and chemical secretions and that they alter mating interactions in the wolf spider, Tigrosa helluo. Allowing males to deposit silk and chemical cues before virgin males and females were allowed to interact reduced aggression and increased mating success in red light (low vision) conditions. These results broaden the possibilities for the types of interacting signals that might influence the efficacy of multimodal communication in animals live and mate in dynamic environments.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Data are included as supplement.
Code availability
Not applicable.
References
GA Bardier A Aisenberg CA Toscano-Gadea FG Costa 2015 Wooing during day or night is not the same: an experimental study in the wolf spider Schizocosa malitiosa Ethology 121 958 965 https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12408
RD Bell AL Rypstra MH Persons 2006 The effect of predator hunger on chemically mediated antipredator responses and survival in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae, Lycosidae) Ethology 112 903 910 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2006.01244.x
Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL (2011) Principles of animal communication. (2nd ed.). Sinauer, Sunderland MA, USA
J Bro-Jorgensen 2010 Dynamics of multiple signaling systems: animal communication in a world in flux Trends Ecol Evol 25 292 300 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.11.003
CM Buddle AL Rypstra 2003 Factors initiating emigration of two wolf spider species (Araneae: Lycosidae) in an agroecosystem Environ Entomol 32 88 93 https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-32.1.88
KP Burnham DR Anderson 2002 Model selection and multimodal inferences: a practical information-theoretic approach Springer New York, NY, USA
U Candolin 2003 The use of multiple cues in mate choice Biol Rev 78 575 595 https://doi.org/10.1017/S1464793103006158
N Choi M Bern DO Elias RH McGinley MF Rosenthal EA Hebets 2019 A mismatch between signal transmission efficacy and mating success calls into question the function of complex signals Anim Behav 158 77 88 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.09.017
M Denoel J Doellen 2010 Displaying in the dark: light-dependent alternative mating tactics in the alpine newt Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64 1171 1177 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-010-0933-0
AA Dore L McDowall J Rouse A Bretman MJG Gage T Chapman 2018 The role of complex cues in social and reproductive plasticity Behav Ecol Sociobiol 72 124 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-018-2539-x
R Dukas 2002 Behavioral and ecological consequences of limited attention Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 357 1539 1547 https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2002.2063
R Dukas 2004 Causes and consequences of limited attention Brain Behav Evolut 63 197 210 https://doi.org/10.1159/000076781
A Fischer 2019 Chemical communication in spiders – a methodological review J Arachnol 47 1 27 https://doi.org/10.1636/0161-8202-47.1.1
RF Foelix 2011 Biology of spiders Oxford University Press Oxford
R Gilbert GW Uetz 2019 Male chemical cues as reliable indicators of infection in the wolf spider Schizocosa ocreata Ethology 125 177 183 https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12841
SD Gordon GW Uetz 2011 Multimodal communication of wolf spiders on different substrates: evidence for behavioural plasticity Anim Behav 81 367 375 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2010.11.003
JA Havrilak KM Shimmel AL Rypstra MH Persons 2015 Are you paying attention? Female wolf spiders increase dragline silk advertisements when males do not court Ethology 121 345 352 https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12340
EA Hebets 2005 Attention altering signal interactions in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa uetzi Behav Ecol 16 75 82 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arh133
EA Hebets 2008 Seismic signal dominance in the multimodal courtship display of the wolf spider Schizocosa stridulans Stratton 1991 Behav Ecol 19 1250 1257 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arn080
EA Hebets DR Papaj 2005 Complex signal function: developing a framework of testable hypotheses Behav Ecol Sociobiol 57 197 214 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-004-0865-7
EA Hebets A Rundus 2011 Chemical communication in a multimodal context T Breithaupt M Thiel Eds Chemical communication in crustaceans Springer New York 335 354
EA Hebets GW Uetz 2000 Leg ornamentation and the efficacy of courtship display in four species of wolf spider (Araneae: Lycosidae) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 47 280 286 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050667
EA Hebets DO Elias AC Mason GL Miller GE Stratton 2008 Substrate-dependent signalling success in the wolf spider Schizocosa retrorsa Anim Behav 75 605 615 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.06.021
EA Hebets CJ Vink L Sullivan-Beckers MF Rosenthal 2013 The dominance of seismic signaling and selection for signal complexity in Schizocosa multimodal courtship displays Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67 1483 1498 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1519-4
