Functional gradients in the human lateral prefrontal cortex revealed by a comprehensive coordinate-based meta-analysis

The lateral prefrontal cortex (LPFC) of humans enables flexible goal-directed behavior. However, its functional organization remains actively debated after decades of research. Moreover, recent efforts aiming to map the LPFC through meta-analysis are limited, either in scope or in the inferred specificity of structure-function associations. These limitations are in part due to the limited expressiveness of commonly-used data analysis tools, which restricts the breadth and complexity of questions that can be expressed in a meta-analysis. Here, we adopt NeuroLang, a novel approach to more expressive meta-analysis based on probabilistic first-order logic programming, to infer the organizing principles of the LPFC from 14,371 neuroimaging studies. Our findings reveal a rostrocaudal and a dorsoventral gradient, respectively explaining the most and second most variance in meta-analytic connectivity across the LPFC. Moreover, we identify a unimodal-to-transmodal spectrum of coactivation patterns along with a concrete-to-abstract axis of structure-function associations extending from caudal to rostral regions of the LPFC. Finally, we infer inter-hemispheric asymmetries along the principal rostrocaudal gradient, identifying hemisphere-specific associations with topics of language, memory, response inhibition, and sensory processing. Overall, this study provides a comprehensive meta-analytic mapping of the LPFC, grounding future hypothesis generation on a quantitative overview of past findings.

If you have any ques5ons, please consult our Journal Policies and/or contact us: editorial@elifesciences.org.

Sample-size es*ma*on
• You should state whether an appropriate sample size was computed when the study was being designed • You should state the sta5s5cal method of sample size computa5on and any required assump5ons • If no explicit power analysis was used, you should describe how you decided what sample (replicate) size (number) to use Please outline where this informa5on can be found within the submission (e.g., sec5ons or figure legends), or explain why this informa5on doesn't apply to your submission:

Replicatess
• You should report how oVen each experiment was performed • You should include a defini5on of biological versus technical replica5on • The data obtained should be provided and sufficient informa5on should be provided to indicate the number of independent biological and/or technical replicates • If you encountered any outliers, you should describe how these were handled • Criteria for exclusion/inclusion of data should be clearly stated • High-throughput sequence data should be uploaded before submission, with a private link for reviewers provided (these are available from both GEO and ArrayExpress) Please outline where this informa5on can be found within the submission (e.g., sec5ons or figure legends), or explain why this informa5on doesn't apply to your submission: This study is a meta-analysis, so sample size is defined in terms of the number of included ar5cles which is 14,370. This is men5oned in the abstract, introduc5on, results, and methods sec5ons.
The frequency of performing each experiment or analysis is not applicable to this kind of studies. No ini5al inclusion/exclusion criteria was applied, all the data were used as is. All data and source code are openly available to be accessed and freely used by the community.

Sta*s*cal repor*ng
• Sta5s5cal analysis methods should be described and jus5fied • Raw data should be presented in figures whenever informa5ve to do so (typically when N per group is less than 10) • For each experiment, you should iden5fy the sta5s5cal tests used, exact values of N, defini5ons of center, methods of mul5ple test correc5on, and dispersion and precision measures (e.g., mean, median, SD, SEM, confidence intervals; and, for the major substan5ve results, a measure of effect size (e.g., Pearson's r, Cohen's d) • Report exact p-values wherever possible alongside the summary sta5s5cs and 95% confidence intervals. These should be reported for all key ques5ons and not only when the p-value is less than 0.05.
Please outline where this informa5on can be found within the submission (e.g., sec5ons or figure legends), or explain why this informa5on doesn't apply to your submission: (For large datasets, or papers with a very large number of sta5s5cal tests, you may upload a single table file with tests, Ns, etc., with reference to sec5ons in the manuscript.)

Group alloca*on
• Indicate how samples were allocated into experimental groups (in the case of clinical studies, please specify alloca5on to treatment method); if randomiza5on was used, please also state if restricted randomiza5on was applied • Indicate if masking was used during group alloca5on, data collec5on and/or data analysis Please outline where this informa5on can be found within the submission (e.g., sec5ons or figure legends), or explain why this informa5on doesn't apply to your submission: Addi*onal data files ("source data") • We encourage you to upload relevant addi5onal data files, such as numerical data that are represented as a graph in a figure, or as a summary table • Where provided, these should be in the most useful format, and they can be uploaded as "Source data" files linked to a main figure or table • Include model defini5on files including the full list of parameters used • Include code used for data analysis (e.g., R, MatLab) • Avoid sta5ng that data files are "available upon request" Please indicate the figures or tables for which source data files have been provided: We report the log-odds ra5o as a measure of the strength of evidence in favor of one hypothesis among two compe5ng hypotheses. We believe the log-odds ra5o plays a similar role as the Bayes factor, which is the Bayesian analog of the frequen5st p-value used in tradi5onal hypothesis tes5ng. We refrain from repor5ng p-values or confidence intervals in this study. However, we are willing to report confidence intervals of logodds ra5o, if the reviewers deem that necessary.
This informa5on does not apply to our study. We do not use any experimental group nor any kind of grouping of subjects.
All code used to produce the findings of this meta-analysis will be freely and openly available. The link to the repository where the source code will be stored is provided in the methods sec5on. In addi5on, the link to the source code of NeuroLang, the main tool used in this study, is also provided in the methods sec5on.