Abstract
This experiment investigated the positive-forgetting phenomenon with sentence material. Sets of sentences were presented to Ss with each sentence being cued “remember” or “forget” immediately following its presentation. To-be-remembered (TBR) sentences were found to be more accessible thanto-be-forgotten (TBF) sentences and uncued control sentences. Sentence connectedness was found to be an important determiner of the magnitude of the observed recall phenomenon; but differential sentence interest was not a significant factor. Using a multiple-choice recognition test, key words or phrases from the to-be-forgotten sentences were found to be equally available as key words or phrases from the to-be-remembered sentences. These results warrant an extention of Bjork’s (1970, 1972) selective-rehearsal and differential-grouping interpretation of the positive-forgetting phenomenon to encompass sentence material. Some implications of the findings for single-presentation information acquisition were noted.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Bartlett, F. C.Remembering. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1932.
Bernbach, H. A. Decision processes in memory. Psychological Review, 1967, 74, 462–480.
Bernbach, H. A., & Kupchak, P. G. Recognition and recall in short-term memory. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 1972, 9, 237–242.
Bjork, R. A. Positive forgetting, the non-interference of items intentionally forgotten. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1970, 9, 255–268.
Bjork, R. A. Theoretical implications of directed forgetting. In A. W. Melton and E. Martin (Eds.),Coding processes in human memory. Washington, D.C: Winston, 1972.
Bjork, R. A., & Woodward, A. E. Directed forgetting of individual words in free-recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1973, 99, 22–27.
Brown, R., & McNeill, D. The “tip of the tongue” phenomenon. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1966, 5, 325–337.
Cicchetti, D. V. Extension of multiple-range tests to interaction tables in the analysis of variance: A rapid approximate solution. Psychological Bulletin, 1972, 77, 405–408.
Cunningham, D. J. The retention of connected discourse: A review. Review of Educational Research, 1972, 42, 47–71.
Davis, J. C., & Okada, R. Recognition and recall of positively forgotten items. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 89, 181–186.
Elms, D. G., & Wilkinson, W. C. Cued forgetting in free recall: Grouping on the basis of relevance and category membership. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 1971, 87, 438–440.
Epstein, W. Mechanisms of directed forgetting. In G. H. Bower (Ed.),The psychology of learning and motivation. Vol. 6. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
James, C. T., Thompson, J. G., & Baldwin, J. M. The reconstructive process in sentence memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 51–63.
Kirk, R. E.Experimental design: Procedures for the behavioral sciences, Belmont, Calif: Wadsworth, 1968.
Reitman, W., Malin, J. T., Bjork, R. A., & Higman, B. Strategy control and directed forgetting. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 1973, 12, 140–149.
Taylor, W. L. “Cloze procedure”: A new tool for measuring readability. Journalism Quarterly, 1953, 30, 415–433.
Woodward, A. E., & Bjork, R. A. Forgetting and remembering in free recall: Intentional and unintentional. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1971, 89, 109–116.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I wish to thank Francis S. Bellezza and George R. Klare for their thoughtful comments on previous drafts of this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geiselman, R.E. Positive forgetting of sentence material. Memory & Cognition 2, 677–682 (1974). https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198138
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198138