Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of immobilisation bra for daily setup of patients with pendulous breasts undergoing radiotherapy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Strahlentherapie und Onkologie Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

A feasibility study to evaluate the Chabner XRT® Radiation Bra (CIVCO Radiotherapy & Qfix, Coralville, IA, USA) as a customised immobilisation device for patients with pendulous breasts undergoing radiotherapy was conducted.

Methods

A total of 34 patients with large pendulous breasts were fitted with the Chabner XRT® Radiation Bra during RT. A mixed-method questionnaire was administered to both radiation therapists (RTTs) and patients. RTTs evaluated the effectiveness of the bra in setup. Patients appraised its comfort level and ease of wearing. Setup reproducibility was evaluated based on a departmental imaging protocol. Acute skin side effects were documented with photos and assessed using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) classification.

Results

Of the patients, 27 (79.4%) completed the questionnaire. 23 patients felt comfortable wearing the bra while 20 felt less exposed during treatment. Reproducibility was acceptable, with a median (range) setup error (isocentre) of 0.0 cm (−0.6 to 0.7 cm; left/right), −0.1 cm (−0.5 to 1.2 cm; posterior) and 0.2 cm (−0.5 to 0.9 cm; inferior) achieved based on matched field borders on skin. However, repeated setups and imaging were required for 3 patients due to large breast size (cups D–G; size 4–5). Minimal skin toxicity (grade 0–1) was observed. No grade ≥ 2 was reported. 10 RTTs completed the survey. Male RTTs (n = 4) were not confident in assisting patients with bra fitting. 8 RTTs agreed that although it was difficult to reproduce the breast tissue for treatment, it helped patients to maintain the treatment position.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated the feasibility of using a customised bra which provided optimal setup reproducibility while maintaining minimal skin toxicity and patient comfort, especially the value-added modesty felt among Asian women during their breast cancer radiotherapy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

  • 08 September 2023

    The ORCID of E. P. P. Pang has been added.

References

  1. Office NRoD (2019) Singapore cancer registry annual report 2019

    Google Scholar 

  2. McDonald ES, Clark AS, Tchou J, Zhang P, Freedman GM (2016) Clinical diagnosis and management of breast cancer. J Nucl Med 57(Suppl 1):9S–16S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jatoi I, Proschan MA (2005) Randomized trials of breast-conserving therapy versus mastectomy for primary breast cancer: a pooled analysis of updated results. Am J Clin Oncol 28:289–294

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Haviland JS, A’Hern R, Bentzen SM, Whelan T, Bliss JM (2014) Radiotherapy for breast cancer, the TARGIT‑A trial. Lancet 383:1716–1717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Pignol JP, Vu TT, Mitera G, Bosnic S, Verkooijen HM, Truong P (2015) Prospective evaluation of severe skin toxicity and pain during postmastectomy radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 91:157–164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Meattini I, Guenzi M, Fozza A, Vidali C, Rovea P, Meacci F et al (2017) Overview on cardiac, pulmonary and cutaneous toxicity in patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. Breast Cancer 24:52–62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ratosa I, Jenko A, Oblak I (2018) Breast size impact on adjuvant radiotherapy adverse effects and dose parameters in treatment planning. Radiol Oncol 52:233–244

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Bentel GC, Marks LB, Whiddon CS, Prosnitz LR (1999) Acute and late morbidity of using a breast positioning ring in women with large/pendulous breasts. Radiother Oncol 50:277–281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Das IJ, Cheng CW, Fein DA, Fowble B (1997) Patterns of dose variability in radiation prescription of breast cancer. Radiother Oncol 44:83–89

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Freedman GM, Anderson PR, Li J, Eisenberg DF, Hanlon AL, Wang L et al (2006) Intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) decreases acute skin toxicity for women receiving radiation for breast cancer. Am J Clin Oncol 29:66–70

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Goodman KA, Hong L, Wagman R, Hunt MA, McCormick B (2004) Dosimetric analysis of a simplified intensity modulation technique for prone breast radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 60:95–102

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Latimer JG, Beckham W, West M, Holloway L, Delaney G (2005) Support of large breasts during tangential irradiation using a micro-shell and minimizing the skin dose—a pilot study. Med Dosim 30:31–35

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Remouchamps VM, Letts N, Yan D, Vicini FA, Moreau M, Zielinski JA et al (2003) Three-dimensional evaluation of intra- and interfraction immobilization of lung and chest wall using active breathing control: a reproducibility study with breast cancer patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57:968–978

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Buijsen J, Jager JJ, Bovendeerd J, Voncken R, Borger JH, Boersma LJ et al (2007) Prone breast irradiation for pendulous breasts. Radiother Oncol 82:337–340

