Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Initial experience with a prototype dual-crystal (LSO/NaI) dual-head coincidence camera in oncology

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo performance of a prototype dual-crystal [lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO)/sodium iodide (NaI)] dual-head coincidence camera (DHC) for PET and SPET (LSO-PS), in comparison to BGO-PET with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in oncology. This follows earlier reports that LSO-PS has noise-equivalent counting (NEC) rates comparable to partial ring BGO-PET, i.e. clearly higher than standard NaI DHCs. Twenty-four randomly selected oncological patients referred for whole-body FDG-PET underwent BGO-PET followed by LSO-PS. Four nuclear medicine physicians were randomised to read a single scan modality, in terms of lesion intensity, location and likelihood of malignancy. BGO-PET was considered the gold standard. Forty-eight lesions were classified as positive with BGO-PET, of which LSO-PS identified 73% (95% CI 60–86%). There was good observer agreement for both modalities in terms of intensity, location and interpretation. Lesions were missed by LSO-PS in 13 patients in the chest (n=6), neck (n=3) and abdomen (n=4). The diameter of these lesions was estimated to be 0.5–1 cm. Initial results justify further evaluation of LSO-PS in specific clinical situations, especially if a role as an instrument of triage for PET is foreseen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

References

  1. Schmand M, Dahlbom M, Eriksson L, Casey ME, Andreaco MS, Vagneur K, Phelps ME, Nutt R. Performance of a LSO/NaI(Tl) phoswich detector for a combined PET/SPECT imaging system. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:P9.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pichler BJ, Miller SM, Hamill JJ, et al. Evaluation of the NaI-LSO-hybrid detector PET-SPECT system: dual isotope scans and first patient studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29:S109.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ak I, Blokland JA, Pauwels EK, Stokkel MP. The clinical value of18F-FDG detection with a dual-head coincidence camera: a review. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28:763–778.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haslinghuis-Bajan LM, Hooft L, van Lingen A, et al. Rapid evaluation of FDG imaging alternatives using head-to head comparisons of full-ring and gamma camera based PET scanners—a systematic review. Nuklearmedizin 2002; 41:208–213.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zimny M, Kaiser HJ, Cremerius U, et al. F-18-FDG positron imaging in oncological patients: gamma camera coincidence detection versus dedicated PET. Nuklearmedizin 1999; 38:108–114.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arthur van Lingen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Joshi, U., Hoekstra, O.S., Boellaard, R. et al. Initial experience with a prototype dual-crystal (LSO/NaI) dual-head coincidence camera in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31, 596–598 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1440-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1440-6

Keywords

Navigation