Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Analysis of factors affecting intraoperative hemorrhage during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and establishment of nomogram model

  • Research
  • Published:
Urolithiasis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intraoperative hemorrhage is an important factor affecting intraoperative safety and postoperative patient recovery in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). This study aimed to identify the factors that influence intraoperative hemorrhage during PCNL and develop a predictive nomogram model based on these factors.A total of 118 patients who underwent PCNL at the Department of Urology, The Affiliated Huai’an No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from January 2021 to September 2023 was included in this study. The patients were divided into a hemorrhage group (58 cases) and a control group (60 cases) based on the decrease in hemoglobin levels after surgery. The clinical data of all patients were collected, and both univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression analysis were conducted to identify the independent risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage during PCNL. The independent risk factors were used to construct a nomogram model using R software. Additionally, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA) were utilized to evaluate the model.Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that diabetes, long operation time and low psoas muscle mass index (PMI) were independent risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage during PCNL (P < 0.05). A nomogram model was developed incorporating these factors, and the areas under the ROC curve (AUCs) in the training set and validation set were 0.740 (95% CI: 0.637–0.843) and 0.742 (95% CI: 0.554–0.931), respectively. The calibration curve and Hosmer-Lemeshow test (P = 0.719) of the model proved that the model was well fitted and calibrated. The results of the DCA showed that the model had high value for clinical application.Diabetes, long operation time and low PMI were found to be independent risk factors for intraoperative hemorrhage during PCNL. The nomogram model based on these factors can be used to predict the risk of intraoperative hemorrhage, which is beneficial for perioperative intervention in high-risk groups to improve the safety of surgery and reduce the incidence of postoperative complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data is available on request by contacting the authors.

References

  1. Tan S, Yuan D, Su H, Chen W, Zhu S, Yan B, Sun F, Jiang K, Zhu J (2024) Prevalence of urolithiasis in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJU Int 133(1):34–43. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16179

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fernström I, Johansson B (1976) Percutaneous pyelolithotomy. A new extraction technique. Scand J Urol Nephrol 10(3):257–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.1976.11882084

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Geraghty RM, Davis NF, Tzelves L, Lombardo R, Yuan C, Thomas K, Petrik A, Neisius A, Türk C, Gambaro G, Skolarikos A, Somani BK (2023) Best practice in Interventional Management of Urolithiasis: an update from the European Association of Urology Guidelines Panel for Urolithiasis 2022. Eur Urol Focus 9(1):199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2022.06.014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ullah S, Ali S, Karimi S, Farooque U, Hussain M, Qureshi F, Shah SI, Afzal A, Tauseef A, Khan MU (2020) Frequency of blood transfusion in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Cureus 12(10):e11086. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11086

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Lee JK, Kim BS, Park YK (2013) Predictive factors for bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Korean J Urol 54(7):448–453. https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2013.54.7.448

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Eksi M, Ozlu DN, Kargi T, Yavuzsan AH, Haciislamoglu A, Karadag S, Sahin S, Tasci AI (2022) Pre-operative parameters Predicting Hemoglobin decline related to Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul 56(1):70–76. https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2021.21284

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Bahat G, Turkmen BO, Aliyev S, Catikkas NM, Bakir B, Karan MA (2021) Cut-off values of skeletal muscle index and psoas muscle index at L3 vertebra level by computerized tomography to assess low muscle mass. Clin Nutr 40(6):4360–4365. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnu.2021.01.010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Jung JW, Lee BK, Park YH, Lee S, Jeong SJ, Lee SE, Jeong CW (2014) Modified Seoul National University Renal Stone Complexity score for retrograde intrarenal surgery. Urolithiasis 42(4):335–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-014-0650-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Okhunov Z, Friedlander JI, George AK, Duty BD, Moreira DM, Srinivasan AK, Hillelsohn J, Smith AD, Okeke Z (2013) S.T.O.N.E. nephrolithometry: novel surgical classification system for kidney calculi. Urology 81(6):1154–1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2012.10.083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wollin DA, Preminger GM (2018) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: complications and how to deal with them. Urolithiasis 46(1):87–97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-017-1022-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Akman T, Binbay M, Sari E, Yuruk E, Tepeler A, Akcay M, Muslumanoglu AY, Tefekli A (2011) Factors affecting bleeding during percutaneous nephrolithotomy: single surgeon experience. J Endourol 25(2):327–333. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2010.0302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Poudyal S (2022) Current insights on haemorrhagic complications in percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Asian J Urol 9(1):81–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajur.2021.05.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Tefekli A, Kurtoglu H, Tepeler K, Karadag MA, Kandirali E, Sari E, Baykal M, Muslumanoglu AY (2008) Does the metabolic syndrome or its components affect the outcome of percutaneous nephrolithotomy? J Endourol 22(1):35–40. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.0034