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ferrari A, Ivaldi G, Leonardi MC, Rondi E, Orecchia R (2009) Prone breast radiotherapy in a patient with early stage breast cancer and a large pendulous breast. Tumori 95:394–397

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Merchant TE, McCormick B (1994) Prone position breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30:197–203

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Moody AM, Mayles WP, Bliss JM, A’Hern RP, Owen JR, Regan J et al (1994) The influence of breast size on late radiation effects and association with radiotherapy dose inhomogeneity. Radiother Oncol 33:106–112

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barrett-Lennard MJTS (2013) Comparing immobilisation methods for the tangential treatment of large pendulous breasts. Radiographer 55:7–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Keller L, Cohen R, Sopka DM, Li T, Li L, Anderson PR et al (2013) Effect of bra use during radiotherapy for large-breasted women: acute toxicity and treated heart and lung volumes. Pract Radiat Oncol 3:9–15

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Group ST, Bentzen SM, Agrawal RK, Aird EG, Barrett JM, Barrett-Lee PJ et al (2008) The UK Standardisation of Breast Radiotherapy (START) Trial A of radiotherapy hypofractionation for treatment of early breast cancer: a randomised trial. Lancet Oncol 9:331–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Murray Brunt A, Haviland JS, Wheatley DA, Sydenham MA, Alhasso A, Bloomfield DJ et al (2020) Hypofractionated breast radiotherapy for 1 week versus 3 weeks (FAST-Forward): 5‑year efficacy and late normal tissue effects results from a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet 395:1613–1626

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Coles C (2020) Guidelines on radiation therapy for breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. www.rcr.ac.uk/cancer-treatment-documents. Accessed 1 June 2022

  23. Mulliez T, Veldeman L, van Greveling A, Speleers B, Sadeghi S, Berwouts D et al (2013) Hypofractionated whole breast irradiation for patients with large breasts: a randomized trial comparing prone and supine positions. Radiother Oncol 108:203–208

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Veldeman L, Schiettecatte K, De Sutter C, Monten C, van Greveling A, Berkovic P et al (2016) The 2‑year cosmetic outcome of a randomized trial comparing prone and supine whole-breast irradiation in large-breasted women. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 95:1210–1217

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Veldeman L, Speleers B, Bakker M, Jacobs F, Coghe M, De Gersem W et al (2010) Preliminary results on setup precision of prone-lateral patient positioning for whole breast irradiation. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 78:111–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Boute B, De Neve W, Speleers B, Van Greveling A, Monten C, Van Hoof T et al (2017) Potential benefits of crawl position for prone radiation therapy in breast cancer. J Appl Clin Med Phys 18:200–205

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Mulla Z, Iskanderani O, Weber A, AlMohamad A, Al-Amoodi MS, Soaida S (2021) Comparing accuracy of thermoplastic mask versus commercial bra for the immobilization of pendulous breast during radiation therapy treatment: a retrospective cohort study. Adv Radiat Oncol 6:100592

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Agostinelli SGS, Bellini A, Pupillo F, Guenzi M, Bosetti D, Blandino G, Taccini G (2015) Helical Tomotherapy of the breast: can thermoplastic immobilization improve the reproducibility of the treatment setup and the accuracy of the delivered dose? Phys Med 31:49–53

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Cheng KF, Wu VW (2014) Comparison of the effectiveness of different immobilization systems in different body regions using daily megavoltage CT in helical tomotherapy. Br J Radiol 87:20130494

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Rudat V, Nour A, Ghaida SA, Alaradi A (2016) Impact of hypofractionation and tangential beam IMRT on the acute skin reaction in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol 11:100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Murray Brunt A, Wheatley DA, Arnold J, Somaiah N, Kelly S, Harnett A et al (2016) Acute skin toxicity associated with a 1-week schedule of whole breast radiotherapy compared with a standard 3‑week regimen delivered in the UK FAST-Forward Trial. Radiother Oncol 120:114–118

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Kusumawidjaja FRCR.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

J.Z. Chua, L.H. Lim, E.P.P. Pang and G. Kusumawidjaja declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical standards

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants or on human tissue were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1975 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

The authors JZ Chua and LH Lim contributed equally to the manuscript.

Supplementary Information

66_2023_2131_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Questionnaires for patients (top) to evaluate their comfort level and radiation therapists (RTT) (bottom) to assess the issues related to the use of immobilisation bra.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chua, J.Z., Lim, L.H., Pang, E.P.P. et al. Use of immobilisation bra for daily setup of patients with pendulous breasts undergoing radiotherapy. Strahlenther Onkol 200, 287–295 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02131-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00066-023-02131-4

Keywords

Navigation