RL Holler MH Persons 2009 Dragline deposition patterns among male and female Hogna helluo (Araneae, Lycosidae) J Arachnol 37 97 100 https://doi.org/10.1636/ST08-37.1
P Jolicoeur 1999 Restricted attention capacity between sensory modalities Psychon B Rev 6 87 92 https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03210813
BJ Kaston 1936 The senses involved in the courtship of some vagabond spiders Entomol Am 4 97 167
R Khan MH Persons 2015 Female Pardosa milvina wolf spiders increase silk advertisements when in the presence of silk from courting males J Arachnol 43 168 173 https://doi.org/10.1636/j14-70
B Krafft 1982 The significance and complexity of communication in spiders PN Witt JS Rovner Eds Spider communication: mechanisms and ecological significance Princeton University Press Princeton 15 66
L Lehmann SE Walker MH Persons 2004 The influence of predator sex on chemically – mediated anti-predator response in the wolf spider Pardosa milvina (Araneae: Lycosidae) Ethology 110 1 7 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-0310.2004.00972.x
SD Marshall DM Pavuk AL Rypstra 2002 A comparative study of phenology and daily activity patterns in the wolf spiders Pardosa milvina and Hogna helluo in soybean agroecosystems in southwestern Ohio (Araneae, Lycosidae) J Arachnol 30 503 510 https://doi.org/10.1636/0161-8202(2002)030[0503:ACSOPA]2.0.CO;2
NE Munoz DT Blumstein 2012 Multisensory perception in uncertain environments Behav Ecol 23 457 462 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arr220
PA Murtaugh 2009 Performance of several variable-selection methods applied to real ecological data Ecol Lett 12 1061 1068 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01361.x
AJ Nappi 1965 Notes on the courtship and mating habits of the wolf spider Lycosa helluo Walckenaer Am Midl Nat 74 368 373
TJ Ord JA Stamps JB Losos 2010 Adaptation and plasticity of animal communication in fluctuating environments Evolution 64 3134 3148 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558j-5646.2010.01056.x
Partan SR (2004) Multisensory animal communication. In: Calvert G, Spence C, Stein BE (eds) The handbook of multisensory processes. MIT, Cambridge, MA USA pp. 1523–1539.
SR Partan 2013 Ten unanswered questions in multimodal communication Behav Ecol Sociobiol 67 1523 1539 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1565-y
SR Partan 2017 Multimodal shifts in noise: switching channels to communicate through rapid environmental change Anim Behav 124 325 337 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2016.08.003
SR Partan P Marler 1999 Communication goes multimodal Science 283 1272 1273 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5406.1272
MH Persons G Uetz 1997 The effect of prey movement on attack behavior and patch residence decision rules of wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) J Insect Behav 10 737 752 https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765390
MH Persons SE Walker AL Rypstra SD Marshall 2001 Wolf spider predator avoidance tactics and survival in the presence of diet-associated predator cues (Araneae: Lycosidae) Anim Behav 61 43 51 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.2000.1594
MF Rosenthal MR Wilkins D Shizuka EA Hebets 2018 Dynamic changes in display architecture and function across environments revealed by a systems approach to animal communication Evolution 72 1134 1145 https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13448
MF Rosenthal EA Hebets B Kessler R McGinley DO Elias 2019 The effects of microhabitat specialization on mating communication in a wolf spider Behav Ecol 30 1398 1405 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arz091
JS Rovner 1993 Visually mediated responses in the lycosid spider, Rabidosa rabida: the roles of different pairs of eyes Mem Queensland Mus 33 635 638
C Rowe 1999 Receiver psychology and the evolution of multicomponent signals Anim Behav 58 921 931 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1242
AS Rundus RD Santer EA Hebets 2010 Multimodal courtship efficacy of Schizocosa retrorsa wolf spiders: implications for an additional signal modality Behav Ecol 21 701 707 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arq042
AS Rundus L Sullivan-Beckers DJ Wilgers EA Hebets 2011 Females are choosier in the dark: environment-dependent reliance on courtship components and its impact on fitness Evolution 65 268 282 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2010.01125.x
AL Rypstra F Samu 2005 Size dependent intraguild predation and cannibalism in coexisting wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) J Arachnol 33 390 397 https://doi.org/10.1636/CT05-10.1
AL Rypstra CD Hoefler MH Persons 2017 Predation on reproducing wolf spiders: access to information has differential effects on male and female survival Anim Behav 128 165 173 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.03.032
SJ Scheffer GW Uetz G Stratton 1996 Sexual selection, male morphology, and the efficacy of courtship signaling in two wolf spiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 38 17 23 https://doi.org/10.1007/s002650050212
KW Schonewolf R Bell AL Rypstra MH Persons 2006 Field evidence of an airborne enemy-avoidance kairomone in wolf spiders J Chem Ecol 32 1565 1576 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-006-9070-7
