Abstract
A limiting-factor, environmental model for radiata pine (Pinus radiata (D. Don)) has been developed using landform and soil morphological features that influence site productivity. The model focuses on soil and landscape constraints to productivity and predicts the native productivity of land and tree species. It permits the integration of land-use objectives for a catchment through forest management and use of silvicultural practices which increase productivity. The soil site evaluation index (SSEI) is an index of forest productivity found when silviculture extends only to the minimum amount of site disturbance needed to establish a plantation of radiata pine. The impacts of intensive silvicultural practices were deducted from the ‘Site Quality’ productivity survey rating to calculate the unimproved yield class (uYC). We calculated SSEI by range standardising uYC values from 0 to 1. SSEI was correlated with the environmental factors in a regression tree model using readily available analytical software. The model accurately predicts unimproved forest productivity from observed soil horizon and land surface properties. The environmental constraints in low lying areas relate to waterlogging, soil sodicity and gravel content. In elevated areas, plant available water storage, rock weathering, landform, ironstone gravel and aspect are recognised factors for pine growth.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
BelbinL.: 1992, PATN Reference Manual, User s Guide, Commercial Manual and Example Manual, CSIRO Division of Wildlife and Ecology, Canberra, Australia.
BoardmanR.: 1983, ‘Use of balanced mineral fertilizers to produce acceptable growth rates in Pinus radiata on marginal sites in South Australia’, In: Forest Site and Continuous Productivity, Proc. IUFRO Symposium, Seattle, Washington, 1982, Gen. Tech. Bull. No. PNW-163, US Dep. Agric., For. Serv., Portland, Oregon, pp. 232–332.
BoardmanR.: 1988, ‘Living on the edge-the development of silviculture in South Australian pine plantations’, Aust. For. 51, 135–156.
Boardman, R. and Simpson, J.A.: 1981, ‘Fertilization to optimize productivity’, In: Productivity in Perpetuity, Proc. Aust. For. Nutr. Workshop, Aust. For. Council, Canberra, Australia, pp. 303–317.
CellierK.M., BoardmanR., BoomsmaD.B. and ZedP.G.: 1985, ‘Response of Pinus radiata (D. Don) to various silvicultural treatments on adjacent first-and second-rotation sites near Tantanoola, South Australia, I. Establishment and growth up to age 7 years’, Aust. For. Res. 15, 431–447.
CockG.J.: 1985, ‘Moisture characteristics of irrigated Mallee soils in South Australia’, Australian Journal of Expt. Agric. Anim. Husband. 25, 209–215.
DaviesE.J.M.: 1968, ‘Scarce resources’, Scot. For. 22, 291–299.
FitzpatrickR.W., HollingsworthI.D., NaiduR. and WilliamsonD.R.: 1993, ‘Warren Reservoir integrated catchment study: soil degradation and water quality’, Project CDS5-Technical Report 18/1993, CSIRO Division of Soils, Adelaide, Australia, 17 pp.
GerrandA.: 1991, ‘Predicting eucalypt plantation growth in Tasmania from site and soil properties’, In: P.J.Ryan (ed.), Productivity in Perspective: Third Australian Forest Soils and Nutrition Conference, Melbourne, Oct. 7–11, 1991, Forestry Commission of NSW, Sydney, Australia, 250 pp.
JayawickramaK.J.S., SchalterV. and EscobarR.: 1993, ‘Eucalypt plantation forestry in Chile’, Aust. For. Res. 56, 179–192.
KirbyM.C., SindenJ.A. and KaineG.W.: 1993, ‘Appraisal of agroforestry investment under uncertainty: a South Australian case stydy’, Aust. For. Res. 56, 109–118.
LewisN.B., KeevesA. and LeechJ.W.: 1976, ‘Yield regulation in South Australian Pinus radiata plantations’, Bulletin No. 23, Woods and Forests Department of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia, 174 pp.
McDonaldR.C., IsbellR.F., SpeightJ.G., WalkerJ. and HopkinsM.S.: 1990, Australian Soil and Land Survey Field Handbook, Inkata Press, Melbourne, Australia, 198 pp.
McKenzieN.J.: 1991, ‘A strategy for soil survey and land evaluation in Australia’, CSIRO Divisional Report No. 114, CSIRO Division of Soils, Canberra, Australia.
MitchellB.A. and CorrellR.L.: 1987, ‘The soil water regime in a young radiata pine plantation in south eastern Australia’, New Forests 4, 273–289.
RyanP.J. and KnottJ.H.: 1991, ‘Site classification and GIS’, In: P.J.Ryan (ed.), Productivity in Perspective: Third Australian Forest Soils and Nutrition Conference, Melbourne, Oct. 7–11, 1991, Forestry Commission of NSW, Sydney, Australia, pp. 39–51.
SalterP.J. and WilliamsJ.B.: 1965, ‘The influence of texture on the moisture characteristics of soils, II. Available water capacity and moisture release characteristics’, J. Soil. Sci. 16, 310–317.
SchönauA.P.G. and FitzpatrickR.W.: 1981, ‘A tentative evaluation of soil types for commercial afforestation in the Transvaal and Natal’, S. Af. For. J. 116, 28–39.
Soil Survey Staff: 1992, Keys to Soil Taxonomy (5th edition), SMSS Technical Monograph No. 19, Pocahontas Press Inc., Blacksburg, Virginia, 529 pp.
TurnerJ., ThompsonC.H., TurveyN.D., HopmansP. and RyanP.J.: 1990, ‘A soil technical classification system for Pinus radiata (D. Don) plantations, I. Development’, Aust. J. Soil Res. 28, 797–811.
TurveyN.D., BoothT.H. and RyanP.J.: 1990, ‘A soil technical classification system for Pinus radiata (D. Don) plantations. II. A basis for estimation of crop yield’, Aust. J. Soil. Res. 28, 813–824.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hollingsworth, I.D., Boardman, R. & Fitzpatrick, R.W. A soil-site evaluation index of productivity in intensively managed Pinus radiata (D. Don) plantations in South Australia. Environ Monit Assess 39, 531–541 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396166
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00396166