Unraveling the developmental dynamic of visual exploration of social interactions in autism

Atypical deployment of social gaze is present early on in toddlers with autism spectrum disorders (ASDs). Yet, studies characterizing the developmental dynamic behind it are scarce. Here, we used a data-driven method to delineate the developmental change in visual exploration of social interaction over childhood years in autism. Longitudinal eye-tracking data were acquired as children with ASD and their typically developing (TD) peers freely explored a short cartoon movie. We found divergent moment-to-moment gaze patterns in children with ASD compared to their TD peers. This divergence was particularly evident in sequences that displayed social interactions between characters and even more so in children with lower developmental and functional levels. The basic visual properties of the animated scene did not account for the enhanced divergence. Over childhood years, these differences dramatically increased to become more idiosyncratic. These findings suggest that social attention should be targeted early in clinical treatments.

We systematically reported exact pvalues wherever possible alongside the summary statistics.

Data availability
Indicate where provided: section/submission form

N/A
For newly created and reused datasets, the manuscript includes a data availability statement that provides details for access (or notes restrictions on access).
This information is provided in the Data Availability section in the submission form.
When newly created datasets are publicly available, provide accession number in repository OR DOI and licensing details where available.

✓
If reused data is publicly available provide accession number in repository OR DOI, OR URL, OR citation.

✓
For any computer code/software/mathematical algorithms essential for replicating the main findings of the study, whether newly generated or re-used, the manuscript includes a data availability statement that provides details for access or notes restrictions.
This information is provided in the Data Availability section in the submission form.
The data and source code used to produce figures in the current paper will be uploaded to the GitHub repository shall the manuscript be accepted for publication.Shall the reviewers request access to the data and the source code for assessing this manuscript, we will be pleased to share them.
Where newly generated code is publicly available, provide accession number in repository, OR DOI OR URL and licensing details where available.State any restrictions on code availability or accessibility.
This information is provided in the Data Availability section in the submission form.
The data and source code used to produce figures in the current paper will be uploaded to the GitHub repository shall the manuscript be accepted for publication.Shall the reviewers request access to the data and the source code for assessing this manuscript, we will be pleased to share them.

Reporting:
The MDAR framework recommends adoption of discipline-specific guidelines, established and endorsed through community initiatives.

research participants Indicate where provided: section/figure legend) or state if these demographics were not collected
Plants: provide species and strain, ecotype and cultivar where relevant, unique accession number if available, and source (including location for collected wild specimens).If the study protocol has been pre-registered, provide DOI.For clinical trials, provide the trial registration number OR cite DOI.
✓Microbes: provide species and strain, unique accession number if available, and source.✓HumanN/AIfcollectedandwithin the bounds of privacy constraints report on age, sex, gender and ethnicity for all study participants.Design:✓Experimental study design (

statistics details) * For in vivo studies: State whether and how the following have been done Indicate where provided: section/figure legend. If it could have been done, but was not, write "not done" N/A
State number of times the experiment was replicated in the laboratory.Define whether data describe technical or biological replicates.
Sample definition and in-laboratory replicationIndicate where provided: section/figure legend N/A ✓ Studies involving experimental animals: State details of authority granting ethics approval (IRB or equivalent committee(s), provide reference number for approval.✓ Studies involving specimen and field samples: State if relevant permits obtained, provide details of authority approving study; if none were required, explain why.✓ Dual

Use Research of Concern (DURC) Indicate where provided: section/submission form N/A
If reused code is publicly available provide accession number in repository OR DOI OR URL, OR citation.