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mithani MH, Khan SA, Khalid SE, Majeed I, Awan AS, Mithani S (2018) Predictive factors for intraoperative blood loss during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 28(8):623–627. https://doi.org/10.29271/jcpsp.2018.08.623

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zheng Z, Xu J, Li Z, Mao L, Zhang W, Ye Z, Zhong W (2023) Development and internal validation of a prediction model to evaluate the risk of severe hemorrhage following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy. World J Urol 41(3):843–848. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04291-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oner S, Okumus MM, Demirbas M, Onen E, Aydos MM, Ustun MH, Kilic M, Avci S (2015) Factors influencing complications of Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy: a single-center study. Urol J 12(5):2317–2323

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shoaib M, Bangash M, Salam B, Ather MH (2020) The correlation between STONE nephrolithometry score and Hemoglobin Drop in patients undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy. Cureus 12(11):e11430. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.11430

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Meng X, Bao J, Mi Q, Fang S (2019) The Analysis of Risk Factors for Hemorrhage Associated with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Biomed Res Int 2019(8619460). https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/8619460

  19. Turna B, Nazli O, Demiryoguran S, Mammadov R, Cal C (2007) Percutaneous nephrolithotomy: variables that influence hemorrhage. Urology 69(4):603–607. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2006.12.021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Amri M, Naouar S, Ben Khalifa B, Hmidi N, Braiek S, ElKamel R (2019) Predictive factors of bleeding and fever after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Tunis Med 97(5):667–674

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hamaguchi Y, Kaido T, Okumura S, Kobayashi A, Hammad A, Tamai Y, Inagaki N, Uemoto S (2016) Proposal for new diagnostic criteria for low skeletal muscle mass based on computed tomography imaging in Asian adults. Nutrition 32(11–12):1200–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2016.04.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Xue D, Li N, Li L, Huang Y, Men K, Meng Q, Zhang S (2022) Sarcopenia is an independent risk factor for depression in patients with advanced lung cancer. Support Care Cancer 30(11):9659–9665. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-07384-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Li Q, An T, Wu J, Lu W, Wang Y, Li J, Yang L, Chen Y, Lin, Yang Z (2023) The impact of Sarcopenia on the outcome of patients with left-sided colon and rectal cancer after curative surgery. BMC Cancer 23(1):640. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-11073-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Umezawa S, Kobayashi S, Otsubo T (2022) Low preoperative psoas muscle mass index is a risk factor for distal cholangiocarcinoma recurrence after pancreatoduodenectomy: a retrospective analysis. World J Surg Oncol 20(1):176. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12957-022-02627-w

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang Y, Dilixiati Y, Jiang W, Cao X, Chen Y, Guo H (2022) Correlation of Psoas Muscle Index with Fragility Vertebral Fracture: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study of Middle-Aged and Elderly Women. Int J Endocrinol 2022, 4149468. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4149468

  26. Iwasaki Y, Shiotsuka J, Kawarai Lefor A, Sanui M (2021) The Psoas muscle index is Associated with Prognosis in Elderly patients Undergoing Cardiovascular surgery. Anesth Pain Med 11(5):e118608. https://doi.org/10.5812/aapm.118608

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Lee SJ, Yang YJ, Lee DW, Song SY, Lew DH, Yang EJ (2023) Influence of Sarcopenia on postoperative complications in patients undergoing autologous microsurgical breast reconstruction: an inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis. Front Oncol 13:1211593. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1211593

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Kim HY, Lee KW, Lee DS (2020) Critical causes in severe bleeding requiring angioembolization after percutaneous nephrolithotomy. BMC Urol 20(1):22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-020-00594-6

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Research design: JHX, LJ, YYW; Data collection: JHX, SG, XZL; Data analysis: JHX, LJ; Manuscript writing: JHX; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yunyan Wang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Huai’an No.1 People’s Hospital of Nanjing Medical University (Ethical approval No.: KY-2024-070-01). As a retrospective study, the patients were exempted from written informed consent.

Conflict of interest

All authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, J., Ji, L., Gu, S. et al. Analysis of factors affecting intraoperative hemorrhage during percutaneous nephrolithotomy and establishment of nomogram model. Urolithiasis 52, 71 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01571-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-024-01571-6

Keywords

Navigation