Wandering machines: narrativity in generative art

Main Article Content

Vladimir Todorovic
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1190-0410
Dejan Grba
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5154-9699

Abstract

The development of automatic narrative systems has been largely driven by the engineering tendency to anthropomorphize the machine logic so they can ‘tell stories’ similar to how humans do. From the artists’ perspective, however, the experimentation with their media is often more important than the (plausibility of) storytelling, and it often unfolds in non-verbal events that have a potential to generate diverse narratives through experience of the audience. We discuss the emergence of the creative practices that enrich the poetic repertoire of new media art by playfully utilizing the machine flaws, irregularities, errors and systemic technical imperfections thus revealing the human biases and fallacies entangled with technology. One of the implications of these practices is that if the AI research opens up a broader space in which a machine could achieve its own authorial voice, our concept and understanding of the narrative would need to be reconsidered.

Keywords: Algorithm, Artificial intelligence, Error, Generative art, Machine learning, Narrativity, New media art, Programming, Software

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aarseth, E. J. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on ergodic literature. JHU Press.

Abbott, H. P. (2008). The Cambridge introduction to narrative. Cambridge University Press.

Arcas, B. A., Mitchell, M., & Todorov, A. (2017, May 6). Physiognomy’s New Clothes,’. Medium. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@blaisea/physiognomys-new-clothesf2d4b59fdd6a.

Arcas, B. A., Mitchell, M., & Todorov, A. (2018). Do algorithms reveal sexual orientation or just expose our stereotypes?. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@blaisea/do-algorithms-reveal-sexual-orientation-or-justexpose-our-stereotypes-d998fafdf477.

Bassett, J. (2017, December 14). A Bot Has Written a Harry Potter Book and It’s Not a Classic. [Blog post]. Retrieved from https://www.nme.com/blogs/a-bot-has-written-a-harry-potter-book-and-its-beyond-terrible-2171167.

Breton, A., Soupault, P., & Gascoyne, D. (1985). The magnetic fields. London: Atlas Press.

Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals, human nature & human culture. Daedalus, 133(4), 47- 54.

Bulhak, A., & Larios, J. (1996). Postmodernism generator. Communications from Elsewhere.

Clements, W. (2013). Tape Mark 1. Retrieved from http://www.in-vacua.com/cgi-bin/tapemark.pl.

Decker-Phillips, E. (2010). Paik video. Barrytown/Station Hill Press.

Dorin, A., McCabe, J., McCormack, J., Monro, G., & Whitelaw, M. (2012). A framework for understanding generative art. Digital Creativity, 23(3-4), 239-259.

Dzieza, J. (2014, November 25). The strange world of computer-generated novels. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com/2014/11/25/7276157/nanogenmo-robot-author-novel

Franke, H. W. (1985). Computergraphik, Computerkunst. München: Bruckmann.

Funkhouser, C. T., & Baldwin, S. (2007). Prehistoric digital poetry: an archaeology of forms, 1959-1995. The University of Alabama Press.

Galloway, A. R. (2006). Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture. Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.

Grba, D. (2015). Get lucky: Cognitive aspects of generative art. In XIX Generative Art Conference Proceedings (pp. 200-213).

Guzdial, M., Harrison, B., Li, B., & Riedl, M. (2015, June). Crowdsourcing Open Interactive Narrative. In FDG.

Hall, J. D. (2007). Popular Prosody: Spectacle and the politics of Victorian versification. NINETEEN CENT LIT, 62(2), 222-249.

Hall, J. D. (2017). Nineteenth-Century Verse and Technology: Machines of Meter. Springer, 115-119.

Hearn, A. (2019). New AI fake text generator may be too dangerous to release, say creators. The Guardian.

Higgins, H., & Kahn, D. (2012). Mainframe experimentalism: Early computing and the foundations of the digital arts. Univ of California Press.

Hosein, L. (2018, July 31), Night of the Living Dead Has a Scarier Story Than You Think...because Copyright Is Terrifying. CBC Arts. Retreived from https://www.cbc.ca/arts/night-of-the-living-dead-has-a-scarier-story-than-you-think-because-copyright-is-terrifying-1.4768307.

Jacobsohn, M. (2019, July 24). A Slice of Learning from the Cake of Kaokoveld Culture. Daily Maverick. Retrieved from https://www.dailymaverick.co.za/article/2019-07-24-a-slice-of-learning-from-the-cake-of-kaokoveld-culture/.

Johnson, S. (2014). How we got to now: Six innovations that made the modern world. Riverhead books.

Kiros, R., Zhu, Y., Salakhutdinov, R. R., Zemel, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2015). Skip-thought vectors. In Advances in neural information processing systems (pp. 3294- 3302).

Lee, K. F. (2018). AI superpowers: China, Silicon Valley, and the new world order. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

Merchant, B. (2015). This App Translates Your Photos into Stories. Motherboard. Retrieved from https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/8qx7q3/the-app-that-translates-your-pictures-into-words.

Miller, G. (2001). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. Anchor. 352-353.

Mindell, D. A. (2015). Our robots, ourselves: Robotics and the myths of autonomy. Viking Adult.170- 178.

Mital, Parag Kumar. (2014). Computational Audiovisual Scene Synthesis. Ph.D. thesis, Arts and Computational Technologies. Goldsmiths, University of London.

Newitz, A. (2016, June 9). The Multiverse / Explorations & Meditations on Sci-Fi. Ars Technica.

nn. (2017). SHARE Lab: Exploitation Forensics Press Release. Aksioma – Institute for Contemporary Art http://www.aksioma.org/press/exploitation.forensics.zip.

Pinker, S. (2018). Enlightenment now: The case for reason, science, humanism, and progress. Penguin. 323-327.

Riedl, M. O., Boyang L., Brent H., & Guzdial M. (2015). Scheherazade Story Generator. Georgia Tech GVU Center. Retrieved from https://gvu.gatech.edu/research/projects/scheherazade-story-generator.

Rosenberg, A. (2018). How History Gets Things Wrong: The Neuroscience of Our Addiction to Stories. The MIT Press.

Sokal, A. D., & Bricmont, J. (1998). Intellectual impostures: postmodern philosophers' abuse of science (pp. xiii-xiii). London: profile books.

Sephton, M. (n.d.). Strachey, Christopher. “Loveletters” (1952). Retrieved from https://www.gingerbeardman.com/loveletter/

Tzara, T. (1981). Dada manifesto on feeble love and bitter love. Seven Dada manifestos and Lampisteries. 31-48.

Valossa. (2016). Description of Research. What Is My Movie. Retrieved from http://www.whatismymovie.com/about.

Wardrip-Fruin, N. (2006). Expressive processing: On process-intensive literature and digital media. Brown University. 94-95.

Weizenbaum, J. (1966). ELIZA—-a computer program for the study of natural language communication between man and machine. Communications of the ACM, 9(1), 36-45.

Winner, L. (1980). “Do Artifacts Have Politics?” Daedalus, Modern Technology: Problem or Opportunity? Vol. 109, No. 1, 121-136.

Yao, Y., Viswanath, B., Cryan, J., Zheng, H., & Zhao, B. Y. (2017, October). Automated crowdturfing attacks and defenses in online review systems. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 1143-1158). ACM.

Zhu, Y., Kiros, R., Zemel, R., Salakhutdinov, R., Urtasun, R., Torralba, A., & Fidler, S. (2015). Aligning books and movies: Towards story-like visual explanations by watching movies and reading books. In Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on computer vision (pp. 19-27).