Skip to main content
Log in

Comparison of planar SDS-PAGE, CGE-on-a-chip, and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for analysis of the enzymatic de-N-glycosylation of antithrombin III and coagulation factor IX with PNGase F

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Three different analytical techniques (planar SDS-PAGE, CGE-on-a-chip and MALDI-TOF-MS) applied for determination of the molecular weight of intact and partly and completely de-N-glycosylated human serum glycoproteins (antithrombin III and coagulation factor IX) have been compared. N-Glycans were removed from the protein backbone of both complex glycoproteins using PNGase F, which cleaves all types of asparagine-attached N-glycan provided the oligosaccharide has at least the length of a chitobiose core unit. Two of the applied techniques were based on gel electrophoretic separation in the liquid phase while the third technique was the gas-phase technique mass spectrometry. It was demonstrated that the enzymatic de-N-glycosylation generally worked well (completely or partially) with both glycoproteins (one containing only N-glycans and the second N- and O-glycans). All three methods were suitable for monitoring the de-N-glycosylation progress. While the molecular weights determined with MALDI-TOF-MS were most accurate, both gel electrophoretic methods provided molecular weights that were too high because of the attached glycan structures.

CGE-on-a-chip, SDS-PAGE and MALDI mass spectrometric pattern obtained from therapeutic glycoprotein

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Putnam F (1993) Perspect Biol Med 36:323–337

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hames B, Rickwood D (1990) (eds) Gel electrophoresis of proteins—a practical approach. IRL, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

  3. Rosenberg I (1996) Protein analysis and purification. Birkhäuser, Boston, USA

    Google Scholar 

  4. Frank R, Rodbard D (1975) Arch Biochem Biophys 171:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Allen H, Kisailus E (1992) Glycoconjugates—Composition, structure and function. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fazekas de St Groth S, Webster R, Datyner A (1963) Biochim Biophys Acta 71:377–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Heukeshoven J, Dernick R (1988) Electrophoresis 9:28–32

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Felton M (2003) Anal Chem 75:505A–508A

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bousse L (2001) Anal Chem 76:1207–1212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Heiger D (2000) High performance capillary electrophoresis—an introduction. Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mueller O, Hahnenberger K, Dittmann M, Yee H, Dubrow R, Nagle R, Ilsley D (2000) Electrophoresis 21:128–134

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogura M, Agata Y, Watanabe K, McCormick R, Hamaguchi Y, Aso Y, Mitsuhashi M (1998) Clin Chem 44:2249–2255

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Woolley A, Mathies R (1995) Anal Chem 67:3676–3680

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Barthmaier P (2002) Application Note 5988-8322EN. Agilent Technologies

  15. Barthmaier P, Kuschel M, Neumann T, Kratzmaier M (2002) Am Biotechnol Lab 1–3

  16. Karas M, Hillenkamp F (1988) Anal Chem 60:2299–2301

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka K, Waki H, Ido Y, Akita S, Yoshida Y, Yohida T (1988) Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 2:151–153

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Belgacem O, Buchacher A, Pock K, Josic D, Sutton C, Rizzi A, Allmaier G (2002) J Mass Spectrom 37:1118–1130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Bond M, Jankowski M, Patel H, Karnik S, Strang A, Xu B, Rouse J, Koza S, Letwin B, Steckert J, Amphlett G, Scoble H (1998) Semin Hematol 35:11–17

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Oakley B, Kirsch D, Morris N (1980) Anal Biochem 105:361–363

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Demelbauer U, Plematl A, Josic D, Allmaier G, Rizzi A (2005) J Chromatogr 1080:15–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kelly L, Barthmaier P (2003) Application Note 5989-0332EN. Agilent Technologies

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to thank F. Weigang (Agilent Technologies, Vienna, Austria) for early support with the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer. Further we thank K. Pock and A. Buchacher (Octapharma, Vienna, Austria) for samples of plasma-derived AT III and FIX.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Allmaier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Müller, R., Marchetti, M., Kratzmeier, M. et al. Comparison of planar SDS-PAGE, CGE-on-a-chip, and MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry for analysis of the enzymatic de-N-glycosylation of antithrombin III and coagulation factor IX with PNGase F. Anal Bioanal Chem 389, 1859–1868 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1586-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-007-1586-3

Keywords

Navigation