CE Scott AG Anderson MCB Andrade 2018 A review of the mechanisms and functional roles of male silk use in spider courtship and mating J Arachnol 46 173 206 https://doi.org/10.1636/JoA-S-17-093.1
MI Sitvarin SD Gordon GW Uetz AL Rypstra 2016 The wolf spider Pardosa milvina detects predator threat level using only vibratory cues Behaviour 153 159 173 https://doi.org/10.1163/1568539X-00003332
C Spence L Read 2003 Speech shadowing while driving: on the difficulty of splitting attention between eye and ear Psychol Sci 14 215 256 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1388-2457/(99)00052-8
JA Stafstrom EA Hebets 2013 Female mate choice for multimodal courtship and the importance of the signaling background for selection on male ornamentation Curr Zool 59 200 209 https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/59.2.200
B Stoffer ME Williams GW Uetz 2016 Variation in female mate preference in response to eavesdropping “interloper” males Behav Ecol 27 1609 1616 https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw083
B Stoffer M Lallo DL Clark GW Uetz 2021 Learning to eavesdrop in multiple modalities: a test of associative learning using unimodal and multimodal playback Anim Behav 178 57 66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.05.014
PW Taylor JA Roberts GW Uetz 2006 Mating in the absence of visual cues by Schizocosa ocreata (Hentz 1844) wolf spiders (Araneae, Lycosidae) J Arachnol 34 501 505 https://doi.org/10.1636/S04-98.1
M Trabalon 2013 Chemical communication and contact cuticular compounds in spiders W Nentwig Eds Spider ecophysiology Springer Heidelberg 125 140
GW Uetz JA Roberts 2002 Multisensory cues and multimodal communication in spiders: Insights from video/audio playback studies Brain Behav Evolut 59 222 230 https://doi.org/10.1159/000064909
GW Uetz DL Clark JA Roberts 2016 Multimodal communication in wolf spiders (Lycosidae) – an emerging model for study Adv Stud Behav 48 117 159 https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.asb.2016.03.003
GW Uetz B Stoffer MM Lallo DL Clark 2017 Complex signals and comparative mate assessment in wolf spiders: results from multimodal playback studies Anim Behav 134 283 299 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2017.02.007
E Velilla M Muñoz N Quiroga L Symes HM Hofstede ter RA Page R Simon J Ellers W Halfwerk 2020 Gone with the wind: is signal timing in a neotropical katydid an adaptive response to variation in wind-induced vibratory noise? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 74 59 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-020-02842-z
SE Walker SD Marshall AL Rypstra DH Taylor 1999 The effects of hunger on locomotory behaviour in two species of wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae) Anim Behav 58 515 520 https://doi.org/10.1006/anbe.1999.1180
SM Wilder AL Rypstra 2007 Male control of copulation duration in a wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae) Behaviour 144 471 484 https://doi.org/10.1163/156853907780756012
SM Wilder AL Rypstra 2008 Trade-off between pre- and postcopulatory sexual cannibalism in a wolf spider (Araneae, Lycosidae) Behav Ecol Sociobiol 66 217 222 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1269-0
SM Wilder AL Rypstra 2008 Sexual size dimorphism mediates the occurrence of state-dependent sexual cannibalism in a wolf spider Anim Behav 76 447 454 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2007.12.023
DJ Wilgers EA Hebets 2011 Complex courtship displays facilitate male reproductive success and plasticity in signaling across variable environments Curr Zool 57 175 186 https://doi.org/10.1093/czoolo/57.2.175
Yamashita S (1985) Photoreceptor cells in the spider eye: spectral sensitivity and efferent control. In: Barth FG (ed) Neurobiology of arachnids, Springer, Berlin, pp 29–41 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-70348-5_6
Acknowledgements
We thank A.D. Berry, H.C. Shannon, and A.D. Salazar for input at various stages in the experiment, data analysis, and manuscript preparation. We are grateful to K.W. Kopf and J. DeVito who assisted with preliminary experimentation. Members of the spider lab research team during 2018–2019 academic year assisted with spider care and provided moral support. Input from anonymous reviewers helped us rethink the experiments and improve the paper substantially.
Funding
This work was funded by the Department of Biology and the Hamilton Campus of Miami University, OH, USA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
JAG and TMM developed the ideas and protocols with input from ALR. TMM and JAG executed the experiments. ALR and TMM documented and assembled data from videos. JAG and ALR developed initial manuscript draft. ALR finalized statistical analyses, edited earlier drafts of the manuscript, and prepared the paper for submission.
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by E. M. Jakob.
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Godfrey, J.A., Murray, T.M. & Rypstra, A.L. The effects of environmental light on the role of male chemotactile cues in wolf spider mating interactions. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 76, 39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03150-4
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-022-03150-4