Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the in vivo performance of a prototype dual-crystal [lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO)/sodium iodide (NaI)] dual-head coincidence camera (DHC) for PET and SPET (LSO-PS), in comparison to BGO-PET with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) in oncology. This follows earlier reports that LSO-PS has noise-equivalent counting (NEC) rates comparable to partial ring BGO-PET, i.e. clearly higher than standard NaI DHCs. Twenty-four randomly selected oncological patients referred for whole-body FDG-PET underwent BGO-PET followed by LSO-PS. Four nuclear medicine physicians were randomised to read a single scan modality, in terms of lesion intensity, location and likelihood of malignancy. BGO-PET was considered the gold standard. Forty-eight lesions were classified as positive with BGO-PET, of which LSO-PS identified 73% (95% CI 60–86%). There was good observer agreement for both modalities in terms of intensity, location and interpretation. Lesions were missed by LSO-PS in 13 patients in the chest (n=6), neck (n=3) and abdomen (n=4). The diameter of these lesions was estimated to be 0.5–1 cm. Initial results justify further evaluation of LSO-PS in specific clinical situations, especially if a role as an instrument of triage for PET is foreseen.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00259-003-1440-6/MediaObjects/s00259-003-1440-6flb1.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00259-003-1440-6/MediaObjects/s00259-003-1440-6fhb2.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs00259-003-1440-6/MediaObjects/s00259-003-1440-6fhb3.jpg)
References
Schmand M, Dahlbom M, Eriksson L, Casey ME, Andreaco MS, Vagneur K, Phelps ME, Nutt R. Performance of a LSO/NaI(Tl) phoswich detector for a combined PET/SPECT imaging system. J Nucl Med 1998; 39:P9.
Pichler BJ, Miller SM, Hamill JJ, et al. Evaluation of the NaI-LSO-hybrid detector PET-SPECT system: dual isotope scans and first patient studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2002; 29:S109.
Ak I, Blokland JA, Pauwels EK, Stokkel MP. The clinical value of18F-FDG detection with a dual-head coincidence camera: a review. Eur J Nucl Med 2001; 28:763–778.
Haslinghuis-Bajan LM, Hooft L, van Lingen A, et al. Rapid evaluation of FDG imaging alternatives using head-to head comparisons of full-ring and gamma camera based PET scanners—a systematic review. Nuklearmedizin 2002; 41:208–213.
Zimny M, Kaiser HJ, Cremerius U, et al. F-18-FDG positron imaging in oncological patients: gamma camera coincidence detection versus dedicated PET. Nuklearmedizin 1999; 38:108–114.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Joshi, U., Hoekstra, O.S., Boellaard, R. et al. Initial experience with a prototype dual-crystal (LSO/NaI) dual-head coincidence camera in oncology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 31, 596–598 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1440-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-003-1440-6